Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

I too had that feeling given the hoop's Candace has to go through to trace the person ( call 'A') who took the video. I get the feeling of 'William Rookwood' from 'V for Vendetta' moment. Given that FBI's narration went south immediately, they have to spin it to different direction and if they chose to spin it different direction, that is the right opportunity. What if this 'A' is fake and by discrediting 'A', they can discredit the entire narration.

But rewatching candace's latest video made me wonder the person who made the video ('A') may be genuine.
  • Initially she reached out based on the video X posting and that went into Chicago numbers with no result
  • Then she worked with UVU student, who led him to Erin guy. Whatever the role Erin guy doing (during the event) seems to have to led to this 'A' guy.
I get a feeling that deep state is not that smart enough to trace and control every body in a short time, particularly with the people who don't have incentive to lie. It is good that Candace was also skeptical about it and she mentioned that they will continue to cross check what this person 'A' says. She mentioned that she will cross check metadata of the video as a reference. Can somebody change metadata by changing the clock of the machine? Probably, I don't know.
What I appreciate about Candace is that she increasingly networks with people and encourages this from her viewers. I think that puts her in good stead to stay on track.
 
As much as I don't want to buy into the possibility that Erika is a key part of this conspiracy to take out Charlie, one must not close one's eyes to the possibility of what might actually be true.
From the very first moment, this woman felt like the lead actress in a play. Her entire demeanor seems fake and orchestrated. The filmed scene at the open casket was utterly disturbing to me—completely unreal. The final detail was her devil's salute when Trump held her in his arms.
 
One detail that struck me as odd was that Erika was wearing white instead of black, which, as far as I know, is more typical in Christian tradition.
Could this have been intentional—perhaps a way of promoting forgiveness and acceptance? I did a bit of research and, using AI (Claude), found some interesting insights about the symbolism of white in relation to forgiveness and acceptance.
You're looking at it a bit too deep. Dress code was red, white and/or blue wearing Sunday's best. Many women there were wearing white, see below. Black is for funerals, this was a memorial.

G1kooFGXEAAQXMi.jpg
 
I just watched it. I said it once before here on the forum, in concern of Candace, that I think you need to be a shark to survive in a shark pool for that long time... Something here is very off, feels very off. I cannot exactly tell what it is yet, there simply is this odd feeling about it. Am I alone with it or does anybody else here have this slightly off feeling concerning her?
Not necessarily, they can’t kill everyone, I see that as an excessive breech of freewill, though the idea of many sharks is not ruled out either because there are loads of them.

There a tonnes of influencers and notable figures that should be dead if they were trying to silence everyone.

I’m more than sure that some people are simply untouchable according to their karmic profile and FRV, is Candace one of them? I don’t know, I don’t get a funny feeling about her as I do with others.
 
The final detail was her devil's salute when Trump held her in his arms.
I totally agree about the coffin side recording - too creepy and bizarre for any normal grieving spouse to do - but, unless it is proven she's actually a satanist operative, then the hand gesture was very likely "I love you" - and surely she does and did even if she's really part of the plot. Didn't Yoko really love John? We're trying to envision a world so opposite of what we think is normal and apply normal logic and reason - it doesn't compute.

I’m more than sure that some people are simply untouchable according to their karmic profile and FRV, is Candace one of them? I don’t know, I don’t get a funny feeling about her as I do with others.
Something else has entered the picture - is her husband one of "them" . . . i.e. Candace's handler? But Candace's karmic profile and FRV is too resistant to be corrupted? This whole thing is getting more and more conspiracy screwball. :nuts:

Can confirm. I saw almost nothing in my timeline but Jews I've never seen or heard of either bashing Tucker or saying something positive about Israel.
Tucker responds in this 14:15 exchange with Glenn Greenwald:


Definitely worth a listen and he explains his view that Trump/America should not be controlled by Israel which is exactly what Netanyahu has said repeatedly - a total fact.

EDIT: About that no line of sight of the supposed real shooter in tactical gear - what about possible "smart" bullet. Wasn't that already posted on this thread, and actually, makes it a real "magic" bullet like no other?
 
Last edited:
Regarding FBI Director Kash Patel's long X post on the Kirk investigation, and specifically where he addresses the private jet that took off from an airport down the road from Utah Valley University, the owner of that jet gave a different reason than Patel for why its transponder 'went off':


An MSM article that quotes the above (right) Instagram post by Derek Maxfield, in which he implies that the transponder was turned off.

The CEO went on to explain the plane departed Provo with two pilots and zero passengers. Upon arrival in Page, Maxfield and seven additional passengers boarded the jet for the return trip to Utah — where his company is located.

Radar services with air traffic control were terminated in mutual agreement between Denver FAA center and N888KG approximately 10 miles from landing at PGA, which is consistent with generally accepted standard practice when flying in and out of non-towered airports like PGA,” he wrote.
 
And can't that be said about the Epstein situation - he didn't kill himself and release the files! This latest distraction is helping to push it out of the public eye, and how likely that another even more sensational distraction is in the works to push the Kirk assassination out as well?!
Annd . . . already theorized!

[11:42]

A must watch IMO.

:evil:
 
Anyway, the guy Owens got testimony from is the guy who filmed this footage of someone on the roof [right video]:


...and he said it's him, it's the shooter, but that he was "wearing black tactical gear."
The first media reports, by the way, were of a "suspect in black tactical gear," because that's what police radio dispatchers were telling officers on the scene to look out for:

"He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans," a female dispatcher said over the radio, according to recordings.
 
Today there was another shooting which I find a little puzzling. This shooter apparently scribbles on his bullets too. It feeds into the current climate of wanting to frame the left and Tyler Robinson as the killer of CK. It also talks about accelerationists, a term I hadn't heard about 2 weeks ago, yet now it is supposedly a common thing. To me it is just a little suspicious.


And a tweet from the FBI chief with a picture of the alleged bullets:

Edit: I am posting it here as I think this latest shooting is linked to the murder of CK. Whether it was a brainwashed manchurian candidate or somebody otherwise triggered is hard to say, but it feeds into the current hysteria/anger and the push for revenge against the left and making laws to control the population even more. Dangerous times.
 
And a tweet from the FBI chief with a picture of the alleged bullets:
I guess the report I saw on this led me to believe the immigrants were the target, not the ICE officers. And gee, what a coincidence to have more bullets with a written message! Like already voiced, "you can't make this stuff up!" Which goes back to the blatant spew that "they" are the reality creators and while we attempt to figure out the current scenario, "they" orchestrate the next one! Can anyone doubt that!
 
Even if the FBI is in the clear, would they not realise that the Mauser couldn't be the gun used?
Surely it's very unlikely that the FBI is 'in the clear' about anything? More likely that they're up to the necks in any country wide conspiracy that needs a hit team or a cover-up. Or.... some of their members are. Just like law inforcement and the CIA. At best you could say it's incompetence, or a "failure of intelligence" (which has a double meaning and can mean lacking cognitive ability).
 
I am posting it here as I think this latest shooting is linked to the murder of CK.
Speaking of shooting links:

On July 13, 2024 Matthew Crooks, a 20 year old man with a history of academic excellence and almost zero social media presence, woke up, drove 1.5 hours from his home, climbed onto the roof of a building just across from where President Trump was speaking and came within 1cm of shooting the prez directly in the head. Crooks was khilled by law enforcement moments later and his body was cremated within days. His family has never spoken to any news outlets and his entire existence was memory holed by the media with the lone exception of Ken Silva of Headline USA.

On December 18, 2024, John Lyons, a 24 year old man from Mahomet, Illinois, who also had zero social media presence, murdered his former roommate, along with his roommate’s mother and sister, and then drove 2.5 hours north to the home of Nick Fuentes with a crossbow and at least one gun where he attempted to gain entry to Nick’s house. When he was unsuccessful, Lyons eventually fled to a neighbor’s backyard where he killed their dogs and broke into their basement before dying in a shootout with police. This event was totally ignored by the mainstream media and memory holed by the social media platforms with 24 hours. *Everything* about John Lyons’ existence has been scrubbed from the internet. Even his family home address has been removed from Google Earth imagery. Lyons’ family has also never spoken to the media.

Then on September 10, 2025 Tyler Robinson, another academically gifted 20-something guy, with zero social media presence, drove 4 hours from his home in Washington, Utah to Orem, Utah where he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk with his grandpa’s WWI era rifle and then evaded police for 36 hours until his family convinced him to turn himself in.

And again, Robinson had no known social media accounts and yet he was driven to homicidal action by a guy whose messaging was wholly dependent on viral social media clips.

So in less than 14 months the 3 most prominent men in the America First movement were all targeted for assntion by 3 anons who belonged to their target audience demographic. Doesn’t that strike you as more than just purely coincidental?

Link to the tweet
 
Back
Top Bottom