Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Joe]

There are only two reasonable explanations I can see for shirt reacting like that. Both have to occur inside the shirt.
1) compressed gas/air (could be a shockwave, explosion, release of compressed gas etc)
2) shrapnel - but very specific as to not tear the shirt? Or perhaps the shrapnel was microscopic and the shirt was damaged.

So we're looking at at a battery pack inside the shirt being turned into a type of air gun that fired a bullet? If so, then the wound we see is an entry wound, and the "bullet" stayed inside him, in keeping with a low velocity, which would work given the proximity.

 

[thorbiorn]

Pretty sure it's a coincidence that these two guys decided to check/adjust their sleeves within a couple seconds of each other.

Could such sudden movements in part be in response to the energies surrounding these people, perhaps parallel to:

• Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, 9 December 2023 in the Daily Mail: Leading biologist explains why you can so often sense when someone is looking at you even if your back is turned
• Psychologist Valeria Sabater, 15 November 2021 in Exploring Your Mind: Why Can You Sense When People Are Looking at You? This one is more materialist, but even advocates of this ideology have tried to come up with an explanation.

 

[Jones]

What if the earpiece itself carried a charge and projectile? That could make the entry wound in the ear canal and could maybe explain how Charlie's shirt responds when the earpiece recoils. Perhaps there was also compressed air from the battery pack sent through the clear tube to the earpiece or something.

 

[Cosmos]

What if the earpiece itself carried a charge and projectile? That could make the entry wound in the ear canal and could maybe explain how Charlie's shirt responds when the earpiece recoils. Perhaps there was also compressed air from the battery pack sent through the clear tube to the earpiece or something.

According to Candace it is pretty much a fact that Kirk didn‘t have a ear piece. It was posted previously somewhere here. I tend to think that that is probably the case when Candace is so sure about it based on her research.

 

[Jones]

According to Candace it is pretty much a fact that Kirk didn‘t have a ear piece. It was posted previously somewhere here. I tend to think that that is probably the case when Candace is so sure about it based on her research.

Check out the video that Brewer shared earlier. I'm not yet totally convinced that Charlie wasn't wearing an earpiece based on that.

 

[Cosmos]

A couple of recent news followed by some speculations from my side.

Recent news:

- Netanyahu is apparently currently on his way to America. Will be interesting to see how the administration will handle that visit.

- It was announced that americas minister of war has scheduled some kind of “urgent“ in person meeting of “all“ (and/or key) American generals worldwide in America. Apparently that will take place in the next couple of days.

- Harrison shared this news:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1971403591765098864

JUST IN - FBI discloses to U.S. Congress it embedded 275 "plainclothes agents" in Jan. 6 crowds, more than four and a half years ago — Blaze

Speculations:

Could it be that many if not most key politicians not only in America but pretty much globally are not only blackmailed by death threats and disclosure of what they have done (probably not seldomly involving children) but also quite literally by the Samson option?

Could it be that “Israel“ (and/or rather the global deepstate?) has in some way some form of nuclear devices (dirty bombs or even nukes) either embedded in various countries (probably in the capitals) or are in control over them?

Besides Israel itself using their own they might be threatening to not only use those but literally start/unleash the apocalypse and/or WW3 by making it explode in a way that major powers have no other way than to blame it on other major powers and/or use their arsenals against them? Could that also explain (besides blackmail) why nobody dares to openly expose or seriously go against “the deepstate“?

 

[Niall]

Some new footage of Robinson, supposedly, walking towards the UVU campus. Seems like sound analysis to me too. We see him not limping at first, then (maybe) taking out a phone, then stopping, then (maybe) taking out his phone a second time when he's come to a stop. Then a big car pulls in towards him, almost stops, pulls back out into the road and drives on. Robinson then continues on his way. Once he turns into the street that takes him to the campus, as we've seen in the original doorcam footage of him walking, only at that point is he seen limping.

So, the limp was likely an 'act', the Feds know he used a phone just before the shooting, and they also have a lead for co-conspirators by tracking down this vehicle.

Another analysis from that same YT channel, this time concerning a glaring inconsistency when comparing the official timeline with Robinson's text exchange with Twiggs. The entire exchange has now formally been entered into the prosecution's case against Robinson as all having occurred on the 10th, but his parents' suspicions, which Robinson alludes to in his exchange, can't have been raised until the 11th, when the Feds released the photo of the rifle they 'found in the woods', following which the Parents presumably recognized it and began contacting Tyler to ask him "where Grandpa's rifle at?":

Besides the impossibility of the latter texts also being from the 10th, which we can overlook as an administrative error that both the authorities and the media have simply yet to correct, the text exchange also begs the question as to Robinson's whereabouts on the night of the 10th. He isn't with Twiggs because he's updating him at-a-distance via phone text, and he isn't with his parents because he's telling Twiggs that he's not answering their calls.

In an earlier episode, Candace Owens discussed the exact location where the rifle was 'found in the woods'. She says (and maybe a media report or two confirms this?) that it was actually found in the yard of a property that's been vacant for many months, which is apparently unusual for this street/suburb. I suspect Robinson simply ran across the road after dropping off the roof of the Losee Building and went into this property (683 W 925 S St, or perhaps the one left of it - I don't recall which one Owens was told has been vacant), and perhaps even spent the night of the 10th there:



Put together, here are Robinson's routes (A = arrival, D = departure) to and from the UVU campus. Not a big area as you can see. Robinson was probably 'right under their noses' for that entire first '33' hours when they 'had no clue who the suspect was, nor where he was':

 

[Cosmos]

I think he could be onto something there. Subtile but very powerful manipulation/editing perhaps? I‘m saying that because when I initially watched that hearing with Tyler R. I paid extra attention to every reaction Tyler might have and I guess most people did the same. And I also think that those slight nod’s and WHEN they occurred were very important in how it shaped my thinking from then on. After a while of me watching him sit there and observing closely I was definitely observing myself starting to question my skepticisms about the official story line!

Now, imagine if that footage can have such an affect on me/us here how much more powerful that effect will be with ordinary people who haven’t even followed what happened in great detail! I think it is very likely that many will come away from watching footage like that believing the official narrative and thinking “nothing else to see here“.

Another thing that would obviously make it easier to manipulate the public/perceptions of what is going on (if someone wants to do so) is to present Tylers Robinson‘s first appearance im public/court after the assassination via him sitting somewhere else while being filmed. Which is what they did. There are many obvious ways in which you can (even just slightly) manipulate such a recording/perceptions. For example: We don’t know what Tyler was hearing at any given moment during that recording and how much of it exactly aligned with what the judge said and at what point. All of that would have been far less easy to manipulate if Tyler would have appeared in court in person and we can be sure that that appearance was recorded live.