Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Was Kirk, perhaps, 'not meant to' die?

A ricochet off the top edge of your armor plate and straight into your jugular vein seems extremely unlucky, and it supports the government narrative that Kirk was 'killed by an amateur lone nutter' (although that doesn't exclude prior manipulation of him by 'experts').

Kirk's chances of surviving a 30.06 cal bullet from 140 yards directly into his plate would have been, what, 50-50?
 
I don't know if this will be of any help, but here is a list of the fastest flying bugs:
  • Dragonfly: 30 km/h; MAX 97 km/h (claimed) (the Australian Dragonfly holds the Guinness record at 39 km/h for fastest flying insect)
  • Horsefly: 60 km/h (claimed); MAX 145 km/h (claimed)
  • Honey Bee: 30 km/h (pollen laden); MAX 65 km/h
  • American Deer Bot Fly: MAX 80 km/h
  • Hornet: 25 km/h
  • Hawkmoth: 54 km/h (the fastest moth, can hover like a hummingbird)
  • Locust: 33 km/h
  • Skipper Butterfly: 60 km/h (the fastest butterfly)
  • Ladybugs: MAX 60 km/h (have also been found at 3600 ft in the air)
  • Bumblebee: 17 km/h (pollen laden); MAX 28 km/h (their wings don't flap but vibrate)

The fastest flying mammal is the Brazilian (aka: Mexican) free-tailed bat. They have been documented at reaching 160 km/h in level flight (perfect conditions) with regular cruising speeds that exceed 60 km/h. They can fly to altitudes of 10,800 ft., the highest of any bat. A native to the Americas and particularly abundant in the southwestern US and Mexico. It does reside in Utah (#6) and has a wingspan of 13 inches. Primarily nocturnal but from the wiki: "Bats appear to be most active in late morning and afternoon between June and September." They are mostly found in caves but will nest in man-made structures.

I don't know of any university campus that doesn't have bats. The flying things could be drones, but for their speed, I really can't say they're bugs. If these things are natural, I'd say they're bats. Best guess.
 
Niall said:
Was Kirk, perhaps, 'not meant to' die?

A ricochet off the top edge of your armor plate and straight into your jugular vein seems extremely unlucky, and it supports the government narrative that Kirk was 'killed by an amateur lone nutter' (although that doesn't exclude prior manipulation of him by 'experts').
Click to expand...
That's how it looks to me. Presumably a professional sniper would be able to hit the plate directly if that's what he intended. With anyone else, being off 4 inches or so wouldn't be that unexpected. Impossible to say where he was even aiming. Was he aiming for the head and the shot went low? Aiming for the heart and the shot went high?
Niall said:
Kirk's chances of surviving a 30.06 cal bullet from 140 yards directly into his plate would have been, what, 50-50?
Click to expand...
Grok sez:
  • Level III/IV Armor, Direct Plate Hit: 80-95% survival chance, assuming no secondary complications.
  • Level IIIA or No Armor: <10-20% survival chance due to penetration and organ damage.
  • Edge Hit or AP Round vs. Inadequate Armor: <10% survival chance.
 
From Sunday, 7 July 2019 (the first episode of his podcast) through Wednesday, 10 September 2025 equals 6 days and 66 days. The number of the beast.

Charlie was shot in Orem, Utah. That's an anagram of Rome. Kirk is a ethymological equivalent of Church.

There is a rumored book that was published a day before his death and taken offline a day after his death, a book called “Who Murdered Charlie Kirk?”. A real book put on Amazon that was taken down the day after…
 
Here a guy, on redacted ,that received some clear video from the day of the shooting. From is videos, he explain that when Robinson is seen running on the roof to escape, he's running before the gun shot is heard. But the reason I post this link is as well that he see a lot of
drone on the film he received and got a pretty good still of one of them. At 1:01:47 is the picture of the drone. Video is at the rigth time bellow

 
Niall said:
Was Kirk, perhaps, 'not meant to' die?
A ricochet off the top edge of your armor plate and straight into your jugular vein seems extremely unlucky, and it supports the government narrative that Kirk was 'killed by an amateur lone nutter' (although that doesn't exclude prior manipulation of him by 'experts').
Kirk's chances of surviving a 30.06 cal bullet from 140 yards directly into his plate would have been, what, 50-50?
Click to expand...
Depends on the ammo. If it was armor piercing it would've probably gone right through, especially if it was a 'hot' load, extra propellant. Hollow point, soft or ballistic tipped? Deformation and fragmentation.
 
Noctu said:
From Sunday, 7 July 2019 (the first episode of his podcast) through Wednesday, 10 September 2025 equals 6 days and 66 days. The number of the beast.
Click to expand...
You meant 6 years and 66 days since whose podcast started? Charlie Kirk's?

I also noticed that September 9th was 9-9 and 2+0+2+5=9. A 999 the day before when Israel bombed Qatar.

The C's mentioned that the real or secret controllers behind Mossad are Kabbalists and it seems that they are into numerology.
 
Candace had new episode and raised quite a few questions others haven't asked. She talked quite a few locals and she mentions that locals thinks Tyler was asked to drop the gun behind a empty house owned by university where the real shooter went. Tyler was found in a dairy queen next day with the same maroon shirt in casual mode.
  • The so called 'door cam' camera( not a door cam) belongs to a family with last name 'steel' who works for a company called caldera engineering who manufacture valves. Most of the people in that street has 'steel' last name and they work for that company, and some of family members are into politics. Members of this family gave interviews to all the big outlets including abc, BBC etc. Candace questions why they chose to give the footage to TMZ a Hollywood celebrity gossip outlet instead of local outlets?
  • The footage is very grainy. Lot of cameras in the university and why are they not releasing the high resolution footage.
  • Some body commented that, the FBI released discord 'script' contains a word 'outfit' which is used by woman. So the FBI script writer might have been a woman.
Theme seems to question whether it is Tyler Robinson who did the shooting at all?

Bibi's reactions reminds me one of the proverb my uneducated mother used to say - "How to find a thief? - the person who shrugged their shoulders". That doesn't mean to be so called "scientific" (which only got some traction during the last 200 years), but that is how things passed down from the old generations.
 
Last edited:
Pretty level-headed video for the most part from another sniper. I remember this guy from the video he did on Butler last year:


Some notes in [brackets]:
0:00 - Intro
1:40 - Body Armor? [Has clear shots of his necklace]
8:52 - Caliber surprise
10:25 - How did he conceal the rifle?
12:40 - Is 200yd a possible shot?
13:13 - (rifle concealment cont)
14:56 - Where’s the rifle on the roof?
16:26 - Suspect pictures aren’t him [Good example of how misleading AI upscaling is]
17:18 - Evidence, admission, motive
18:01 - 1/2 summary recap
19:26 - He didn’t work alone… [shows the several social media posts with seeming foreknowledge]
20:46 - Psych eval
22:46 - 3/4 summary recap
23:09 - Conspiracy 1: Tampering with the crime scene [the guy removing the camera was Charlie's official videographer, according to Candace]
24:52 - Conspiracy 2: Charlie still alive
25:22 - Conspiracy 3: The UFO [If it's bird-sized, I think it's moving too fast to be a bird]
26:26 - Conspiracy 4: Second shooter in crowd (signals)
29:45 - Conspiracy 5: Second shooter (w/Alex jones) [Coincidentally, the "muzzle flash" to Charlie's right appears right when the shot from the roof would've been shot. So either it's a coincidence, or somehow something in that location caught a reflection of the flash]
Click to expand...
 
Aeneas said:
It could also just show the conflict within the elite in Israel and that not all are behind BB, perhaps some even deliberately undermining him.
Click to expand...
"The Times of Israel" is center-leftist (Israeli standards) and at least since mid 2023 quite critical of BN and his government; as have been IDF, significant parts of intelligence, and MoD until BN replaced Gallant with his yes-man Katz last November.

About two weeks ago they published an article about "Israel’s moral crossroads in Gaza" (link) that would be a great case material for experts in twisted... about everything: language, minds, morals (IL standards), etc. I may be wrong but think the main difference between their 'morality' and that of BN with his kahanists is of utilitarian, or practical, nature and lies in how others perceive them. That quote is likely the least pathological most straightforward in the whole text, and shows the difference as they see it:

But we also know that something has gone very wrong in Gaza. .... That the Netanyahu government, a coalition of the fanatical and the corrupt, is disgracing the Jewish state. That, if implemented, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s chilling description of the goals of this next phase of the war – total destruction and mass emigration of Palestinians – will implicate us in a war crime. That once-marginal fanatics among the settler community are protected by government patrons as they burn and injure and occasionally kill.
Click to expand...

My guess is, it's not them who had invested in CK so they can freely comment on his more recent attitude, and the same time highlight BN's feigned concern and sorrow.

We may never get to know the truth for certain, but when talking about twists, I'm wondering how likely is the option that BN says the truth, it's not Israel who did it; and instead it was a Suleimani 2.0 scheme?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom