Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
Discord is saying there is no evidence of Robinson planning or mentioning anything on its chats before the assassination.
This, like the rifle itself 'found' in nearby woods, appear to have been planted after the fact.
And so, Robinson's political affiliations and online profile, like Crooks', are unusually opaque, giving authorities - and everyone commenting on the assassination - 'tabula rasa' on which to paint whatever profile of the man they wish, according to their own political persuasions.
This is most likely by design.
This is supposedly a leaked ADL conversation (haven't fact-checked it) where they warn precisely of this joining of left and right:
Notice however how he implies that it's the far-right they're REALLY afraid of, because they will "f*ck sh*t up".
Which confirms my suspicion that it's not really the joining of left/right they're afraid of, but a broad coalition on the right. I mean, what is left of the left anyway? Sure, there are the woke types who are also pro-Palestine, but it's mostly a case of a broken clock being right twice a day - for the most part, what people call "the left" these days is just crazy, easy to control and manipulate, and of no danger to Israel. Ideologically, the pro-Palestine left also can only go so far - they would for example never question the very idea of a "Jewish home state" or that Jews deserve a special victim status because muh Holocaust. In fact, they are useful because they poison the pro-Palestine sentiment in the minds of many normal people who otherwise lean right. Even the traditional anti-war/anti-imperial left is gone - most of these people have either descended into wokeness or have become more right-wing one way or the other.
Also, what more is there to divide between right and left? They are living in different universes. Perhaps the Charlie Kirk thing was intended as a spark to bring this underlying conflict to a head, which in and of itself would redirect energies away from Israel, who knows. But the real danger to Israel, it seems to me, would be a broad coalition on the right that gets serious about solving the "Israel"/"Jewish" question.
The only option left for the Ziobots is to associate criticism of Israel with Muslims, since right-wingers tend to be anti-Muslim. Which is precisely what Bibi and his shills in the US are trying to do.
Ironically, however, what we're seeing is a coming together of the right, what with people like Dave Smith, Matt Walsh and Darryl Cooper softening up to Nick Fuentes, and Nick Fuentes sending conciliatory vibes.
Agree with @Keit though, it's fine to speculate about what "the cosmic plan" behind it all might be, but ultimately, we can't say and have to wait and see.
I just watched the above series. Very revealing, especially the stuff about the O9A and links to Gladio and Azov in Ukraine. Some excellent examples of ponerology at work - Myatt sounds like a classic schizoidal spellbinder and Sutter a callous and conning psychopath.
Here's a Grok summary of some background on Tyler Robinson:
Apparently Robinson's father, a former deputy sheriff, confronted him after recognising him from an official person of interest photo. Robinson then confessed and refused to turn himself in. His father called a local youth pastor, a family friend, who then alerted the authorities and then two then ensured Robinson remained at home until the FBI took him into custody.Grok said:
I get Crooks vibes from the shooting as well. I suspect there were professionals that groomed and shadowed Robinson that were able to melt into the background once they'd observed that he'd done his job. Just like 9/11, it then falls to everyone else in the US to clean up the mess.
And I couldn't agree more with this:
My opinion now is that there is no right or left. There are just various beings with different traits, histories and levels of awareness.
Finished it and as expected Ian Carroll is doing a great job. Recommend watching it. Besides couple of minor points he probably is getting wrong (some of which he corrected on the show) such as the claim that Shapiro might take over TPUSA I think it is well worth the listen and share. The point he is making about the Zinn guy I think is justified as a suspicion I did not quite think about in that way: It could also have been an distraction of some sorts on the ground to make it easier for the real shooter and/or shooters to escape.
Steven King tweeted that Charlie was advocating stoning gays to death. He later deleted the tweet and apologised (well, sort of) but blamed his mistake on fact checkers misleading him:
In response, Belfast Books removed all of his work from their website. It may not be much but in the age of information ignorance isn’t an excuse. If you foolishly trust every bit of nonsense you see on the internet you deserve the backlash you get.
King later said that Charlie cherry picked the scripture content. I’m not sure how, if anything, Charlie’s weakness was following it too thoroughly and literally. Otherwise he may have questioned not only the historical accuracy and legitimacy of the alleged “Judeo-Christian” tradition - but also its purpose and who it really serves.
In response, Belfast Books removed all of his work from their website. It may not be much but in the age of information ignorance isn’t an excuse. If you foolishly trust every bit of nonsense you see on the internet you deserve the backlash you get.
King later said that Charlie cherry picked the scripture content. I’m not sure how, if anything, Charlie’s weakness was following it too thoroughly and literally. Otherwise he may have questioned not only the historical accuracy and legitimacy of the alleged “Judeo-Christian” tradition - but also its purpose and who it really serves.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
