Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this comment. Hope for what?

OK - so this sentiment is unknown in Croatia.
"Hope springs eternal" is an idiom that means people will always remain optimistic and believe in a better future, even when faced with adversity. The phrase is a shortened version of the line "Hope springs eternal in the human breast" from the 1732 poem An Essay on Man by Alexander Pope. The saying is often used to describe the human tendency to continue hoping for success, no matter how unlikely it may seem.

And, I'm with you in that the ultimate goal is the Gaza Riveria and not liking at all Trump's son-in-law's role in it. However, at least for now -

gaza_peace_deal_Oct_2025.jpg

Third time's a charm? 10 October 2025: Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians seen returning to northern Gaza, again, following the announcement of another Israel-Hamas 'peace deal'.

- for as long as it does last. Likely a temporary reprieve. Nonetheless, Netanyahu and Israel is losing big time in the court of public opinion which may have been a factor to back off for now. Kirk's assassination didn't help their optics either as the court of public opinion has rendered a guilty verdict. When and how will the empire Zionists strike back . . . and we all know they will. (The Samson option always the wild card.)
 
OK - so this sentiment is unknown in Croatia.


And, I'm with you in that the ultimate goal is the Gaza Riveria and not liking at all Trump's son-in-laws role in it. However, at least for now -

gaza_peace_deal_Oct_2025.jpg

Third time's a charm? 10 October 2025: Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians seen returning to northern Gaza, again, following the announcement of another Israel-Hamas 'peace deal'.

- for as long as it does last. Likely a temporary reprieve. Nonetheless, Netanyahu and Israel is losing big time in the court of public opinion which may have been a factor to back off for now. Kirk's assassination didn't help their optics either as the court of public opinion has rendered a guilty verdict. When and how will the empire Zionists strike back . . . and we all know they will. (The Samson option always the wild card.)
The Croatian saying goes: Nada umire zadnja, or Hope dies last, but I'm confused as to how we got to talking about hope and what's happening in Gaza from a simple question about basic physics.
 
One can certainly hope that there´s sustained peace regarding Gaza but doesn´t seem likely , not if the 4th d STS plans are to wipe out "Palestinians" , plus however long the weapons are silent the greater the chance that the horror that´s been unleashed on Gaza will be even more exposed , not that it´s hasn´t but eh , likely for it to resume shortly i think.
Crease fire? As if (bit of cross posting)

 
That doesn't explain it, IMO. F=m•a
Did you familiarise yourself with the forces and physics involved in shaped charges?
Did you at least watch all the videos I shared? Including the home made device?

You’ll notice the home made device is barely contained in a cardboard tube that it obliterates. Yet the shaped charge itself (very light copper foil) punches a hole into the lock.

We’re dealing with the physics of very very very light projectiles here. Maybe 1/4 or 1/2 a gram.

Now replace that tube of the home made device with a metal tube strong enough to contain/direct a tiny high powered explosive device.

Remove the shaped charge and you get a super tiny super sonic shockwave.
Add the shaped charge of a few pieces of copper foil, and you get a lethal device.
All the device needs is enough resistance (smaller exit) behind the explosive to balance the 1/4 gram (or much less) of copper foil it’s expelling.

It’s not like firing a bullet.
 
Also Ck´s upper t-shirt around upper chest and back simultaneously rapidly expands and goes back , which does point to a fast gas movement being discharged around the area potentially indicating of a way to direct any reaction on the explosive device being very quickly ie microseconds directed around rather than backwards by shaped charge explosion (?) i think.
 
I'm confused as to how we got to talking about hope and what's happening in Gaza from a simple question about basic physics.

Let's review:

If someone can provide an explanation for why the mic moved towards Charlie's neck instead of away from it, I'll entertain the possibility.
Mossad's at the very top of the 3D/4D pyramid and in direct contact with 4D entities. Maybe a little technical input from the real masters overseeing it all.
So what's the explanation for the mic moving in the direction of the shot and not opposite?
4D physics.

BTW - I was only half kidding. As I pointed out, they practiced on dummies until they perfected the mic that would deliver the kill shot while also obscuring it was the actual weapon. And as I already stated in a previous post, "just because it's never been seen before or have the same tell-tale signature of those other exploding devices, doesn't mean the top assassination techs in the world couldn't have devised such a device and have it work precisely as it did."

Continuing:


Why use a physical projectile then? They could have just burst his jugular from the inside with their 4d weapons and we'd be none the wiser.
We're none the wiser as it is. Nobody knows nuthin' and I expect it'll stay that way.
You seem to be convinced.
Hope springs eternal. And won't it be fine when hope becomes reality. I mean, who would have thought there'd be peace in Gaza now!

As far as physics go, I suggested it's not entirely impossible that 3D/4D factors are in play that could explain your consternation regarding the fact that the mic moved in the direction of the shot and not the opposite.

@RedFox reiterated an explanation by reposting:

As such, if something similar to the second type where included in his mic pack, the mic pack would be propelled forwards rather than backwards. Whilst still firing a deadly projectile (not a bullet) through his neck.

Annd, you're not happy with that explanation either:

That doesn't explain it, IMO. F=m•a

If you had a projectile going out from one side and at a certain acceleration, you would need to have an equal force on the other end. Even if you're right that the whole mic would move with the projectile, you would need to have enormous acceleration of the air on the other end to match the m•a of both the projectile and the mic itself. It would blow up the shirt so much, I would expect it to be ripped to shreds.

Just think about the force that would be required for a small projectile to pierce a persons chests and come out clean on the other side of the neck. The same amount of force would have to be present in the opposite vector as well. Where is that force? I just don't see it.

Not being a physicist myself, I cannot improve upon @RedFox 's reply. Maybe this is a question for the Cs assuming you won't dismiss their answer as a transmission corruption. :flowers:

EDIT: I see @RedFox made a reply. Sounds like a reasonable analysis to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom