Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

What's the latest on the bullet, by the way? The "30.06" one they said was used... did they report finding it?
I haven't heard anything else on it one way or the other. If the Paramount Tactical guy's hypothesis is right, it might have lodged in Kirk's cranium, so it would've only been recovered during the autopsy - but I haven't heard anything about that either.
 
I wish these posts regarding Candace had occurred sooner, then I might not have misspelled her name repeatedly. At least I was consistent. :-[

But anyway, all these questions regarding the shooting made we want to view the vid again and surprise, it's almost only available on X requiring log in due to age restriction. I did finally find it here. Do not read the comments as most are just horrible.

In viewing the incident again, I can believe that the shot came from the right and exited left through the neck. And as ever, the amount of blood that comes gushing out is unreal - hard to believe this wasn't instant death - and yes, he does drop the mic after about a second.

Other vids around show his team carrying him to a vehicle and again, no ambulance standing by for any kind of possible emergency which seems irresponsible. Probably would not have made any difference, but one should have been on hand just the same.

I suppose just like Crooks, Tyler is the shooter and like Crooks, the designated set up patsy with probable handlers and mind control influence. I guess it would have been too obvious to have him killed like Crooks or am I speaking too soon - think Oswald taken out by Ruby. Tyler could have the same fate. One has to marvel at the personal scenario set up for this assassination - young white gay guy that hates Charlie for anti-trans position cause his white male partner is trans wannabe. And just had to make all those pertinent memes on the bullet casings. Nice touch, no? It's also being thought the shot was about 142 yards instead of 200 and Tyler got it all done in a couple of minutes from getting on the roof, attaching the scope (left screwdriver behind), taking the shot, to exiting the roof. And somehow, he thought ditching the rifle in the wooded area was a good idea, especially with his DNA on the towel (and the screwdriver). Gotcha boy!

The account above was derived from a vid that I can't find now (figures!) that was very detailed outlining the path Tyler took from before he entered campus with his walking gait modified by the rifle hidden on his body, going through a pedestrian tunnel, and how he made his way up to the roof. It further showed the angle needed to make the shot without it being blocked by the adjacent building. It goes on to show him climbing off the roof, dropping his glasses and struggling to put them back on while walking and trying to look inconspicuous, and finally exiting and crossing the street to the wooded area where he left the towel wrapped rifle; it's thought that residential ring cameras might capture his movements with the rifle since he didn't conceal it like before as he was in such a hurry to flee, so he ditched it. What puzzles me is it appeared to show a very rapid action on the roof with him being prone and shooting for maybe less than a minute. That would seem to contradict an earlier vid where he was spied on the roof with the voice over ending with "just sayin'." Those spectators would have witnessed the shot if the other vid is accurate.

Again, why haven't autopsy results been released? Is it because the forensic evidence doesn't confirm the Tyler assassin theory? I do think we're looking at a similar Butler scenario.

It seems like they want to normalize online tracking.

I believe they are using this tragedy to roll out an internet surveilance system..

Yep - I think you're right and a lot more is going to be ushered in just like 911 and the Patriot Act. Let's watch our freedoms totally evaporate. After all, they never let a good crisis go to waste.

EDIT: No wonder I couldn't find the screwdriver vid - @Approaching Infinity posted it earlier! Whew - thought I was losing it!
 
Last edited:
Pam Bondi just made the case that there's something called Hate speech and that it had no place in the US... where have I heard that before? oh yea... the US from the previous administration, different target, same method.

So, on the one hand I think that this event is being planned as a way to push certain agendas in a lot of directions. I have not read the entire thread, as it is moving rather rapidly, but it must've been pointed out before the connections in dates, 9/11 and 9/10. Tucker just posted a livestream called "America after Charlie Kirk" so there's a sense that something planned for which Kirk's assassination would be the catalyst.

Will it work? I don't know.. but if we draw the comparison, back then the goal was to channel the anger of a shocking event in a specific direction, in that emotional state it's easy to fill in the "data" and people will slowly draw conclusions, and the desired outcome will be achieved. Shock doctrine all over again.

Dehumanize a portion of the population that are to be blamed for our pain, and it's easy to watch people commit atrocities in the name of justice. It's a human condition, I don't think it's exclusive to any political ideology. Before this happened, I had started to see a trend where both political angles in the US had begin to all agree on one issue, Gaza. Now we may be ripe to begin hating one another along ideological lines, or perhaps that is part of the plan. But not out there really (or maybe).. mostly internally in our private lives, we'll hate and oppose people we have never met, abstract individuals. Or at least, I think that is their hope.

On the other hand, I remember the C's mentioned that the PTB had promoted infighting between Candace, Tucker and Fuentes because it would be problematic if they all got together and agreed on the same point. This event could've also been planned as a way to warn those commentators to self censor, but interestingly I have seen the exact opposite, so maybe it was a huge miscalculation?

It's rough, I don't want to compare one death to another in level of importance, I do not diminish the heartbreaking stories, and I hope I have not become too cynical in the face of what happens, but this is the reality we live in, we live under a set of overlords for whom murder for utilitarian purposes is just another option to consider, they will not hesitate if they think it'll work, and here we are.
 
Now here's another area that gives me concern. I was away over the weekend to celebrate my MIL's 99th birthday. A visit with my husband's brother revealed his wife's sister and husband believe Charlie Kirk was not murdered but is still alive! It was all faked! :nuts: Say what!!! Thinking that was just a one off, I've since seen that this is actually a genuine belief being fomented - see 51:39 rumble vid below:
Yes, I'm wondering where this belief that "everything's fake" is coming from. Can't these people deal with reality? I just don't know what to think about it. I know a person in Australia who's going on and on about it. Upon reflection, I think they have a need for validation, attention and for "being right". I'm sure there must be many reasons for thinking everything (out of the ordinary) is fake. Potentially specific to the individual.
 
For me, I feel ashamed to say that I thought of Charlie as a bit of a grifter, not bad per se but a normie conservative pundit, I thought of him as Mr. Potato head and I'd watch his clips and laugh when he'd run circles around lefty loonies but beyond that I ignored him.

So then why when after viewing his murder did I feel like I was punched in the chest? For days I've felt severe pain, like a force in my heart chakra area. I've felt more pain for him than one one of my best friends who died in a car crash. Makes no sense. I thought, was this just a feeding tube? Loosh basically, being manipulated by a traumatic viewing of someone I followed on social media's death. Or was something else going on.

Then I realized that maybe both, loosh and something else. The reason for the pain is because of what he represented, a voice for Truth in the face of ridicule from his own side (being too normie) or villified by the left, it didn't matter, he knew his mission and went out into battle, with Truth, conversation, debate, communication and mediation as his weapons. All of which I believe in strongly but when covid happened I abandoned, my voice shriveled to nothing, and by abandoning something that is so important to me, something died in me. So I think Charlies death was like a mirror, showing me that I'd abandoned something foundational to my soul, maybe even sinning against my soul and the pain I've been feeling is the witnessing of a great warrior die in battle, as well as feeling the pain of turning against my own soul. Gosh maybe I'm reaching here with all of this. Which is why I'm networking about it, to make sense of it.

I also understand why so many are choosing to go to church and what I guess Christians are referring to as the "Holy Spirit" calling them, I've always thought of it as the light of the Divine, that I'm a flower in some barren or dark place but up above, and for some reason to the right of me, I feel a light calling me to turn towards the light, to reach, to grow. I've felt this "calling" for a few years but with Charlies death, I feel it even stronger, not really sure what to do with that, just sharing.

Dehumanize a portion of the population that are to be blamed for our pain, and it's easy to watch people commit atrocities in the name of justice. It's a human condition, I don't think it's exclusive to any political ideology. Before this happened, I had started to see a trend where both political angles in the US had begin to all agree on one issue, Gaza. Now we may be ripe to begin hating one another along ideological lines, or perhaps that is part of the plan. But not out there really (or maybe).. mostly internally in our private lives, we'll hate and oppose people we have never met, abstract individuals. Or at least, I think that is their hope.

It's difficult to hold anger and hate for too long in this situation because Charlie did not represent those energies, he appeared ( at least to me) to represent the other path, one of dialogue and mediation in the face of anger, hate and violence. So even though people are angry about what happened, do they really want to to take violent and hateful actions in his name, when that is the opposite of his mission.

What his death has allowed for, is more lifting of the veil or revealing of the truth of the situation on this planet. That forces of evil, darkness and something non human moves amongst us. Most people see this "non human" force as demonic, we see it as hyperdimensional, same thing really. And maybe this is where things can go wrong. That people can SEE there is evil amongst the left and they get herded into believing the entirety of the left is demonic, that could lead to something horrific. When in truth it's only a few demons who have acquired for themselves a platform and that the majority of lefties are not demons themselves but hypnotized by the few. Who knows how many have been de-hypnotized by Charlies death, I've seen many testimonies by lefties suggesting just this, that his death has opened their eyes to the destructive hate of their ideology.
 


This reads like it was written by the FBI to corroborate their story.

That letter reads like an adult pretending to be a kid.

Yeah, the letter sounds almost “comically“ pretentious just as if someone wrote it specifically with the goal to corroborate key elements of the official narrative in mind. Sorry for having quite some problems believing that a young adult would write in that way and especially after what he supposedly did.
 
Sorry for having quite some problems believing that a young adult would write in that way

Prosecutors released key text messages between Tyler Robinson, the accused assassin of Charlie Kirk, and his roommate and romantic partner. Gen Z says nobody actually texts like this.

The text messages prosecutors released are supposed to show motive, but anyone under 25 would just laugh. Young people do not write in full sentences with perfect punctuation, yet that is exactly how the government says these texts appeared. It looks less like evidence and more like a script written by someone who never used a group chat.

1758084320662.png

Nuff said!
 
So far no peep about it on german mainstream radio. And there probably won’t be anything they say about it in the future either. Which might be an indication that blaming Iran for it might not be part of the agenda since german mainstream is so fully bought and sold to the evil ones. He isn’t the most well known person by the way, especially in Germany I think.

Back to how the mainstream in Germany handles the Kirk assassination now:

After the above described apparently pretty slow start of not even saying anything about it, german mainstream radio today has the Kirk thing (and that the supposed shooter is facing the death penalty) as the number 1 news. So the reporting on it seems to have shifted quite a bit in germany. And as said earlier, one needs to also remember that Kirk was very likely not a known person for almost everyone in germany before the assassination.
 
Maybe those should have their American passports revoked ? (no such chance ofc. ) , re . discord and similar digital records they all can be easily faked out of thin air obviously , and , similar to the event in Butler , then FBI director claimed that Crooks internet history revealed that he had been searching about Oswald , as far as i'm concerned the official Tyler Robinson story is all coverup for whatever really happened at this point. fiwiw.
 
I would think it would be smart for both Tucker and especially Candace (at least for the time being) to stay at home and not attend public spaces/gatherings, and especially areas that have been fixed/announced beforehand where they will be. At least for now that also seems to be what both are doing, which is good. They might also want to increase security around their properties, preferably with people they know and can trust. Also, if they want to go out, especially to public gatherings, it would be smart to tell as little as possible to anyone beforehand where they will be going and at what point in time.

I wouldn’t put anything past the crazies in their desperation, not even being stupid enough to kill any of the two or similar people right after what has just happened and has been exposed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom