Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Brewer]

If the bullet entered from the back of his neck/head, there would have been blood coming out back there. Candace has the video from behind. There is no blood coming out the back.

Not necessarily, I've witnessed a self inflicted .22LR to the head, suicide, no blood, even though the patient still had a healthy pulse. Just a neat hole in the forehead surrounded by some swelling. Happens often with deer or my sheep as blood takes the path of least resistance and will follow the wound channel to the exit wound or body cavities such as the airways and chest.

 

[Cosmos]

It gets weirder... Tyler's R. acknowledgement on video at court seems to be edited to push narrative.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969148296947253360

I think he could be onto something there. Subtile but very powerful manipulation/editing perhaps? I‘m saying that because when I initially watched that hearing with Tyler R. I paid extra attention to every reaction Tyler might have and I guess most people did the same. And I also think that those slight nod’s and WHEN they occurred were very important in how it shaped my thinking from then on. After a while of me watching him sit there and observing closely I was definitely observing myself starting to question my skepticisms about the official story line!

Now, imagine if that footage can have such an affect on me/us here how much more powerful that effect will be with ordinary people who haven’t even followed what happened in great detail! I think it is very likely that many will come away from watching footage like that believing the official narrative and thinking “nothing else to see here“.

 

[Beau]

How is a video of an initial appearance in court even a thing?

Under Utah law the presiding judge can authorize credentialed media to conduct audio or video recordings under strict conditions.

 

[Niall]

Anyone know what this guy's analysis is getting at?

He doesn't make it clear, but he seems to be basing it off a thread of earlier research.

The gist of it, I can see, is 'acoustics all point to this spot being the location from which the shot was fired'.

And 'this spot' is, again, off to Kirk's right, but not at the window we saw earlier, rather, from the roof of a building behind that location:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969453063032176677

Separately, but related, someone who thinks he sees a possible 'entry' on Kirk's left side. Seems too grainy to me, but it would make sense if the bullet came in there are severed the chain of his cross:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969509280978981255

 

[gottathink]

Just a note that Ian Carrol didn't attack Candace here, he just recounts how in his view the "Donors tied to shut him up" story developped, and Candace's role in it. This Zionist shill Eyal Yakobi then tries to frame this as a grand conspiracy of Israel haters working in concert to push that "false story".

Agreed that the attacks on Candace are relentless, but mostly come from the Zionists, as well as (to a smaller extent) a few influencers who desperately want to distance themselves from the Israel angle.

Thanks for that clarification. I like that Candace is networking with her viewers more and more as she encourages people to email in their tips and analyses.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Anyone know what this guy's analysis is getting at?

He doesn't make it clear, but he seems to be basing it off a thread of earlier research.

That's the biggest problem: he isn't showing his work, just making assertions and seemingly expecting people to take him at his word.

The gist of it, I can see, is 'acoustics all point to this spot being the location from which the shot was fired'.

He's operating on his false assumption/claim that the "crack-bang timing" is 0.08–0.21s. That 0.08 is a mistake. The video taken from right in front of Kirk (about 10 meters away) is 0.205s. And here is this guy's his original image, which it looks like is the video taken from Kirk's right:

It shows the same thing: just over 0.2 seconds. Both of those imply a shot coming about 130 yards from Kirk.

He does the same thing for the balcony recording, which I haven't analyzed. But just looking at the layout, it's questionable whether that microphone would've picked up the "crack" - just the "bang," followed by multiple echoes as the sound reflects off multiple buildings. The sonic boom shockwave is a fairly tight cone stretching out behind the bullet. When the bullet stops moving, the shockwave dissipates quickly, so it won't reach microphones a certain distance away, perpendicular to the trajectory of the bullet path, or behind the point at which the bullet stops.

Also, the circles drawn around the cameras are misleading. You can't triangulate a shot using this method. Long story short, this guy doesn't really know what he's doing.

 

[Brewer]

The scope set up on the rifle is bizarre, and why is the photo so blurry? Looks like it was snapped by a 110 camera from the 70s.

It's too far back, the hefty recoil would give you a serious eye injury, especially when shooting prone. Been there done that, got the scar to prove it! It's not fixed properly (red circle) to the forward scope base, in my experience you could not sight it in using live rounds, too unstable, the recoil would knock the point of aim out every shot. This is how should look like, you cannot see it in this image but those clamps, (blue circles) have transverse screws to affix them to the scope base via those 2 slots (yellow) and clamp it to the mount. However the scope rings (red) are a little sloppy, I'd even up the gaps.

Here's a close up example

That screw rests securely in a transverse slot and that gap (blue) closes as you tighten it. The scope is then secured in the rings, I use a feeler gauge to get the gap (red) as even as possible then tighten all screws a little at time in a set sequence. Scopes, though robust are finicky, on a hot day in direct sunlight metal expands and the point of aim can wander. Drop your rifle on a hard surface then its back to the range to sight it in. Some YouTubers are saying you can disassemble then reassemble a scoped rifle and still shoot straight, doubt it, not with a bog standard sporting rifle anyway. Highly unlikely that rifle was used.

 

[Ruth]

Everything so far seems to indicate he was shot from the front. So we have to work with that.
Either it’s an abnormal entry wound on his neck, or it’s an exit wound and he was shot from the front.

Well it's certainly the narrative the authorities are going with (shot from the front by Tyler Robinson).

If the authorities are actually involved in some way, my concern would be that they will try to hide, obscure or make up evidence to both obscure their involvement and promote the narrative which obscure's their involvement. That seems pretty standard with high profile domestic assassinations (and even attempted ones - i.e. Butler)?

At @2.44 minutes of this video (below) Ian Carroll he questions the video of the suspect escaping the roof. I feel it's a legitimate question.
Why start the clip of the suspect on the run (mere seconds after the shot), if you can wind it back and see him taking the shot and/or even setting it up. What don't they want us to see? In addition the camera (I assume it must be under someone's control) zooms in on the suspect as he is jumping off the roof. That's weird to me.

 

[Bluegazer]

This has been a recurring thought to me. The shot was at him from the front, and it didnt matter if he died or not (50-50?) - however, just like higher Consortium intervened so the bullet magically missed Trump, it could have been higher density Consortium intervention that caused the almost magical fragmentation/ ricochet/ neck redirection of the bullet to kill Charlie instantly? (i.e. program change)

Divine intervention to take a life?

It is precisely for this reason that we should not rule out some kind of intervention, such as what appears to be a “glitch in the matrix.” That is why there are so many inconsistencies. But we should not rule out physical manipulation either. At this stage of the game, it is a bit of both.

 

[Ruth]

Has this already been posted here? I am trying to understand the events that have occurred, and day by day more things outside of known reality are, let's say... manifesting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969279134036635936

I don't know if it's a faulty video or what, but it reminded me of this: New Session Update (June 28, 2025)

Oh my! Forget the 'glitching chair'! Look at 0:49 seconds onwards when he actually gets hit by the bullet.

Could the entry wound be through his ear canal? That would be some impressive sharp shooting if true. Having said that, it could also be what happens when an ear piece gets violently ripped out of someone's ear. So it could definitely negate that 'theory'!

It just looks so incredibly fast and incredibly violent... rather than being a reaction to a shockwave. Which indicates to me that something had to have hit part of the chord?

If his earpiece behaved like that, then some part of the bullet (or bullet fragment) might have hit the chord it was attached to. This would explain the violent wrenching of his earpiece and why the shirt lifted - it was attached to a microphone which was clipped to a chord lying underneath his shirt that wound around the back of his neck to his earpiece.

His body is also reacting in the opposite direction from where the bullet came from (if it came from his right side to the back).

Sigh. That 'magic bullet' theory is looking better and better!

 

[Phill4]

One thing that came to mind, was how it was near instant death.

Shooting the carotid artery will not kill you instantly.

I saw a pig getting shot once and the person doing it missfired and the pig was wildly rolling for 10 minutes.



My first thought was that the "bullet" or watever it was, hit the spinal cord in some way.... unless another element froze his body in place at that moment.. severing an artery doesn't freeze you like that...

Reloading the rifle would have take time from his escape time, i believe it was intended to hit where it did.

EDIT:Typo

 

[Bluegazer]

But I thought forum members who've read Laura's From Paul to Mark, or who are familiar with our discussions about the origins of Christianity, might be interested in the specific exchange between Kirk and the 'Catholic-converted Jew', who references 'the new covenant' and Paul. Note how Kirk lights up upon hearing this.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968464909236080819

Let me put it into context. What if, finally, people begin to understand what Christianity is and how it leads people to discover a great deal of truth?

In another post, I emphasize the following:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967378732102144366

And shortly after my comment, in another tweet: (In this last tweet, where Laura comments and then I comment, the original post clearly expresses a spiritual crisis.)

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967814289118638395

Is it possible that the forces behind the assassination, from a non-material point of view, want to prevent people from finding the true meaning of Christianity? Of course, they have not succeeded, because otherwise there would not be people entering this crisis and looking for another church. And I don't know if this has anything to do with the increase in negativity pointed out by the C´s in the last session...

 

[Moine]

Is it possible that the forces behind the assassination, from a non-material point of view, want to prevent people from finding the true meaning of Christianity? Of course, they have not succeeded, because otherwise there would not be people entering this crisis and looking for another church. And I don't know if this has anything to do with the increase in negativity pointed out by the C´s in the last session...

Spiritual crisis, when true, always presents itself as an individual manifestation, and not as a collective phenomenon. This is per any definition of a tangible, discrete soul.

But making up some hysteria that drives people to act upon their individual movements of spiritual inquiry, into a branded form of collective religion, is one way of covering up, and trying to hinder the ongoing process of "The Wave"...

That's one possibility.

 

[Ruth]

It is becoming crazy to watch X and makes me wonder what was going on? Literally all the alternate anti-PTB guys are falling ( or criticizing) on each other and strangely all has ONE enemy - Candace Owens. And these new X polls asking 'Do you trust Candace Owens?' What? Is Elan Musk is also behind it?

Who benefits? Of course it is Israel. It was like complete melt down. Latest is Ian Carroll.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968822710978355486

Is this related to what C's said in the Last session (extreme negative energies building on the planet) and usual beaming? I hope she has her own protection beyond the 3D well wishers.

I don't think he said that. The Zionists are going into absolute overdrive to discredit Candace, Tucker, Dave Smith, Ian Carroll and Max Blumenthal. I meant it's to the point of almost screeching. It would be completely hilarious if they got a resounding "yes" to their poll on X as to whether people trust Candace. Hilarious.

 

[seek10]

I don't think he said that. The Zionists are going into absolute overdrive to discredit Candace, Tucker, Dave Smith, Ian Carroll and Max Blumenthal. I meant it's to the point of almost screeching. It would be completely hilarious if they got a resounding "yes" to their poll on X as to whether people trust Candace. Hilarious.

Ya!. I looked at some other activity of Ian Carroll on X and his words are mis-interpreted by the pro-Zionist sources.