Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Candace now saying she has received information that Robinson is innocent, the story of his father turning him in is a lie, and that he's not suicidal. That he has never been on UVU campus (but was "around" the campus that day) and is maintaining his innocence.
But... she can't reveal the source. Talk about a monkey wrench! (See the text accompanying her speaking.)

 
After reading Laurent's take, and comparing that to all the very odd behaviors and observations that we've already noted in this thread, I'm starting to have a real seed of doubt.

As for Laurent (have read his book on JFK et cetera), awhile ago he came out against Candace in hit piece on her book (which i've a copy) and her theories. What he said made little sense, much twisting, and here we have a real voodoo take on Kirk by Laurent that makes little sense, so what is going on with Laurent?

To me, there are 101 unanswered questions as it is - it will take time, if ever to know, and yet Laurent looks to be muddying the waters with wax effigies in a grand conspires that are just too grand (IMO).

That said, there are shenanigans' aplenty, as can be seen.
 
Back
Top Bottom