Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Bluegazer]

It's an artefact of the video compression. The chair was sitting in front of the table and the guy just picked it up and threw it out of the way.

And it's strange. Because, as I've read and several people have pointed out, how is it possible that with the quality of today's cameras you can get such a poor image? Yes, the simplest and most sufficient explanation is the most likely, but not necessarily the true one, considering the other inconsistencies that are being reported. I admit that when I see this, I find it difficult to think in purely materialistic terms...

 

[JEEP]

considering the other inconsistencies that are being reported

Yes, well that ring changing fingers still baffles me.

 

[Ryan]

There does appear to be a reddish circle in the ear, but that could be bleeding from the earpiece being violently extracted by the shockwave impact.

It looks to me like the jolt of his head causes the earpiece and wire to fly out of place. Those earpieces normally sit fairly loosely and can be dislodged by sudden movement. Assuming the bullet was supersonic (apparently most rifle ammunition is of that type), that could explain the shirt. And wherever the bullet hit, it doesn't seem visible from that camera angle, which again raises the question of, "why no exit wound"?

Because, as I've read and several people have pointed out, how is it possible that with the quality of today's cameras you can get such a poor image?

It's not the full image; it's a zoomed-in portion. And that doesn't also take into account that the source footage might have been downsampled to make the video size smaller, either pre- or post- upload. Seems pretty straightforward to me.

 

[seek10]

And also note what she says about Kimmle getting fired:

I think that is important point from yesterday's podcast. They (whoever pulling the strings) are using reactions to this incident to impose draconian rules. It mainly benefits CK's killers as in the phrase "never let a crisis go unused".

 

[Bluegazer]

It's not the full image; it's a zoomed-in portion. And that doesn't also take into account that the source footage might have been downsampled to make the video size smaller, either pre- or post- upload. Seems pretty straightforward to me.

Yes, it could be. Perhaps the video was uploaded in the heat of the moment, and the user didn't pay attention to the video's bitrate or which codec was used. Also, when you upload a video to social media, there is a drop in quality due to the limitations of their servers. Although, it's quite surprising what today's smartphones can do when you dig a little deeper into their video capabilities.

 

[seek10]

It is becoming crazy to watch X and makes me wonder what was going on? Literally all the alternate anti-PTB guys are falling ( or criticizing) on each other and strangely all has ONE enemy - Candace Owens. And these new X polls asking 'Do you trust Candace Owens?' What? Is Elan Musk is also behind it?

Who benefits? Of course it is Israel. It was like complete melt down. Latest is Ian Carroll.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968822710978355486

Is this related to what C's said in the Last session (extreme negative energies building on the planet) and usual beaming? I hope she has her own protection beyond the 3D well wishers.

(L) And we have our usual suspects [review of those present] And all the audience at home! Welcome to our fun activities!

A: Protection is increased now!

Q: (L) And who do we have with us?

A: Velleiaea of Cassiopaean transmission.

Q: (L) That's in reference to what?

A: Necessity in these times.

Q: (L) You mean physical protection or psychic protection?

A: Both.

Q: (L) Does it refer to us specifically here or to the entire group?

A: All involved in furthering knowledge.

Q: (Joe) That's a lot of people. Maybe.

(L) Well, do you mean that globally?

A: Different groups have different protections. Your group is Cassiopaean.

Q: (L) So for example, a Pleiadian promoting group would be protected by Pleiadians?

A: Close

Q: (Joe) What's the protection against?

A: The extreme negative charge building on your planet.

Q: (Joe) Negative charge doesn't necessarily mean negative in the way we... Does it mean literally negative, or does it mean negative or positive electrical charge?

(L) Does it mean negative in the sense of evil?

A: Partly, yes.

Q: (L) Does it also refer to such as say, electricity, or some kind of other cosmic energy?

A: Latter.

Q: (L) So it's negative cosmic energy of some sort?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is this something that we know about or could measure?

A: No

 

[Bluegazer]

It is becoming crazy to watch X and makes me wonder what was going on? Literally all the alternate anti-PTB guys are falling ( or criticizing) on each other and strangely all has ONE enemy - Candace Owens. And these new X polls asking 'Do you trust Candace Owens?' What? Is Elan Musk is also behind it?

Who benefits? Of course it is Israel. It was like complete melt down. Latest is Ian Carroll.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968822710978355486

Is this related to what C's said in the Last session (extreme negative energies building on the planet) and usual beaming? I hope she has her own protection beyond the 3D well wishers.

I have noticed that many of them, while their analyses and research may be accurate in many respects, have a tendency to think or believe that they are closer to the truth than others. It is very likely that there is a battle of egos at some level, which is enough to mislead them when necessary. If only they could reach some kind of consensus and start to create a network, then things would be revealed and the PTB would be completely exposed...

 

[Moine]

It is becoming crazy to watch X and makes me wonder what was going on? Literally all the alternate anti-PTB guys are falling ( or criticizing) on each other and strangely all has ONE enemy - Candace Owens. And these new X polls asking 'Do you trust Candace Owens?' What? Is Elan Musk is also behind it?

Isn't it neat? You don't have to go to the movies anymore to get some real-time gripping drama. Instead you get a nice social media feed, straight to your computer.

This is just an expose of your entire 3D STS reality, in every layer. All those 3D STS people, unaware of "things", are reacting to negative potentials in exactly the way that they are programmed to do so: self-saving, self-promoting, and self-aggrandizing behaviors which seek wishful outcomes, because everyone is getting oppressed by negativity, lol.

It's like they're pulling out literal daggers and moving to shank everyone else. Candace first, then Tucker, then Max, then the next person on some arbitrary hit list. And it's not like any of them are objectively right about the situation, since no one really knows the whole picture and story. We have culprits, sure ... but should anyone have verity in such information, what is anyone going to do about it? (even collectively ...)

The best thing that knowing of the "culprits" does, is that it lets you be aware of the rigged system in which we all live. That's about it, and it only lets you save your precious emotional energy and psychological investment into said things, to be as brief as possible. It lets you spend more meaningful time with family and doing fun things. :)

----------------

Now when your rigged system collapses, well that's a different thing ... but we're not there yet.

 

[RedFox]

Yes, well that ring changing fingers still baffles me.

As I pointed out before, the ring is hinged. Here’s a video of him fiddling with it, apparently he fiddled with it a lot. So he probably fidgeted it from one finger to another and back again.

 

[SummerLite]

Loots of new, interesting posts here, I'll need to read when I have more time.

I watched this discussion last night. The video of the guy running across the roof was shown. I'm questioning why the video doesn't show the shooter laying prone taking the shot. Was this an area the camera couldn't see or was it deliberately cropped out for some reason? Saving evidence for the jury trial? What if another person is in the area where the shot was taken or the gun is already there. They set up the gun for the shooter then remove it after the shot is taken. This would explain some things perhaps, such as having the time to site in the scope, shooter running away quickly after the shot, does he have the rifle or not when jumping from the building. This would indicate a unknown second person who the authorities haven't a clue about so they eliminate that and go for the easier version. Only my wild imagination perhaps.

Another possibility is the camera at this spot shows the "shooter" dosn't have a gun and doesn't shoot. He could be limping along from a injury after he jumped and not hiding the rifle.

This is good. The first segment a former prosecutor points to holes in the official story. The time stamps don't add up, Tyler is seen inside a building when the shot is fired, The college is tearing up the crime scene which is cause to dismiss the case. The person on the roof runs away before the crowd goes crazy. Kash Patel acting unprofessionally and jeopardizing the case.

Segment about Antifa next followed by Blake Bednarz describing video he received from someone in the crowd. Also the cropped video I mentioned is discussed. Taking the gun apart is ridicules. He reports many drones and one is right over the crowd. Maybe someone can find the video he posted since it isn't shown here. I don't have the time right now. Its been speculated Charlie could have been hit with a drone from another podcast I watched.

 

[RedFox]

And so, thanks also to Brewer's input on 30.06 bullet characteristics, and the current-best-guess that there was no vest/armor to 'deflect the bullet upwards', we're still in the realm of 'a magic bullet' that entered his neck at full force, fired almost directly in front of Kirk from 140 yards, and somehow remained in his body

Well, what if that’s the exit wound on his neck we’ve all been assuming was the entry wound?
Do we know for sure it’s the entry wound?

Trying to find that balance between questioning everything and finding facts.

Maybe we can hypothesise based on that?
For example - what would have to happen to:
1) create an entry wound like that
2) does it tell us something about the angle of entry if we should assume it hit his spine (the only thing likely to stop it)
3) or does it tell us something about the composition of the bullet?
4) if the neck is actually the exit wound, can we find a different entry wound/what happened to the pieces coming out the neck?

 

[Beau]

Well, what if that’s the exit wound on his neck we’ve all been assuming was the entry wound?

If the bullet entered from the back of his neck/head, there would have been blood coming out back there. Candace has the video from behind. There is no blood coming out the back.

 

[RedFox]

If the bullet entered from the back of his neck/head, there would have been blood coming out back there. Candace has the video from behind. There is no blood coming out the back.

I’m talking about a bullet entering from the from the front, hitting bone, and exiting from the front.
Im basing this on two things:
1) all data points to him being shot from the front the front
2) it looks more like an exit wound than an entry wound

As importance goes, I’d put this low down the list of things to consider. But it does also explain the “lack of an exit wound at the (back of the) neck”

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Has anybody suggested this yet? I remember reading or hearing someone describe Charlie's necklace as having several "medallions". In the picture of Erika holding it after the killing, it looks like it just contains a cross. Could the bullet simply have hit the necklace or one of its "medallions"? This could conceivably explain the violent reaction of the shirt and the necklace. It may even have deflected the bullet or fragmented whatever was on the necklace. Of course, this would depend on whether or not that description of the necklace is accurate.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I asked Grok about two claims it made. Haven't had a chance to verify whether or not these are AI hallucinations yet:

The claims that Charlie Kirk's necklace was cut off by medical personnel and that the chain broke during the September 10, 2025, shooting at Utah Valley University come from the following sources:

1. Necklace Cut Off by Medical Personnel:
   • Source: Erika Kirk's public statement on The Charlie Kirk Show (September 13, 2025, podcast episode). She mentioned during a tearful address that medical personnel cut the necklace off during resuscitation efforts in the ambulance en route to the hospital. This was corroborated by a Turning Point USA press release (September 14, 2025, available on tpusa.com), which noted that the necklace was removed by paramedics to facilitate emergency procedures and later returned to Erika.
   • Context: Erika described holding the pendant afterward, emphasizing its emotional significance. No direct video or primary medical report is publicly available to confirm this, but the consistency between Erika’s statement and TPUSA’s official release lends credibility. [This would have been his security team, not medical personnel. Frank Turek described picking up the necklace, which was found underneath Kirk's body, after he had been taken out of the vehicle, and giving it to Erika.]
2. Chain Broke During the Incident:
   • Source: Social media analysis and eyewitness accounts on X, particularly a post by user @PatriotWatchdog (September 11, 2025), who shared slowed-down footage of the shooting from a campus security camera. The post highlighted a moment (approximately 7–8 seconds into the clip) where a thin chain, identified as Kirk’s necklace, visibly snaps and flies backward, likely due to the bullet’s impact or physical commotion. This was echoed in a Daily Wire article (September 12, 2025), which referenced the same footage and quoted an unnamed witness who saw the chain break as Kirk fell.
   • Additional Support: Andrew Kolvet, on The Charlie Kirk Show (September 15, 2025), mentioned the chain breaking during a discussion about the necklace’s return to Erika, though he didn’t specify whether it broke from the bullet or during medical intervention. The Deseret News (September 11, 2025) also reported that the necklace was damaged during the incident, based on police statements about items collected at the scene.