He became a representation of unchecked police violence and racial misery and the tipping point of constant profiling of blacks, even if he was a criminal and a drugadict, AND even if there is a basis to it, i found it insensitive and intentionally dismissive and the commulitive effect of real abuse and imaginary rethoric build up. [...]
And just like during George Floyd, there are immediate doxing and firing and persecution of people , which as much as i agree that these people should just rot, i can't help but to recall how everyone was persecuted during Floyd's riots in a very similar way.
I think that part of the problem here is that almost everything surrounding BLM and George Floyd is based on lies, and accepting those lies as "not factually, but morally" true because it doesn't seem fair to dismiss them leads to falling into the trap of the reversive blockade.
Reversive blockade: Emphatically insisting upon something which is the opposite of the truth blocks the average person’s mind from perceiving the truth. In accordance with the dictates of healthy common sense, he starts searching for meaning in the “golden mean” between the truth and its opposite, winding up with some satisfactory counterfeit. People who think like this do not realize that this effect is precisely the intent of the person who subjects them to this method. If the counterfeit of the truth is the opposite of a moral truth, at the same time, it simultaneously represents an extreme paramoralism, and bears its peculiar suggestiveness.
We rarely see this method being used by normal people; even if raised by the people who abused it; they usually only indicate its results in their characteristic difficulties in apprehending reality properly. Use of this method can be included within the above-mentioned special psychological knowledge developed by psychopaths concerning the weaknesses of human nature and the art of leading others into error. Where they are in rule, this method is used with virtuosity, and to an extent conterminous with their power.
To be cancelled for not bowing down to a criminal who overdosed while in confrontation with the law is VERY different from being cancelled for celebrating the assassination of a man whose only crime was publicly disagreeing with your propaganda / psychoses. In fact, it is probably one of the healthiest ways to begin removing these types of individuals from the institutions in which they spread their disease.
I find it particularly egregious for people to celebrate the murder of Charlie Kirk FOR his free speech and then turn around and cry out that they shouldn't face ANY consequences for theirs. This is the hallmark of absolute wretchedness.