Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[JEEP]

It could just be that her 'Romania Angels' role for orphans was largely ceremonial, and that she had no idea the US colonel stationed there was a degenerate.

We keep wanting to give Erika the benefit of the doubt, which as basically good people we tend to do and sadly, that facet of our being has been weaponized for use against us. As the Cs responded, "A bit shady. Notice her current behavior", what exactly are we to make of that? Is she merely a useful idiot that was groomed by her "shady" family to be the honeypot to snare Charlie? Is she a full-fledged psychopath that knowingly set up a charity that sent innocent orphans into the child trafficking pipeline?

We know that very attractive persons are instantly given a highly favorable reception in people's minds, a psychological fact. Does her outward beauty cunningly hide a devious and evil persona inside? We'll have to go with "By their fruits ye shall know them." IOW, wait and see how she proceeds from this point on, keeping in mind she's surrounded by the wolves who plotted to take out Charlie. My take anyway.

 

[il y a des cactus]

Here is an afterlife interview with Charlie Kirk: part 1

and part 2:

. I was hoping for more answers about the shooting, but Charlie was not forthcoming with much detail. The main message was one of hope, unity, love of God and family, etc. He had soul contracts with his family and this was a chosen exit point. I'd love to see a similar interview with a different channeler as I'm not sure about this one. And maybe a different interviewer. This was a bit of a softball.

 

[The Mechanic]

Is that spot marked in yellow exactly where Kirk lay? How soon afterwards was this still/footage taken? Have objects (and the tent itself) since been moved around or altered? They're making a 'strange lack of blood' assessment based on very limited data and faulty assumptions.

I agree. I havent seen any footage of first aid being delivered tbh.

 

[JEEP]

"A bit shady. Notice her current behavior", what exactly are we to make of that?

I started watching this vid in which Erika's public speech response is being critiqued - unfavorably. I watched most of it, but it really got to be too much to stomach, both Erika's part and the analysis. I skipped watching those post death speeches, so it's the first time I'm hearing/viewing her behavior in what amounts to a eulogy - and it is um, abnormal at best, deliberate acting at worst. I already previously noted that her up-close vid at Charlie's casket was beyond the pale, so the starting point regarding her actions was already set at weird.

Concerning this vid critiquing her speech, I don't believe Erika was on scene to witness Charlie's death - on campus, but not in that collected audience. Whether she witnessed it from afar or ever saw the video of his being killed, I don't know. Nonetheless, as has been remarked by others, what comes across is very performative behavior, overly dramatic - particularly the whispering - for maximum effect and I think that's hard to dismiss. Is she some kind of programmed she-bot who's still playing her part in this horrific, shock and awe psych attack on everyone's sensibilities for the very nefarious objective it was meant to achieve? The beautiful blonde, sweet and loving wife and mother image purposely cultivated to deceive the gullible true believers? It should be noted that she did finally say evildoers, plural, so not the official lone perp narrative being fomented.

I'm afraid my benefit of the doubt is leaning more and more to devious she-bot. However, I did hear a clip of Tucker Carlson's impression of Erika when he first met her and how blown away he was by her. She is no ordinary woman according to Tucker (or maybe just a first encounter with a Stepford wife), and so that needs to be added in to the analysis of this person we're trying to figure out. I think it's safe to say she's one of a kind, and if we're lucky, one way or another, she'll come out on the side of good and may even prove integral to revealing the true evil that took place in what can only be described as a mindf*ck psyop.

Which lioness will come out on top - Erika or Candace? Wait and see.

 

[gottathink]

Here’s a reasonable take at this point:

The Girlboss Paradox​

That’s where things get fascinating. The conservative movement she now leads often promotes a vision of womanhood rooted in submission, family, and “biblical femininity.” Yet Erika is the opposite of a silent partner. She’s a beauty queen–turned–executive, a faith-based influencer, a mother who also happens to run a multimillion-dollar political organization.

The contradiction feels ripped from The Handmaid’s Tale. If Charlie was the commander, Erika was never Offred — she was Serena Joy: articulate, stylish, powerful, shaping narratives while speaking the language of tradition. Her rise exposes the paradox within modern conservative politics: railing against feminism while simultaneously celebrating women who embody its gains — ambition, leadership, visibility.

Why This Story Sticks​

Part of why Erika Kirk’s backstory fascinates is timing. She just inherited one of the most high-profile conservative platforms in the U.S., while still in the eye of a global grieving process. Part of it is narrative: her life arc — beauty queen, influencer, widow, CEO — is tailor-made for headlines. And part of it is the way the internet works in 2025: every past connection, rumor, and contradiction gets pulled up, memed, and dissected.

So what’s real? Erika Kirk did model, did direct casting, did found multiple ventures, did build an influencer brand, and did meet Charlie through a “job interview turned date.” She has not been charged with anything in Romania, and the trafficking claims remain unproven internet chatter.

But whether true, false, or exaggerated, these stories stick because Erika herself is a living paradox: the conservative widow who also happens to be a girlboss CEO, the faith-driven homemaker who runs a political empire, the figure who looks just as at home in a boardroom as in a Bible study.

In the end, Erika Kirk’s past may not be the Netflix scandal some corners of the internet want it to be. But her present — equal parts influencer, entrepreneur, and political leader — is already stranger, and more compelling, than fiction.

 

[Niall]

I don't think that's Kirk's arm coming up, more likely someone closer down to Kirk? If so, that would explain why these three security guys we see 'don't have any blood on them' - they're not among those closest to Kirk.

Or, it is Kirk's arm, but some troll has intentionally manipulated the video to make it seem like Kirk is raising it himself.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1975233862558167161

 

[Niall]

The Kirk memorial from another perspective:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969955536201236572

Remember the above video/rant from a woman who said the 'occult/astrological' aspects to Kirk's memorial would see all attendees there 'farmed' for 'higher/dark forces'?

She meant it, I presume, more or less in the way we understand it - 'loosh' to 4DSTS - but their data was also literally farmed for Israel:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1975173945180520936