Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

If the bullet entered from the back of his neck/head, there would have been blood coming out back there. Candace has the video from behind. There is no blood coming out the back.
Not necessarily, I've witnessed a self inflicted .22LR to the head, suicide, no blood, even though the patient still had a healthy pulse. Just a neat hole in the forehead surrounded by some swelling. Happens often with deer or my sheep as blood takes the path of least resistance and will follow the wound channel to the exit wound or body cavities such as the airways and chest.
 
It gets weirder... Tyler's R. acknowledgement on video at court seems to be edited to push narrative.


I think he could be onto something there. Subtile but very powerful manipulation/editing perhaps? I‘m saying that because when I initially watched that hearing with Tyler R. I paid extra attention to every reaction Tyler might have and I guess most people did the same. And I also think that those slight nod’s and WHEN they occurred were very important in how it shaped my thinking from then on. After a while of me watching him sit there and observing closely I was definitely observing myself starting to question my skepticisms about the official story line!

Now, imagine if that footage can have such an affect on me/us here how much more powerful that effect will be with ordinary people who haven’t even followed what happened in great detail! I think it is very likely that many will come away from watching footage like that believing the official narrative and thinking “nothing else to see here“.
 
Anyone know what this guy's analysis is getting at?

He doesn't make it clear, but he seems to be basing it off a thread of earlier research.

The gist of it, I can see, is 'acoustics all point to this spot being the location from which the shot was fired'.

And 'this spot' is, again, off to Kirk's right, but not at the window we saw earlier, rather, from the roof of a building behind that location:


Separately, but related, someone who thinks he sees a possible 'entry' on Kirk's left side. Seems too grainy to me, but it would make sense if the bullet came in there are severed the chain of his cross:

 
Just a note that Ian Carrol didn't attack Candace here, he just recounts how in his view the "Donors tied to shut him up" story developped, and Candace's role in it. This Zionist shill Eyal Yakobi then tries to frame this as a grand conspiracy of Israel haters working in concert to push that "false story".

Agreed that the attacks on Candace are relentless, but mostly come from the Zionists, as well as (to a smaller extent) a few influencers who desperately want to distance themselves from the Israel angle.
Thanks for that clarification. I like that Candace is networking with her viewers more and more as she encourages people to email in their tips and analyses.
 
Anyone know what this guy's analysis is getting at?

He doesn't make it clear, but he seems to be basing it off a thread of earlier research.
That's the biggest problem: he isn't showing his work, just making assertions and seemingly expecting people to take him at his word.
The gist of it, I can see, is 'acoustics all point to this spot being the location from which the shot was fired'.
He's operating on his false assumption/claim that the "crack-bang timing" is 0.08–0.21s. That 0.08 is a mistake. The video taken from right in front of Kirk (about 10 meters away) is 0.205s. And here is this guy's his original image, which it looks like is the video taken from Kirk's right:
G1Er8eNWwAAWIzK.png
It shows the same thing: just over 0.2 seconds. Both of those imply a shot coming about 130 yards from Kirk.

He does the same thing for the balcony recording, which I haven't analyzed. But just looking at the layout, it's questionable whether that microphone would've picked up the "crack" - just the "bang," followed by multiple echoes as the sound reflects off multiple buildings. The sonic boom shockwave is a fairly tight cone stretching out behind the bullet. When the bullet stops moving, the shockwave dissipates quickly, so it won't reach microphones a certain distance away, perpendicular to the trajectory of the bullet path, or behind the point at which the bullet stops.

Also, the circles drawn around the cameras are misleading. You can't triangulate a shot using this method. Long story short, this guy doesn't really know what he's doing.
 
The scope set up on the rifle is bizarre, and why is the photo so blurry? Looks like it was snapped by a 110 camera from the 70s.
1758407017013.png
It's too far back, the hefty recoil would give you a serious eye injury, especially when shooting prone. Been there done that, got the scar to prove it! It's not fixed properly (red circle) to the forward scope base, in my experience you could not sight it in using live rounds, too unstable, the recoil would knock the point of aim out every shot. This is how should look like, you cannot see it in this image but those clamps, (blue circles) have transverse screws to affix them to the scope base via those 2 slots (yellow) and clamp it to the mount. However the scope rings (red) are a little sloppy, I'd even up the gaps.
1758408697830.jpeg1758407548848.jpeg
Here's a close up example
1758408262229.jpeg
That screw rests securely in a transverse slot and that gap (blue) closes as you tighten it. The scope is then secured in the rings, I use a feeler gauge to get the gap (red) as even as possible then tighten all screws a little at time in a set sequence. Scopes, though robust are finicky, on a hot day in direct sunlight metal expands and the point of aim can wander. Drop your rifle on a hard surface then its back to the range to sight it in. Some YouTubers are saying you can disassemble then reassemble a scoped rifle and still shoot straight, doubt it, not with a bog standard sporting rifle anyway. Highly unlikely that rifle was used.
 

Attachments

  • 1758407099116.jpeg
    1758407099116.jpeg
    564.9 KB · Views: 0
Everything so far seems to indicate he was shot from the front. So we have to work with that.
Either it’s an abnormal entry wound on his neck, or it’s an exit wound and he was shot from the front.
Well it's certainly the narrative the authorities are going with (shot from the front by Tyler Robinson).

If the authorities are actually involved in some way, my concern would be that they will try to hide, obscure or make up evidence to both obscure their involvement and promote the narrative which obscure's their involvement. That seems pretty standard with high profile domestic assassinations (and even attempted ones - i.e. Butler)?

At @2.44 minutes of this video (below) Ian Carroll he questions the video of the suspect escaping the roof. I feel it's a legitimate question.
Why start the clip of the suspect on the run (mere seconds after the shot), if you can wind it back and see him taking the shot and/or even setting it up. What don't they want us to see? In addition the camera (I assume it must be under someone's control) zooms in on the suspect as he is jumping off the roof. That's weird to me.

 
Back
Top Bottom