Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

JFK was killed with an Italian Carcano rifle. Mauser is German.
True, I'm sorry, I used the word ostensibly to mean apparently, meaning that it was the rifle that was discovered at the School Book Depository behind a stack of boxes. It was indeed not the murder weapon.
 
Not true, as per the poster's own replies and those of others. It's a Mauser.
Joh Cullen, I remember, was posting all kinds of nonsense theories about the Butler shooting. I strongly got the impression then that he was deliberately trying to distract and create false leads. And, if I remember correctly, he got really angry at people questioning his theories and his 'authority'. Paid shill, is my guess.
 
This post brings up the idea that a shooter the on the top of the Losee building at UVU would have line of site obstructed by the tent that Charlie was sitting under. It's not just about how many stories high the Losee building is, and I haven't been able to find any info about that, but also that the courtyard where Charlies tent was is kind of dug out and terraced like an ampitheatre. If indeed the line of site would have been obstructed by the tent, then that might explain the failure of Charlies security detail or the police on sight from doing roof sweeps. Or maybe the real shooter wasn't on the roof at all.

My colleague who I've worked with for years-(he's an ex-Navy Seal and runs high level security for events like the Super Bowl, etc.)

"Tell those keyboard warriors that they can't hit a deer with grandpa's rifle. No. A 10-year-old could NOT have pulled off that shot under THOSE circumstances. GTFOH

This is a much more complicated operation than just climbing on the roof with a gun and shooting. You have to take into account line of sight, he was under a tent, ballistic drift and wind speed. Given where Charlie was positioned underneath that tent-the math would say that the building had to be under four stories tall or 40 feet. Otherwise, that tent would mask the shot. Then you have to take into account that you truly have one shot. This isn't casual hunting day with the boys...this is a murder if you flinch or give away your position...its game over.

The man travelled with a security team but there was no roof sweeps? No one watching the obvious "sight lines" Nahhh. I'm not buying that. Charlie obviously wore a jacket. That would be a known. I'm calling it. It was probably a 7.62mm which is a high-power caliber round-most likely out of a sniper rifle. The sniper rifle is easier to breakdown and is lighter to carry. Whoever did this? Was a professional. That shooter will never be found. This is just like the JFK assassination-they may have a patsy but the real shooter is long gone."
 
I kept scrolling on social media, listening and watching today and I really don't remember the last time when I've seen so much public hatred, crazyness and call for murder. I even saw a guy who is selling a 3D printed model of Charlie getting shot as trophy for people who want to remember this day ! Something has been triggered to lead to this point
The deliberate division and pathological programming of society has been going on for multiple decades at this point.
This is just the point where it is becoming blatantly obvious. The seeds planted long ago are sprouting and bearing their sickened fruits.

On that note, here’s an article with some thoughts on recent events that I agree with.
It shows the results of the deliberate policies and the programming.
The only angle I can see he’s missing is that of pathology/ponerology
 
Now there's some speculation that the shooter was actually a Groyper (the online troll community who are Nick Fuentes fans). So far I've seen the claim from a tweet from an unknown 'journalist', Tiktokers posting about the memes, and looks like Fuentes responded to the claim last night:

“My followers and I are currently being framed for the murder of Charlie Kirk by the mainstream media based on literally zero evidence,” said Fuentes on X:


Newsweek published this article yesterday: "What Is a 'Groyper'? What to Know About Nick Fuentes' Alt-Right Movement" and
made this pretty unsubstantiated claim:

Social media users have also questioned whether early claims by officials that the suspect, apprehended late Thursday, was tied to left-wing extremism were premature, pointing instead to possible links to the far-right.

As of Friday afternoon, it remained unclear what the motive was in the Kirk shooting, or the political ideology of the alleged gunman. Robinson's family said he had become "more political" in recent years, according to police. The markings on the bullet casings suggest the subject was steeped in meme culture and made references to online taunts and anti-fascist messages.

Which in turn looks based on this tweet:


It was interesting that less than a month ago Fuentes was blowing up on Youtube and Instagram (like the algorithims were seriously pushing videos about him, oddly all in a positive light), and now this. And just weeks ago Fuentes was coming down especially hard on Charlie Kirk. If all this starts to track, it looks like there has been something like a 'priming of the American mind' as we saw in Evidence of Revision with the JFK assassination.

Could very well be that Robinson was groomed in Groyper groups, and assisted in some way in the assassination.
 
A few inconsistencies.

1) the video of the man getting off the roof without a gun. The explanation is the gun was dismantled quickly after the shot and put in backpack/clothing

2) The gun was found intact in the woods

3) shooter takes time after shot to dismantle gun but then when on the run takes time to put gun back together and leaves it behind

I know people aren’t logical and there is unexplained randomness in actions but to take time and put the gun back together when escaping is strange

Also if you know about the type of rifle it not easy/quick to dismantle/put back together
 
On that note, here’s an article with some thoughts on recent events that I agree with.
It shows the results of the deliberate policies and the programming.
The only angle I can see he’s missing is that of pathology/ponerology
I agree with you there - I came across that article yesterday. Iryna Zarutska was another tragic and senseless loss.
Without saying too much about the article for those who want to read it, I thought John Carter made an interesting point about mad, rabid dogs and what can justly be done about them, though that could probably extend to the owners as well. My thought: for 'mad rabid dog', read 'programmed OP / patsy'. For 'dog owner', read 'essential psychopath'.
 
Back
Top Bottom