Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth

[JEEP]

Candace's episode for Wednesday follows up on the one from yesterday:

Ep. 302

Epstein's text messages mention Emmanuel Macron's boyfriend, more inconsistencies appear in Erika's story, and we look more into the story of Gilgamesh and how it ties in with Epstein and the elites.
00:00 - Start.
00:58 - Gilgamesh, Epstein, and the elites.
21:10 - Erika's lies and misrepresentations.
26:54 - Tip on who Erika was with on the 10th.
31:48 - Macron in the Epstein files.
35:05 - Final thoughts and comments.

 

[Beau]

Candace's episode for Wednesday follows up on the one from yesterday

I wish she'd focus her Kirk-related investigation on Harpole and Flood rather than EK. Of course it doesn't help that EK has been caught lying and otherwise behaved strangely for a grieving widow. That seems to have taken Owens' focus away from the real conspirators. Hoping she circles back to those guys in the future.

 

[herondancer]

I think she's particularly incensed at Erika because she was his wife. The person who was supposedly closest to him, the one who should be fired up and doing the job Candace is doing. Each lie, big and small, is to her another betrayal of Charlie and everything Candace believed about their relationship.

 

[Ricardo]

fwiw , worries me more that she is going through her " historical analysis " through a bible focused outlook which is very misleading at best. On a side note Epstein docs. seem to have vindicated her on Macron´s husband.

 

[Tuatha de Danaan]

fwiw , worries me more that she is going through her " historical analysis " through a bible focused outlook

After decades of leery biblical education (just a gut feeling) I think that Candace will resonate with so many Americans in trying to tie Nimrod to these Satanic overlords. She's trying to get the US to waken up and is using everything they have all been schooled in to show what lies beneath.
She can only work with what she's got but trying to pull on many strings and get them to line up is a task very very few of us would be hard pushed to do in front of Millions.
Trying to get deeper and closer as she goes with her various leads may get her nearer to Harpole and Flood but as yet she's not got a connection that she can share. Maybe she never will but if she can get to a place where she can discredit TPUSA in the eyes of the population of the USA she will have done them a service.
Take away what the C's have told us over the years and could any of us do what she is doing?. I think not.

 

[Ricardo]

If there´s a significant overlap between the 70% humans that don´t take at face value " the narrative " of CK´s assassination and the current public image of the "merry widow" , imo safe to say that tpusa is all bought and paid for with dollars but nothing else for support , as somewhat of a confirmation ( again imo ) , even Alex jones came out with public ad hominem attacks on Mrs. Candace shortly after the Fort Huachaca meetings became public knowledge. Even King groyper schizo Nicko posted further mindless attacks on Mrs. Candace , guess those invisible hands have been pushing his buttons if that´s what is motivating him .

 

[Laura]

I think she's particularly incensed at Erika because she was his wife. The person who was supposedly closest to him, the one who should be fired up and doing the job Candace is doing. Each lie, big and small, is to her another betrayal of Charlie and everything Candace believed about their relationship.

Agree. To me, it is VERY sad that Charlie's wife didn't really love him. I suspect she is one of those women who is as deep as a thimble.

 

[Voyageur]

She can only work with what she's got but trying to pull on many strings and get them to line up is a task very very few of us would be hard pushed to do in front of Millions.

True, and one suspects she may have a lot given her associations, yet to come right out with them probably requires much more verifiable crosschecking, and things are kept in reserve. If only a fifth of the connections that she has brought to light are true, its very bad indeed, and now the scope grows exponentially, which comes with risk not to be discounted.

She has poked the hornets nest to be sure, and it is one thing to do what very much needs doing, and quite another to see who officially in our times will do nothing about it (that is what many people are seeing, the whole evil premeditate mess opening up).

 

[seek10]

In one of the last week's episode ( BAAL SO HARD ) She made some curious comment about these Israeli Satanists ( I related it as Ashkanazi Jews) orgins as Turkish pagan gypsies that converted to Judiasim (around 8th century around ) and created their own Khazaria.
session-24-june-2023

(seek10) The C’s mentioned gypsies are gene spliced with an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers. Did this happen in the Indus Valley civilization region and period?

A: No, it was much earlier. Refugees migrated there.

Q: (seek10) If the Indus Valley civilization peoples are into genetic modification, is the current Indian tendency for rituals the remnant of it through the Dravidian lineage?

A: Yes, but see previous answer also.

When I asked the above question, I have a specific threads of thought.

• C's confirmed that 540 AD (or 564 AD) event that burned the rome and triggered dark ages also impacted animals in India.
  • That is used by religous Brahmins of Hinduism used against Buddhists( due to the powerful Mauryan patronage). B.R. Ambedkar who was trying to make sense of linkage (he had been hearing from un touchabilities across the country) between untouchability and beef eating hypothesized that it is part of cunning and brutal religious ploy. For me, that is too far fetched. But,
    • This reminded me BBC Survivor's series we watched long back. In the first season, when plague hit, any body outside comes to a house or city, they were asked to live in a detached room/place for a few days, before they were allowed to enter the main house. What if this is what happened in India at that time and that short term measure became political untouchability ( after 540 AD) and they rewrote it as a Upper caste theology ( much twisted version of much older ManuSmriti). For my surprise, C's seems to agree with it. Naturally, people are not stupid and it is highly unlikely they followed those non-sensical rules for long. But these hierarchial social structure mixed in theology are from North India and naturally fizzle out, which it did. But, this is where South Indian Bhakthi movement ( freedom of worship of choice) came to rescue.
      • South Indian Bhakthi movement ( freedom of worship of choice) became popular all across India as a alternative to Brahminical theology. Interestingly this spread of Bhakthi movement is facilitated by Sankaracharya ( who only lived for 30 odd years, travelled all across India and installed his own centers) winning religious competitions over Buddhists.
      • Another effect is ( it is my hypothesis or thought process at that time), these Gysies ( very small group from North West Indian state of Rajastan and Punjab) fed up with this brahminical non-sense and migrated out of India in 2 phases one around 800 AD and another one around 1100 AD. they moved first to Iran and migrated to other Western regions after that. Given that Indus valley icons has some strange animals and it is created by lizards, I thought they are into Genetic experiments (as a 4D STS oursourcing - STS works through least effort path).
        • But, C's were saying that Gypsies were brought to Indus valley ( 4000 BCE - 1100 BCE) and this genetic mixing might have happened much before 4000 BCE. Cayce says Atlanteans are into weird genetic experiments. Probably these are Atlanteans or most probably Post YD phenomenon ( as only 19 million out of 6 billion survived).

Is there a connection between Ashkanazi jews and Gypsies as Candace mentioning? I am not sure of the source of her claim, but thought interesting. Here we are assuming all 'Gypsies' are same. Some times unrelated people also can also be labelled as Gypsies due to social dynamics ( aka "food fight" politics and war propaganda).

If this is true, We can know why Ashkanazi Jews ( as Gypsies - gypsies are gene spliced with an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers ) are "chosen" to be patsies under the portal of the middle east to control rest of the world.

If Gypsies were brought into Indus valley ( large area from Afghanistan to North West India) from outside ( i.e. from the Western side), these Gypsies must have existed else where too. If so, why genetic studies only showing Indian origin? May be genetic findings are only part of the story, not the whole story? Hard to know, but thought interesting.

 

[Gaby]

If this is true, We can know why Ashkanazi Jews ( as Gypsies - gypsies are gene spliced with an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers ) are "chosen" to be patsies under the portal of the middle east to control rest of the world.

In my mind, the clearest relation was that gypsies were slaves of dark forces during Atlantean times, and now the jews are slaves of dark forces this time around. Yahweh chose them as its people. Yahweh's chosen people = slaves of dark forces.

October 20th, 1994

Q: We would like to know what is the origin of the Gypsies.

A: Genes spliced. Slaves of dark forces.

Q: Who are these dark forces?

A: Same.

Q: As what?

A: Brotherhood.

Q: Does this brotherhood consist of Lizzies and various humans?

A: Yes.

Q: If the Gypsies were gene spliced, who were they gene spliced with?

A: Alien race, humanoid, and Atlantean drone workers.

Q: What were Atlantean drone workers?

A: Slave people controlled by crystal.

Q: Why do the Gypsies remain so cohesive? Is that genetically programed?

A: Yes. And mind control.

Q: There are legends of half human creatures, minotaurs, centaurs, etc. Were any of these creatures real?

A: Experiments known as beasts in Atlantis. V___ is part Gypsy. Hiding this.

Q: Does she know it?

A: Some.

If Gypsies were brought into Indus valley ( large area from Afghanistan to North West India) from outside ( i.e. from the Western side), these Gypsies must have existed else where too. If so, why genetic studies only showing Indian origin? May be genetic findings are only part of the story, not the whole story? Hard to know, but thought interesting.

I think the understanding of population genetics is just very partial.

I asked last year about the origins of a genetic mutation and the Cs told me it was from the Balkans, around the end of the Bronze Age. Turns out the genetic mutation is most widespread in East Asia (i.e. Japan, certain parts of China), and less so in the British Isles and Northern Europe, where the mutation is classically most associated with.

I'll keep my eyes open, but I noticed Cs have hinted to something that turns out to be the case in a study published 20 years after the Cs said it.

 

[Gaby]

In my mind, the clearest relation was that gypsies were slaves of dark forces during Atlantean times, and now the jews are slaves of dark forces this time around. Yahweh chose them as its people. Yahweh's chosen people = slaves of dark forces.

But then, even though that is how I interpreted it, there seems to be nothing in the sessions that suggests that is the case.

 

[Charade]

In the course of this interview they discuss at length how psychopaths can lie so elaborately and easily. But then Candace reveals her ignorance of the difference between psychopathy and developmental personality disorders. She believes psychopaths are a product of sex trauma, having been abused as children. She struggles to answer Bassem Youssef when he asks her what she thinks happened to Ben Shapiro then. Things would make more sense to her if she read PP.

I remember the interview that Laura and Harrison had about the book PP and psychopaths, years back, was really an eye opener and easy to understand. Is it on YT? Perhaps that would be a quick overview for her. The book is difficult and takes time she may not have.

 

[Charade]

After decades of leery biblical education (just a gut feeling) I think that Candace will resonate with so many Americans in trying to tie Nimrod to these Satanic overlords. She's trying to get the US to waken up and is using everything they have all been schooled in to show what lies beneath.
She can only work with what she's got but trying to pull on many strings and get them to line up is a task very very few of us would be hard pushed to do in front of Millions.
Trying to get deeper and closer as she goes with her various leads may get her nearer to Harpole and Flood but as yet she's not got a connection that she can share. Maybe she never will but if she can get to a place where she can discredit TPUSA in the eyes of the population of the USA she will have done them a service.
Take away what the C's have told us over the years and could any of us do what she is doing?. I think not.

This applies to everything happening in the world. The ability to understand reality with any degree of accuracy wouldn’t be possible without the C’s and this forum. I am so grateful every moment. There are so many people in my life with no clue.

 

[Jones]

I remember the interview that Laura and Harrison had about the book PP and psychopaths, years back, was really an eye opener and easy to understand. Is it on YT? Perhaps that would be a quick overview for her. The book is difficult and takes time she may not have.

Here's one from sott:

Interview with Harrison Koehli on Political Ponerology (Full Transcript)

Interview by Geoff Brady from In Other News Radio with Harrison Koehli on Political Ponerology and psychopaths.

www.sott.net

 

[seek10]

But then, even though that is how I interpreted it, there seems to be nothing in the sessions that suggests that is the case.

My line of thought is this - Possible "Controllability" of current Israeli elite (mossad, cabbalists etc) by 4D STS through genetic vulnerability represented in Romani/Gyspies - as "Chosen". There are lot of assumptions in this.

Here is the complete Grok conversation. No conclusive though.

Grok

Grok is a free AI assistant designed by xAI to maximize truth and objectivity. Grok offers real-time search, image generation, trend analysis, and more.

grok.com

C's were saying Gypsies came to IVC ( 4000 - 1100 BCE), but traditional Gypsie origin is out of NW India (around 8th - 10th century AD. ) few possibilities in an attempt to create lineage ( Atlantean times ( or post YD) to current elite) .

• Did AdMixture ( between Ashkanazi Jews and Romanis) happened after they moved out of India in the europe?. Grok says not much.
• If one thread came to IVC ( 4000-1100 BCE) and went back out of India to become Romanis ( 8th to 10th century AD- sources vary). This small group still exist in India with each region has their own name.
• Is it possible to identify original thread? Well, probing Grok ( asking it to pull out info from few sources like Douglas Reed etc.), came across Israeli scholar Shmuel Avukia who claimed that Romanis are from the 'tribe of Simeon' (one of the 10 tribes of bible , very revengeful and agressive, got assimilated later to Judaism). He did put some effort into his research.

what is the source or thought process of Israeli scholar Shmuel Avukia claim of Romanis are from the tribe of Simeon?

Shmuel Avukia, an Israeli Bible enthusiast and scholar from the community of Kokhav Yaakov, developed his claim that the Romani people (often referred to as Gypsies) are descendants of the ancient Israelite tribe of Simeon through a process rooted in deep biblical study. His idea originated several years ago while examining the weekly Torah portion (parsha), where he was particularly struck by a verse in Genesis 33:15: "And Esau said, Let me now leave with thee some of the folk that are with me." Avukia pondered the identity of these "folk" accompanying Esau, interpreting the term as a potential reference to a group that could connect to the Romani. This curiosity sparked years of intensive research into biblical texts, going beyond superficial readings to uncover what he describes as hidden connections.

### Key Elements of His Thought Process
Avukia's approach involved thorough, non-surface-level analysis of the Torah, where he "stumbled upon the Romani issue" during his studies. He began sharing preliminary findings online, which garnered significant responses from Romani communities worldwide (e.g., from France, Finland, Spain, Russia, and the U.S.), leading him to organize forums and gatherings starting in 2017. At these events, such as the first Jewish-Gypsy Forum in Jerusalem in December 2017, he presented his conclusions, emphasizing the need to "connect the dots" between biblical clues, Romani traditions, and community knowledge. He acknowledges that many Romani people intuitively believe in their Jewish origins but lack empirical proof, and he positions his work as bridging that gap through scriptural interpretation and cultural parallels.

### Sources He Relies On
- **Biblical Sources**: Primarily the Torah, with a focus on the Book of Genesis (especially Chapter 33) and references to the tribe of Simeon as one of the 12 tribes of Israel descended from Jacob. Simeon is described in the Bible as a tribe that received no independent territory but was scattered among others (e.g., Joshua 19:1-9), which Avukia ties to the nomadic history of the Romani.
- **Other Sources**: Romani cultural traditions and oral histories, which he sees as aligning with Torah-based practices. He also draws on historical events, such as the shared persecution of Jews and Romani during the Holocaust (where Nazis targeted both groups for extermination), as evidence of a linked destiny. Additionally, he references mystical elements, claiming Romani interpretations of God's teachings form the basis of Kabbalah, passed down verbally with a covenant not to write them down (though he notes the 2003 publication of the Zohar as a perceived betrayal). Avukia does not cite extensive external academic or genetic sources; his framework is predominantly theological and interpretive.

### Reasoning Behind the Claim
Avukia argues that the Romani are "spiritual descendants of Abraham" through Simeon, with their culture and customs—such as strict Torah interpretations, monotheistic beliefs, purity rituals, and mystical practices—mirroring ancient Israelite traditions. He interprets the biblical scattering of Simeon (due to Jacob's curse in Genesis 49:5-7 for violence against Shechem) as explaining the Romani's migratory, diaspora existence. The shared Nazi targeting reinforces this for him, suggesting a divine or historical bond that "cannot be ignored." He likens the improbability of his theory to events like the founding of Israel, stating, "only that which seems impossible happens at the end," and plans to submit a book and video to rabbinic and halachic authorities for validation.

This claim remains fringe and unconfirmed by rabbinic authorities, with Avukia anticipating initial denial. Mainstream genetic studies contradict it, tracing Romani origins to northern India around 1000 CE with no significant Jewish admixture. However, it has sparked interest, leading to ongoing forums and collaborations between Jewish and Romani groups.

The real issue is every body all over the world saw comets in sky and worshipped one way or other. So similarities of traditions ( Romanis and Jews) means nothing with that type of origin. The only difference is it is replaced in Christian and Islamic influence areas, not in others.

That doesn't prove any connection (Romanis to Ashkanazi Jews) and common suffering from Nazi's is like 'projecting the present onto past' and it is deceptive correlation.

I guess not much to go about it (atleast for now).