Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

There are only two reasonable explanations I can see for shirt reacting like that. Both have to occur inside the shirt.
1) compressed gas/air (could be a shockwave, explosion, release of compressed gas etc)
2) shrapnel - but very specific as to not tear the shirt? Or perhaps the shrapnel was microscopic and the shirt was damaged.

So we're looking at at a battery pack inside the shirt being turned into a type of air gun that fired a bullet? If so, then the wound we see is an entry wound, and the "bullet" stayed inside him, in keeping with a low velocity, which would work given the proximity.
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure it's a coincidence that these two guys decided to check/adjust their sleeves within a couple seconds of each other.
Could such sudden movements in part be in response to the energies surrounding these people, perhaps parallel to:
 
What if the earpiece itself carried a charge and projectile? That could make the entry wound in the ear canal and could maybe explain how Charlie's shirt responds when the earpiece recoils. Perhaps there was also compressed air from the battery pack sent through the clear tube to the earpiece or something.
 
What if the earpiece itself carried a charge and projectile? That could make the entry wound in the ear canal and could maybe explain how Charlie's shirt responds when the earpiece recoils. Perhaps there was also compressed air from the battery pack sent through the clear tube to the earpiece or something.

According to Candace it is pretty much a fact that Kirk didn‘t have a ear piece. It was posted previously somewhere here. I tend to think that that is probably the case when Candace is so sure about it based on her research.
 
According to Candace it is pretty much a fact that Kirk didn‘t have a ear piece. It was posted previously somewhere here. I tend to think that that is probably the case when Candace is so sure about it based on her research.

Check out the video that Brewer shared earlier. I'm not yet totally convinced that Charlie wasn't wearing an earpiece based on that.
 
A couple of recent news followed by some speculations from my side.

Recent news:

- Netanyahu is apparently currently on his way to America. Will be interesting to see how the administration will handle that visit.

- It was announced that americas minister of war has scheduled some kind of “urgent“ in person meeting of “all“ (and/or key) American generals worldwide in America. Apparently that will take place in the next couple of days.

- Harrison shared this news:

JUST IN - FBI discloses to U.S. Congress it embedded 275 "plainclothes agents" in Jan. 6 crowds, more than four and a half years ago — Blaze

Speculations:

Could it be that many if not most key politicians not only in America but pretty much globally are not only blackmailed by death threats and disclosure of what they have done (probably not seldomly involving children) but also quite literally by the Samson option?

Could it be that “Israel“ (and/or rather the global deepstate?) has in some way some form of nuclear devices (dirty bombs or even nukes) either embedded in various countries (probably in the capitals) or are in control over them?

Besides Israel itself using their own they might be threatening to not only use those but literally start/unleash the apocalypse and/or WW3 by making it explode in a way that major powers have no other way than to blame it on other major powers and/or use their arsenals against them? Could that also explain (besides blackmail) why nobody dares to openly expose or seriously go against “the deepstate“?
 
Some new footage of Robinson, supposedly, walking towards the UVU campus. Seems like sound analysis to me too. We see him not limping at first, then (maybe) taking out a phone, then stopping, then (maybe) taking out his phone a second time when he's come to a stop. Then a big car pulls in towards him, almost stops, pulls back out into the road and drives on. Robinson then continues on his way. Once he turns into the street that takes him to the campus, as we've seen in the original doorcam footage of him walking, only at that point is he seen limping.


So, the limp was likely an 'act', the Feds know he used a phone just before the shooting, and they also have a lead for co-conspirators by tracking down this vehicle.
Another analysis from that same YT channel, this time concerning a glaring inconsistency when comparing the official timeline with Robinson's text exchange with Twiggs. The entire exchange has now formally been entered into the prosecution's case against Robinson as all having occurred on the 10th, but his parents' suspicions, which Robinson alludes to in his exchange, can't have been raised until the 11th, when the Feds released the photo of the rifle they 'found in the woods', following which the Parents presumably recognized it and began contacting Tyler to ask him "where Grandpa's rifle at?":


Besides the impossibility of the latter texts also being from the 10th, which we can overlook as an administrative error that both the authorities and the media have simply yet to correct, the text exchange also begs the question as to Robinson's whereabouts on the night of the 10th. He isn't with Twiggs because he's updating him at-a-distance via phone text, and he isn't with his parents because he's telling Twiggs that he's not answering their calls.

In a show she did one week ago, Candace Owens discussed the exact location where the rifle was 'found in the woods'. She says that it was actually found in the yard of a property (which just happens to have many trees in it), and that it's well-known to locals that the property right next to it (address: 691 W 925 S St, Orem) has been vacant for many months and is owned by Utah Valley University. She discusses it here, at 28 mins:


I couldn't verify that this adjacent, vacant, property is university-owned, but on G-maps it's currently listed as the "Tibault Autogenic Training & Meditation Online Campus." I searched for it on property listings and, while I can't tell whether it's listed 'for sale', it is nonetheless listed value-wise:

vacant property_Orem_UVU.jpg

I'm not sure what "autogenic meditation" is, but I found this 15-year-old introductory video to said center's meditation training course. Nothing else on "Richard Tibault" so far...

Put together, here are Robinson's routes (A = arrival, D = departure) to and from the UVU campus. Circled is the backyard of the property where the gun was 'found'. Marked off in purple is the 'vacant property' that is apparently owned by Utah Valley University. Not a big area as you can see.

Map_Orem_Robinson.jpg

Whether or not he had a rifle in his hand, and whether or not he placed it among those trees, I wonder if Robinson could have been 'right under their noses' for that entire first '33' hours when they 'had no clue who the suspect was, nor where he was', spending the night of the 10th at that vacant property?
 

Attachments

  • location_Robinson_rifle.jpg
    location_Robinson_rifle.jpg
    265.5 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
I think he could be onto something there. Subtile but very powerful manipulation/editing perhaps? I‘m saying that because when I initially watched that hearing with Tyler R. I paid extra attention to every reaction Tyler might have and I guess most people did the same. And I also think that those slight nod’s and WHEN they occurred were very important in how it shaped my thinking from then on. After a while of me watching him sit there and observing closely I was definitely observing myself starting to question my skepticisms about the official story line!

Now, imagine if that footage can have such an affect on me/us here how much more powerful that effect will be with ordinary people who haven’t even followed what happened in great detail! I think it is very likely that many will come away from watching footage like that believing the official narrative and thinking “nothing else to see here“.

Another thing that would obviously make it easier to manipulate the public/perceptions of what is going on (if someone wants to do so) is to present Tylers Robinson‘s first appearance in public/court after the assassination via him sitting somewhere else while being filmed. Which is what they did. There are many obvious ways in which you can (even just slightly) manipulate such a recording/perceptions. For example: We don’t know what Tyler was hearing at any given moment during that recording and how much of it exactly aligned with what the judge said and at what point. All of that would have been far less easy to manipulate if Tyler would have appeared in court in person and we can be sure that that appearance was recorded live.
 
Last edited:
Just a note to say that, at the outset of her show from 23 Sept - the one in which she shares her exchange with the guy who filmed someone "wearing all-black tactical gear, including face-mask and helmet" in a prone position on the roof of the Losee Building moments before the assassination - Owens says "I know for a fact that Kirk wasn't wearing an ear-piece and a bullet-proof vest":

Another 'echo' of someone being "dressed all in black, including a mask" is from this kid neighbor of Robinson and Twiggs, who told reporters - immediately after Robinson was named as the suspect on Sept 13th - that he saw them outside their property in St. George, Utah, holding hands, kissing, and that Robinson was "dressed all in black, and wearing a mask" about two weeks before the event.


Update on Twiggs, by the way: he's 'fled' the house he and Robinson were living in (and which was apparently owned by Twiggs's parents).
 
Last edited:
So we're looking at at a battery pack inside the shirt being turned into a type of air gun that fired a bullet? If so, then the wound we see is an entry wound, and the "bullet" stayed inside him, in keeping with a low velocity, which would work given the proximity.

I think that is a possibility. For example I‘m pretty sure that you can achieve A LOT of velocity of any type of projectile not only with ordinary bullets but with high pressured air. If I remember correctly, the achieved velocity can even be much higher than a big/strong caliber if you want to.

Just regular airgun Zylinders can have anywhere between 200 and 300 bars of pressure in them. And I guess depending on how you release the pressure you can have quite many bars pushing the projectile doing a lot of damage without needing any kind of conventional gun/explosive/fire mechanism (aka. bullet).

I would guess that it would be pretty easy for agencies to have very small Zylinders holding a high or very high pressure catapulting a projectile even over a very short guiding “rod“ (barrel). I‘m also speculating that you wouldn’t even need much of a barrel or even projectile to cause a lot of damage close by, with air pressure.
 
So we're looking at at a battery pack inside the shirt being turned into a type of air gun that fired a bullet? If so, then the wound we see is an entry wound, and the "bullet" stayed inside him, in keeping with a low velocity, which would work given the proximity.

Alternatively, there could be an entry wound hidden by the inflated teeshirt, and the visible wound is exit.
 
If it was some kind of signal I think it would happen in the order it did. I would expect the guy in the tent (not visible to someone outside in an elevated position) to signal first to the guy in the crowd, who relays it to a person outside, who activates a detonation signal.

A shooter watching Charlie doesn't need a signal to shoot or know when a good shot is available because their eyes would be on Charlie. Even if a signal was needed using a visual signal adds an unnecessary step. The more reasonable signal to use would be an auditory one since that would allow the sniper to stay on target the whole time rather than having to wait for the signal to then put Charlie in their sights, set up the shot, and take it.

I think an explosive of some kind is unlikely to have been the cause of Charlie's death, but a signal for that is also an unnecessary step as whoever was holding the detonator could place themselves to have the perfect view where any signaling would be unnecessary.

But let's say for whatever reason they needed signals and those signals had to be visual.

The guy on the stage would be visible to everyone who saw Charlie as Charlie's head is on the same level as the neck of stage guy so there's no need for crowd guy.

Also, crowd guy is facing Charlie and his movements are obscured to the vast number of people in the area. The only place where you could see crowd guy but not stage guy is behind/above Charlie and to his left. But that means you don't see Charlie either and would require sending yet another signal. This is why I said it would make more sense for it to be crowd guy signalling stage guy to send the signal.

Since we can reasonably assume that visual signals weren't necessary and therefore probably weren't used, the only thing that makes sense is two guys on a hot day decided to adjust their shirts at around the same time.
 
Last edited:
By the way, yesterday the guy on the Charlie Kirk show on YouTube made and announcements that today Erika Kirk will be on the show “answering the questions from the audience“ or something like that. The guy who announced that is the guy that told us about what the “medical guy“ (?) saw on Kirks body after the assassination and that what the bullet was doing was a miracle or something. Let’s see what she has to say.
 
So we're looking at at a battery pack inside the shirt being turned into a type of air gun that fired a bullet? If so, then the wound we see is an entry wound, and the "bullet" stayed inside him, in keeping with a low velocity, which would work given the proximity.

I posted an analysis earlier by a guy who did some sort of autistic analysis (by his own account) to trace the force, and it pointed him to the mic module. However, he believes that the explosion turned the mag-clipped mic itself into a projectile, which doesn't make any sense; but I thought the idea that something might have been hidden in the battery pack maybe shouldn't be discarded out of hand:

 
Back
Top Bottom