Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

I've been thinking about the exploding microphone, how they would position it, co-ordinating the sound of a rifle firing, having someone on the roof etc, and it all seems so massively complicated for what could have been achieved with someone at the front of the crowd with a pistol. Why the added complexity, with so much potential for something to go wrong, and plenty of holes (like we're seeing) in the official narrative? I find it confusing, but then again, psychopaths can have that effect.
It needs to be complex in order to cover up the real perpetrators and sew a false narrative. This whole thing has really, really big implications. THAT's why it needs to be complex, in my opinion.
 
I'm just posting this mostly for my own clarification because, after re-reading it, I found it confusing because there are four devices listed: a rifle, an RFS, a controller and an explosive.

Sept. 27, 2025
A: The rifle sound was produced by a rifle that was connected to a remote firing system linked to the same controller that was used to set off the explosive that killed Charlie. This was meant to provide a distraction for agents to remove incriminating evidence from the area around Charlie.

I did a bunch of looking around at remote firing devices (RFD) and the like and it looked promising but at the same time it didn't seem quite right. So, I thought I might ask Grok to see if it could come up with a system as described.

Query:
You've listed some systems that are interesting but too complex. I'm wondering if there could be a system that has a person holding a rifle (that fires a blank just for noise) that is wirelessly connected to a Remote Firing System which is wirelessly linked to the same controller that is connected to an explosive device. The rifle and exploding device are then triggered at the same time.

Grok's response:
Such a synchronized system is feasible and has applications in controlled environments, such as special effects for film, theater, or training simulations. Wireless firing systems designed for pyrotechnics and special effects can integrate multiple triggers, allowing simultaneous activation of devices like a blank-firing mechanism attached to a rifle for auditory simulation and a pyrotechnic device for visual or explosive effects. These systems typically employ secure radio frequency communication to ensure precise timing and reliability, with controllers capable of managing multiple outputs from a single command unit. However, implementation requires adherence to relevant safety regulations and professional expertise to mitigate risks associated with pyrotechnic materials.

Grok provided four links to companies that sell these systems: Holatron (link, link2), Firelinx, and Cobra Firing Systems.

From the first Holatron link:
Special Effects Systems
These systems are widely used for wireless actuation of movie and theatrical special effects devices. Private system codes are available at very low cost for prevention of actuation from other Holatron transmitters. Guaranteed line-of-sight range is 1/4 mile for micro-receivers, two miles for frequency-hopping spread-spectrum receivers, and ½ mile for all other receivers. Firing latency of less than 100 milliseconds assures you of easily and reliably actuating remote devices with precise synchronization. Sound-actuated transmitters are available for the ultimate real-time synchronization of remote effects with gunshots, explosions, crashes, etc.

So, the lavaliere mic on Charlie's shirt was actually a receiver with a trigger mechanism, propellant and some kind of exploding projectile packed into it. The rifle with a remote trigger connected to a RFS and firing a blank and the "mic" were triggered simultaneously by a remote controller that could have been anywhere within a 1/4 mile or more (satellite even?). The RFS could even have had a camera on it. All of those drones reported flying around could have been there to broadcast a dedicated, secure, operating frequency "bubble" (I think this was already mentioned). I wonder who was the lucky sob that pushed the button?

I understand that the existence of these systems has already been mentioned. I just needed to wrap my head around them.

A little Q&A from EOD Gear:
What is a remote firing device (RFD)?
A remote firing device is a system used to initiate an explosive charge, detonator, or disruptor from a safe distance, allowing operators to maintain standoff during explosive operations.

What are remote firing devices used for?

Remote firing devices are used during demolition, render-safe procedures, training events, and controlled explosive operations where personnel safety and initiation reliability are critical.

Who uses remote firing devices?
RFDs are used by military EOD units, law enforcement bomb squads, demolition teams, and authorized government or commercial explosive professionals.

Are remote firing devices wired or wireless?

Remote firing devices may be wired, wireless, or hybrid systems depending on operational requirements such as distance, environment, and interference considerations.

Are EOD Gear listed remote firing devices suitable for render-safe procedures?
Yes. RFDs offered by EOD Gear are suitable for render-safe procedures and controlled explosive initiation when used by trained and authorized personnel.

Are remote firing devices regulated?
Yes. Remote firing devices are regulated and must be used in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local explosive safety regulations and procedures.

Are RFDs available for government procurement?

Yes. EOD Gear supports government and agency procurement requirements and can provide configuration guidance and quotation support for remote firing devices.
 
I've been thinking about the exploding microphone, how they would position it, co-ordinating the sound of a rifle firing, having someone on the roof etc, and it all seems so massively complicated for what could have been achieved with someone at the front of the crowd with a pistol. Why the added complexity, with so much potential for something to go wrong, and plenty of holes (like we're seeing) in the official narrative? I find it confusing, but then again, psychopaths can have that effect.
Depends on your capabilities. What might seem complicated to someone without those capabilities would seem simple to someone with them. There's also the psycho angle as you say, using the same MO as the pagers in Israel sends a 'chilling' message to those in the know. The "complicated" nature of it also signals a prowess, that also puts others on notice.

In terms of 'complexity,' would add that wherever one turns, their created mess has been built upon mess, and it is as if they don't even seem to care when their show goes sideways. The MSN runs cover for all their nonsense - and sure, people see it, yet the many many are quite comfortable with it, with their consciousness being so badly bent out of shape. The MSN's self-enforcing feedback loop demands unity, with weaponized so-called fact checked slurs that helps to do their bidding.

All this has had historical longevity, yet a house of cards can only stand so long until even the slightest wind brings it down.
 
Microphone with a shaped charge explosive seems to be getting some traction on the web , Mr. Jon A. Bray ( his background includes working with body armor for the US military ) talks about his research on it in this interview on the Stew Peters show ( @ 1:01:34 mins. long ) , in this he raises the issue and i tend to agree that the visible neck wound was unforeseeable and not planned , which led the conspirators to scramble to try and spin what could not possibly be result of a 30,06 bullet impacting CK. ( warning graphic images in video )

 
I'm wondering about that old quote from the C's that "a fatal miscalculation" will be made?
Microphone with a shaped charge explosive seems to be getting some traction on the web , Mr. Jon A. Bray ( his background includes working with body armor for the US military ) talks about his research on it in this interview on the Stew Peters show ( @ 1:01:34 mins. long ) , in this he raises the issue and i tend to agree that the visible neck wound was unforeseeable and not planned , which led the conspirators to scramble to try and spin what could not possibly be result of a 30,06 bullet impacting CK.

I dunno, but this is really looking like it might be the "fatal miscalculation" the Cs referenced. To go so far as to blow up the Tennessee facility that makes the mics, killing 16 employees, just to ensure no evidence to the plot can be identified, shows just how calculating and desperate the perps are! And how involved is Vance in all this? Was it his job to whisk Charlie's body away to prevent an autopsy and expose what really killed him? More and more threads are being pulled exposing lies and schemes that simply don't jive with the official narrative and all the authorities playing along. The fake scenario is crashing and burning and the perps are activating every asset possible to discredit the few who have been brave enough to call bogus on this whole assassination op. More and more players are being exposed and what a shock as we see who they really are!

The really big question though . . .

iap_640x640.7609064153_7rpljne5.jpg
 
fwiw , Alex Jones just exposed himself blatantly as an agent of the matrix with his mindless ( ad hominem ) attacks on Mrs. Candace , so there´s that
How about Gary of Paramount Tactical not only being Andrew Kolvet's PR minion, but accidentally exposed it! Oh! So much egg on faces!

just how calculating and desperate the perps are!
With Trump's latest breach of international law with his kidnapping of Mauro and wife, along with his threats to numerous other countries - plus the very real possibility that this could lead to war with both Russia (I know, already in effect via Ukraine) and China (something the PTB have been wanting for a long time) - how important is that Charlie Kirk assassination plot now? Has Trump's latest maneuver succeeded in sweeping the dirt under the rug and was that even a factor in this latest headline grabbing sensation? Others have said it helps dismiss the Epstein problem as well. I have to admit, the heightened threat of WWIII does minimize all these other intrigues no matter how much they can reveal the man behind the curtain. Just how restrained is Putin willing to be from this point on after the recent attack on his life - and they know who did it! Maybe some other "bombshell" connected to the Kirk assassination will explode on the scene and make a real difference to how things play out on a much larger scale.
 
How about Gary of Paramount Tactical not only being Andrew Kolvet's PR minion, but accidentally exposed it! Oh! So much egg on faces!


With Trump's latest breach of international law with his kidnapping of Mauro and wife, along with his threats to numerous other countries - plus the very real possibility that this could lead to war with both Russia (I know, already in effect via Ukraine) and China (something the PTB have been wanting for a long time) - how important is that Charlie Kirk assassination plot now? Has Trump's latest maneuver succeeded in sweeping the dirt under the rug and was that even a factor in this latest headline grabbing sensation? Others have said it helps dismiss the Epstein problem as well. I have to admit, the heightened threat of WWIII does minimize all these other intrigues no matter how much they can reveal the man behind the curtain. Just how restrained is Putin willing to be from this point on after the recent attack on his life - and they know who did it! Maybe some other "bombshell" connected to the Kirk assassination will explode on the scene and make a real difference to how things play out on a much larger scale.
(Link to my post in Venezuela Thread ) Brandon Brigss who has had some reportedly " psychic accurate predictions", has said that China will do something similar in Taiwan as what US just did in Venezuela , ie using a small team to imprison/abduct its leadership . So the PTB might just have done something that opens up a lot of bad outcomes with this stunt , since in a general sense this is complete and very explicit exertion of power without any semblance of legal cover , UN will do nothing about it for sure i guess, not even genocide in Palestine was enough for it to do anything. ( my 2x cents )
 
the Tennessee facility that makes the mics, killing 16 employees, just to ensure no evidence to the plot can be identified, shows just how calculating and desperate the perps are!

Just a note that the explosives factory that "blew up" did not make the mics, and did not officially modify consumer devices to turn them into deadly weapons, although its function as a munitions factory likely included making standard (large) shaped charges for the military. It could, therefore, feasibly have conducted research and development of such a device, although that would have been shrouded in military secrecy and not publicly known.
 
Just a note that the explosives factory that "blew up" did not make the mics, and did not officially modify consumer devices to turn them into deadly weapons, although its function as a munitions factory likely included making standard (large) shaped charges for the military. It could, therefore, feasibly have conducted research and development of such a device, although that would have been shrouded in military secrecy and not publicly known.
Thanks for the correction as I forgot it wasn't mics exactly that the factory produced. However, based on what you've written, can we still conjecture that the factory somehow represented an evidence threat to the perpetrators of Charlie's death and so felt it essential to obliterate it? Or just a very nasty coincidental accident of immense proportions?
 
Back
Top Bottom