Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
Hypothesis: Charlie Kirk was a "sacrificial lamb," similar to General Soleimani, that was offered to the Zionists by Trump.
en.wikipedia.org
Remember, after high-profile assassinations come big (program) changes!
Sacrificial lamb - Wikipedia
Remember, after high-profile assassinations come big (program) changes!
Someone at TPUSA is still leaking tidbits of info to Max Blumenthal. The latest is that the biggest donor to TPUSA is a top Zio-funding American Jew named Robert Shillman, and he supposedly cut off/revoked his funding of TPUSA just days before Kirk's assassination.
thegrayzone.com
A sidenote: in the article, Blumenthal says he asked Loomer on X if she knew anything about Shillman revoking his funding for Kirk's TPUSA. She said no, she didn't know about that, then said a few things about how wonderful 'Dr. Bob' Shillman is, and concluded with this:
Top pro-Israel TPUSA donor terminated support for Kirk in days before death, sources say - The Grayzone
Ultra-Zionist billionaire Robert Shillman was one of Charlie Kirk's most committed donors. But as Kirk fell under attack for his increasingly critical Israel views during his final weeks, sources say Shillman ended funding for TPUSA. As his campus tour approached, Kirk was subjected to an...
thegrayzone.com
A sidenote: in the article, Blumenthal says he asked Loomer on X if she knew anything about Shillman revoking his funding for Kirk's TPUSA. She said no, she didn't know about that, then said a few things about how wonderful 'Dr. Bob' Shillman is, and concluded with this:
Someone earlier on this thread was wondering whether a man like Charlie Kirk gets his fame and money because he is in some way 'groomed'. Well, wonder no longer! Not only is that the case, as far as the groomers are concerned, if any of their 'products' ever 'stray' or 'become defective', well, bad things can happen, let's say.
Last edited:
Having felt that things were a little off during the proceedings, I still think as this was a tribute, of sorts for Charlie, and not a funeral then the choice of colour for the immediate family members does not matter. At a Catholic funeral only the close family members wear black.
I'm currently watching this 1:04:12 vid of Max Blumenthal on Nima's show from two days ago - lots of insight from Max especially regarding Netanyahu/Israel's ties with TPUSA:
Ruth
The Living Force
Could he be one of a few guys? It's definitely suspicious behaviour, even if he didn't actually shoot Charlie. Another decoy perhaps? They had them in the crowds as well as on the rooftops?
A U.S. Army's HADES program flight (Bombardier Global 6500 aircraft, identified as N1098L) started its flight from Al Paso Texas on the way to Montana. It descended to 600 feet ( and slowed down to 115 nautical miles adjacent to Utah valley university) 3 hours before the shooting and climbed back to usual altitude and went to its destination - Montana. It is does the reverse maneuver from Montana and comes down over Utah to 150 ft and goes back up and returns to Al Paso Texas.
As per the author of this video John Cullen, this plane may be the origin of drones.
As per the author of this video John Cullen, this plane may be the origin of drones.
Ricardo
The Living Force
Origin and/or mobile command and control for drones agreed , seems likely fwiw.
Ruth
The Living Force
Actually, I think it was the guy next to the pot plant, at an elevated position to Charlie's right.
I'm wondering how much the FBI as well as all the other parties involved are relying on the scenario that the public is intimately familiar with: The attempted assassination of Trump at Butler, to spin their coverups and explanations?
My guess is they're not going to try this sort of thing again (unless they can set it up as an Arab doing it). Too many people have cell phones and they can't hide things any more. Not at a public event.
If they're going to assassinate someone high profile, they won't chose a public event, but something private, like poison as per Arafat. I wonder if Trump is aware of that? He probably might be.
Fantastic rant, hilarious and really smart at the same time. Breuer was great on covid, but this was on another level. His impersonations are soooo funny!
On the whole that is probably so, but there are variations.
On the topic of religion, I found this lecture by a self proclaimed Zimbabwean - British preacher and businessman Uebert Angel
the truth behind Charlie Kirk's death 
| Prophet Uebert Angel[If the reader has watched a few hours of African TV, movies, and reality shows, it is easier to appreciate the dramatic presentation.]
00:00-3:45
Truth or not, Uebert Angel is having his little online audience and is lambasting priests, in particular, but also some professed Christians and black people who have come out celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk. He does not understand how they can be so heartless knowing that the wife of children were present, or how they can stand watching the filmed murder over and over again.
He claims some of them say that Charlie Kirk was race bating, but he says that the accusers are the ones who are having the problem, not Charlie Kirk. If some church goers have such priests, they should leave that church. In his opinion, too many black people are being too pro-black, to the extent they are now going against Christ. People should go for God, not for their race.
03:45 -5:00
The idea with this murder is to stop people, and to oppose free speech, because word carry power. He makes comments on Charlie Kirk speaking in favour of homeschooling, saying that Jesus likes children and the devil tries to get to what Jesus likes the most (through the educational system). Charlie Kirk touched people around the world using Jesus. He was different from politicians, and he was talking more about Jesus than some of all these preachers that talk about nonsense and only do it to pay their bills at the end of the month.
05:00 -9:40
He enters into the more subtle aspects. His premise is that something is happening and the world is choosing not to listen to it, being caught up with non-entities and divisive speeches. Everytime someone dies of importance, God leaves some blueprints. That is number one. Number two, the devil leaves evidence without knowing. God also leaves something, as to say, "I knew about it, and I'm pointing to the killer and I'm pointing to this, and I am pointing to this." Then he goes into the territory of coincidences and suspicious dealings. He mentions that one of the sponsors Bill Ackman offered one million to find the guilty and after 33 hours of manhunt, not 34 or 30 or 31, but 33 (someone else may know if that is true), they found the person, and that the money will go to the killer's family since it was the father who told about the son.
9:40
Later he goes into more alleged coincidences with numbers, more and he talks about the Masons who he claims run the world.
Maybe someone else has already posted the numerology of the hats above 3x(4+7), but if you add the numbers there is a 33 coincidence. I think he tries too hard to squeeze a 47 out of the angle in Masonic symbol, I found it to be 60. Anyway he has a few more observations, and what he encourages people to do in general is to look beyond the obvious rather than jump to conclusions, believe in lies, or for that matter suspect that everyone who leaves a clue from our perspective is necessarily guilty, because the clues might have been left by God for those who know how to observe. What he thinks people ought to know is the need to rise up, because the devil (in his language) is trying to silence people. Here he is referring to Isaiah 53:7
In an odd kind of way, this brings it back to what the Cs were saying, that if people do not oppose such assassinations, the next steps follow. I don't think Uebert Angel expects people to rise of violently, but he probably hopes people will not remain silent like sheep, but open their mouths and speak up, also against those in their midst who have gotten this case very wrong.
Here is the latest episode from Candace. she was able to trace the person who did the video of the shooter in black on the top of the building and talked to him. What this guy was saying makes sense. In short it is not Tyler ( some foreign looking in complete black dress , professional using a short sized gun), gun is not AR-15, bullet is not 30-06 etc.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
Thread 'Nick Fuentes, from troll king to... leader of a true 'America First' movement?'- mugacoffee
Replies: 129
