But, from what I understand, we don't know what weapon was used unless we believe in that Schrödinger rifle wrapped in a towel of same nature with creatively engraved bullets? But I didn't follow all the details closely, so may be missing something.
Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
Then only part missing in that description is him saying that the bullet was then found in prestine conditions like the JFK bullet. So not only do we have a Superman Charlie or Teflon Charlie, we also have a magic bullet.
A bullet that comes from the front where it enters the neck, then for some reason makes a dive downwards into his body only to then make a sharp turn back upwards, where it is found just inside the skin. Human skin is of course extremely tough and can stop just about anything apart from thorns, mosquitos, sharp things and so on, but it stopped the bullet which at this stage would have been frayed
But staying with the official story, then no exit wound and the bullet would have fragmented when hitting something 'magically hard' in the neck (perhaps Charlie's steel body) which made it go downwards and then again turn when it hit something down there to make it go upwards in the body again. The more I hear about Charlie's magic bullet, the more, the magic bullet which hit JFK and Connally, causing 7 wounds, sounds pretty ordinary. Here is a good youtube description of just what magic bullets can do. (from the movie 'JFK').
Well, this assassination tale is getting more convoluted by the minute! Funny that neither Andrew Kolvet or the surgeon said what caliber the bullet was, but gave the impression it was intact and not fragmented - was it? And now that revision of what the bullet did just adds to the emerging coverup vibe.
Couldn't help but notice similarity to UFO footage - always blurry/fuzzy and lacking in detail. And, we're still waiting for the clear camera footage of all the ones attached to campus buildings. Maybe it takes time to doctor what was recorded. Have to ensure the narrative is upheld.
A strange coincidence? Didn't Candace say the people involved with finding the rifle were named Steele? Or was it sharing the vid with TMZ of Tyler walking by their property? And there's like a whole bunch of people with that name that work with pipes and fittings - I can't quite remember the key part that she said. It turns out that kind of engineering is very common for a lot of industrial uses including nuclear plants. Seems like there's something odd there, but maybe just pattern recognition run amok.
Um - like the patsy not having been killed . . . yet. Wait and see I guess.
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
I don't think you are missing anything.
I think to reach some plausible conclusions people first need to agree on a few basic facts, and take that line of questioning to its conclusion.
Was he shot? Yes or no.
Was he shot at close range or from a distance? etc.
Based on the video, to my eyes, if he was shot, it looked like it was from a distance. But that creates a problem because something high calibre would have been needed, and in that case, that doesn't explain why there is no exit wound.
Okay, right, maybe he was shot from much closer and with something much weaker that resulted in the bullet not exiting the body. That leaves a conundrum though because a) the perp would have been seen by the crowd surely b) the angle of entry.
Are the PTB going to come out and tell us the truth? Would we believe anything they'd say anyways? The answer to the last question is no.
So the mysteries will kind of remain for now. The answer we should accept is that he was shot from a distance but for whatever reason there wasn't an exit wound despite the bullet hitting the neck directly. And we shouldn't ask any more questions beyond that.
.
Saw this clip on X from some longer podcast, and just wanted to post it here because it includes the surveillance footage of Robinson running across the roof of the Losee building, but shows more of him doing so than the clip shared by the Feds last week.
[Ignore the first post, which is almost certainly a fixed object on the roof of the Woodbury building right of Kirk's position. It's the video clip in the reply by Red_StateRebel that I'm referring to]
From 01:28
So frustrating! Where's the whole sequence of him climbing up there, then taking up position, firing, and then standing up to begin his sprint?
Like I said though, the 'whodunnit' investigation is a game of cat-and-mouse between the Feds and the public.
[Ignore the first post, which is almost certainly a fixed object on the roof of the Woodbury building right of Kirk's position. It's the video clip in the reply by Red_StateRebel that I'm referring to]
From 01:28
So frustrating! Where's the whole sequence of him climbing up there, then taking up position, firing, and then standing up to begin his sprint?
Like I said though, the 'whodunnit' investigation is a game of cat-and-mouse between the Feds and the public.
Last edited:
Ricardo
The Living Force
As someone quipped on that X post , don't know the origin of the initial official picture of assassin's claimed gun ( TV ?) , but it sure ain't a WWI 's era relic :
WWI-era riffle? Bingo! With dum-dum bullets. No exit explained.
Me too. I have a vivid memory from high school days of shooting a friend's .30-06 rifle at a big board ( 2X10 - 6-8 feet long) floating in a lake. We were standing on a high bank above the lake so the downward angle was significant. I hit it near the middle and the board exploded with one end spinning many feet in the air before crashing back into the lake. The board was totally devastated near the inpact point. So I have to agree with Adams here.
What if the bullet went INTO his carotid artery and travelled down the artery into his heart. Had his heart not been so big it would have fired the bullet back at the assailant, killing him with a headshot. But alas his heart was just too big. He died AND had no cholesterol?
They are still used for hunting, but are called soft point or hollow point depending on the design. We just don't know the rifle type. Whether an actual WW1 rifle was used, it is possible. The 30.06 rifle is from 1906 and was also used in WW1.
From a distance the timing of the murder of Charlie Kirk happens to coincide with what Israel is doing in Gaza. A Russian media accepts the murder as presented, though the interpretation of the political steps that followed are not necessarily all wrong. If machine translated, there is:
Perhaps in line with what Niall and Luc raised, there has still been no official confirmation that the photo of the rifle making the rounds is genuine. It was acquired by media (NYP, I think), but not officially released by any law enforcement body. Maybe it was leaked, but it's curious that there hasn't been any official confirmation or denial, to my knowledge. If it was Robinson's grandfather's, I'd be surprised if there weren't family photos of the gun.
Here's Paramount Tactical guy's latest statement:
So, like with the rifle photo, another instance of a refusal to confirm or deny a very important detail - even from those closest to him!
True, yet all the speculation on the internet is based on the assumption that it was a 30.06 rifle. Again, the official sources doesn't deny or confirm so to let all different theories on the internet come out which is convenient in order to direct the narrative in the 'right' direction. Confusion is to their advantage as usual.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K
