I had a look at A. Lobaczewski in order to get knowledge about the CCP.
His basic take would be:
I am a very aged clinical psychologist. Forty years ago I
took part in a secret investigation of the real nature and psy-
chopathology of the macro-social phenomenon called “Com-
munism”. The other researchers were the scientists of the pre-
vious generation who are now passed away.
Communism as "a macrosocial phenomenon".
The profound study of the nature of psychopathy, which
played the essential and inspirational part in this macro-social
psychopathologic phenomenon (...)
It may be clumsy to assert that A. Lobaczewski is qualifying Communism straight as a "macrosocial" AND "a pathological" phenomenon. He seems to say, in the first quote, that "he will study the psychopathology" (of) "the macrosocial phenomenon Communism".
We know by his research that psychopathology is the vector of all troubles. The above quotes would be a perfect example of this approach: a lens going by "let's discern a phenomenon" & "let's discern the pathology".
"Pathology" could be akin to "let's spot an alien STS component sneaking in and doing internal work".
Still, this is not that clear cut. There exists a text, here on the forum, written by A. Lobaczewski, when he visited the Chateau, which says: "... the macrosocial disease Communism".
I am not sure that he splits the pathology from Communism,
overall.
A. Lobaczewski's take is that Communism has been created by a schizoïd, so that the "whole" concept is already pathological. It means that Communism is "inherently pathological".
We would still be able to split the pathological elements from the sane ideas.
But. A. Lobaczewski says as well:
If there were ever such a thing as a country with a commu-
nist structure as envisaged by Karl Marx, wherein the working
people’s leftist ideology would be the basis for government,
which, I believe, would be stern, but not bereft of healthy hu-
manistic thought, the contemporary social, bio-humanistic, and
medical sciences would be considered valuable and be appro-
priately developed and used for the good of the working peo-
ple. Psychological advice for youth and for persons with vari-
ous personal problems would naturally be the concern of the
authorities and of society as a whole. Seriously ill patients
would have the advantage of correspondingly skillful care.
However, quite the opposite is the case within a pathocratic
structure.
If we look at President Xi, here is what we can read:
Xi Jinping Thought - Wikipedia
Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, commonly abbreviated outside China as Xi Jinping Thought, is a political doctrine created during General Secretary Xi Jinping's leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that combines Chinese Marxism and national rejuvenation. According to the CCP, Xi Jinping Thought "builds on and further enriches" previous party ideologies and has also been called as the "Marxism of contemporary China and of the 21st century".
Eh! This perfectly matches "Marxism". This would attest of the sane version of Communism, as stated by A. Lobaczewski - "it exists".
If we look back at A. Lobaczewski's quote, here is a bit of interest:
However, quite the opposite is the case within a pathocratic
structure.
So he basically says that "there exists a sane version of Marxism" - and that, sometimes, it's unfortunately the very opposite that which happens. I suppose that "the infiltration of alien elements" is what pushes a Communist structure to "an exact counterpart".
The question would be then to know if this happened or not, in China (or, in the opposite, if we are still staring at "the sane Marxist model"). The case of Yu Menlong provides clues, hints and elements potentially attesting of such situation, but let us balance those with the above sane-Marxism hypothesis. We have to be honest and study this along those lines, and, could be, even favour the sane-Marxist scenario. IF the data sufficiently attests of a sufficient degenerated process, inside China, then, we would switch "scenarios".
And so, the unpleasant part for China, elements which
could potentially attest of "a contamination from an alien mind":
Xi Jinping Thought - Wikipedia
"First of all: Socialism with Chinese characteristics is socialism, not any other “ism.” The guiding principles of scientific socialism thus cannot be abandoned. Our Party has always emphasized adherence to the basic principles of scientific socialism, but adapted to the particular conditions of China. This means that socialism with Chinese characteristics is socialism, not some other doctrine... It was Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought that guided the Chinese people out of the long night and established a New China, and it was socialism with Chinese characteristics that led to the rapid development of China."
Xi encensing Mao Zedong could be considered as a bit "nuts".
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/03/asia/xi-putin-chat-immortality-longevity-intl
“In a few years, with the development of biotechnology, human organs can be constantly transplanted so that (people) can live younger and younger, and even become immortal.”
Oh-hoo Chinese are on a quest to immortality. That's the whole Medusa3535 and the whole Lizard's material focus which comes to mind here... Add the following article to it and China goes deep in the ground for the common bloke:
From Yu Menglong to Xiangya: Inside the Organ Harvesting Empire of China’s Elite - Vision Times
evidence and leaked documents from a whistleblower link the prime suspect — Ji Guangguang (alias Li Ming) — to China’s forced organ harvesting network
Ji Guangguang is the grandson of former Premier Li Peng, widely condemned for his role in the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre,
Ji allegedly owns multiple high-end apartments in Beijing’s Sunshine Upper East Side residential complex, including Apartment 601 in Building 18, where Yu Menglong was reportedly thrown to his death, as well as Unit 701 in Building 15.
Data collection via the school system
Luo’s files also implicated schools in the organ supply chain. Under the pretense of routine “health screenings,” schools allegedly collected students’ blood types and medical data, later used for potential organ matching. “I never understood why schools were so insistent on free health checks,” one Weibo user wrote. “Now I see — they were grooming data for a darker system.”
With such "readings", a world view will switch to "the certainty that China is doing the process that the C refferred to as body-soul-containers" (etc).
But there may be room for something not dark here. Let us look back at Xi's ideological Communism:
Xi Jinping Thought - Wikipedia
Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, commonly abbreviated outside China as Xi Jinping Thought, is a political doctrine created during General Secretary Xi Jinping's leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that combines Chinese Marxism and national rejuvenation. According to the CCP, Xi Jinping Thought "builds on and further enriches" previous party ideologies and has also been called as the "Marxism of contemporary China and of the 21st century".
What wrong is there in the idea to have a physical science imrpoving aging, via organ harvesting? Somehow, this is technical progress, and organ transplants help people.
IF Xi's China has been remaining absolutely cautious and impartial, a country so wide, dedicating itself to improving aging, would feature a vast structure for it. In addition, Xi's conversation with Putin would be "a sane one". The immortality would be a kind of joke - a hope for citizen and people. Let us not forget how, in the West, we barely reach 70 y.o. and cancer is the name of the game. It has been a while since Western science does not improve the health any more. I mean - big research is not achieving anything substantial. At all.
And so, we would be tempted to conflate "an organ harvesting network" with something neutral.
But - we got glimpses of organ trafficking and borderline scientifical practices, with the case of Yu Menlong. First, it appears that the owner of this appartment complex (and, could be, this specific plastination company) - is "Ji Guangguang":
From Yu Menglong to Xiangya: Inside the Organ Harvesting Empire of China’s Elite - Vision Times
evidence and leaked documents from a whistleblower link the prime suspect — Ji Guangguang (alias Li Ming) — to China’s forced organ harvesting network
Ji Guangguang is the grandson of former Premier Li Peng, widely condemned for his role in the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre,
Ji allegedly owns multiple high-end apartments in Beijing’s Sunshine Upper East Side residential complex, including Apartment 601 in Building 18, where Yu Menglong was reportedly thrown to his death, as well as Unit 701 in Building 15.
So, a heir of Mao Zedong - chances are that this guy is a bloody psychopath.
In addition, we got all the Fallun Gong people, a kind of STS sect, building "the opposition". Those can not be the good guys in the equation.
We got, too, the Biden family who did business with some Chinese fellas. Business with Hunter? Well... Chances are that the negative organ business may not be representative of reality, and that it could be tied to a specific entity - in this case, some basic international stuff, unwanted by China, and matching what
@seek10 explains.
There are elements that have the ability to split a whole chunk of China's media apparatus in a "bag of villains"... It seems that it is possible. Adding to this that we would indeed have a structure matching "sane-Marxism", as the remainder, would furnish a plausible ground for objective analysis.
I must be absolutely cautious so as not to put China in the wrong bag; there was a plastinated lady, in an expo which toured the world. It seems that this lady was in the midst of a criminal event. She got killed, and "displayed". This is terrific at first glance. But. Was she a criminal, too? Was she a "psychopath"? This would match a basic model of China saying "that's how we treat criminals" / "psychopaths not welcomed". They would have "exported" the idea. I know that this may be too far, but I am exploring various explanations - and it's possible to find some. In the end, it becomes difficult than to say "China-bad", "China-bad-CCP".
I am sorry, long post, and I wanted to try to lay down the main variables that may play objectively out, because we are on the verge of "China bad". There exist elements which attest of the ver yopposite - and it's not good to loose China in our hearts, because of subjectivity.
I would be interested to know, from the C's, if we should focus a bit more on China, or if there is nothing. If they say yes, we would know that there is a danger. Otherwise, it's a wrong lead and China is doing great and this csse ties to "internal opposition to humanity". In this case, the murder of the guy would have been committed by a small organization of individuals who are external to China's ideas of prosperity.
I would say that the case of Yu Menlong hints at:
- undergound torture chambers
- plastination of bodies etc etc organ harvesting
- Biden
- media industry contaminated by negative "Hollywoodian" practices (child abuse etc)
Those variables match "the STS alien mind" and as well what low-level humans sometimes give into, after contact / influence with the alien STS world view. Basically, exploitation of humans. And in this case, it seems possible than to track down this alien mindset to a specific entity: a group of powerful elite Chinese people. A "heir of Mao Zedong", those "media managers". And in addition, we got Biden's USA who did business in China - Was it with those "people"? ((Was this a CIA operation?!))
Idea would be that this represents a restricted alien component, indeed present in China, and trying to grow. We would need to figure out if it did some internal work, too much, and how far it went to, or if it remained restricted and contained. A. Lobaczewski says that normal people are the best antidote to it. Many people say that China is great, flourishing - and so there may exist a counteracting basis. I would tend to see a thwarted alien phenomenon then.
But, who knows? I am trying to remain impartial, and "there is some smoke".