Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

I agree with you.

Hello @hans25, welcome to the forum. Since this is your first post you are invited to write an introduction in the Newbies section to tell us a bit about yourself and how you found your way here :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a vid where the man in the white cap and shirt and the man in the black shirts who are supposedly signalling in the same shot with Charlie as the bullet hits him. Timing sure does seem suspicious from this angle, but still they could just be signalling to others in the security detail.


Geez it's sad. Like I said earlier I've never followed Kirk but reading the stories about him from his friends has bought tears to my eyes.

Has anyone else read anything to suggest that Kirks wife and children were on site at the time? I've only seen it written once so it isn't necessarily so.
 
That right there is more motive to assassinate Kirk: to hurt Owens.
Maybe the "message" has a broader impact than just Candace?
This shooting was attacking:

1. Free Speach
2. Social media influencers, especially Conservative ones.
3. White males.
4. Christians.
5. Young people at university. Representing all young people in general.
6. The Alternative Media.
7. Whistle-blowers.
8. Anyone who speaks truth to power and doesn't shut up.

Charlie Kirk founded and ran a non-profit called "Turning Point USA". That may end up being incredibly symbolic, just like 911 was.
 
Seems there was something "in the air" over the past couple of days.

Which would fit with HAARP activation, which would fit with a 'hidden hand' behind the assassination.

In fact, I think the Evergreen shooting in Colorado took place at the exact same time as the shooting of Kirk, who was shot at 12:20pm US Mountain Time. The first 911 emergency call at the Colorado school was at 12:24pm, also Mountain Time. Also, those two states are next to each other.

The school shooter is being portrayed as "anti-Semitic," by the way.
 
Last edited:
From what Candace, Chad, Vance, Donald Jr. and especially Tucker just revealed it becomes even more apparent that Kirk indeed was a remarkable young man with the inherent talents of a true leader who could have indeed become president.

Take a special note how far Kirk went in sticking to his humane principles in what Tucker just revealed on the Kelly show:

He was one of the only people who had the backbone, guts and integrity in Trumps immediate circle to flat out go to him and tell him that he disagrees with the things that were pushed/planned against Iran while explaining his position rationally AND clearly going against the interests of his jewish donors. In fact, this is another clear point that justifiably points to exactly those forces to have had the prime motive. I think there are many signs that point towards exactly that. ALSO it could very well be that what Kirk did there vis-à-vis Iran and Trump was one of the reasons Trump decided against doing a horrible thing there AND that it might have been right there that his “ohh so lovely donors“ decided, enough is enough and kill him as a threat/sign towards anyone else thinking about addressing the real issues there while also using that murder as “a perfect idea“ for a divide and conquer strategy at the same time.
 
Last edited:
While everything is in the air right now I really do think there are real reasons for hope that this is another potential “mistake that reveals the man behind the curtain“ moment. I do think it is likely that this could turn out as another shot in the foot for the PTB. When we take what the C‘s said into account it might take a bit more suffering and trials though before at least one significant part of “the beast“ gets exposed and dealt with. I think with the kind of high profile, brave and talented people America has to offer right now there is a real chance to slowly but surely turn the tide and address and deal with one of the most serious kinds of demonic possessions that America allowed to be guided by for decades.

Not only that, as Chad and others I think rightfully suggest it seems like what they just did to Kirk and will probably continue to do to others doesn’t only create martyrs of some descriptions but and/or also quite a number of young people with a moral compass who will spring out of the ground guided by some if not many of the principles Kirk embodied. I think there is a real chance that some if not many of the real and public alternative people will try to unite forces more seriously in concert with new streams of young brave people following the lead, step by step. All of that of course would also mean that the crazies will get even more crazy/desperate to lose control which increases the chances of further mistakes grounded in wishful thinking.
 
Apparently, the shooter was captured, according to Trump himself, in addition to says he hopes that Charlie Kirk's killer will get the death penalty.

BREAKING: President Trump on Charlie Kirk suspected assassin: "I think, with a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody."

Essentially somebody that was very close to him turned him in.
The person was involved with law enforcement but was a person of faith and a minister and brought him to a US marshal who was fantastic, and the father convinced the son this is it.
 
Last edited:
Here's a vid where the man in the white cap and shirt and the man in the black shirts who are supposedly signalling in the same shot with Charlie as the bullet hits him. Timing sure does seem suspicious from this angle, but still they could just be signalling to others in the security detail.
The man in the white is Frank Tourek, one of Charlie Kirk's closest friends. I'm not saying it's impossible that he wasn't signaling a shooter, but I think the probability is very low.
 
For those who don't know who Charlie was, here is short video on his journey and the legacy he leaves behind. He was a pretty remarkable individual, by all accounts.

His death "hits" differently. I dont recall a similar event where I have witnessed this much public display of emotion in my lifetime, aside from 9/11 (for which I was too young to truly grasp). There is a sense of deep sorrow hanging in the air, like we lost a truly great person.

Many people who weren't even close followers, like myself, have expressed a similar sentiment.

I think if there was a "program change" , this has to be a central element of it.

 
Which would fit with HAARP activation, which would fit with a 'hidden hand' behind the assassination.
On that note, I read this comment under a video covering the topic (specifically the vitriol from the psychotic left)
They killed the last guy willing to talk to them. They killed the negotiator.
Which reminded me of the bombing of the Hamas negotiators in Qatar a few days ago by Israel.
It also reminded me of the Russian diplomat who was shot some years ago.

Taking that line of reasoning further:
If they want all Palestinians dead, and have radicalised/pathologized them in order to do it.
Do they want all Left wing people dead (including the non crazy ones), having radicalised/pathologized them?
Do they want all Right wing people dead (specifically those who want national sovereignty), and are radicalising/pathologizing them through uncontrolled immigration?
Do they want all Muslims dead (by radicalising populations against them), by sending the worst of the worst to western countries?#

Dialogue and bridging the gaps between view points (also strongly but legally pushing back against pathological types) is the antithesis of such plans, so that may be another reason to add to Kirks hit list.
 
For all the talk about "creating division", we shouldn't pretend that the absolute, soul-smashing insanity of the left during the last 20 years (much longer, really) doesn't exist. These people are insane, many are psychos, and it all created an environment of complete inversion of reality. And they have infected a great many minds, even "normal" people by ponerological osmosis. The only way to fight this is to create a harsh atmosphere and a society that sends a clear message that this is off-limits now, and there will be consequences for promoting this insanity.
My observation was not to pretend that such recalcitrant left does not exists. X, several months ago change it's algorithms so people lives and interact in a more harmonic way, seeing more cute animals and the like in their feeds and suddenly -from mine point of view in this matter - the posts of the degenerate left, are popping up in people feeds.
 
Back
Top Bottom