Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Perhaps depends on the gun... be good to know if any of those were shot by a sniper's rifle or hunting rifle.
But, from what I understand, we don't know what weapon was used unless we believe in that Schrödinger rifle wrapped in a towel of same nature with creatively engraved bullets? But I didn't follow all the details closely, so may be missing something.
 
..specified that what happened was that the bullet went in at an angle, coming *down* into his body, then ricocheted from within the body upwards, where they then found the bullet.
Then only part missing in that description is him saying that the bullet was then found in prestine conditions like the JFK bullet. So not only do we have a Superman Charlie or Teflon Charlie, we also have a magic bullet.

A bullet that comes from the front where it enters the neck, then for some reason makes a dive downwards into his body only to then make a sharp turn back upwards, where it is found just inside the skin. Human skin is of course extremely tough and can stop just about anything apart from thorns, mosquitos, sharp things and so on, but it stopped the bullet which at this stage would have been frayed :headbash:

But staying with the official story, then no exit wound and the bullet would have fragmented when hitting something 'magically hard' in the neck (perhaps Charlie's steel body) which made it go downwards and then again turn when it hit something down there to make it go upwards in the body again. The more I hear about Charlie's magic bullet, the more, the magic bullet which hit JFK and Connally, causing 7 wounds, sounds pretty ordinary. Here is a good youtube description of just what magic bullets can do. (from the movie 'JFK').

 
Well, this assassination tale is getting more convoluted by the minute! Funny that neither Andrew Kolvet or the surgeon said what caliber the bullet was, but gave the impression it was intact and not fragmented - was it? And now that revision of what the bullet did just adds to the emerging coverup vibe.

the quality of the videos online of this event get worse each day.
Couldn't help but notice similarity to UFO footage - always blurry/fuzzy and lacking in detail. And, we're still waiting for the clear camera footage of all the ones attached to campus buildings. Maybe it takes time to doctor what was recorded. Have to ensure the narrative is upheld.

"Man of Steel"
A strange coincidence? Didn't Candace say the people involved with finding the rifle were named Steele? Or was it sharing the vid with TMZ of Tyler walking by their property? And there's like a whole bunch of people with that name that work with pipes and fittings - I can't quite remember the key part that she said. It turns out that kind of engineering is very common for a lot of industrial uses including nuclear plants. Seems like there's something odd there, but maybe just pattern recognition run amok.

like the patsy not having been killed
Um - like the patsy not having been killed . . . yet. Wait and see I guess.
 
But, from what I understand, we don't know what weapon was used unless we believe in that Schrödinger rifle wrapped in a towel of same nature with creatively engraved bullets? But I didn't follow all the details closely, so may be missing something.
I don't think you are missing anything.

I think to reach some plausible conclusions people first need to agree on a few basic facts, and take that line of questioning to its conclusion.

Was he shot? Yes or no.

Was he shot at close range or from a distance? etc.

Based on the video, to my eyes, if he was shot, it looked like it was from a distance. But that creates a problem because something high calibre would have been needed, and in that case, that doesn't explain why there is no exit wound.

Okay, right, maybe he was shot from much closer and with something much weaker that resulted in the bullet not exiting the body. That leaves a conundrum though because a) the perp would have been seen by the crowd surely b) the angle of entry.

Are the PTB going to come out and tell us the truth? Would we believe anything they'd say anyways? The answer to the last question is no.

So the mysteries will kind of remain for now. The answer we should accept is that he was shot from a distance but for whatever reason there wasn't an exit wound despite the bullet hitting the neck directly. And we shouldn't ask any more questions beyond that. 🤐.
 
Saw this clip on X from some longer podcast, and just wanted to post it here because it includes the surveillance footage of Robinson running across the roof of the Losee building, but shows more of him doing so than the clip shared by the Feds last week.

[Ignore the first post, which is almost certainly a fixed object on the roof of the Woodbury building right of Kirk's position. It's the video clip in the reply by Red_StateRebel that I'm referring to]

From 01:28


So frustrating! Where's the whole sequence of him climbing up there, then taking up position, firing, and then standing up to begin his sprint?

Like I said though, the 'whodunnit' investigation is a game of cat-and-mouse between the Feds and the public.
 
Last edited:
This makes sense to me.

I'm really not trying to be graphic, and it pains me to even have to address this, but the narrative is becoming so delusional, we must call it out. If a .30-06 round (which carries 3000+ foot-pounds of energy) entered his neck and was STOPPED by his neck, his neck would have…— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) September 21, 2025
Me too. I have a vivid memory from high school days of shooting a friend's .30-06 rifle at a big board ( 2X10 - 6-8 feet long) floating in a lake. We were standing on a high bank above the lake so the downward angle was significant. I hit it near the middle and the board exploded with one end spinning many feet in the air before crashing back into the lake. The board was totally devastated near the inpact point. So I have to agree with Adams here.
 
Back
Top Bottom