Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[RedFox]

What is thus far the most likely entry and exit point of the bullet on the neck that people have figured out SOLELY on the videos that show Kirk being shot WITHOUT taking into account from where the shot might have come from?

That's the problem: currently, there is no exit wound.

And I think the current consensus is also that there was no breast-plate.

Which means no ricochet, which means the full force of the 30.06 round directly penetrated Kirk's neck... and didn't exit his body.

Which Paramount Tactical guy seems to be saying is next-to-impossible given the anatomy of the neck.

So, yeah. That's 'spooky psy-ops' for ya. In the absence of full disclosure of information, you need 'magic bullets' for them to make sense!

As for the mystery of the exit wound, the only explanation I can think of is that the bullet hit bone and deflected it, staying inside

I’ll add to this. One of the first videos I saw suggesting the ricochet from the top of a vest said that the entry wound on the neck was weird. It was too big for a normal entry wound.

So here’s a hypothesis. The bullet hit him in the chest, ricocheting off a bone (shattering into pieces), and exited at the front of his neck.

I watched documentaries on bullet trajectories decades ago, they can do very weird things, including exiting the same side they entered.

If it came in the front of the neck but didn’t leave, it has to be lodged in, or ricochet off of his spine. An impact like that would have “snapped his neck” instantly. But from what I’ve seen the shot was the wrong angle for the neck wound to be the entry point and it to hit his spine as well.

 

[Niall]

I got to watching the rest of the analysis by ex-sniper Marcus J. Allen. At 35 mins, when he's debunking the 'sniper shot from a window to the right of Kirk', he's surprised to discover that the 'muzzle flash' (or white light, or whatever it is) we see in (or reflected by) the window - while it does not synch with a bullet being fired from there - it does synch with a bullet being fired from the same distance as Robinson's location: 132 meters, or 140 yards.

 

[JEEP]

An impact like that would have “snapped his neck” instantly. But from what I’ve seen the shot was the wrong angle for the neck wound to be the entry point and it to hit his spine as well.

There were reports of his right ear bleeding. Could a shot through that ear cause a neck exit wound? At that presumably sharp interior angle, what parts of the head might have been damaged from a fragmenting bullet - brain, spine, but maybe missed mouth/teeth? Does the body response correspond to a strike from the right side ear?

 

[RedFox]

Does the body response correspond to a strike from the right side ear?

Keep simple physics in mind. If the bullet is traveling in one direction, it will continue to move in that direction unless deflected or obstructed.
Whatever it hits will also want to move in the same direction.
If he was shot from the right then his head (in total or in part) should move to the left.

 

[Joe]

I'm satisfied with the Sonar21 shockwave explanation regarding the front of Charlie's shirt

Bullets don't produce any significant shockwave. There's a video on YT where they fired a bullet within a bullet's diameter of a pile of flour and barely a grain moves.

 

[Joe]

Here's the photo of Robinson "allegedly" in dairy queen around 6:38pm, I think it was on the day of the shooting actually not they day after. So 6 hours after the shooting, 17 minutes drive away from the campus.

It has been suggested that the advertisement for the Superman movie puts this photo back a couple of months.

 

[Aeneas]

I am not sure that it is that guy Robinson. There are just too many things we don't know. We don't have a bullet and the alleged murder weapon is one that the police conveniently pointed out to us as being the one. No one saw a rifle on that roof or anything to indicate that it was the place where the shooting happened from. A person was seen running but with no gun. Putting a rifle in a backpack is not easy and walking with a rifle even if it is disassembled is next to impossible especially up stairs. Those who were first by Charlie Kirk or in the car with him must have seen the exit hole unless as soneone suggested, it remained in the body, which is certainly possible. A lot of confusion and likely by design, just like with JFK.

Here's the photo of Robinson "allegedly" in dairy queen around 6:38pm, I think it was on the day of the shooting actually not they day after. So 6 hours after the shooting, 17 minutes drive away from the campus.

Him being there in the same clothes as in the morning though allegedly having changed it for the murder (where did he keep that clothes in the meantime) and being totally at ease with no intent to hide his face, is just strange. Not least when a manhunt is going on apparently and here he is just being cool, 17 minutes from the place of the murder. Did noone really notice him that whole time?

Like an "I know something you don't know" gloating power trip. Just a thought, I get a feeling of roleplay. "These guys" created a 'secret mission' scenario and Robinson played the 'hero'.

Yes, it is possible. It is also possible that they were meant to believe this was going to happen, while a real sniper did the deed and these guys were left hanging, carrying the can. Joe outlined that scenario in Newsreal last Sunday, how the FBI manufactured one 'terror' attack after another. The book, "The terror factory" by Trevor Aaronson details a lot of those cases where the FBI used useful idiots, who in real life never could pull anything off, to be at the right place or say the right thing, only to then be arrested when something actually did happen thanks to the real team.

Post on X claiming a second person on the roof of the building opposite Kirk's speaking location, at a time claimed as being 12:06pm:

Interesting, but as AI says:

Could it be the peak of one of those pyramid skylights

Possible.

A Sherlock Holmes scenario: A man is killed but no bullet and a curious entry wound. Inspector Lestrade has pointed out a weapon, but is it the right one? Scotland Yard has arrested a suspect, who is not confessing and whom the people are calling for to be hanged. Scotland Yard has likewise posted many things as 'proof' which don't stand the light of day while simultaneously withholding a ton of things like top quality photage which could throw light on the murder. Meanwhile a foreign head of state is protesting too much while simultaneously perpetrating a genocide and attacking 6+ countries. Sherlock Holmes would likely light his pipe and sit back until more evidence or witnesses come forward, while sending Watson out to sniff out some information.

Instead we have Candace Owen detailing the timeline and pointing out the many gaps. Good on her!

 

[SummerLite]

In addition to my post above here is Joe’s post from the Nick Fuentes thread:

I think it is likely the US Government is complicit in the assassination of CK, oh lordly lord, what is coming next?!

Significant portions of the US government have been part of the international globalist mafia for a long time and they don't want the American people to actually be in control of their own country. They aren't in full control now like in previous administrations so they're fighting back. And we can be sure there are international players involved and its a very deep and expansive network that has gained a lot of power in the last 150 years. The good gov vs the bad gov.

I'm sticking with body armor .

 

[SummerLite]

It has been suggested that the advertisement for the Superman movie puts this photo back a couple of months.

yea, I was suspicious of that right away.

 

[Benjamin]

Just watching Candace's latest video, she says she's seen the video from the camera directly behind Kirk. She says there was no blood at all. Does that mean there is no exit wound? Outside of a ricochet, could it be some type of frangable bullet?

 

[JEEP]

Bullets don't produce any significant shockwave. There's a video on YT where they fired a bullet within a bullet's diameter of a pile of flour and barely a grain moves.

Yes, I remember seeing that now and in that vid, as you say, the bullet flies over the flour extremely close - but it doesn't impact it.

Larry Johnson (Sonar21) posted a video showing subsonic and supersonic bullet shockwave shadows that he claims explains Charlie's shirt movement. He says it also proves the shot was from the front. Below is the supersonic bullet shadow - Larry says the bullet that killed Kirk was a supersonic round:

In the next photo, Charlie’s head pitches forward slightly — down and to the left — as his T-shirt climbs upwards. This is the moment the shockwave and the bullet hit him. It is the compressed air from the shockwave that moves the T-shirt upwards, as you can see from the lettering.

The bullet hit him - there was impact with shockwave that caused the shirt to move according to Larry - and likely the necklace he was wearing underneath.

There were reports of his right ear bleeding. Could a shot through that ear cause a neck exit wound? At that presumably sharp interior angle, what parts of the head might have been damaged from a fragmenting bullet - brain, spine, but maybe missed mouth/teeth? Does the body response correspond to a strike from the right side ear?

Keep simple physics in mind. If the bullet is traveling in one direction, it will continue to move in that direction unless deflected or obstructed.
Whatever it hits will also want to move in the same direction.
If he was shot from the right then his head (in total or in part) should move to the left.

Well, as Larry laid out above, it was a shot from the front and not from the right and through the ear. But, the head pitched forward slightly - down and to the left. And all the subsequent images in sequence showed head movement to the left with the last one, head/body falling left and back (image with neck wound as appears in article):

Spoiler: Last pic

So, unless and until more details that happen to be true and accurate are released, we're left with sheer speculation as to what really happened.

 

[aimarok]

It has been suggested that the advertisement for the Superman movie puts this photo back a couple of months.

Candace has just asserted that this photo is fresh. There is an ad near the poster, and this ad was launched on August 31 according to her.