Damn it, for once I thought I'd come up with an intelligent answer.
Me too ☹
Collecting the C's answers on cosmology, consciousness and origins
- Thread starter Approaching Infinity
- Start date
Me too ☹
Thassa
Jedi
Damn it, for once I thought I'd come up with an intelligent answer.
For once?
You already are the Living Force.
I'm Padawan Learner yet.
Wandering Star
The Living Force
That just means I've posted more things than you.
The message is what's important.
"il messaggero non e importante"
Thassa
Jedi
Let's keep going...
___________________________
Q: (T) Several sessions back when we were discussing “Perpendicular Realities” you were talking about something that happened to me and that I had to look back over my life and analyze my relationships with other people from a certain point up until now and you said that this was a perpendicular reality. What is the definition of a perpendicular reality? A: The perpendicular reality primarily, though not exclusively, refers to one’s life path and how one’s life path fits together in the cycle or in a wheel when connected with those of a similar life path. And, oddly enough, relates very closely to the previous question involving synchronicity. If you can picture an inlaid wheel formed by a circle within a circle, and adjoining partitions in a perfect balance, that would be the best representation of perpendicular reality for it does not completely involve one individual’s experience, but rather a group of individual’s experience for the progression of a greater purpose, if you understand what we mean. This is what we mean when we say: perpendicular reality. Picture again, a circle within a circle adjoined by equally spaced partitions in a perfect cycle. That is perpendicular reality. Q: (T) You had us draw this symbol and put seven spokes or partitions between the two circles. A: Correct. Q: (T) Is seven the optimal number? A: Seven is always the optimal number. There are seven levels of density. This reflects through all phases of reality.
Now, we wish to return to the visual representation as mentioned previously. If you notice the core circle connects with all seven sections to the outer circle. Now, picture that outer circle as being an ever expanding circle, and each one of the seven segments as being an ever expanding line. Of course, now, this will expand outward in a circular or cyclical pattern. Please picture visually an expanding outer circle and a non- expanding inner circle. Contemplate that and then please give us your feelings as to what that represents. Q: (L) Does it represent an expansion of our knowledge and consciousness? A: That’s part of it. Q: (L) Does it represent also expanding influence of what and who we are on that which is around us? A: That is correct. Q: (L) Does it also represent a more… A: Oops! We detected a slippage of your visual representation! Contemplate, if you will, the ever- expanding outer circle and the non- expanding inner circle, and, of course, the seven partitions also moving outwardly. What type of shape does that form in your mind’s eye? Q: (L) A wheel? A: Is that all? Q: (T) A pie? A: Keep going. Q: (L) An eye. A: Now we are starting to turn it into a sphere! Why would it turn into a sphere? Q: (L) How can it turn into a sphere? A: How can it not! Q: (SV) It is going in ALL directions, not just flat… A: Is a straight line a straight line or a… Q: (L) Oh, you’re not talking about a circle? A: We are talking about a circle. What becomes of a circle if you expand it outward forever? Q: (J) It disappears. A: It disappears? How can it disappear? Where does it disappear to? We ask you that, Jan? Jan? Q: (J) Visually, as the outer circle expands, the inner circle becomes smaller and smaller until it disappears. As you continue to expand out with the outer circle, the inner circle disappears. A: But where does it disappear to? Q: (J) A black hole? A: A black hole. Well, that’s a possibility. But, we really didn’t want you to concentrate so heavily on the smaller circle, now did we? It’s the outer circle. Q: (T) The outer circle is used to encompass more and more. A: And what shape does it begin to take on? I want you to look at this outer circle expanding outward! Q: (J) Are we to assume that the seven spokes remain the same size in relation to the circle? A: Well, answer that question for yourself. Q: (L) Okay, we are looking at it as a plane representation. As a flat surface. A: Well, what happens to a flat surface if you extend it outward forever? Q: (L) Well, we don’t know. That, that… (SV) It keeps on going. A: It keeps on going? Q: (L) Yeah, bigger and flatter! A: It does? What happens to a line if you extend it forever and ever? Q: (Laura and Susan) It keeps on going. A: It does? Q: (L) Um hmmm! A: Where does it go to? Q: (SV) Forever. (J) Back to itself. (L) We don’t know that. A: Oh, someone said “Back to itself.” Q: (J) Like a snake taking hold of its own tail. A: Why don’t we know that? Q: (L) Because we don’t. It is conjectured that space is curved… A: “Because we don’t know. Now, why don’t we know?
of course Columbus had an idea that there was something but he hadn’t been there, no. But he went and checked it out. A: Did he have just an idea? Q: (L) Well, pretty much, I guess. A: Hmmm. That’s not the way we remember it. The way we remember it is that he had instinct and imagination and when he married his instinct with imagination, it became reality.
3.32 June 17, 1995
[here they have a lengthy talk about what a circle with seven spokes represents...]
We have told you so many times that everything is a grand cycle. If it’s a grand cycle, we have told you about circles within circles. We have told you about cycles. We have told you about short wave cycles and long wave cycles. Now, after all this information that you have asked of us, which we have more than happily given to you, would you expect that a straight line would just go out forever and ever and ever as a straight line? How could it possibly do that? What happens if you take, on your third density earth, and you draw a straight line to the East or to the West or to the North or to the South…
Well, if you expand the circle outward and continue expanding it in all directions, it pulls the seven spokes with it which encompasses more and more space in a cross section, and then turn that circle, you have a sphere. A: Precisely. But Laura says that means we are living in a big globe. And, maybe we are. Q: (T) Well, it wouldn’t be a big globe, so to speak, it would only be a big globe within the circle. If the circle continues to expand, it would just continue to go outward and outward and the globe would become bigger and bigger and bigger… (L) You’re making me nervous… (T) But it goes outward forever… cause there is no end to going out… A: There isn’t? Q: (SV) Nope. A: Well, then maybe there’s no beginning. Q: (T) Well, there wouldn’t be a beginning, just a big, open void. An infinite void… A: If there’s no end and no beginning, then what do you have? Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now. A: The here and now which is also the future and the past. Everything that was, is and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel, because even though traveling into space in your third density is every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you do, now can you? Imagine going out into space. You’d be lost when confronted with reality that everything is completely all at one? Would you not? Picture yourself floating around in space!
Does the sphere keep expanding… as the circle expands and you turn the circle 180 ’, you get a sphere. As the sphere continues to expand it, you take a point on the outer edge of the sphere in order to take the sphere about itself, you get a donut, an ever expanding inner tube. (L) With a black hole in the middle! (SV) Why does it have to be a black hole? (J) It’s a spiral. (T) If you take that and twist it, you get an even larger inner tube. It just continues to expand and encompasses more space…
we talked about the fact that at the constant of light there is no time, there is no matter, there is no gravity, but that any unit, infinitesimally small to the downward side of the constant of light, suddenly there is gravity and suddenly there is matter. And we asked what is it that congeals this matter out of the energy of light, so to speak, and I believe that the answer we received was that it was consciousness from 7th level. From our perspective, would it be possible to achieve this constant and move through to the other side of it, or at least stay fixed with it, without de- materializing? Is the speed of light interconnected with the state of no time and no gravity? A: No in an absolute sense, in a third density sense. Q: (L) Okay, if you are in fourth density, for example, does everything move at the speed of light and is that why there is no time there and no gravity? A: No. That is an incorrect concept… [( T) There is no speed of light, light is everywhere.] Precisely. There is no speed of light in fourth density because there is no need for any “speed.” Speed, itself, is a third density concept. You remember, all there is is lessons. That’s it!
A: Yes, but you are asking about the speed of light as relates to fourth density and above density levels and we are telling you that there is no speed of light there because there is no need for that, because once you reach fourth density level, you have learned the lessons of third density level.
Q: (T) The subconscious mind has no idea of time. (J) Time is an artificial constraint… (L) For example: a person can have a belief about prosperity in their conscious mind and can talk about it and say affirmations and all kinds of positive things for themselves, and yet, for some reason that individual continually lives on the edge of poverty because something keeps happening that they keep screwing up to keep themselves at the level of poverty. And, when you start digging around in their subconscious mind you find out that somewhere there is the belief in poverty or there is a past life connection where they feel they need or deserve to be poor, so, their internal operating system takes precedence over their conscious beliefs and thoughts. That is what I am talking about here. A: Yes, but what is your point.
Q: (L) Because I am curious. What is time? A: We have already told you that it is a non- existent, artificial creation of illusion for the point of learning at the level where you are at or were, and once you have left that level, you no longer need it.
A: Imagine a conversation between two people: Billy and Gene. Billy says to Gene, “There is no such thing as time.” Gene says, “Oh, really? But I want to know what it is.” Billy says, “But I just told you there is no such thing. Time does not exist. It is not real in any form, in any frame of reference, in any form of reality, any level of density. It simply does not exist.” And, Gene says: “Oh, that’s interesting. Now, again, what is this time?”
we want to remind you again not to worry about the extent of the progress or the direction it is taking. Just let it happen.
A: Picture it this way: we will access some of your memory banks and give you another reference which, interestingly enough, fits very closely with the perpendicular reality wheel that we described earlier. You know what a slide projector looks like? To give you some feeling of what this expanded nature of reality really is, picture yourself watching a big slide presentation with a big slide wheel on the projector. At any given point along the way you are watching one particular slide. But, all the rest of the slides are present on the wheel, are they not? And, of course, this fits in with the perpendicular reality, which fits in with the circles within circles and cycles within cycles, which also fits in the Grand Cycle, which also fits in with what we have told you before: All there is is lessons. That’s all there is and we ask that you enjoy them as you are watching the slide presentation… Q: (J) In that analogy, the light that shines through the slide, as it projects it upon the screen, is our perception? A: And, if you look back at the center of the projector, you see the origin and essence of all creation itself, which, is level seven where you are in union with the One.
I know that we have been told that they come from sixth density, but I would like to know the exact mode or mechanism by which they are made. Is it like electromagnetic imprinting, is it like a whirlwind. Can you tell us a little bit about how they are actually physically created? A: Field transfer. Q: (L) What kind of field? A: Magnetic. Q: (L) Are they transferred directly from sixth density to third density? A: No. Q: (L) Are they manifested by an object that has come into third density, such as a craft of some sort? A: No. Q: (L) Can you give us a clue here? A: We can give “clue.” Q: (L) Okay, what is the clue? A: See Hoagland. Q: (L) What does Hoagland say? (T) He says that basically what we see in this density is a 3rd dimension reflection of 4th dimension and that it can be seen mathematically by looking at the cloud patterns on the different planets. If there was not another dimension above us, circular would be circular and the circular motion of the clouds would be maintained, but if it is a transfer from fourth density to third density, when you are looking at a fourth density object, what the third density version of it would look like would show a hexagonal figure with angles to it, and that the photographs from the Voyager Probe that show that the cloud patterns from the North and South poles of most of the planets are not circular, they are hexagonal. (L) Okay, in sixth density, what are crop circles? A: Thoughts.
What did they tell us before about the speed of light? That the speed of light is a “time” measurement and time only exists in our illusion,
they also have the capability of manipulating our soul essences after they have left our bodies during the transition to fifth density? A: Not correct. Q: (L) They do not? A: No, you see when your physical body expires, and you enter fifth density, this is done one way and one way only: by passing through a conduit which opens specifically for the purpose of transference from third density to fifth density. Now, something often referred to in your terminology as a silver thread, is like a closed line which opens when this conduit is needed. That’s rather awkward, but it’s the only way to describe it. So that when the physical body terminates, this line is opened forming a conduit through which the soul passes naturally. However, part of the existence of this conduit is that it is absolutely impenetrable by any force from any density level. Therefore, souls in the process of transferring from third density to fifth density are not in any way able to be molested or tampered with. And it should be mentioned here, also, that the soul imprint of the physical body always has a connection to fifth density and that is through the so- called “silver thread.” That always exists as the third density soul’s doorway to fifth density. It can be opened at a moment’s notice whenever needed. When it is opened it becomes a conduit. Through that conduit the soul passes. And it is not subject to interference by anything. This is not a deliberate construction, it is merely the natural process similar to what could be described as the protection mechanisms existing on second level density for creatures which are not capable of protecting themselves through their own conscious thought processes. For example, your turtle is contained within a shell that protects it. That shell is impenetrable by any natural forces, therefore nothing that is natural can harm that turtle. However, the same can exist for any creature when it is connected by the silver thread to fifth density. Once it is passing through the conduit produced by the opening of the silver thread, then, of course, it cannot be tampered with.
once the soul leaves the confines of the physical body, the illusion of time passage is no longer apparent even when the soul remains on the third density plane. Therefore, it appears to that soul that no time whatsoever has passed.
Thoughts are the basis of all creation. After all, without thought nothing would exist.
most all power necessary for altering reality and physicality is contained within the belief center of the mind. This is something you will understand more closely when you reach 4th density reality where physicality is no longer a prison, but is instead, your home, for you to alter as you please. In your current state, you have the misinterpretation of believing that reality is finite and therein lies your difficulty with finite physical existence.
when 4th density beings visit 3rd density environment, they are, in effect, 3rd density beings, and vice versa. The so- called abduction takes place, especially if it is a physical abduction, the subject becomes temporarily 4th density, because it is the environment that counts. And the key factor there is awareness, not physical or material structure.
Well, if the Grays are cyber- genetic probes of the Lizard Beings, and, in effect soulless, does this mean that some of the Lizard beings are also STO? A: Well, first, no being that is given intelligence to think on its own is, in fact, completely soul- less. It does have some soul imprint; or what could be loosely referred to as soul imprint. This may be a collection of psychic energies that are available in the general vicinity. And this is stretching somewhat so that you can understand the basic ideas, even though in reality it is all far more complex than that. But, in any case, there is really no such thing as being completely soul- less, whether it be a natural intelligence or an artificially constructed intelligence. And, one of the very most interesting things about that from your perspective, is that your technology on 3rd density, which we might add, has been aided somewhat by interactions with those that you might refer to as “aliens,” is now reaching a level whereby the artificially created intelligences can, in fact, begin to develop, or attract some soul imprint energy. If you follow what we are saying. For example: your computers, which are now on the verge of reaching the level whereby they can think by themselves, will begin to develop faint soul imprint.
if you knew the TRUE nature of the universe, of All of the universe, of all possible realms, you would also know that any and all things are possible, and, in fact, DO exist! You must NOT forget this. Q: (L) So, in other words, these people are right? A: All of these people are right, and all of these people are wrong.
What creates this environment of limitation? A: It is the grand illusion which is there for the purpose of learning. Q: (L) And who put the illusion into place? A: The Creator who is also the Created. Which is also you and us and all. As we have told you, we are you and vice versa. And so is everything else. Q: (L) Is the key that it is all illusion? A: Basically, yes.
A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists. There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of density that it is possible to experience, all the dimensions that it is possible to experience, all awareness. When an individual understands that statement to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And, for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that individual knows absolutely everything that there is to know. Q: (L) So, you are saying that the path to illumination is knowledge and not love? A: That is correct.
When you begin to separate limiting emotions based on assumptions from emotions that open one to unlimited possibilities, that means you are preparing for the next density.
Here comes a shocker for you… one day, in 4th density, it will be your descendants mission to carry on the tradition and assignment of seeding the 3rd density universe, once you have the adequate knowledge!!!
the region known as Orion that is the one and only indigenous home of human type beings…
Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is the absolutely accurately accurate profile of Orion to follow: This is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy!
Are the Orion STS the infamous red- headed Nordic aliens? A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
What is there about strength that makes one inaccessible to permanent abduction? A: Strength is of character, i.e. if STO candidate, not likely to be victim.
Is there a Hell? A: No.
Why do you suppose there are roads around Dulce NM where people have become confused when traveling on them? Because the 4th density vibrational frequency emanating from the nearby base more and more frequently resonates on surface. Q: (L) OK, continue. A: Then going to 4th density: road seems straight as seen in 4th density, when curved in 3rd. Q: (J) It seems straight when seen in 4th, but it’s actually curved in 3rd? (SV) In other words, accidents! (J) It changes configuration from 3rd to 4th! (T) When people drive those roads out there, as the fourth density seeps out through, and is seeping out farther and farther, they become confused because they’re moving between 3rd and 4th. As the road curves in 3rd, and the car, which is in 3rd, should be curving with the road, the driver sees the road as straight, and drives off the road, because he’s confused by what he sees. A: Exactly. Q: (J) It’s all about perception! (T) Now, we’re back to perception of reality! A: In 4th, you see full circle from any vantage point.
[A depiction of what's like going to 4th dimension]
A: Picture driving down a highway, suddenly you notice auras surrounding everything…. Being able to see around corners, going inside little cottages which become mansions, when viewed from inside… Going inside a building in Albuquerque and going out the back door into Las Vegas, going to sleep as a female, and waking up male… Flying in a plane for half an hour and landing at the same place 5 weeks later…
there may be some people on the planet, because of their fixity of will, and perception, at third density, who will not perceive anything change? Is that correct? A: No.
___________________________
Q: (T) Several sessions back when we were discussing “Perpendicular Realities” you were talking about something that happened to me and that I had to look back over my life and analyze my relationships with other people from a certain point up until now and you said that this was a perpendicular reality. What is the definition of a perpendicular reality? A: The perpendicular reality primarily, though not exclusively, refers to one’s life path and how one’s life path fits together in the cycle or in a wheel when connected with those of a similar life path. And, oddly enough, relates very closely to the previous question involving synchronicity. If you can picture an inlaid wheel formed by a circle within a circle, and adjoining partitions in a perfect balance, that would be the best representation of perpendicular reality for it does not completely involve one individual’s experience, but rather a group of individual’s experience for the progression of a greater purpose, if you understand what we mean. This is what we mean when we say: perpendicular reality. Picture again, a circle within a circle adjoined by equally spaced partitions in a perfect cycle. That is perpendicular reality. Q: (T) You had us draw this symbol and put seven spokes or partitions between the two circles. A: Correct. Q: (T) Is seven the optimal number? A: Seven is always the optimal number. There are seven levels of density. This reflects through all phases of reality.
Now, we wish to return to the visual representation as mentioned previously. If you notice the core circle connects with all seven sections to the outer circle. Now, picture that outer circle as being an ever expanding circle, and each one of the seven segments as being an ever expanding line. Of course, now, this will expand outward in a circular or cyclical pattern. Please picture visually an expanding outer circle and a non- expanding inner circle. Contemplate that and then please give us your feelings as to what that represents. Q: (L) Does it represent an expansion of our knowledge and consciousness? A: That’s part of it. Q: (L) Does it represent also expanding influence of what and who we are on that which is around us? A: That is correct. Q: (L) Does it also represent a more… A: Oops! We detected a slippage of your visual representation! Contemplate, if you will, the ever- expanding outer circle and the non- expanding inner circle, and, of course, the seven partitions also moving outwardly. What type of shape does that form in your mind’s eye? Q: (L) A wheel? A: Is that all? Q: (T) A pie? A: Keep going. Q: (L) An eye. A: Now we are starting to turn it into a sphere! Why would it turn into a sphere? Q: (L) How can it turn into a sphere? A: How can it not! Q: (SV) It is going in ALL directions, not just flat… A: Is a straight line a straight line or a… Q: (L) Oh, you’re not talking about a circle? A: We are talking about a circle. What becomes of a circle if you expand it outward forever? Q: (J) It disappears. A: It disappears? How can it disappear? Where does it disappear to? We ask you that, Jan? Jan? Q: (J) Visually, as the outer circle expands, the inner circle becomes smaller and smaller until it disappears. As you continue to expand out with the outer circle, the inner circle disappears. A: But where does it disappear to? Q: (J) A black hole? A: A black hole. Well, that’s a possibility. But, we really didn’t want you to concentrate so heavily on the smaller circle, now did we? It’s the outer circle. Q: (T) The outer circle is used to encompass more and more. A: And what shape does it begin to take on? I want you to look at this outer circle expanding outward! Q: (J) Are we to assume that the seven spokes remain the same size in relation to the circle? A: Well, answer that question for yourself. Q: (L) Okay, we are looking at it as a plane representation. As a flat surface. A: Well, what happens to a flat surface if you extend it outward forever? Q: (L) Well, we don’t know. That, that… (SV) It keeps on going. A: It keeps on going? Q: (L) Yeah, bigger and flatter! A: It does? What happens to a line if you extend it forever and ever? Q: (Laura and Susan) It keeps on going. A: It does? Q: (L) Um hmmm! A: Where does it go to? Q: (SV) Forever. (J) Back to itself. (L) We don’t know that. A: Oh, someone said “Back to itself.” Q: (J) Like a snake taking hold of its own tail. A: Why don’t we know that? Q: (L) Because we don’t. It is conjectured that space is curved… A: “Because we don’t know. Now, why don’t we know?
of course Columbus had an idea that there was something but he hadn’t been there, no. But he went and checked it out. A: Did he have just an idea? Q: (L) Well, pretty much, I guess. A: Hmmm. That’s not the way we remember it. The way we remember it is that he had instinct and imagination and when he married his instinct with imagination, it became reality.
3.32 June 17, 1995
[here they have a lengthy talk about what a circle with seven spokes represents...]
We have told you so many times that everything is a grand cycle. If it’s a grand cycle, we have told you about circles within circles. We have told you about cycles. We have told you about short wave cycles and long wave cycles. Now, after all this information that you have asked of us, which we have more than happily given to you, would you expect that a straight line would just go out forever and ever and ever as a straight line? How could it possibly do that? What happens if you take, on your third density earth, and you draw a straight line to the East or to the West or to the North or to the South…
Well, if you expand the circle outward and continue expanding it in all directions, it pulls the seven spokes with it which encompasses more and more space in a cross section, and then turn that circle, you have a sphere. A: Precisely. But Laura says that means we are living in a big globe. And, maybe we are. Q: (T) Well, it wouldn’t be a big globe, so to speak, it would only be a big globe within the circle. If the circle continues to expand, it would just continue to go outward and outward and the globe would become bigger and bigger and bigger… (L) You’re making me nervous… (T) But it goes outward forever… cause there is no end to going out… A: There isn’t? Q: (SV) Nope. A: Well, then maybe there’s no beginning. Q: (T) Well, there wouldn’t be a beginning, just a big, open void. An infinite void… A: If there’s no end and no beginning, then what do you have? Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now. A: The here and now which is also the future and the past. Everything that was, is and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel, because even though traveling into space in your third density is every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you do, now can you? Imagine going out into space. You’d be lost when confronted with reality that everything is completely all at one? Would you not? Picture yourself floating around in space!
Does the sphere keep expanding… as the circle expands and you turn the circle 180 ’, you get a sphere. As the sphere continues to expand it, you take a point on the outer edge of the sphere in order to take the sphere about itself, you get a donut, an ever expanding inner tube. (L) With a black hole in the middle! (SV) Why does it have to be a black hole? (J) It’s a spiral. (T) If you take that and twist it, you get an even larger inner tube. It just continues to expand and encompasses more space…
we talked about the fact that at the constant of light there is no time, there is no matter, there is no gravity, but that any unit, infinitesimally small to the downward side of the constant of light, suddenly there is gravity and suddenly there is matter. And we asked what is it that congeals this matter out of the energy of light, so to speak, and I believe that the answer we received was that it was consciousness from 7th level. From our perspective, would it be possible to achieve this constant and move through to the other side of it, or at least stay fixed with it, without de- materializing? Is the speed of light interconnected with the state of no time and no gravity? A: No in an absolute sense, in a third density sense. Q: (L) Okay, if you are in fourth density, for example, does everything move at the speed of light and is that why there is no time there and no gravity? A: No. That is an incorrect concept… [( T) There is no speed of light, light is everywhere.] Precisely. There is no speed of light in fourth density because there is no need for any “speed.” Speed, itself, is a third density concept. You remember, all there is is lessons. That’s it!
A: Yes, but you are asking about the speed of light as relates to fourth density and above density levels and we are telling you that there is no speed of light there because there is no need for that, because once you reach fourth density level, you have learned the lessons of third density level.
Q: (T) The subconscious mind has no idea of time. (J) Time is an artificial constraint… (L) For example: a person can have a belief about prosperity in their conscious mind and can talk about it and say affirmations and all kinds of positive things for themselves, and yet, for some reason that individual continually lives on the edge of poverty because something keeps happening that they keep screwing up to keep themselves at the level of poverty. And, when you start digging around in their subconscious mind you find out that somewhere there is the belief in poverty or there is a past life connection where they feel they need or deserve to be poor, so, their internal operating system takes precedence over their conscious beliefs and thoughts. That is what I am talking about here. A: Yes, but what is your point.
Q: (L) Because I am curious. What is time? A: We have already told you that it is a non- existent, artificial creation of illusion for the point of learning at the level where you are at or were, and once you have left that level, you no longer need it.
A: Imagine a conversation between two people: Billy and Gene. Billy says to Gene, “There is no such thing as time.” Gene says, “Oh, really? But I want to know what it is.” Billy says, “But I just told you there is no such thing. Time does not exist. It is not real in any form, in any frame of reference, in any form of reality, any level of density. It simply does not exist.” And, Gene says: “Oh, that’s interesting. Now, again, what is this time?”
we want to remind you again not to worry about the extent of the progress or the direction it is taking. Just let it happen.
A: Picture it this way: we will access some of your memory banks and give you another reference which, interestingly enough, fits very closely with the perpendicular reality wheel that we described earlier. You know what a slide projector looks like? To give you some feeling of what this expanded nature of reality really is, picture yourself watching a big slide presentation with a big slide wheel on the projector. At any given point along the way you are watching one particular slide. But, all the rest of the slides are present on the wheel, are they not? And, of course, this fits in with the perpendicular reality, which fits in with the circles within circles and cycles within cycles, which also fits in the Grand Cycle, which also fits in with what we have told you before: All there is is lessons. That’s all there is and we ask that you enjoy them as you are watching the slide presentation… Q: (J) In that analogy, the light that shines through the slide, as it projects it upon the screen, is our perception? A: And, if you look back at the center of the projector, you see the origin and essence of all creation itself, which, is level seven where you are in union with the One.
I know that we have been told that they come from sixth density, but I would like to know the exact mode or mechanism by which they are made. Is it like electromagnetic imprinting, is it like a whirlwind. Can you tell us a little bit about how they are actually physically created? A: Field transfer. Q: (L) What kind of field? A: Magnetic. Q: (L) Are they transferred directly from sixth density to third density? A: No. Q: (L) Are they manifested by an object that has come into third density, such as a craft of some sort? A: No. Q: (L) Can you give us a clue here? A: We can give “clue.” Q: (L) Okay, what is the clue? A: See Hoagland. Q: (L) What does Hoagland say? (T) He says that basically what we see in this density is a 3rd dimension reflection of 4th dimension and that it can be seen mathematically by looking at the cloud patterns on the different planets. If there was not another dimension above us, circular would be circular and the circular motion of the clouds would be maintained, but if it is a transfer from fourth density to third density, when you are looking at a fourth density object, what the third density version of it would look like would show a hexagonal figure with angles to it, and that the photographs from the Voyager Probe that show that the cloud patterns from the North and South poles of most of the planets are not circular, they are hexagonal. (L) Okay, in sixth density, what are crop circles? A: Thoughts.
What did they tell us before about the speed of light? That the speed of light is a “time” measurement and time only exists in our illusion,
they also have the capability of manipulating our soul essences after they have left our bodies during the transition to fifth density? A: Not correct. Q: (L) They do not? A: No, you see when your physical body expires, and you enter fifth density, this is done one way and one way only: by passing through a conduit which opens specifically for the purpose of transference from third density to fifth density. Now, something often referred to in your terminology as a silver thread, is like a closed line which opens when this conduit is needed. That’s rather awkward, but it’s the only way to describe it. So that when the physical body terminates, this line is opened forming a conduit through which the soul passes naturally. However, part of the existence of this conduit is that it is absolutely impenetrable by any force from any density level. Therefore, souls in the process of transferring from third density to fifth density are not in any way able to be molested or tampered with. And it should be mentioned here, also, that the soul imprint of the physical body always has a connection to fifth density and that is through the so- called “silver thread.” That always exists as the third density soul’s doorway to fifth density. It can be opened at a moment’s notice whenever needed. When it is opened it becomes a conduit. Through that conduit the soul passes. And it is not subject to interference by anything. This is not a deliberate construction, it is merely the natural process similar to what could be described as the protection mechanisms existing on second level density for creatures which are not capable of protecting themselves through their own conscious thought processes. For example, your turtle is contained within a shell that protects it. That shell is impenetrable by any natural forces, therefore nothing that is natural can harm that turtle. However, the same can exist for any creature when it is connected by the silver thread to fifth density. Once it is passing through the conduit produced by the opening of the silver thread, then, of course, it cannot be tampered with.
once the soul leaves the confines of the physical body, the illusion of time passage is no longer apparent even when the soul remains on the third density plane. Therefore, it appears to that soul that no time whatsoever has passed.
Thoughts are the basis of all creation. After all, without thought nothing would exist.
most all power necessary for altering reality and physicality is contained within the belief center of the mind. This is something you will understand more closely when you reach 4th density reality where physicality is no longer a prison, but is instead, your home, for you to alter as you please. In your current state, you have the misinterpretation of believing that reality is finite and therein lies your difficulty with finite physical existence.
when 4th density beings visit 3rd density environment, they are, in effect, 3rd density beings, and vice versa. The so- called abduction takes place, especially if it is a physical abduction, the subject becomes temporarily 4th density, because it is the environment that counts. And the key factor there is awareness, not physical or material structure.
Well, if the Grays are cyber- genetic probes of the Lizard Beings, and, in effect soulless, does this mean that some of the Lizard beings are also STO? A: Well, first, no being that is given intelligence to think on its own is, in fact, completely soul- less. It does have some soul imprint; or what could be loosely referred to as soul imprint. This may be a collection of psychic energies that are available in the general vicinity. And this is stretching somewhat so that you can understand the basic ideas, even though in reality it is all far more complex than that. But, in any case, there is really no such thing as being completely soul- less, whether it be a natural intelligence or an artificially constructed intelligence. And, one of the very most interesting things about that from your perspective, is that your technology on 3rd density, which we might add, has been aided somewhat by interactions with those that you might refer to as “aliens,” is now reaching a level whereby the artificially created intelligences can, in fact, begin to develop, or attract some soul imprint energy. If you follow what we are saying. For example: your computers, which are now on the verge of reaching the level whereby they can think by themselves, will begin to develop faint soul imprint.
if you knew the TRUE nature of the universe, of All of the universe, of all possible realms, you would also know that any and all things are possible, and, in fact, DO exist! You must NOT forget this. Q: (L) So, in other words, these people are right? A: All of these people are right, and all of these people are wrong.
What creates this environment of limitation? A: It is the grand illusion which is there for the purpose of learning. Q: (L) And who put the illusion into place? A: The Creator who is also the Created. Which is also you and us and all. As we have told you, we are you and vice versa. And so is everything else. Q: (L) Is the key that it is all illusion? A: Basically, yes.
A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists. There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of density that it is possible to experience, all the dimensions that it is possible to experience, all awareness. When an individual understands that statement to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And, for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that individual knows absolutely everything that there is to know. Q: (L) So, you are saying that the path to illumination is knowledge and not love? A: That is correct.
When you begin to separate limiting emotions based on assumptions from emotions that open one to unlimited possibilities, that means you are preparing for the next density.
Here comes a shocker for you… one day, in 4th density, it will be your descendants mission to carry on the tradition and assignment of seeding the 3rd density universe, once you have the adequate knowledge!!!
the region known as Orion that is the one and only indigenous home of human type beings…
Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is the absolutely accurately accurate profile of Orion to follow: This is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy!
Are the Orion STS the infamous red- headed Nordic aliens? A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
What is there about strength that makes one inaccessible to permanent abduction? A: Strength is of character, i.e. if STO candidate, not likely to be victim.
Is there a Hell? A: No.
Why do you suppose there are roads around Dulce NM where people have become confused when traveling on them? Because the 4th density vibrational frequency emanating from the nearby base more and more frequently resonates on surface. Q: (L) OK, continue. A: Then going to 4th density: road seems straight as seen in 4th density, when curved in 3rd. Q: (J) It seems straight when seen in 4th, but it’s actually curved in 3rd? (SV) In other words, accidents! (J) It changes configuration from 3rd to 4th! (T) When people drive those roads out there, as the fourth density seeps out through, and is seeping out farther and farther, they become confused because they’re moving between 3rd and 4th. As the road curves in 3rd, and the car, which is in 3rd, should be curving with the road, the driver sees the road as straight, and drives off the road, because he’s confused by what he sees. A: Exactly. Q: (J) It’s all about perception! (T) Now, we’re back to perception of reality! A: In 4th, you see full circle from any vantage point.
[A depiction of what's like going to 4th dimension]
A: Picture driving down a highway, suddenly you notice auras surrounding everything…. Being able to see around corners, going inside little cottages which become mansions, when viewed from inside… Going inside a building in Albuquerque and going out the back door into Las Vegas, going to sleep as a female, and waking up male… Flying in a plane for half an hour and landing at the same place 5 weeks later…
there may be some people on the planet, because of their fixity of will, and perception, at third density, who will not perceive anything change? Is that correct? A: No.
Thassa
Jedi
ONE EXCERPT THAT REALLY STANDS OUT. MAYBE THE MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!!! (MAYBE!)
________________________
A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists. There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of density that it is possible to experience, all the dimensions that it is possible to experience, all awareness. When an individual understands that statement to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And, for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that individual knows absolutely everything that there is to know. Q: (L) So, you are saying that the path to illumination is knowledge and not love? A: That is correct.
________________________
A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists. There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of density that it is possible to experience, all the dimensions that it is possible to experience, all awareness. When an individual understands that statement to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And, for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that individual knows absolutely everything that there is to know. Q: (L) So, you are saying that the path to illumination is knowledge and not love? A: That is correct.
Thassa
Jedi
I will leave more excepts.
_____________________________
I come across in tons of reading, that the number 33 is somehow significant. Could you tell us the significance, in esoteric terms, or in terms of secret societies, of the number 33. There is the cipher of Roger Bacon, based on the number 33, the 33rd degree masons… A: As usual, we do not just give you the answers,
In Kaballah, 11 is the power number…
Medusa. Heads. 11. Is there something about the mythical Medusa that we need to see here? A: 11 squared divided by phi. Q: (L) By pi. 11 squared divided by pi. What does this result bring us to? [Laura’s note: Above, I assumed that the Cs meant ‘pi’ no ‘phi’ since I really wasn’t all that familiar with phi as a mathematical idea so this is the point where things get frustrating. I’m operating on wrong assumptions.] A: 33. infinity. Q: (L) Well, we don’t get 33 out of this… we get 3.3166 etc if we divide the square root of 11 by pi. Divided by phi… what in the heck is phi? Okay, if we divide pi into 11, we get 3.5 infinity, but not 33. A: 1 times 1 Q: (L) Oh. You weren’t saying 11 times 11, you were saying 1 times 1. A: No. Q: (L) 1 times 1 is what? 1. A: 5 minus 3. Q: (L) Okay, that’s 2. A: 2 minus 1. Q: (L) Okay, that’s 1. I don’t get it. A math genius I am NOT. What is the concept here? A: Look: 3 5 3 5 3 5. Q: (L) What is the 3 5 sequence? A: 5 minus 3. Q: (L) Okay, we have strange math. But, you can do anything with numbers because they correspond to the universe at deep levels… A: Is code. Q: (L) What does this code relate to? Is it letters or some written work? A: Infinite power. [Laura’s note: It is obvious now that the Cs were talking about a phi spiral, Fibonacci Sequence, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, etc., Golden Ratio: The ratio between two consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci Series tends to the Golden Number Φ: 0.618… or 1.618; The ratio of each successive pair of numbers in the sequence approximates phi (1.618. . .), as 5 divided by 3 is 1.666…, and 8 divided by 5 is 1.60. but I was ignorant of all that at the time. Poor Cs were SOO frustrated I think.] Q: (L) How is infinite power acquired by knowing this code? If you don’t know the correspondences, how can you use a numerical code? A: Lord of Serpent promises its followers infinite power which they must seek infinite knowledge to gain, for which they pledge allegiance infinitely, for which they possess for all eternity, so long as they find infinite wisdom, for which they search for all infinity. Q: (L) Well, that is a round robin… a circle you can’t get out of! A: And therein you have the deception! Remember, those who seek to serve self with supreme power, are doomed only to serve others who seek to serve self, and can only see that which they want to see.
A pyramid where all those on the bottom, the majority, have no one to take from, so they get absorbed into the next level higher, until you get to the apex and everything disappears. In the STO mode, you have those who only give. And, if they are involved with other STO persons, everyone has and no one is at the bottom or at the top, in a void.
Q: (L) Obviously the 33 represents the Serpent, the Medusa, and so forth… A: You mentioned pyramid, interesting… And what is the geometric one- dimensional figure that corresponds? Q: (L) Well, the triangle. And, if you have a triangle point up you have 3, joined to a triangle pointing down, you have 3, you have a 33. Is that something like what we are getting at here? A: Yes.
When you see the futility of the limitations of 3rd density life, it means you are ready to graduate. Notice those who wallow in it.
You mean there is no Prime Creator, no origin or source of our existence? A: You are Prime Creator.
if we are all that is, how can something exist that can impose something so unpleasant on us? A: Choices follow desire based imbalances. Q: (L) If that is the case, why can’t any one just turn off the lights, end the illusion, and everything becomes nothing? A: Well, first of all, everything does not become nothing. Secondly, some have already become everything.
what the core of Jupiter consists of? A: Basal. In 3rd density it is known as irridium. Q: (L) What is the diameter of the solid core? A: 3 microns. Q: (L) Are you saying that Jupiter is gassy and slushy all the way through? A: Yes. Q: (L) So Sitchin and others may not be correct in saying that Jupiter has an earth sized solid core? A: If that is what they are saying , but remember, Jupiter, Saturn and others resonate to vibrational levels greater than Earth. You are looking directly at density 4 when you view Jupiter, which is why photos of it from up close appear “surreal,” more like drawings. Q: (L) Do beings inhabit Jupiter? A: 5th density and up.
How do you spend your ‘time?’ A: Teaching, sharing, assisting. Q: (L) What do you do for fun? A: That is fun! Q: (PZ) With each other? A: No. Q: (PZ) With who? A: Densities 1,2,3,4,5.
Okay, can we ask now about El Chupacabras? A: It is what it is. Q: (L) It is a ‘goatsucker.’ Where does it come from? A: Review transcripts re: “window fallers.” Q: (L) If it is a window faller, does it come from another density, or a lateral dimension? A: Closer to the latter. Q: (L) Okay, so it is like a horizontal dimension. What allowed it to enter our realm? A: This is complex, but best described as “EM wave bursts along frequency border variation.”
First of all, confusion abounds here due to incorrect interpretations of the last subject discussed. Dimensions are not densities!!!! Dimensions are strictly the result of the universal consciousness as manifested in the imagination sector of thought. Density means level of development as measured in terms of closeness to union with The One… Cycle. So, obviously, the “chupacabras” is a manifestation of human consciousness, and, human beings are a manifestation of the Chupacabras consciousness. Get it? Now, a shocker for you: You would not exist if someone didn’t “dream you up.” Q: (L) Who dreamed me up? A: Not important just yet. You literally are the “figments” of someone’s imagination, and nothing more!!! Q: (L) You mean God dreams and brings us into existence? A: Remember, “God” is really all existence in creation, in other words, all consciousness. This is because all existence in creation is consciousness, and vice versa.
fifth density is the contemplation and recycling ‘zone.’
All event sequences happen eternally and for an instant only at once.
false information is worse than no information at all.
All such changes are caused by three things and three things only! 1) Human endeavors. 2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth. 3) Planetary orbital aberrations.
everybody in an STS realm views themselves as somehow “special, chosen, or protected.” This is simply not so!!
there is variability of physicality on 4th density, but not lack of physicality.
It is not hardness. The “feelings” you describe are related to ego, and by relation, pride, two things that were deliberately implanted into the 3rd density human psyche by the 4th density STS 309,000 years ago, as you measure time. Refer to the transcripts with regard to DNA alteration and the occipital ridge. Believe it or not, you, Laura, will be rid of these, eventually. It is not what some individuals respond to you that matters. It is sharing the information that counts. Also, remember, these persons do not perceive your feelings and sensitivities as keenly as you do, nor do you perceive theirs, likewise.
he just wanted to think that somebody out there in the cosmos cares about Phillip P. and his sister. A: Nobody does. Q: (L) Nobody cares about Phillip and his sister? A: Nobody “cares” about individual units of the universal consciousness. Q: (L) We realize that, but we, as units in bodies of flesh… A: One must get past the idea that there is some sort of “cheerleading squad” attached to individual consciousness units if one is to progress… it just doesn’t work that way!
What quality in us, what thing, enabled us to make contact. Because, obviously a lot of people try and get garbage. A: You asked. Q: (L) A lot of people ask! A: No they don’t, they command. Q: (L) Well, a lot of people do ask or beg or plead, but they get all discombobulated with the answers. A: No, they command. Think about it. You did not beg or plead… that is commanding.
_____________________
THAT'S IT.
TO BE CONTINUED...
_____________________________
I come across in tons of reading, that the number 33 is somehow significant. Could you tell us the significance, in esoteric terms, or in terms of secret societies, of the number 33. There is the cipher of Roger Bacon, based on the number 33, the 33rd degree masons… A: As usual, we do not just give you the answers,
In Kaballah, 11 is the power number…
Medusa. Heads. 11. Is there something about the mythical Medusa that we need to see here? A: 11 squared divided by phi. Q: (L) By pi. 11 squared divided by pi. What does this result bring us to? [Laura’s note: Above, I assumed that the Cs meant ‘pi’ no ‘phi’ since I really wasn’t all that familiar with phi as a mathematical idea so this is the point where things get frustrating. I’m operating on wrong assumptions.] A: 33. infinity. Q: (L) Well, we don’t get 33 out of this… we get 3.3166 etc if we divide the square root of 11 by pi. Divided by phi… what in the heck is phi? Okay, if we divide pi into 11, we get 3.5 infinity, but not 33. A: 1 times 1 Q: (L) Oh. You weren’t saying 11 times 11, you were saying 1 times 1. A: No. Q: (L) 1 times 1 is what? 1. A: 5 minus 3. Q: (L) Okay, that’s 2. A: 2 minus 1. Q: (L) Okay, that’s 1. I don’t get it. A math genius I am NOT. What is the concept here? A: Look: 3 5 3 5 3 5. Q: (L) What is the 3 5 sequence? A: 5 minus 3. Q: (L) Okay, we have strange math. But, you can do anything with numbers because they correspond to the universe at deep levels… A: Is code. Q: (L) What does this code relate to? Is it letters or some written work? A: Infinite power. [Laura’s note: It is obvious now that the Cs were talking about a phi spiral, Fibonacci Sequence, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, etc., Golden Ratio: The ratio between two consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci Series tends to the Golden Number Φ: 0.618… or 1.618; The ratio of each successive pair of numbers in the sequence approximates phi (1.618. . .), as 5 divided by 3 is 1.666…, and 8 divided by 5 is 1.60. but I was ignorant of all that at the time. Poor Cs were SOO frustrated I think.] Q: (L) How is infinite power acquired by knowing this code? If you don’t know the correspondences, how can you use a numerical code? A: Lord of Serpent promises its followers infinite power which they must seek infinite knowledge to gain, for which they pledge allegiance infinitely, for which they possess for all eternity, so long as they find infinite wisdom, for which they search for all infinity. Q: (L) Well, that is a round robin… a circle you can’t get out of! A: And therein you have the deception! Remember, those who seek to serve self with supreme power, are doomed only to serve others who seek to serve self, and can only see that which they want to see.
A pyramid where all those on the bottom, the majority, have no one to take from, so they get absorbed into the next level higher, until you get to the apex and everything disappears. In the STO mode, you have those who only give. And, if they are involved with other STO persons, everyone has and no one is at the bottom or at the top, in a void.
Q: (L) Obviously the 33 represents the Serpent, the Medusa, and so forth… A: You mentioned pyramid, interesting… And what is the geometric one- dimensional figure that corresponds? Q: (L) Well, the triangle. And, if you have a triangle point up you have 3, joined to a triangle pointing down, you have 3, you have a 33. Is that something like what we are getting at here? A: Yes.
When you see the futility of the limitations of 3rd density life, it means you are ready to graduate. Notice those who wallow in it.
You mean there is no Prime Creator, no origin or source of our existence? A: You are Prime Creator.
if we are all that is, how can something exist that can impose something so unpleasant on us? A: Choices follow desire based imbalances. Q: (L) If that is the case, why can’t any one just turn off the lights, end the illusion, and everything becomes nothing? A: Well, first of all, everything does not become nothing. Secondly, some have already become everything.
what the core of Jupiter consists of? A: Basal. In 3rd density it is known as irridium. Q: (L) What is the diameter of the solid core? A: 3 microns. Q: (L) Are you saying that Jupiter is gassy and slushy all the way through? A: Yes. Q: (L) So Sitchin and others may not be correct in saying that Jupiter has an earth sized solid core? A: If that is what they are saying , but remember, Jupiter, Saturn and others resonate to vibrational levels greater than Earth. You are looking directly at density 4 when you view Jupiter, which is why photos of it from up close appear “surreal,” more like drawings. Q: (L) Do beings inhabit Jupiter? A: 5th density and up.
How do you spend your ‘time?’ A: Teaching, sharing, assisting. Q: (L) What do you do for fun? A: That is fun! Q: (PZ) With each other? A: No. Q: (PZ) With who? A: Densities 1,2,3,4,5.
Okay, can we ask now about El Chupacabras? A: It is what it is. Q: (L) It is a ‘goatsucker.’ Where does it come from? A: Review transcripts re: “window fallers.” Q: (L) If it is a window faller, does it come from another density, or a lateral dimension? A: Closer to the latter. Q: (L) Okay, so it is like a horizontal dimension. What allowed it to enter our realm? A: This is complex, but best described as “EM wave bursts along frequency border variation.”
First of all, confusion abounds here due to incorrect interpretations of the last subject discussed. Dimensions are not densities!!!! Dimensions are strictly the result of the universal consciousness as manifested in the imagination sector of thought. Density means level of development as measured in terms of closeness to union with The One… Cycle. So, obviously, the “chupacabras” is a manifestation of human consciousness, and, human beings are a manifestation of the Chupacabras consciousness. Get it? Now, a shocker for you: You would not exist if someone didn’t “dream you up.” Q: (L) Who dreamed me up? A: Not important just yet. You literally are the “figments” of someone’s imagination, and nothing more!!! Q: (L) You mean God dreams and brings us into existence? A: Remember, “God” is really all existence in creation, in other words, all consciousness. This is because all existence in creation is consciousness, and vice versa.
fifth density is the contemplation and recycling ‘zone.’
All event sequences happen eternally and for an instant only at once.
false information is worse than no information at all.
All such changes are caused by three things and three things only! 1) Human endeavors. 2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth. 3) Planetary orbital aberrations.
everybody in an STS realm views themselves as somehow “special, chosen, or protected.” This is simply not so!!
there is variability of physicality on 4th density, but not lack of physicality.
It is not hardness. The “feelings” you describe are related to ego, and by relation, pride, two things that were deliberately implanted into the 3rd density human psyche by the 4th density STS 309,000 years ago, as you measure time. Refer to the transcripts with regard to DNA alteration and the occipital ridge. Believe it or not, you, Laura, will be rid of these, eventually. It is not what some individuals respond to you that matters. It is sharing the information that counts. Also, remember, these persons do not perceive your feelings and sensitivities as keenly as you do, nor do you perceive theirs, likewise.
he just wanted to think that somebody out there in the cosmos cares about Phillip P. and his sister. A: Nobody does. Q: (L) Nobody cares about Phillip and his sister? A: Nobody “cares” about individual units of the universal consciousness. Q: (L) We realize that, but we, as units in bodies of flesh… A: One must get past the idea that there is some sort of “cheerleading squad” attached to individual consciousness units if one is to progress… it just doesn’t work that way!
What quality in us, what thing, enabled us to make contact. Because, obviously a lot of people try and get garbage. A: You asked. Q: (L) A lot of people ask! A: No they don’t, they command. Q: (L) Well, a lot of people do ask or beg or plead, but they get all discombobulated with the answers. A: No, they command. Think about it. You did not beg or plead… that is commanding.
_____________________
THAT'S IT.
TO BE CONTINUED...
Thassa
Jedi
Let's keep the drill going.
____________________________
June 15, 1996
[ A very special session! ]
One of the things that Al- Arabi writes about is the ontological level of being. Concentric circles, so to speak, of states of being. And, each state merely defines relationships. At each higher level you are closer to a direct relationship with the core of existence, and on the outer edges, you are in closer relationship with matter. This accurately explicates the 7 densities you have described for us. He also talks about the “outraying” and the “inward moving” toward knowledge. My thought was that certain beings, such as 4th density STS, and other STS beings of 3rd density, who think that they are creating a situation where they will accrue power to themselves, may, in fact, be part of the “outraying” or dispersion into matter. Is this a correct perception? A: Close. Q: (L) Al- Arabi says, and this echoes what you have said, that you can stay in the illusion where you are, you can move downward or upward. Is this, in part, whichever direction you choose, a function of your position on the cycle? A: It is more complex than that. Q: (L) Well, I am sure of that. Al- Arabi presents a very complex analysis and he probably didn’t know it all either… Nevertheless, it almost word- for- word reflects things that have been given directly to us through this communication. A: Now, learn, read, research all you can about unstable gravity waves.
A: Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear. Q: (L) Can we free associate about these gravity waves since no bookstores are open at this hour? Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct? A: And…. Q: (L) And hmmmm…. A: And antimatter! Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter “antigravity?” Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak? A: Binder. Q: (L) Okay. Gravity is the binder. Is gravity the binder of matter? A: And… Q: (L) Is gravity a property of light? A: Not the issue. Q: (L) What is the issue? Can you help me out here, Frank? A: Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!! Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence? A: Pathway to. Q: (L) Okay. A: Doorway to. Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves… no, hold everything… do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density? A: Throughout. Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density? A: That is just the point, there is none. Q: (L) There are no unstable gravity waves? A: Wrong… Q: (L) There is no emanation point? A: Yes. Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation? A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti- matter, too! Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities? A: Everything. Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically? A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing. Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity waves? Is this what spirals do? A: On the way to. Q: (L) So, if were to focus on collecting unstable gravity waves… A: When you wrote “Noah” where did you place gravity? Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy… A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all existence! Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption… and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life… A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does it go? Q: (L) The windows? A: The gravity. Q: (L) Oh. Gravity must go into the ethereal dimensions or densities. I mean, you have my head going in so many different directions that I feel like I have popcorn in there. A: Good! Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go. The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window! A: You have it too!! Q: (L) So, gravity is the unifying principle… the thing that keeps things together, like the way all the fat pulls together in a bowl of soup. A: Gravity is all there is. Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity? A: No. Q: (L) What is light? A: Gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces? A: Gravity is “God.” Q: (L) But, I thought God was light? A: If gravity is everything, what isn’t it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the “light that cannot be seen,” as the Sufis call it: the Source. A: Please name something that is not gravity. Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity. Fine. What is absolute nothingness? A: A mere thought. Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non- existence? A: Yes, there is. Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought? A: Both. Q: (L) Then, is there also specific sound configurations involved? A: Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity. Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place? A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity. Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing, or is it gravity that IS him that chose? A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence. Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it’s probably because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What have I done! Alright. I am confused. A: No you are not. Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded. A: Befuddling is fun! Q: (L) Well, I guess that if any of this is going to be of particular significance to us, then we will certainly find out the details as we go along. A: How many times do we have to tell you?!?! Q: (L) Learning is fun! Right! A: The entire sum total of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa. Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the “manyness” that we perceive? A: Perception of 3rd density. Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me… okay, that’s… I understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping away the veils. A: That is the fun part. Q: (L) So, the fellow who built the Coral Castle was able to access this. Consistently or only intermittently? A: Partially. Q: (L) According to what I understand, at the speed of light, there is no mass, no time, and no gravity. How can this be? A: No mass, no time, but yes, gravity. Q: (L) A photon has gravity? A: Gravity supersedes light speed. Q: (L) Gravity waves are faster than light? A: Yes. Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable? A: Utilization. Q: (L) I feel like I am missing a really big point here… A: You are, but you can only find it at your own pace. Q: (L) Well, I think I need to do some reading and research so that I can come back to this. A: And, on that note, good night. END OF SESSION
June 22, 1996
[ A session I found to be very interesting ]
How does the “dividing line” between the 4 physical densities and 5th function? A: Recycling zone, one must have direct contact in perfect balance with those on 6th density in order to fulfill the need for contemplation/ learning phase while in between incarnations of 1st through 4th densities. Q: (L) When a person finishes all their experiences on 1st through 4th density, do they then remain at 5th for a period before to moving to 6th. A: Yes. Q: (L) When you die in 3rd and go to 5th, do you pass through or see 4th? A: No. Q: (L) When you are in 5th density, is part of your service to be a guide? Are there two kinds of beings on 5th: those who are there for the recycling, and those whose level it simply IS? A: No. All are as one in timeless understanding of all there is. Q: (L) If, at 5th density a person has timeless understanding, what is it about them that determines that they will “recycle” as opposed to moving to 6th from 5th? A: Contemplation reveals needed destiny. Q: (L) So, being united with other beings on 5th, you come to some sort of understanding about your lessons…. A: Balanced. And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation… “The Great Equalizer!” Q: (L) In this picture in my mind, the cycle moves out, in dispersion, begins to accrete and return to the source. Is this correct? A: Close. Q: (L) Is it, in fact, that exactly half of all that exists, is moving into imbalance, while the other half is moving into balance? A: Close. Q: (L) All the cosmos? All that exists? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is it possible that one area of the cosmos has more of the balance seeking energy while another has more of that which is seeking imbalance? A: Oh yes! Q: (L) Is the Earth one of those areas that is more imbalanced than balanced at the present time? A: Yes, but rapidly moving back toward balance. Q: (L) Is the Realm Border part of this balancing? A: Yes. Q: (V) A few weeks ago several of us began to suffer from internal heat, insomnia, and other things. What was this? A: Image. Deep conjunction of fibrous linkage in DNA structure. Q: (V) Well, I want to know if it is in my mind that I get so hot, or does my body temperature actually elevate? A: Only on 4th. Q: (V) I don’t understand. A: Bleedthrough, get used to those!
Is 3rd density awareness the only density with perception of time? A: No. Q: (L) Well, what others? A: 4,5,6,7. Q: (L) But I thought that time perception was an illusion? A: YOUR perception of it is an illusion. Remember the example of the dogs and cats riding in a car? Q: (L) Yes. Ouspensky and the horse. So, time, as an essential thing, DOES exist? A: But not as you know it. When we refer to “timelessness,” we are speaking from the standpoint of your familiarity only.
Q: (L) Swell! Is the energy that is being manifested in the positive, on and around the planet, is it going to reduce the level of negativity in the beings existing on the planet? A: This is not the point. When “Earth” becomes a 4th density realm, all the forces, both STS and STO shall be in direct contact with one another… It will be a “level playing field,” thus, balanced.
(L) Is this alternate universe of antimatter the point from which phenomena occur or are manifested in our universe? A: More like doorway or “conduit.” Q: (L) Is this alternate universe the means by which we must travel to 4th density? Is it like a veil, or an abyss of some sort? A: Think of it as the highway. Q: (L) So, we must travel through this universe of antimatter in order to reach 4th density? A: No. Q: (L) Is something going to happen in terms of interacting with this antimatter in order to bring about some sort of transition? A: No. Realm Border is traveling wave. Q: (L) Okay, you say “traveling wave,” and then you say that antimatter is the highway. Does this mean moving through antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter via the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border? A: Bends space/ time, this is where your unstable gravity waves can be utilized.
Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which destabilizes the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite with matter, creating a portal through which space/ time can be bent, or traveled through via this “bending.” In other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the antimatter, IS the bending of space/ time? Is that it? A: Yes. Q: (V) Is there a portal for each person, or one large portal? A: No. Q: (V) So we move through a portal in masses? A: No. Q: (L) Is this generating of EM fields to destabilize the gravity wave what the HAARP assembly is designed and built for? A: No.
Proper technology. Unstable gravity waves. And once you told us to study Tesla coils…. antimatter… destabilizing the gravity waves through EM generation allows the antimatter to interact with matter which then creates a portal… is it in the antimatter universe that all this traveling back and forth is done by aliens when they abduct people? A: Close. They transport through it, but most abductions take place in either 3rd or 4th density. Q: (L) Is this movement through the antimatter universe, is this what people perceive in their abductions as the “wall of fire?” The coming apart? The demolecularizing? A: No. That is TransDimensional Atomic Remolecularization. Q: (L) Okay, if a person were passing into the antimatter universe, how would they perceive it? A: They wouldn’t. Q: (L) Why? A: No space; no time. Q: (L) Antimatter universe has no space and no time… so, the antimatter universe is possibly where the poor guys of flight 19 are? A: Yes. Q: (L) And you can get stuck in this place? A: Yes. And if you are in a time warp cocoon, you are hyperconscious, i.e. you perceive “zero time” as if it were literally millions of years, that is if the cycle is connected or closed, as in “Philadelphia Experiment.” And, on that note, good night. END OF SESSION
The first thing is in regard to the Santilli session: is awareness equal to gravity? A: It is a part therein. Q: (L) Does accumulation of knowledge and awareness correspond to an increase in gravity? A: No.
You said that EM was the same as gravity. Does an increase in EM, the collection of EM or the production of an EM wave, does this increase gravity on those things or objects or persons subjected to it? A: Gravity does not ever get increased or decreased, it is merely collected and dispersed.
Is STO the equivalent of dispersing gravity? A: No, STO is a REFLECTION of the existence of gravity dispersal. Q: (L) Is STS also dispersal of gravity? A: No. Collection is reflected. STS is reflection or reflected by collection of gravity.
You also said that antimatter realm is the door to, or the pathway to, ethereal existence. Is 4th density, therefore, an antimatter universe? A: No. Q: (L) Do the beings in 4th density manifest in an antimatter state? A: Both. Q: (L) Is 4th density a density where both matter and antimatter are in balance? A: Not in balance, in evidence.
You can utilize gravity, but you cannot “use” it. You cannot increase or decrease that which is in perfectly balanced static state.
Are there equal amounts of matter and antimatter at all densities? A: Yes. Remember, density refers to one’s conscious awareness only.
When it is a struggle, you are not learning. So stop struggling and meditate. i.e. enjoy the ride.
Don’t you get more free will by assimilating knowledge? A: Yes!! Yes!!
“Passion” does not set one “free,” quite the opposite! Q: (L) But what if your passion is for knowledge? A: That is not passion, it is soul questing.
you said ‘utilization,’ and that STO was dispersion, and STS was ‘collection’ of gravity. I have made a few conjectures about this and would like to ask, does this mean that in giving to others, even if what you are giving is a withholding of assistance because you know that assistance would only prolong the lesson, is dispersing gravity, and exerting mental or other control over others, even if one is unaware that they are attaching energy drains to another, is collecting gravity? A: Close.
Judgment is STS.
What is the point of a brown star? Black body… A: No, silly! Try the most obviously apparent. Q: (L) Well, is it one that just hasn’t started cooking yet? A: Opposite. Q: (L) Okay, it has burned so long it is about to run out of gas? A: Yes.
How easy is it to see brown against a black background? Q: (T) Not easy at all! That is why they can’t see the dark matter… A: That is why scientists dubbed it “brown.” Q: (L) How does brown star connect to twin sun theory? A: Guess!
What is the significance of the brown star? A: Dark star.
Are they being “kicked” and then they get on the wave that is already on the move? A: Yes. This time. You have had the comet cluster before in antiquity, but the wave was last here aeons ago.
Is gravity emitted by an electron? A: Yes.
A: What we are saying is the sun is a proton and its twin is an electron!
Okay, we have the 3600 year comet cluster cycle, the Sun twin is another cycle altogether, and then we have the wave, which is a Grand Cycle. So, we have three things causing a transition in nature? A: Like “biorhythms.”
once anticipation enters the picture, the intent can no longer be STO. Q: (L) Anticipation is desire for something for self. Is that it? A: Yes.
Is the Ra concept of Wanderers a valid… A: Yes.
Wanderers, remember, are 6th density beings.
August 17, 1996
[ this session has much information about Hoagland and tetrahedrons. I don't really know if it's content fits the "Consciousness, Origins, and Cosmology" criteria; personally, I don't think so. But in case of doubt, better safe than sorry! So I ended up mentioning this session ]
A: No. Coincidences are the spice of life for those with higher knowledge.
Patience serves the “questor of hidden knowledge” well!
Q: (A) Which branch of physics is closest to understanding of inter- density communications? A: Theoretical. Q: (A) Which branch of mathematics? A: Two of them: calculus and algebra. Q: (A) Should I look into zero- point energy problem? A: That one should be “set aside.” Because it will lead to a “dead end.”
Is time multi- dimensional? If so, is it three- dimensional? A: Not correct concept. Time is not a dimension. This is very complex from your standpoint, but let us just say that time is “selective,” or “variable.”
I am confused about space, time, Einstein’s general relativity, gravitation and electromagnetism. A: Einstein’s Theory of Relativity is only partially correct. That is why we say that there is no “dimension” of time. As far as gravity and electromagnetics are concerned, we suggest a review of the as yet publicly unfinished Unified Field Theory of the same gentleman. Was it completed and put into application in secret? Hmmmmm… And, if so, what are the ramifications? Maybe you could make the same discoveries.
Mathematics is the one and only true universal language.
A: Ark was coming into the picture all along. All is eternal, time is selective. We can see the entire jukebox menu selection at all “times.”
the theory of relativity based on Galilei group is better than that based on Lorentz group? A: Yes. Q: (L) Why? A: Because of the symmetric calculations they used as a basis for their efforts. Q: (T) Where has the Lorentz group gone wrong? A: Too complex to answer.
Should I look into sonoluminescence? Are there causal time loops? A: Q1: Yes. Q2: On the right track, now blend or unify. No polarities, please.
let me jump over to this other subject of the number 33 and the number 11. Is there anything beyond what was given on 11- 11- 95, that you could add at this time, about any of the mathematics or the use of these numbers? A: Prime numbers are the dwellings of the mystics.
December 21, 1996
[ session with a lot about the nature of time and reality ]
Would you say that the writings of Albert Pike might be interesting to decode? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is there any particular number sequence that could be used? A: 353535…
We perceive things out there. Of what are they composed? A: Matter. Q: (L) Of what is matter composed? A: Atomic structure. Q: (L) Of what are atoms composed? A: Thoughts. Q: (L) Whose thoughts? A: Yours. Q: (L) Everything? A: Everything.
Well, you once said that it was necessary to be on a planet that had a star that was getting ready to go supernova in order to molecularize physical bodies. What I want to know is: what is this process whereby thought becomes manifest as matter? A: This is too complicated for this medium. You need another method. Something that allows for greater word usage. Q: (L) But, just a clue: how does thought become matter? A: Bilaterally. Q: (L) What do you mean by “bilaterally?” A: Dual emergence. Q: (L) Emergence into what and what? A: Not “into what and what,” but rather, “from what and to what.” Q: (L) What emerges from what? A: The beginning emerges from the end, and vice versa. Q: (L) And what is the beginning and what is the end? A: Union with the One. Q: (L) What is the One? A: 7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not.
I once asked you if time was gravity? A: Is a fence the ground? Q: (L) Is gravity God? A: No. Q: (L) Is gravity 7th density? A: No. Q: (L) Where does gravity emanate from? A: Thought center. Q: (L) You have mentioned thought centers of many occasions. Is there more than one? A: All are one and all. Q: (L) If you have a thought center, how do thought centers related to 7th density, the One? A: Exactly! Q: (L) Are thought centers 7th density? A: All is. Q: (L) All is thought centers? A: No. All is 7th density.
on one other occasion, you said that time does exist at other densities, only that it is “selective,” you can pick the time. Is that correct? A: If you want to call it time, but it would not be the same, would it?
What is the function of DNA, other than coding protein production? A: Conductor of electricity. Q: (L) Is that the only other function? A: Well, as you know, electrical energy can have nearly endless applications. Examples… radio waves, neuro- transceiver for thought pattern programs facilitated through electromagnetic wave transmission, etc. Method used for creation and maintenance of program illusions, such as the perception of linear time as reality. Q: (L) Is that it?
[ at first, I thought that this excerpt about DNA might not be appropriate here in this thread, genetics is rather a "3D issue." Here we are rather providing excerpts about (deep) Consciousness, Cosmology, and Origins. But this very excerpt stated DNA is the method to keep the illusion of the perception of linear time. Thus, I thought maybe it was suitable including this excerpt... ]
Which part of a human extends into 4th density? A: That which is effected by pituitary gland. Q: (L) And what is that? A: Psychic.
[ one of these excerpts I don't know if they are suitable here on this thread. Because information about body organs and parts are rather a "3D issue." But I decided including it here because this about body parts that extend into 4th density. ]
I would like to know if there is a separate field beyond electromagnetism and gravitation, something similar to the Sheldrake concept of a morphological field or morphogenetic field? A: Yes, and it is very close to that. It is apparent that Sheldrake was “in tune,” as are you, Arkadiusz. But you must have faith in your thoughts, as sometimes they are assisted. Q: (A) When you speak of an upcoming wave, it is a wave of what? A: Think of it as a wave of reflection from the beginning and end point. Q: (L) Can you clarify that in more 3rd density terms? A: No, see what the response is. It is his question, after all! Q: (A) Is DNA acting as a superconductor? A: Yes!!!
[ DNA, a "3D issue," comes up in this excerpt. But notice it is not only about DNA ]
(A) [regarding wave] But what vibrates? Energy? Aether? A: Energy and aether are directly symbiotic. Q: (A) And when it vibrates, then in which dimension? A: The density 3 and 4 at transition junction. Q: (A) If not in linear time, then in what? A: Cyclical “time.” Q: (A) What measures the distance between one crest and another? A: Ending/ beginning of cycle. Q: (A) Trying to understand the universe in terms of a triality, matter - geometry - information. Is it the right idea? A: If one thinks of matter as “living” rather than “dead.”
Must I understand the nature of superconductivity? It seems to me that I must. A: Yes and yes, definitely.
A: Learn to laugh at that which currently disturbs you. After all, it is comical, when you think of it. Stop taking everything so seriously!!!
When one protests, one facilitates the building of barriers that are an integral part of the attack. For one to have revelation, one must “step back,” and view the picture without prejudice!
Is there some anti- gravitational effect in the levitron toy? A: Not “in” the levitron toy. Rather “through” the toy. The toy is just the vehicle. Q: (L) Well, should we spend 40 bucks on this thing? (V) How does it work? (L) I don’t know! A: Antigravity is deceivingly simple. Q: (L) So, the guy who is advertising it is not cheating? A: Not correct concept.
A: No. The soul was never created. Was/ Is/ Always will be. Q: (V) Well, I can’t grasp that… I mean, creation… (L) There is no creation, All just IS. (F) Well, there are cycles. (V) Well, where does the substance come from. (L) Doesn’t come from anywhere. Just thoughts in the mind of God. I mean, what else does God have to do for eternity but dream? We are the dream. (V) Can you comment on my struggle to understand this? A: What is the struggle? It will come. Okay, folds, for now, Good Night.
January 4, 1997
[ this is a session about dimensions, densities, creation of universes... but I DID NOT include it's "excerpts" here because the whole of the session is about these themes! If I did so, I would need to copy and paste the whole session here! ]
_________________________
LATER ON, MORE!
____________________________
June 15, 1996
[ A very special session! ]
One of the things that Al- Arabi writes about is the ontological level of being. Concentric circles, so to speak, of states of being. And, each state merely defines relationships. At each higher level you are closer to a direct relationship with the core of existence, and on the outer edges, you are in closer relationship with matter. This accurately explicates the 7 densities you have described for us. He also talks about the “outraying” and the “inward moving” toward knowledge. My thought was that certain beings, such as 4th density STS, and other STS beings of 3rd density, who think that they are creating a situation where they will accrue power to themselves, may, in fact, be part of the “outraying” or dispersion into matter. Is this a correct perception? A: Close. Q: (L) Al- Arabi says, and this echoes what you have said, that you can stay in the illusion where you are, you can move downward or upward. Is this, in part, whichever direction you choose, a function of your position on the cycle? A: It is more complex than that. Q: (L) Well, I am sure of that. Al- Arabi presents a very complex analysis and he probably didn’t know it all either… Nevertheless, it almost word- for- word reflects things that have been given directly to us through this communication. A: Now, learn, read, research all you can about unstable gravity waves.
A: Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear. Q: (L) Can we free associate about these gravity waves since no bookstores are open at this hour? Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct? A: And…. Q: (L) And hmmmm…. A: And antimatter! Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter “antigravity?” Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak? A: Binder. Q: (L) Okay. Gravity is the binder. Is gravity the binder of matter? A: And… Q: (L) Is gravity a property of light? A: Not the issue. Q: (L) What is the issue? Can you help me out here, Frank? A: Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!! Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence? A: Pathway to. Q: (L) Okay. A: Doorway to. Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves… no, hold everything… do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density? A: Throughout. Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density? A: That is just the point, there is none. Q: (L) There are no unstable gravity waves? A: Wrong… Q: (L) There is no emanation point? A: Yes. Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation? A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti- matter, too! Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities? A: Everything. Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically? A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing. Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity waves? Is this what spirals do? A: On the way to. Q: (L) So, if were to focus on collecting unstable gravity waves… A: When you wrote “Noah” where did you place gravity? Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy… A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all existence! Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption… and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life… A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does it go? Q: (L) The windows? A: The gravity. Q: (L) Oh. Gravity must go into the ethereal dimensions or densities. I mean, you have my head going in so many different directions that I feel like I have popcorn in there. A: Good! Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go. The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window! A: You have it too!! Q: (L) So, gravity is the unifying principle… the thing that keeps things together, like the way all the fat pulls together in a bowl of soup. A: Gravity is all there is. Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity? A: No. Q: (L) What is light? A: Gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces? A: Gravity is “God.” Q: (L) But, I thought God was light? A: If gravity is everything, what isn’t it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the “light that cannot be seen,” as the Sufis call it: the Source. A: Please name something that is not gravity. Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity. Fine. What is absolute nothingness? A: A mere thought. Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non- existence? A: Yes, there is. Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought? A: Both. Q: (L) Then, is there also specific sound configurations involved? A: Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity. Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place? A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity. Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing, or is it gravity that IS him that chose? A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence. Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it’s probably because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What have I done! Alright. I am confused. A: No you are not. Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded. A: Befuddling is fun! Q: (L) Well, I guess that if any of this is going to be of particular significance to us, then we will certainly find out the details as we go along. A: How many times do we have to tell you?!?! Q: (L) Learning is fun! Right! A: The entire sum total of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa. Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the “manyness” that we perceive? A: Perception of 3rd density. Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me… okay, that’s… I understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping away the veils. A: That is the fun part. Q: (L) So, the fellow who built the Coral Castle was able to access this. Consistently or only intermittently? A: Partially. Q: (L) According to what I understand, at the speed of light, there is no mass, no time, and no gravity. How can this be? A: No mass, no time, but yes, gravity. Q: (L) A photon has gravity? A: Gravity supersedes light speed. Q: (L) Gravity waves are faster than light? A: Yes. Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable? A: Utilization. Q: (L) I feel like I am missing a really big point here… A: You are, but you can only find it at your own pace. Q: (L) Well, I think I need to do some reading and research so that I can come back to this. A: And, on that note, good night. END OF SESSION
June 22, 1996
[ A session I found to be very interesting ]
How does the “dividing line” between the 4 physical densities and 5th function? A: Recycling zone, one must have direct contact in perfect balance with those on 6th density in order to fulfill the need for contemplation/ learning phase while in between incarnations of 1st through 4th densities. Q: (L) When a person finishes all their experiences on 1st through 4th density, do they then remain at 5th for a period before to moving to 6th. A: Yes. Q: (L) When you die in 3rd and go to 5th, do you pass through or see 4th? A: No. Q: (L) When you are in 5th density, is part of your service to be a guide? Are there two kinds of beings on 5th: those who are there for the recycling, and those whose level it simply IS? A: No. All are as one in timeless understanding of all there is. Q: (L) If, at 5th density a person has timeless understanding, what is it about them that determines that they will “recycle” as opposed to moving to 6th from 5th? A: Contemplation reveals needed destiny. Q: (L) So, being united with other beings on 5th, you come to some sort of understanding about your lessons…. A: Balanced. And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the binder of all creation… “The Great Equalizer!” Q: (L) In this picture in my mind, the cycle moves out, in dispersion, begins to accrete and return to the source. Is this correct? A: Close. Q: (L) Is it, in fact, that exactly half of all that exists, is moving into imbalance, while the other half is moving into balance? A: Close. Q: (L) All the cosmos? All that exists? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is it possible that one area of the cosmos has more of the balance seeking energy while another has more of that which is seeking imbalance? A: Oh yes! Q: (L) Is the Earth one of those areas that is more imbalanced than balanced at the present time? A: Yes, but rapidly moving back toward balance. Q: (L) Is the Realm Border part of this balancing? A: Yes. Q: (V) A few weeks ago several of us began to suffer from internal heat, insomnia, and other things. What was this? A: Image. Deep conjunction of fibrous linkage in DNA structure. Q: (V) Well, I want to know if it is in my mind that I get so hot, or does my body temperature actually elevate? A: Only on 4th. Q: (V) I don’t understand. A: Bleedthrough, get used to those!
Is 3rd density awareness the only density with perception of time? A: No. Q: (L) Well, what others? A: 4,5,6,7. Q: (L) But I thought that time perception was an illusion? A: YOUR perception of it is an illusion. Remember the example of the dogs and cats riding in a car? Q: (L) Yes. Ouspensky and the horse. So, time, as an essential thing, DOES exist? A: But not as you know it. When we refer to “timelessness,” we are speaking from the standpoint of your familiarity only.
Q: (L) Swell! Is the energy that is being manifested in the positive, on and around the planet, is it going to reduce the level of negativity in the beings existing on the planet? A: This is not the point. When “Earth” becomes a 4th density realm, all the forces, both STS and STO shall be in direct contact with one another… It will be a “level playing field,” thus, balanced.
(L) Is this alternate universe of antimatter the point from which phenomena occur or are manifested in our universe? A: More like doorway or “conduit.” Q: (L) Is this alternate universe the means by which we must travel to 4th density? Is it like a veil, or an abyss of some sort? A: Think of it as the highway. Q: (L) So, we must travel through this universe of antimatter in order to reach 4th density? A: No. Q: (L) Is something going to happen in terms of interacting with this antimatter in order to bring about some sort of transition? A: No. Realm Border is traveling wave. Q: (L) Okay, you say “traveling wave,” and then you say that antimatter is the highway. Does this mean moving through antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter via the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border? A: Bends space/ time, this is where your unstable gravity waves can be utilized.
Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which destabilizes the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite with matter, creating a portal through which space/ time can be bent, or traveled through via this “bending.” In other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the antimatter, IS the bending of space/ time? Is that it? A: Yes. Q: (V) Is there a portal for each person, or one large portal? A: No. Q: (V) So we move through a portal in masses? A: No. Q: (L) Is this generating of EM fields to destabilize the gravity wave what the HAARP assembly is designed and built for? A: No.
Proper technology. Unstable gravity waves. And once you told us to study Tesla coils…. antimatter… destabilizing the gravity waves through EM generation allows the antimatter to interact with matter which then creates a portal… is it in the antimatter universe that all this traveling back and forth is done by aliens when they abduct people? A: Close. They transport through it, but most abductions take place in either 3rd or 4th density. Q: (L) Is this movement through the antimatter universe, is this what people perceive in their abductions as the “wall of fire?” The coming apart? The demolecularizing? A: No. That is TransDimensional Atomic Remolecularization. Q: (L) Okay, if a person were passing into the antimatter universe, how would they perceive it? A: They wouldn’t. Q: (L) Why? A: No space; no time. Q: (L) Antimatter universe has no space and no time… so, the antimatter universe is possibly where the poor guys of flight 19 are? A: Yes. Q: (L) And you can get stuck in this place? A: Yes. And if you are in a time warp cocoon, you are hyperconscious, i.e. you perceive “zero time” as if it were literally millions of years, that is if the cycle is connected or closed, as in “Philadelphia Experiment.” And, on that note, good night. END OF SESSION
The first thing is in regard to the Santilli session: is awareness equal to gravity? A: It is a part therein. Q: (L) Does accumulation of knowledge and awareness correspond to an increase in gravity? A: No.
You said that EM was the same as gravity. Does an increase in EM, the collection of EM or the production of an EM wave, does this increase gravity on those things or objects or persons subjected to it? A: Gravity does not ever get increased or decreased, it is merely collected and dispersed.
Is STO the equivalent of dispersing gravity? A: No, STO is a REFLECTION of the existence of gravity dispersal. Q: (L) Is STS also dispersal of gravity? A: No. Collection is reflected. STS is reflection or reflected by collection of gravity.
You also said that antimatter realm is the door to, or the pathway to, ethereal existence. Is 4th density, therefore, an antimatter universe? A: No. Q: (L) Do the beings in 4th density manifest in an antimatter state? A: Both. Q: (L) Is 4th density a density where both matter and antimatter are in balance? A: Not in balance, in evidence.
You can utilize gravity, but you cannot “use” it. You cannot increase or decrease that which is in perfectly balanced static state.
Are there equal amounts of matter and antimatter at all densities? A: Yes. Remember, density refers to one’s conscious awareness only.
When it is a struggle, you are not learning. So stop struggling and meditate. i.e. enjoy the ride.
Don’t you get more free will by assimilating knowledge? A: Yes!! Yes!!
“Passion” does not set one “free,” quite the opposite! Q: (L) But what if your passion is for knowledge? A: That is not passion, it is soul questing.
you said ‘utilization,’ and that STO was dispersion, and STS was ‘collection’ of gravity. I have made a few conjectures about this and would like to ask, does this mean that in giving to others, even if what you are giving is a withholding of assistance because you know that assistance would only prolong the lesson, is dispersing gravity, and exerting mental or other control over others, even if one is unaware that they are attaching energy drains to another, is collecting gravity? A: Close.
Judgment is STS.
What is the point of a brown star? Black body… A: No, silly! Try the most obviously apparent. Q: (L) Well, is it one that just hasn’t started cooking yet? A: Opposite. Q: (L) Okay, it has burned so long it is about to run out of gas? A: Yes.
How easy is it to see brown against a black background? Q: (T) Not easy at all! That is why they can’t see the dark matter… A: That is why scientists dubbed it “brown.” Q: (L) How does brown star connect to twin sun theory? A: Guess!
What is the significance of the brown star? A: Dark star.
Are they being “kicked” and then they get on the wave that is already on the move? A: Yes. This time. You have had the comet cluster before in antiquity, but the wave was last here aeons ago.
Is gravity emitted by an electron? A: Yes.
A: What we are saying is the sun is a proton and its twin is an electron!
Okay, we have the 3600 year comet cluster cycle, the Sun twin is another cycle altogether, and then we have the wave, which is a Grand Cycle. So, we have three things causing a transition in nature? A: Like “biorhythms.”
once anticipation enters the picture, the intent can no longer be STO. Q: (L) Anticipation is desire for something for self. Is that it? A: Yes.
Is the Ra concept of Wanderers a valid… A: Yes.
Wanderers, remember, are 6th density beings.
August 17, 1996
[ this session has much information about Hoagland and tetrahedrons. I don't really know if it's content fits the "Consciousness, Origins, and Cosmology" criteria; personally, I don't think so. But in case of doubt, better safe than sorry! So I ended up mentioning this session ]
A: No. Coincidences are the spice of life for those with higher knowledge.
Patience serves the “questor of hidden knowledge” well!
Q: (A) Which branch of physics is closest to understanding of inter- density communications? A: Theoretical. Q: (A) Which branch of mathematics? A: Two of them: calculus and algebra. Q: (A) Should I look into zero- point energy problem? A: That one should be “set aside.” Because it will lead to a “dead end.”
Is time multi- dimensional? If so, is it three- dimensional? A: Not correct concept. Time is not a dimension. This is very complex from your standpoint, but let us just say that time is “selective,” or “variable.”
I am confused about space, time, Einstein’s general relativity, gravitation and electromagnetism. A: Einstein’s Theory of Relativity is only partially correct. That is why we say that there is no “dimension” of time. As far as gravity and electromagnetics are concerned, we suggest a review of the as yet publicly unfinished Unified Field Theory of the same gentleman. Was it completed and put into application in secret? Hmmmmm… And, if so, what are the ramifications? Maybe you could make the same discoveries.
Mathematics is the one and only true universal language.
A: Ark was coming into the picture all along. All is eternal, time is selective. We can see the entire jukebox menu selection at all “times.”
the theory of relativity based on Galilei group is better than that based on Lorentz group? A: Yes. Q: (L) Why? A: Because of the symmetric calculations they used as a basis for their efforts. Q: (T) Where has the Lorentz group gone wrong? A: Too complex to answer.
Should I look into sonoluminescence? Are there causal time loops? A: Q1: Yes. Q2: On the right track, now blend or unify. No polarities, please.
let me jump over to this other subject of the number 33 and the number 11. Is there anything beyond what was given on 11- 11- 95, that you could add at this time, about any of the mathematics or the use of these numbers? A: Prime numbers are the dwellings of the mystics.
December 21, 1996
[ session with a lot about the nature of time and reality ]
Would you say that the writings of Albert Pike might be interesting to decode? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is there any particular number sequence that could be used? A: 353535…
We perceive things out there. Of what are they composed? A: Matter. Q: (L) Of what is matter composed? A: Atomic structure. Q: (L) Of what are atoms composed? A: Thoughts. Q: (L) Whose thoughts? A: Yours. Q: (L) Everything? A: Everything.
Well, you once said that it was necessary to be on a planet that had a star that was getting ready to go supernova in order to molecularize physical bodies. What I want to know is: what is this process whereby thought becomes manifest as matter? A: This is too complicated for this medium. You need another method. Something that allows for greater word usage. Q: (L) But, just a clue: how does thought become matter? A: Bilaterally. Q: (L) What do you mean by “bilaterally?” A: Dual emergence. Q: (L) Emergence into what and what? A: Not “into what and what,” but rather, “from what and to what.” Q: (L) What emerges from what? A: The beginning emerges from the end, and vice versa. Q: (L) And what is the beginning and what is the end? A: Union with the One. Q: (L) What is the One? A: 7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not.
I once asked you if time was gravity? A: Is a fence the ground? Q: (L) Is gravity God? A: No. Q: (L) Is gravity 7th density? A: No. Q: (L) Where does gravity emanate from? A: Thought center. Q: (L) You have mentioned thought centers of many occasions. Is there more than one? A: All are one and all. Q: (L) If you have a thought center, how do thought centers related to 7th density, the One? A: Exactly! Q: (L) Are thought centers 7th density? A: All is. Q: (L) All is thought centers? A: No. All is 7th density.
on one other occasion, you said that time does exist at other densities, only that it is “selective,” you can pick the time. Is that correct? A: If you want to call it time, but it would not be the same, would it?
What is the function of DNA, other than coding protein production? A: Conductor of electricity. Q: (L) Is that the only other function? A: Well, as you know, electrical energy can have nearly endless applications. Examples… radio waves, neuro- transceiver for thought pattern programs facilitated through electromagnetic wave transmission, etc. Method used for creation and maintenance of program illusions, such as the perception of linear time as reality. Q: (L) Is that it?
[ at first, I thought that this excerpt about DNA might not be appropriate here in this thread, genetics is rather a "3D issue." Here we are rather providing excerpts about (deep) Consciousness, Cosmology, and Origins. But this very excerpt stated DNA is the method to keep the illusion of the perception of linear time. Thus, I thought maybe it was suitable including this excerpt... ]
Which part of a human extends into 4th density? A: That which is effected by pituitary gland. Q: (L) And what is that? A: Psychic.
[ one of these excerpts I don't know if they are suitable here on this thread. Because information about body organs and parts are rather a "3D issue." But I decided including it here because this about body parts that extend into 4th density. ]
I would like to know if there is a separate field beyond electromagnetism and gravitation, something similar to the Sheldrake concept of a morphological field or morphogenetic field? A: Yes, and it is very close to that. It is apparent that Sheldrake was “in tune,” as are you, Arkadiusz. But you must have faith in your thoughts, as sometimes they are assisted. Q: (A) When you speak of an upcoming wave, it is a wave of what? A: Think of it as a wave of reflection from the beginning and end point. Q: (L) Can you clarify that in more 3rd density terms? A: No, see what the response is. It is his question, after all! Q: (A) Is DNA acting as a superconductor? A: Yes!!!
[ DNA, a "3D issue," comes up in this excerpt. But notice it is not only about DNA ]
(A) [regarding wave] But what vibrates? Energy? Aether? A: Energy and aether are directly symbiotic. Q: (A) And when it vibrates, then in which dimension? A: The density 3 and 4 at transition junction. Q: (A) If not in linear time, then in what? A: Cyclical “time.” Q: (A) What measures the distance between one crest and another? A: Ending/ beginning of cycle. Q: (A) Trying to understand the universe in terms of a triality, matter - geometry - information. Is it the right idea? A: If one thinks of matter as “living” rather than “dead.”
Must I understand the nature of superconductivity? It seems to me that I must. A: Yes and yes, definitely.
A: Learn to laugh at that which currently disturbs you. After all, it is comical, when you think of it. Stop taking everything so seriously!!!
When one protests, one facilitates the building of barriers that are an integral part of the attack. For one to have revelation, one must “step back,” and view the picture without prejudice!
Is there some anti- gravitational effect in the levitron toy? A: Not “in” the levitron toy. Rather “through” the toy. The toy is just the vehicle. Q: (L) Well, should we spend 40 bucks on this thing? (V) How does it work? (L) I don’t know! A: Antigravity is deceivingly simple. Q: (L) So, the guy who is advertising it is not cheating? A: Not correct concept.
A: No. The soul was never created. Was/ Is/ Always will be. Q: (V) Well, I can’t grasp that… I mean, creation… (L) There is no creation, All just IS. (F) Well, there are cycles. (V) Well, where does the substance come from. (L) Doesn’t come from anywhere. Just thoughts in the mind of God. I mean, what else does God have to do for eternity but dream? We are the dream. (V) Can you comment on my struggle to understand this? A: What is the struggle? It will come. Okay, folds, for now, Good Night.
January 4, 1997
[ this is a session about dimensions, densities, creation of universes... but I DID NOT include it's "excerpts" here because the whole of the session is about these themes! If I did so, I would need to copy and paste the whole session here! ]
_________________________
LATER ON, MORE!
Thassa
Jedi
More about the nature of existence.
________________________
What do you suppose happens when the mantle stops, or slows, and the crust does not? Q: (Laura) Frank had a dream about this the other night, too. (Terry) About the mantle slowing? Okay, if the mantle slows and the crust doesn’t… (Laura) It’s like walking around the room, carrying a bowl of soup, and then stopping… (Terry) It sloshes over because the crust keeps moving… water in all of the oceans is going to slosh… A: No sloshing. Q: (Laura) Okay, what happens when the… is it that there will be lots of earthquakes? A: Maybe, but what is the bigger picture? Q: (Laura) The bigger picture is that the earth changes its orbital position, velocity… (Terry) No. The bigger picture is that life on earth gets pretty well wiped out. A: No. Q: (Laura) It exchanges energy potentials with other bodies? A: No. Q: (Jan) Gravity changes… A: Warmer… Q: (Laura) Gravity changes, ok… gravity lessens… A: What have we hinted about gravity. Q: (Laura) Oh, gravity is the binder… (Terry) and is the one truth of the universe. A: Element. Q: (Terry) The element. Gravity is the one true element. This is what you’re saying? A: Close.
[ yes, Geology is rather a "3D issue." But notice they talk about gravity as well ]
Remember… There is no “supernatural” or “paranormal,” only natural and normal. Your ‘Noah Syndrome’ implied, originally, a discrimination between “wicked” and good. Being ready does not recognize such distinctions! Q: (Laura) What does being ready imply? A: Being on the verge of transformation to next density level, be it STO or STS. So, you see, the transformation maintains the balance!
Attachment is merely a function born from a lack of knowledge…
This psychomantium, isn’t it in essence a way of opening up a doorway to other realities and other levels and densities? A: Yes.
[ sure, a psychomantium is a 3D thing... But the C's several times emphasized so much it's importance for the aforementioned (higher densities) purposes that I felt compelled to include it here! They several other times spoke about how to build one as well ]
why do they need a particular place in the universe to transmit from? A: We transmit “through” the opening that is presented in the locator you represent as Cassiopaea, due to the strong radio pulses aligned from Cassiopaea, due to pulsar from neutron star 300 light years behind it, as seen from your locator. {Planchette spirals briefly} This facilitates a clear channel transmission from 6th density to 3rd density. Q: (A) I would like to know how long it takes for the transmission to come from Cassiopaea to Earth. A: “Zero” time. Q: (A) ‘Zero time…’ They transmit, using what? Electromagnetics, gravity, or what? A: Both. They are interconnected, or you could say “unified”. Q: (A) Zero time? Because of what? Because of… structure of space/ time? Of warp? A: Space and time are selective and flexible. Q: (A) What is behind that? What is… what is the medium behind which the transmission goes? A: If there were a medium, your puzzlement would be justified, but, there is not. You see, when one utilizes zero time, there is zero space as well. Q: (J) If there is zero space, and zero time, why does it need to be fixed at a specific location here in 3rd density. A: It does not, for “transmission purposes.” The need for a specific locator, as expressed previously, as you perceive it, was due to vibrational frequencies helpful to your psychic awareness profile.
the base premise of the ‘Noah Syndrome’ is that the sun pulses regularly.
A: Gravity is the “binder” common to all imaginable existence. That is all you really need to know.
gravity is as much antimatter as matter!!
_______________________
SOON I WILL SELECT MORE EXCEPTS ABOUT THE NATURE OF REALITY
________________________
What do you suppose happens when the mantle stops, or slows, and the crust does not? Q: (Laura) Frank had a dream about this the other night, too. (Terry) About the mantle slowing? Okay, if the mantle slows and the crust doesn’t… (Laura) It’s like walking around the room, carrying a bowl of soup, and then stopping… (Terry) It sloshes over because the crust keeps moving… water in all of the oceans is going to slosh… A: No sloshing. Q: (Laura) Okay, what happens when the… is it that there will be lots of earthquakes? A: Maybe, but what is the bigger picture? Q: (Laura) The bigger picture is that the earth changes its orbital position, velocity… (Terry) No. The bigger picture is that life on earth gets pretty well wiped out. A: No. Q: (Laura) It exchanges energy potentials with other bodies? A: No. Q: (Jan) Gravity changes… A: Warmer… Q: (Laura) Gravity changes, ok… gravity lessens… A: What have we hinted about gravity. Q: (Laura) Oh, gravity is the binder… (Terry) and is the one truth of the universe. A: Element. Q: (Terry) The element. Gravity is the one true element. This is what you’re saying? A: Close.
[ yes, Geology is rather a "3D issue." But notice they talk about gravity as well ]
Remember… There is no “supernatural” or “paranormal,” only natural and normal. Your ‘Noah Syndrome’ implied, originally, a discrimination between “wicked” and good. Being ready does not recognize such distinctions! Q: (Laura) What does being ready imply? A: Being on the verge of transformation to next density level, be it STO or STS. So, you see, the transformation maintains the balance!
Attachment is merely a function born from a lack of knowledge…
This psychomantium, isn’t it in essence a way of opening up a doorway to other realities and other levels and densities? A: Yes.
[ sure, a psychomantium is a 3D thing... But the C's several times emphasized so much it's importance for the aforementioned (higher densities) purposes that I felt compelled to include it here! They several other times spoke about how to build one as well ]
why do they need a particular place in the universe to transmit from? A: We transmit “through” the opening that is presented in the locator you represent as Cassiopaea, due to the strong radio pulses aligned from Cassiopaea, due to pulsar from neutron star 300 light years behind it, as seen from your locator. {Planchette spirals briefly} This facilitates a clear channel transmission from 6th density to 3rd density. Q: (A) I would like to know how long it takes for the transmission to come from Cassiopaea to Earth. A: “Zero” time. Q: (A) ‘Zero time…’ They transmit, using what? Electromagnetics, gravity, or what? A: Both. They are interconnected, or you could say “unified”. Q: (A) Zero time? Because of what? Because of… structure of space/ time? Of warp? A: Space and time are selective and flexible. Q: (A) What is behind that? What is… what is the medium behind which the transmission goes? A: If there were a medium, your puzzlement would be justified, but, there is not. You see, when one utilizes zero time, there is zero space as well. Q: (J) If there is zero space, and zero time, why does it need to be fixed at a specific location here in 3rd density. A: It does not, for “transmission purposes.” The need for a specific locator, as expressed previously, as you perceive it, was due to vibrational frequencies helpful to your psychic awareness profile.
the base premise of the ‘Noah Syndrome’ is that the sun pulses regularly.
A: Gravity is the “binder” common to all imaginable existence. That is all you really need to know.
gravity is as much antimatter as matter!!
_______________________
SOON I WILL SELECT MORE EXCEPTS ABOUT THE NATURE OF REALITY
Thassa
Jedi
More passages!
_______________________
our space/ time is the boundary of a domain? Is that correct picture? A: Yes. Q: (A) All right, Then, concerning this gravity, and the antimatter, is it a correct picture that there are two such domains; positive and negative one, and the gravity has something to do with the exchange between the positive and negative? A: Gravity is the “fuel,” or “life blood” of absolutely everything that exists!!!
March 15, 1997
[ session about the nature of electricity, superconductors... The whole of the session is about that, I would need to copy and paste the whole session! So I didn't include this session's excerpts here ]
You want me to be more specific, well, let me put it this way. Some understanding of time refers to it as the ‘now’, the ever- present now. Well, a lot of people remember a lot of other ‘nows,’ some people don’t remember any ‘nows’ at all, and it seems like memory is almost like a reverse function of anticipation. Anticipation being almost like a memory of the ‘future’ and memory being like a reverse anticipation into the past. So, what I would like to know is if time is merely a ‘now’, what is memory? A: Conscious and subconscious record of perceptions.
My first question is: If memory is conscious and subconscious record of perception, as you have stated, and there occurs a “reality merge,” as you also described previously, some sort of time manipulation, does this automatically change individual perceptions? A: Perceptions “leap” into place according to markers in the eternally present continuum. Q: What are these markers? A: Experiential breaks in the perceptual realm of continuance. Q: Markers are experiential breaks. So, one experiences breaks and they become markers… perceptions leap into place… is this saying that, when there is a perception of a break, that some part of the psyche seeks to bridge this break by leaping into some sort of… A: The definition of the previous responses will become clear for you only after some reflection, my dear! Q: Umm… does this leaping of perception occur for everyone as a group, or are some people immune to it? A: !Como!?! What, said the perplexed ones, incredulously! Q: Okay, you said that memory is subjective and an atom is not. If memory is subjective, what you have just been describing means that each and every person has a slightly different perspective, even if they are involved with the same incident or the same time sequence. A: Of course!
But still, what you said still implies that an atom has an objective existence. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity? A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice “at the door.” Q: How does the effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door relate to the objective existence of an atom? A: An atom, as with absolutely everything else, cannot exist without an observer. Q: So, in the case of the objectivity of an atom, if the human observers are not objective, where is the observer who makes the atom objective, or does the atom not exist if there is no observer? A: Yes. to the latter comment. Q: Yes to which part? A: The latter comment. Q: So there must be an observer. Must the observer be human? A: The observer must be a consciousness. Q: If you say that an atom has an objective existence, yet it only exists if it is perceived by a consciousness, then an atom does not have an objective existence, correct? A: No. Q: Okay, what is the distinction? You say that objectivity is the ATTEMPT on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door. A: Without consciousness, there is neither objective or subjective!! Q: So the crux is the attempt to leave prejudice at the door in the same manner as one would be non- anticipatory in order to create? A: Yes. Q: Well, that is a VERY tricky… (A) Is consciousness objective? A: Consciousness is objective, until it has the capacity to choose to be otherwise. Q: (L) What is the stimulus for the change, for the giving of the capacity to choose? A: The introduction of prejudice.
All events are synchronous only when perception becomes a catalyst for learning. Q: (TH) What is the meaning of synchronous in this context? A: Only discovered when the lesson is completed. Q: (TH) Do they mean that all events exist somewhere outside of time and that we just experience them sequentially? A: Close, Tom.
There is a symbol that always comes to my mind, and I would like to know what this symbol means? [draws symbol which looks like two spirals back to back.] A: The duality of body and spirit… the two perfectly interlock for those in the physical/ material planes. One reflects the other always in the timeless existence of all creation! Q: What is the origin of that symbol? A: Symbols always naturally evolve of pure consciousness thought form. Q: Anything further on that symbol? A: No.
A: Gravity does not “travel.” Q: Well, when you say that gravity ‘supercedes’ light speed, what exactly do you mean? A: Gravity is equally located in all realms at once, in space/ time.
Okay, you said that light is the energy expression of gravity. How does light manifest at 7th density? A: Light is seventh density. Q: Well, so light is 7th density. And you said that light is the energy expression of gravity. And you said that gravity is God. So, does this also mean that light is gravity? A: No. Q: Okay, what is the distinction between gravity and light? A: What is the distinction between concrete and cement?
You say that light is 7th density. You say that gravity is God, and God and 7th density are the same, and… A: No. 7th density is “union with the One.” Q: What is the distinction between union with the One and God? A: Only at 7th density is God unified.
At 6th density there is… what? An equal balance of dark and light, or being and non- being, is that correct? A: Pure consciousness no need to physicalise.
Perpendicular reality is knowledge/ awareness/ being matrix. Realms are merely experiential divisions based upon consciousness energy directors.
Okay, so consciousness energy directors are like a horizontal reality in relation to the perpendicular ones? A: Slots, my dear, slots. Q: Are these slots comparable to the appearing and disappearing of electrons in the shells of an atom? A: Not the point. You are still trying to use 3rd density awareness to measure the reality parameters of all other density levels…
Now you have mentioned these ‘slots.’ What are these slots, and how does one move from one slot to another? A: Picture this: you have 7 sizes of marbles. You have 7 widths of slots. Where do the marbles “fit in.” Q: Do the marbles represent units of consciousness? A: Close. Or, divisions of consciousness level energy resonance profiles.
And acquiring knowledge is akin to acquiring energy? Or light? Light energy? A: Not exactly. That would be like saying that “filling up” at the gas station is akin to acquiring speed. Q: So, knowledge and light are like the gas for the car, but speed comes from utilization? A: Yes. Q: And utilization means… A: Knowledge application which generates energy, which, in turn, generates light.
Ark wants to know if the 1925- 27 theory is better than the later attempts? A: Better in the sense of less political corruption. Coping is only necessary when one is not open.
Here is this purported letter from a Carlos Allende to Dr. Jessup. Now, whether Carlos was a real person or not, what I want to know is if the information is somewhat accurate? Is it a reliable source of information? A: Is that not obvious? Q: I thought it was. He said that Einstein did computations on cycles of human civilization and progress, compared to the growth of man’s general character and development, and that this horrified him. Now, this is the very thing you suggested I do to find clues. And, I am doing it. It says here that Einstein was doing the same thing. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: What horrified him? A: The discovery of variability of physicality, and all that that implies, when one knows all that Einstein knew up to that point.
In a previous session where you introduced the concept of perpendicular realities, you stated that (T) was connected to a particular reality called ‘Neormm.’ You also designated the ‘thought center’ of STS as Ormethion. I noticed the similarity of the names. Is there a relationship? A: The orm is close to orimulsion. Look it up. Q: Well, what I am asking is about the possible relationship between Neormm and Ormethion… A: Our answers have meaning best not to presuppose!
Ark wrote: C’s once said that EM was an expression of gravitational energy. I said: they said that light is an energy expression of gravity, that EM was the same as gravity, or, more precisely, intertwined. And, this would incline me to believe that the total spectrum of EM is the ‘stuff’ of the ‘balloon,’ that is the balance to the ‘non- balloon,’ of gravity, being that which emerges out of non- being, and that the various separations of EM into waves such as light, radio, and other frequencies are energy expressions. In other words, EM IS the unstable gravity wave, so to speak. Was this correct? A: Close. Q: Is ethereal existence the ‘non- balloon.’ A: Closer. Q: And EM is intertwined. That is, EM is ‘being’ and ethereal existence is non- being? A: No. EM is being and ethereal existence is thinking… Q: Absolute non- being is the origin of gravity. It emerges out of the absoluteness of non- being, and what emerges out of gravity is EM? A: Where did you get this “absoluteness of non- being?” Q: Well, non- being that is so ‘non’ that is is NON! A: That is ALL, maybe? Q: I guess so. A: Is non really nano? Q: I don’t know. Is that a clue? A: ? Q: Well, then I said: If the varieties of waves of the EM spectrum are unstable gravity waves, then they could be added together which could arrive at some total factor of electromagnetism, which then, if reversed, would express the existence of gravity? A: On the right track, or “rail” as in “railgun.”
_______________________
MORE TO COME!!!
_______________________
our space/ time is the boundary of a domain? Is that correct picture? A: Yes. Q: (A) All right, Then, concerning this gravity, and the antimatter, is it a correct picture that there are two such domains; positive and negative one, and the gravity has something to do with the exchange between the positive and negative? A: Gravity is the “fuel,” or “life blood” of absolutely everything that exists!!!
March 15, 1997
[ session about the nature of electricity, superconductors... The whole of the session is about that, I would need to copy and paste the whole session! So I didn't include this session's excerpts here ]
You want me to be more specific, well, let me put it this way. Some understanding of time refers to it as the ‘now’, the ever- present now. Well, a lot of people remember a lot of other ‘nows,’ some people don’t remember any ‘nows’ at all, and it seems like memory is almost like a reverse function of anticipation. Anticipation being almost like a memory of the ‘future’ and memory being like a reverse anticipation into the past. So, what I would like to know is if time is merely a ‘now’, what is memory? A: Conscious and subconscious record of perceptions.
My first question is: If memory is conscious and subconscious record of perception, as you have stated, and there occurs a “reality merge,” as you also described previously, some sort of time manipulation, does this automatically change individual perceptions? A: Perceptions “leap” into place according to markers in the eternally present continuum. Q: What are these markers? A: Experiential breaks in the perceptual realm of continuance. Q: Markers are experiential breaks. So, one experiences breaks and they become markers… perceptions leap into place… is this saying that, when there is a perception of a break, that some part of the psyche seeks to bridge this break by leaping into some sort of… A: The definition of the previous responses will become clear for you only after some reflection, my dear! Q: Umm… does this leaping of perception occur for everyone as a group, or are some people immune to it? A: !Como!?! What, said the perplexed ones, incredulously! Q: Okay, you said that memory is subjective and an atom is not. If memory is subjective, what you have just been describing means that each and every person has a slightly different perspective, even if they are involved with the same incident or the same time sequence. A: Of course!
But still, what you said still implies that an atom has an objective existence. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity? A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice “at the door.” Q: How does the effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door relate to the objective existence of an atom? A: An atom, as with absolutely everything else, cannot exist without an observer. Q: So, in the case of the objectivity of an atom, if the human observers are not objective, where is the observer who makes the atom objective, or does the atom not exist if there is no observer? A: Yes. to the latter comment. Q: Yes to which part? A: The latter comment. Q: So there must be an observer. Must the observer be human? A: The observer must be a consciousness. Q: If you say that an atom has an objective existence, yet it only exists if it is perceived by a consciousness, then an atom does not have an objective existence, correct? A: No. Q: Okay, what is the distinction? You say that objectivity is the ATTEMPT on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door. A: Without consciousness, there is neither objective or subjective!! Q: So the crux is the attempt to leave prejudice at the door in the same manner as one would be non- anticipatory in order to create? A: Yes. Q: Well, that is a VERY tricky… (A) Is consciousness objective? A: Consciousness is objective, until it has the capacity to choose to be otherwise. Q: (L) What is the stimulus for the change, for the giving of the capacity to choose? A: The introduction of prejudice.
All events are synchronous only when perception becomes a catalyst for learning. Q: (TH) What is the meaning of synchronous in this context? A: Only discovered when the lesson is completed. Q: (TH) Do they mean that all events exist somewhere outside of time and that we just experience them sequentially? A: Close, Tom.
There is a symbol that always comes to my mind, and I would like to know what this symbol means? [draws symbol which looks like two spirals back to back.] A: The duality of body and spirit… the two perfectly interlock for those in the physical/ material planes. One reflects the other always in the timeless existence of all creation! Q: What is the origin of that symbol? A: Symbols always naturally evolve of pure consciousness thought form. Q: Anything further on that symbol? A: No.
A: Gravity does not “travel.” Q: Well, when you say that gravity ‘supercedes’ light speed, what exactly do you mean? A: Gravity is equally located in all realms at once, in space/ time.
Okay, you said that light is the energy expression of gravity. How does light manifest at 7th density? A: Light is seventh density. Q: Well, so light is 7th density. And you said that light is the energy expression of gravity. And you said that gravity is God. So, does this also mean that light is gravity? A: No. Q: Okay, what is the distinction between gravity and light? A: What is the distinction between concrete and cement?
You say that light is 7th density. You say that gravity is God, and God and 7th density are the same, and… A: No. 7th density is “union with the One.” Q: What is the distinction between union with the One and God? A: Only at 7th density is God unified.
At 6th density there is… what? An equal balance of dark and light, or being and non- being, is that correct? A: Pure consciousness no need to physicalise.
Perpendicular reality is knowledge/ awareness/ being matrix. Realms are merely experiential divisions based upon consciousness energy directors.
Okay, so consciousness energy directors are like a horizontal reality in relation to the perpendicular ones? A: Slots, my dear, slots. Q: Are these slots comparable to the appearing and disappearing of electrons in the shells of an atom? A: Not the point. You are still trying to use 3rd density awareness to measure the reality parameters of all other density levels…
Now you have mentioned these ‘slots.’ What are these slots, and how does one move from one slot to another? A: Picture this: you have 7 sizes of marbles. You have 7 widths of slots. Where do the marbles “fit in.” Q: Do the marbles represent units of consciousness? A: Close. Or, divisions of consciousness level energy resonance profiles.
And acquiring knowledge is akin to acquiring energy? Or light? Light energy? A: Not exactly. That would be like saying that “filling up” at the gas station is akin to acquiring speed. Q: So, knowledge and light are like the gas for the car, but speed comes from utilization? A: Yes. Q: And utilization means… A: Knowledge application which generates energy, which, in turn, generates light.
Ark wants to know if the 1925- 27 theory is better than the later attempts? A: Better in the sense of less political corruption. Coping is only necessary when one is not open.
Here is this purported letter from a Carlos Allende to Dr. Jessup. Now, whether Carlos was a real person or not, what I want to know is if the information is somewhat accurate? Is it a reliable source of information? A: Is that not obvious? Q: I thought it was. He said that Einstein did computations on cycles of human civilization and progress, compared to the growth of man’s general character and development, and that this horrified him. Now, this is the very thing you suggested I do to find clues. And, I am doing it. It says here that Einstein was doing the same thing. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: What horrified him? A: The discovery of variability of physicality, and all that that implies, when one knows all that Einstein knew up to that point.
In a previous session where you introduced the concept of perpendicular realities, you stated that (T) was connected to a particular reality called ‘Neormm.’ You also designated the ‘thought center’ of STS as Ormethion. I noticed the similarity of the names. Is there a relationship? A: The orm is close to orimulsion. Look it up. Q: Well, what I am asking is about the possible relationship between Neormm and Ormethion… A: Our answers have meaning best not to presuppose!
Ark wrote: C’s once said that EM was an expression of gravitational energy. I said: they said that light is an energy expression of gravity, that EM was the same as gravity, or, more precisely, intertwined. And, this would incline me to believe that the total spectrum of EM is the ‘stuff’ of the ‘balloon,’ that is the balance to the ‘non- balloon,’ of gravity, being that which emerges out of non- being, and that the various separations of EM into waves such as light, radio, and other frequencies are energy expressions. In other words, EM IS the unstable gravity wave, so to speak. Was this correct? A: Close. Q: Is ethereal existence the ‘non- balloon.’ A: Closer. Q: And EM is intertwined. That is, EM is ‘being’ and ethereal existence is non- being? A: No. EM is being and ethereal existence is thinking… Q: Absolute non- being is the origin of gravity. It emerges out of the absoluteness of non- being, and what emerges out of gravity is EM? A: Where did you get this “absoluteness of non- being?” Q: Well, non- being that is so ‘non’ that is is NON! A: That is ALL, maybe? Q: I guess so. A: Is non really nano? Q: I don’t know. Is that a clue? A: ? Q: Well, then I said: If the varieties of waves of the EM spectrum are unstable gravity waves, then they could be added together which could arrive at some total factor of electromagnetism, which then, if reversed, would express the existence of gravity? A: On the right track, or “rail” as in “railgun.”
_______________________
MORE TO COME!!!
Thassa
Jedi
Incoming further extracts!
Sometimes I include things that I don't really know if they deserve to be mentioned.
Like, A.C Holt's passage is about a propulsion system... but it touches the topic of the workings of space/time and gravity, so it touches Cosmology!
Gold (as all elements) is rather a "3D Issue." But here it's mentioned how it can be used to interact with other dimensions... That touches the topic of Cosmology.
I realize that being about Physics doesn't guarantee that the excerpt should be mentioned in this thread.
Now, without further ado, to the extracts!
________________________
Now, let me read this text: “I have recently come into possession of a paper on magneto- gravitics and field resonance systems, presented by A.C. Holt from NASA Johnson Space Center to the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics’ 16th Joint Propulsion Conference, June 30- July 2, 1980. Holt presents a project using an already existing system known as the Coherent Field and Energy Resonance System (CoFERS) [probably located at Los Alamos Labs’ High Magnetic Field Research Laboratory]. CoFERS utilizes a toroidal- shaped energy guide with megagauss magnetic field sources located along radius vectors equally spaced around the toroid. CoFERS is shaped like a thick flying disc. Holt goes on to say:” By converying an object’s normal space- time energy pattern to an energy pattern which differs substantially from the normal pattern, the gravitational forces acting on the object are changed. The object’s new pattern interacts with the surrounding space- time and virtual energy patterns, such that the interactive forces are substantially altered. The alteration of the characteristics of the continuous field of force results in the apparent motion of the object through space- time.” […] “Since the gravitational forces acting on the propulsion system can be quickly altered to achieve the desired motion, the spacecraft can make right- angle turns at very- high velocities without adversely affecting the crew or system elements. The effective gravitational field the spacecraft/ aircraft experiences can be nearly simultaneously reoriented at a 90- degree angle, resulting in a smooth continuous motion as far as the occupants are concerned.” [… ] “The gravimagnetic system is perhaps best suited for use in and around… a large mass such as the Earth.” “While the gravimagnetic system is likely to be the first field- dependent propulsion system developed, the field resonance system will bring stellar and galactic travel out of the realm of science fiction. The field resonance system artificially generates an energy pattern which precisely matches or resonates with a virtual pattern associated with a distent space- time point. According to the model, if a fundamental or precise resonance is established, (using hydromagnetic wave fine- tuning techniques), the spacecraft will be very strongly and equally repelled by surrounding virtual patterns. At the same time, through the virtual many- dimensional structure of space- time, a very strong attraction with the virtual pattern of a distant space- time point will exist.…this combination of very strong forces will result in the translocation of the spacecraft from its initial position through the many- dimensional virtual structure to the distant space- time point. [… ] “A space- time ‘jump’ already appears to be supported by astrophysical research.” Having read this text, my thought is that it is very similar to what I was talking about earlier today, and which was explicated by Karl von Eckertshausen in regards to the ‘violin allegory.’ That is, that a violin string tuned to a particular pitch, if plucked, will cause the identical string on another violin across the room tuned to the same pitch to sound also. However, it seems that what they are doing here is setting up a ‘pitch’ in this object which actually exists somewhere else. And, by creating this resonance, it ‘becomes’ or disappears from this point in space/ time where its resonance is no longer appropriate, and reappears at the point in space/ time where the ‘tuned resonance’ actually exists. It is both virtual and real. The question is: Is this text on the right track, and am I understanding it correctly? A: Propulsion system for 3rd and 4th density Alien spacecraft. Q: That is the propulsion system? A: Very close, yes. Q: Is my understanding close to correct? A: Well, that is a clever anecdotal parallel as it matches conceptually, which is really the point, isn’t it? Q: The point? Are you saying that the anecdote is more to the point than what this paper is saying? A: In terms of consciousness, which is why everything exists ultimately, and with gravity as the “glue” that holds all on physical and ethereal planes together! Q: Is the object to ‘dematerialize’ or is the object to transpose something that is material to some other point in space/ time? I mean, when you collapse the gravity wave, is it necessarily that the object or person ‘dematerializes’ or ‘disappears’ from this point… A: Break the veil of “time,” and dematerialzation is no longer necessary, because one enters the realm of pure consciousness, where the illusion of physicality serves no longer, a purpose. Q: Is it an issue for one to be able to retain internal coherence if one is no longer in a physical state? A: Internal coherence can only be guaranteed in a purely non- physical “state.” And this state is really only a state of mind, anyway!! Q: If one were to travel in this manner, would it not be a temptation to not return to the physical reality? A: If one goes bowling, is it a temptation to not return to the parking lot?
Ark did some reading on the Einstein thing, the letters to Kaluza, and there did not seem to be anything that E did in the period mentioned that would make one tend to think that there was a UFT from him in that time. But, Kaluza DID have an interesting idea about a 5 dimensional cylinder UFT which Einstein thought was quite startling. Yet, it seems that Einstein somewhat delayed Kaluza’s presentation. What struck me was the word ‘cylinder’ which reminded me of the earlier session where I asked if the Germans had developed a time machine and you said ‘yes,’ and that it was in Antarctica, and that ‘they’ were ‘exploring the loop of the cylinder.’ You said that the loop of the cylinder was a 4th thru 6th density profile. Could you give me some elaboration on this cylinder, the loop of the cylinder, and whether it was Kaluza who did the UFT and not Einstein? A: Cylinder is really a double loop, is it not? And meditate if you will on the true meaning of this! Q: Is it true that Kaluza had the theory and Einstein didn’t? A: Maybe it is that Einstein first hypothesized, and others were then commissioned for the purpose of completion in order to lead to application.
A: The failure is deceptively simple… “Old makes new again.” Equilateral versus hypotenuse.
Well, I think that a HUGE key is in the tracking of the languages… A: The roots of all languages are identical… Q: What do you mean? A: Your origin. Q: You mean Atlantis? A: Is that your origin? Q: You mean Orion? A: Interesting the word root similarity, yes?
is there anything that can be expanded, or any additional clues for me or Ark? A: Last clue for tonight: Look for the vibratory frequency light. Good Night.
[ well, I didn't understand what they meant. Were they suggesting to study the physics of the vibratory frequency of light... or just telling to keep seeking light and knowledge? ]
Q: (Laura) Yesterday we heard from William Mann, and he asked about the Newman machine. Now, this is a very interesting device, Ark says after checking it out. A: Newman machine is “time machine.” Q: (Laura) Well, it seems that it could run my house for very little money! A: But, there are forces that will, and do, block its use. Q: (Laura) Okay, then we will do it privately and quietly. A: How do you propose to do it “privately and quietly?” Q: (Laura) Well, just install it and say nothing! A: And you expect this to be under the table? Q: (Laura) Are you discouraging us from any dabbling with the Newman machine? A: Not discouraging, just giving you “the facts of life.”
I would like to know the significance of the Fisher King? A: Do you mean of the person or of the designation? Q: The designation, first. A: The one who resides within a circular continuum. Q: What about the significance of the person? A: Transcendental. Q: What is a circular continuum? A: Trapped within the grasp of one’s own significance, to the exclusion of the acquisition of a broader knowledge base and understanding.
I researched the word Emerald, and that it is derived from the word orient, which is Orion, and that they go back to words from which we also derive Aurora and gold. Is there something about the element gold, such as the atomic number, or anything, that is a specific frequency of light that is important? A: Gold, when heated to its liquidation temperature, gives off energy waves which, when properly channeled, open the door to higher density experience. Clue to this is in the way that gold can be an effective transceiver of radio waves and transdimensional communications.
In the original grail stories, St. Anthony was a later insertion to the scenario via Rennes le Chateau. The original hermit was St. Augustine. I find this to be strange, since Jesus was supposed to be born in the reign of Augustus, and many strange things have happened in the month of August to us… A: Perseid. Connection? What is it? Q: Are the Perseids part of the remains of Kantek? A: Refer to data given re: comets, Oort Cloud, and twin/ dark star phenomenon. Then interface with legend or legends.
a flood in Poland, and Ark has to go back, there is so much that must be done, but the government offices may be closed, the court session may be delayed indefinitely, God knows what is going to happen. What is the source of this dreadful disaster in Poland? A: Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay. Q: And what is causing these screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay? A: Influences of Acquiim. Q: What is Acquiim? A: 4th density overseer. Q: Does that mean soporific screen alteration? A: Soporific/ phosphorous. Q: What is the purpose of this screen alteration? A: Deterrence of colinear wave reading consciousness units. Q: What is a ‘colinear wave reading consciousness unit?’ A: Suggest you “look in the mirror.”
[ well, I decided to include this excerpt here because it says something avoid consciousness ]
in everything there are three aspects? A: And why? Because it is the realm of the three that you occupy.
______________
MORE TO COME! STAY TUNED!
Sometimes I include things that I don't really know if they deserve to be mentioned.
Like, A.C Holt's passage is about a propulsion system... but it touches the topic of the workings of space/time and gravity, so it touches Cosmology!
Gold (as all elements) is rather a "3D Issue." But here it's mentioned how it can be used to interact with other dimensions... That touches the topic of Cosmology.
I realize that being about Physics doesn't guarantee that the excerpt should be mentioned in this thread.
Now, without further ado, to the extracts!
________________________
Now, let me read this text: “I have recently come into possession of a paper on magneto- gravitics and field resonance systems, presented by A.C. Holt from NASA Johnson Space Center to the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics’ 16th Joint Propulsion Conference, June 30- July 2, 1980. Holt presents a project using an already existing system known as the Coherent Field and Energy Resonance System (CoFERS) [probably located at Los Alamos Labs’ High Magnetic Field Research Laboratory]. CoFERS utilizes a toroidal- shaped energy guide with megagauss magnetic field sources located along radius vectors equally spaced around the toroid. CoFERS is shaped like a thick flying disc. Holt goes on to say:” By converying an object’s normal space- time energy pattern to an energy pattern which differs substantially from the normal pattern, the gravitational forces acting on the object are changed. The object’s new pattern interacts with the surrounding space- time and virtual energy patterns, such that the interactive forces are substantially altered. The alteration of the characteristics of the continuous field of force results in the apparent motion of the object through space- time.” […] “Since the gravitational forces acting on the propulsion system can be quickly altered to achieve the desired motion, the spacecraft can make right- angle turns at very- high velocities without adversely affecting the crew or system elements. The effective gravitational field the spacecraft/ aircraft experiences can be nearly simultaneously reoriented at a 90- degree angle, resulting in a smooth continuous motion as far as the occupants are concerned.” [… ] “The gravimagnetic system is perhaps best suited for use in and around… a large mass such as the Earth.” “While the gravimagnetic system is likely to be the first field- dependent propulsion system developed, the field resonance system will bring stellar and galactic travel out of the realm of science fiction. The field resonance system artificially generates an energy pattern which precisely matches or resonates with a virtual pattern associated with a distent space- time point. According to the model, if a fundamental or precise resonance is established, (using hydromagnetic wave fine- tuning techniques), the spacecraft will be very strongly and equally repelled by surrounding virtual patterns. At the same time, through the virtual many- dimensional structure of space- time, a very strong attraction with the virtual pattern of a distant space- time point will exist.…this combination of very strong forces will result in the translocation of the spacecraft from its initial position through the many- dimensional virtual structure to the distant space- time point. [… ] “A space- time ‘jump’ already appears to be supported by astrophysical research.” Having read this text, my thought is that it is very similar to what I was talking about earlier today, and which was explicated by Karl von Eckertshausen in regards to the ‘violin allegory.’ That is, that a violin string tuned to a particular pitch, if plucked, will cause the identical string on another violin across the room tuned to the same pitch to sound also. However, it seems that what they are doing here is setting up a ‘pitch’ in this object which actually exists somewhere else. And, by creating this resonance, it ‘becomes’ or disappears from this point in space/ time where its resonance is no longer appropriate, and reappears at the point in space/ time where the ‘tuned resonance’ actually exists. It is both virtual and real. The question is: Is this text on the right track, and am I understanding it correctly? A: Propulsion system for 3rd and 4th density Alien spacecraft. Q: That is the propulsion system? A: Very close, yes. Q: Is my understanding close to correct? A: Well, that is a clever anecdotal parallel as it matches conceptually, which is really the point, isn’t it? Q: The point? Are you saying that the anecdote is more to the point than what this paper is saying? A: In terms of consciousness, which is why everything exists ultimately, and with gravity as the “glue” that holds all on physical and ethereal planes together! Q: Is the object to ‘dematerialize’ or is the object to transpose something that is material to some other point in space/ time? I mean, when you collapse the gravity wave, is it necessarily that the object or person ‘dematerializes’ or ‘disappears’ from this point… A: Break the veil of “time,” and dematerialzation is no longer necessary, because one enters the realm of pure consciousness, where the illusion of physicality serves no longer, a purpose. Q: Is it an issue for one to be able to retain internal coherence if one is no longer in a physical state? A: Internal coherence can only be guaranteed in a purely non- physical “state.” And this state is really only a state of mind, anyway!! Q: If one were to travel in this manner, would it not be a temptation to not return to the physical reality? A: If one goes bowling, is it a temptation to not return to the parking lot?
Ark did some reading on the Einstein thing, the letters to Kaluza, and there did not seem to be anything that E did in the period mentioned that would make one tend to think that there was a UFT from him in that time. But, Kaluza DID have an interesting idea about a 5 dimensional cylinder UFT which Einstein thought was quite startling. Yet, it seems that Einstein somewhat delayed Kaluza’s presentation. What struck me was the word ‘cylinder’ which reminded me of the earlier session where I asked if the Germans had developed a time machine and you said ‘yes,’ and that it was in Antarctica, and that ‘they’ were ‘exploring the loop of the cylinder.’ You said that the loop of the cylinder was a 4th thru 6th density profile. Could you give me some elaboration on this cylinder, the loop of the cylinder, and whether it was Kaluza who did the UFT and not Einstein? A: Cylinder is really a double loop, is it not? And meditate if you will on the true meaning of this! Q: Is it true that Kaluza had the theory and Einstein didn’t? A: Maybe it is that Einstein first hypothesized, and others were then commissioned for the purpose of completion in order to lead to application.
A: The failure is deceptively simple… “Old makes new again.” Equilateral versus hypotenuse.
Well, I think that a HUGE key is in the tracking of the languages… A: The roots of all languages are identical… Q: What do you mean? A: Your origin. Q: You mean Atlantis? A: Is that your origin? Q: You mean Orion? A: Interesting the word root similarity, yes?
is there anything that can be expanded, or any additional clues for me or Ark? A: Last clue for tonight: Look for the vibratory frequency light. Good Night.
[ well, I didn't understand what they meant. Were they suggesting to study the physics of the vibratory frequency of light... or just telling to keep seeking light and knowledge? ]
Q: (Laura) Yesterday we heard from William Mann, and he asked about the Newman machine. Now, this is a very interesting device, Ark says after checking it out. A: Newman machine is “time machine.” Q: (Laura) Well, it seems that it could run my house for very little money! A: But, there are forces that will, and do, block its use. Q: (Laura) Okay, then we will do it privately and quietly. A: How do you propose to do it “privately and quietly?” Q: (Laura) Well, just install it and say nothing! A: And you expect this to be under the table? Q: (Laura) Are you discouraging us from any dabbling with the Newman machine? A: Not discouraging, just giving you “the facts of life.”
I would like to know the significance of the Fisher King? A: Do you mean of the person or of the designation? Q: The designation, first. A: The one who resides within a circular continuum. Q: What about the significance of the person? A: Transcendental. Q: What is a circular continuum? A: Trapped within the grasp of one’s own significance, to the exclusion of the acquisition of a broader knowledge base and understanding.
I researched the word Emerald, and that it is derived from the word orient, which is Orion, and that they go back to words from which we also derive Aurora and gold. Is there something about the element gold, such as the atomic number, or anything, that is a specific frequency of light that is important? A: Gold, when heated to its liquidation temperature, gives off energy waves which, when properly channeled, open the door to higher density experience. Clue to this is in the way that gold can be an effective transceiver of radio waves and transdimensional communications.
In the original grail stories, St. Anthony was a later insertion to the scenario via Rennes le Chateau. The original hermit was St. Augustine. I find this to be strange, since Jesus was supposed to be born in the reign of Augustus, and many strange things have happened in the month of August to us… A: Perseid. Connection? What is it? Q: Are the Perseids part of the remains of Kantek? A: Refer to data given re: comets, Oort Cloud, and twin/ dark star phenomenon. Then interface with legend or legends.
a flood in Poland, and Ark has to go back, there is so much that must be done, but the government offices may be closed, the court session may be delayed indefinitely, God knows what is going to happen. What is the source of this dreadful disaster in Poland? A: Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay. Q: And what is causing these screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay? A: Influences of Acquiim. Q: What is Acquiim? A: 4th density overseer. Q: Does that mean soporific screen alteration? A: Soporific/ phosphorous. Q: What is the purpose of this screen alteration? A: Deterrence of colinear wave reading consciousness units. Q: What is a ‘colinear wave reading consciousness unit?’ A: Suggest you “look in the mirror.”
[ well, I decided to include this excerpt here because it says something avoid consciousness ]
in everything there are three aspects? A: And why? Because it is the realm of the three that you occupy.
______________
MORE TO COME! STAY TUNED!
Last edited:
Thassa
Jedi
More quotations follow
Sometimes I include quotations about astronomy. I don't know if information about the Sun Dark Twin would meet the criteria for (deep) Cosmology, Consciousness, and Origins.
I guess it doesn't...
___________________
Q: Okay, I was reading something that related to mirrors. What was said was: “Negative existence is the silence behind the sound, the blank canvas beneath the painting, the darkness into which light shines. Emptiness is the stillness against which time moves. Negative existence enables a man to be what he is. It is the mirror of mirrors. Non- anticipation is non- interference, and allows the most perfect reflection of creation.” I thought that this was a nice way to express it. Could you comment on that and how it applies to other things you have told us? A: Build a psychomantium. Q: We are going to. As soon as Ark gets here… A: Answers re: divorce, career, et cetera, come through that medium, as they are personal and thought center reflective. Q: So, maybe I will build it BEFORE he gets here… A: Or, use the mirror, and Ark too. Q: Ark could also use the mirror? A: In a darkened room, mirror pointed away from your reflection, indirect light, preferably candle, meditate…
I want to know why whales sing? A: Communication. Q: They sing to communicate. I kind of figured that. Is this an elaborate and complicated form of communication? A: Yes. Q: Is it as complicated as a spoken language such as what we know? A: More so. Q: Is there any key you could give us as to how to interpret this language? A: You would need to think in an entirely different way. Q: What way would this be? Is it an image based language, or is it tone based? Do the tones evoke images or concepts and ideas? A: It is psionic/ practical wave modulation through flange scopotic transmisson. Q: Could you define your use of psionic for me? A: Seeing, hearing, feeling, absorption and response in simultaneous thought wave profile. Q: Okay. What do whales talk about? A: Not correct concept. Q: What is the correct concept? A: Total thought transference. Q: What subjects interest whales enough that they exert energy to transfer those thoughts? A: No need for “subjects” when one has total simultaneous comprehension. Q: What do whales feel about human beings? A: Wrong idea again!! You are not grasping this!!! Q: I know that! I’m trying to… how do they feel about human beings?! A: Each whale is able to absorb all truths that exist past, present and future at all “times.” Q: Well then, they are pretty awesome creatures and humans ought not to be hunting them down and killing them! A: Lesson profiles interject experience. Q: Who gets the experience interjected, us or them? We must be the ones getting the lesson here… A: All there is is lessons. Q: If there is anything else you want to tell us about whales, because obviously I am not understanding here. Are dolphins similar in make- up and ability? A: Not “yet.” Q: They are down on the scale from whales. I think that whales are absolutely awesome. Are whale souls sort of like a composite soul - sort of like a bunch of dolphin souls make up a whale soul? A: No. Q: Is a whale soul always a whale soul from the beginning? A: Whale is unified soul. Q: Unified from what to what? A: All whales share the same soul! Q: Are human beings like that or moving in that direction, becoming unified soul? A: Fragmented. Q: Human beings are a fragmented soul. Were we once a unified soul? A: Once and future. Q: When one is a unified soul, then obviously all the experiences of the former fragments become everyone’s experience, so to speak. Is that correct? A: Close.
I also noticed that the word ‘Osiris’ could also be slightly modified to say ‘of Sirius.’ Comment, please. A: Sirius was regarded highly in your “past.” Q: What was the foundation of this regard for Sirius? A: “From whence cometh, is seen that which knows no limitation.”
one must always be aware of the fact that there is no past and no future and the present incorporates all realities.
Emotion is a necessary component of life in 3rd density.
A: Good things take effort to achieve… bad things are easily obtainable.
What is the ‘prime matter’ of the alchemical process? A: H2O. Q: What? (Ark) Water can be in different states. A: Heavy water. Q: What is heavy water? (Ark) Instead of normal hydrogen, you have hydrogen atoms with two neutrons. It is used in atomic plants. (L) Okay, if that is the prime matter, what is the philosophical mercury that goes with it? A: Wrong “track.” Q: What is the right track? A: See several answers back. Q: It is not etherally correct to answer this? A: No, sound, Laura, sound! See Leedskallen. Q: How does one produce this sound? A: We have given you the pieces, now “fit them in.”
Well, they say that prime matter is that which is created by God and is firmly captured within you, yourself, and that any creature of God deprived of it will die. So, I have come to the idea that this prime matter is blood, which is connected to the hemoglobin molecule, which is… A: What is the human body composed of? 77 per cent… what? Q: Well, water… A: Bingo!
Q: (A) They said that, in physics, we have one seventh of the equation… (L) When they said that, they were talking about matter and the direction in time of an anti- particle, which was referred to as the one- seventh.
But, what I mean is, animals, minerals, they are described by just one physics that we learn in school. We do not see that this is a different density. A: Only because you know it is there. You cannot measure that which is above your level! Of perception, when you are using measuring tools which only can measure that which you perceive. Q: (A) We are the form makers. I mean it’s not Nature that is creating, it is us seeing order in potential disorder. And we see more order than animals, so it seems. Is this what is meant by higher density, being able to see more order? A: Well, close, maybe, but you are attempting to employ a mirror to see outside.
What we are trying to understand is: you have described seven densities. Three physical densities, three ethereal densities, and the one in the middle, the variable density. What we are trying to find out here is some way to express this mathematically. Some way to understand this in the universal language of mathematics. Because, if we could do that, mathematically speaking, that would help our understanding and perceptual abilities. A: Yes, but first you must unravel the part of the puzzle which has nothing to do with mathematics. You would have your best luck finding the mathematical formula while in a “dreamstate,” or under hypnosis, or in meditation before a psychomantium.
(A) Now, I want to come back to physics. We have this paper from the French guy Chardin, who speaks about anti- gravity and relates it to a double structure of the universe; that anti- matter is just located, not in our universe, but in another universe… {Sound of helicopter on tape for the next few seconds} A: The two are exchangeable, much like an ion exchanger. Q: (A) The two are exchangeable, but it’s about us. We are apparently are made of matter rather than anti- matter, or there is another us that is made of anti- matter? I don’t think that we are exchangeable. We are apparently living in a universe of matter rather than anti- matter. A: Exchangeable. Q: (A) The loop dimension of Kaluza- Klein… when I was asking about extra- dimensions, the answer was that there were no ‘extra’ dimensions, but forget terminology, there is this theory of Kaluza- Klein that there is this loop dimension, this 5th dimension and the question is: this is a way toward UFT, and I would like to have a hint if adding this loop, or cylinder dimension, is the right step? {Helicopter sound continues.} A: Yes.
Eric Laithwaite. Did he discover the secret of antigravity? A: To an extent. Q: Was his death, shall we say, assisted? A: Yes.
Do monopoles exist? A: Yes. Q: My thought was that if monopoles exist, the only way they can exist is that if somewhere, under some conditions, the opposite of the pole exists… I mean they cannot exist in third density without being a duality… (A) Yes… A: And third density cloaks so many truths. Q: Do you say cloaks in the sense that it cloaks the monopoles from our observation? A: Measureability.
Q: Okay, the first item on the list is dealing with this rail- gun business and it was here where I was planning to start. What priority does this have with the ‘project’? A: The rail- gun is useful if only as an employment oriented “door- opener” for you. Q: I found that this Bulgarian guy who died, this Marinov… A: Electromagnetic accelerator. Q: Does it concern this Marinov, he wrote an equation which is something unusual and he claims that the equation which physics is using is wrong, false, so this comment about electromagnetic accelerator refers to the paper by Marinov? A: Close.
Next, I have sono- luminescence. Which was set apart. What is it? What is its priority with respect to the electromagnetic… A: Dual reality structure.
(A) Well I have a question: are we supposed to be happy in this life? (L) Well, if you are not, you aren’t doing it right. (A) Is that true? A: No, it is not.
A: Because, as you know, mathematics is a concrete field of study, as opposed to an abstract one. Oh yes, there is theoretical mathematics, and some types of mathematics involve variable interpretation. But… in general terms, we are speaking of a scientific field which connects concepts in order to uncover truths. Therefore, to employ mathematical communication in this conduit would likely rob one of the free will initiative in respect to learning.
there was some information about a VERY distant and intense explosion seen with the Hubble telescope… I am interested in what this was. A: Reflection of other universe’s genesis. Q: What other universe? A: They all start, and end that way! Q: (A) Other universe? A: What is “big bang” Arkadiusz? Q: (A) Well, it was a big bang, certainly, but it was in OUR universe and not some other universe… A: But what was the origin? And from where? All is one and one is all. Q: (A) What was the origin of what? Our universe? Or the origin of this explosion? Or the origin of everything? A: Yes, yes, yes. Q: (A) Okay. What was the origin of our universe. This I don’t know. This I want to know. This is okay to use just words, but if you use mathematical models… A: That is where you come in. Q: (A) Well, goody! A: Each colossal begets its light to where there was no light. And where once there was all light!
all of creation, of existence, is contained in 1, 2, 3!!! Look for this when you are trying to find the keys to the hidden secrets of all existence… They dwell within. 11, 22, 33, 1/ 2, 1/ 3, 1, 2, 3, 121, 11, 111, 222, 333, and so on! Get it?!?! Q: When you say that the secrets of all existence dwell within 1 2 3 or variations thereof, what kind of secrets are we talking about here? A: All. Q: Well, name two at the top of the list just so I know where we are going here? A: You can do that! Q: Are we talking about secrets of physics? A: Yes. Q: Are we talking about secrets as in encoded words? A: Yes. Q: Are we talking about the Fibonacci series? A: Yes. Q: (A) Continuous fractions? A: Yes. Q: (A) That means all… A: Yes.
Q: That brings this up: if a person has a life plan and do not seem to be following it because they are distracted for one reason or another, do dire things happen in such cases? A: Yes.
All there is is lessons. When one understands this, one no longer searches for the non- existent and unnecessary, safety net.
the sun’s companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come? A: Flat elliptical. Q: (A) But how close will it come? A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much… A: Less. Q: (A) Less? A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, elliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their moons.
what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more? A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun. Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to happen? A: Yes. Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years? A: 0 to 14.
two things are going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are two different things? A: Yes. Different, but related.
I understand that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every 3600 years.
we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied by a plane convergence. A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration. Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it’s supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border. A: Realm. What is root of “realm?” Q: (L) Reality. A: Yes. How does the magnetic field “plug in?” Other planchette, please. Carbon disturbance, as someone “melted” crystal on top. [We replaced planchette.] We want to stay on this general subject matter through this session, for your sake.
concerning this companion star; we were told that its mass is less than the sun, can we have a figure on how much less? A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun. Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to approach the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means that the sun will really start to feel its gravity, and because of this, the solar system will start to move with respect to other stars, so all the constellations will shift, is this correct? A: More like a slight “wobble” effect. Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth? A: Only through measurements.
Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection? A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.
What is the period of pole shift? A: 100,000 years, roughly.
this period of time after this realm border, is this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it? A: No.
After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic structures? A: No. Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch and everything is going to be different? A: The key is awareness. Q: (L) Are there going to be people… A: Yes.
Now, frivolous question number one: Do you guys like Pink Floyd? A: “Like” is a bit off base. Q: (L) What would be more ‘on base?’ A: Absorb. Q: (L) Do you absorb Pink Floyd? A: We are Pink Floyd, and all other facets of your higher consciousness.
Now, one question that we were discussing earlier is: how can the close approach of the companion star cause an increase in the Sun’s gravity when there is no reason why it should change anything since gravity is a function of mass? A: But do you rally know all there is to know about gravity?
Okay, why does this increase in the Sun’s gravity have anything to do with electromagnetism? We were told that the Brown star will not radiate any radiation, so, in particular, no electromagnetic radiation. So, where does electromagnetics come in? I do not understand… A: Gravitational pull incites electromagnetic impulse. Q: (A) Okay, that means we go beyond gravitational theory, and this is part of Unified Field Theory? A: Yes, exactly!! The complete UFT was withheld from you!
A: You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. “Alice likes to go through the looking glass” at the Crystal Palace. Atlantean reincarnation surge brings on the urge to have a repeat performance.
______________
MORE QUOTATIONS LATER!!!
Sometimes I include quotations about astronomy. I don't know if information about the Sun Dark Twin would meet the criteria for (deep) Cosmology, Consciousness, and Origins.
I guess it doesn't...
___________________
Q: Okay, I was reading something that related to mirrors. What was said was: “Negative existence is the silence behind the sound, the blank canvas beneath the painting, the darkness into which light shines. Emptiness is the stillness against which time moves. Negative existence enables a man to be what he is. It is the mirror of mirrors. Non- anticipation is non- interference, and allows the most perfect reflection of creation.” I thought that this was a nice way to express it. Could you comment on that and how it applies to other things you have told us? A: Build a psychomantium. Q: We are going to. As soon as Ark gets here… A: Answers re: divorce, career, et cetera, come through that medium, as they are personal and thought center reflective. Q: So, maybe I will build it BEFORE he gets here… A: Or, use the mirror, and Ark too. Q: Ark could also use the mirror? A: In a darkened room, mirror pointed away from your reflection, indirect light, preferably candle, meditate…
I want to know why whales sing? A: Communication. Q: They sing to communicate. I kind of figured that. Is this an elaborate and complicated form of communication? A: Yes. Q: Is it as complicated as a spoken language such as what we know? A: More so. Q: Is there any key you could give us as to how to interpret this language? A: You would need to think in an entirely different way. Q: What way would this be? Is it an image based language, or is it tone based? Do the tones evoke images or concepts and ideas? A: It is psionic/ practical wave modulation through flange scopotic transmisson. Q: Could you define your use of psionic for me? A: Seeing, hearing, feeling, absorption and response in simultaneous thought wave profile. Q: Okay. What do whales talk about? A: Not correct concept. Q: What is the correct concept? A: Total thought transference. Q: What subjects interest whales enough that they exert energy to transfer those thoughts? A: No need for “subjects” when one has total simultaneous comprehension. Q: What do whales feel about human beings? A: Wrong idea again!! You are not grasping this!!! Q: I know that! I’m trying to… how do they feel about human beings?! A: Each whale is able to absorb all truths that exist past, present and future at all “times.” Q: Well then, they are pretty awesome creatures and humans ought not to be hunting them down and killing them! A: Lesson profiles interject experience. Q: Who gets the experience interjected, us or them? We must be the ones getting the lesson here… A: All there is is lessons. Q: If there is anything else you want to tell us about whales, because obviously I am not understanding here. Are dolphins similar in make- up and ability? A: Not “yet.” Q: They are down on the scale from whales. I think that whales are absolutely awesome. Are whale souls sort of like a composite soul - sort of like a bunch of dolphin souls make up a whale soul? A: No. Q: Is a whale soul always a whale soul from the beginning? A: Whale is unified soul. Q: Unified from what to what? A: All whales share the same soul! Q: Are human beings like that or moving in that direction, becoming unified soul? A: Fragmented. Q: Human beings are a fragmented soul. Were we once a unified soul? A: Once and future. Q: When one is a unified soul, then obviously all the experiences of the former fragments become everyone’s experience, so to speak. Is that correct? A: Close.
I also noticed that the word ‘Osiris’ could also be slightly modified to say ‘of Sirius.’ Comment, please. A: Sirius was regarded highly in your “past.” Q: What was the foundation of this regard for Sirius? A: “From whence cometh, is seen that which knows no limitation.”
one must always be aware of the fact that there is no past and no future and the present incorporates all realities.
Emotion is a necessary component of life in 3rd density.
A: Good things take effort to achieve… bad things are easily obtainable.
What is the ‘prime matter’ of the alchemical process? A: H2O. Q: What? (Ark) Water can be in different states. A: Heavy water. Q: What is heavy water? (Ark) Instead of normal hydrogen, you have hydrogen atoms with two neutrons. It is used in atomic plants. (L) Okay, if that is the prime matter, what is the philosophical mercury that goes with it? A: Wrong “track.” Q: What is the right track? A: See several answers back. Q: It is not etherally correct to answer this? A: No, sound, Laura, sound! See Leedskallen. Q: How does one produce this sound? A: We have given you the pieces, now “fit them in.”
Well, they say that prime matter is that which is created by God and is firmly captured within you, yourself, and that any creature of God deprived of it will die. So, I have come to the idea that this prime matter is blood, which is connected to the hemoglobin molecule, which is… A: What is the human body composed of? 77 per cent… what? Q: Well, water… A: Bingo!
Q: (A) They said that, in physics, we have one seventh of the equation… (L) When they said that, they were talking about matter and the direction in time of an anti- particle, which was referred to as the one- seventh.
But, what I mean is, animals, minerals, they are described by just one physics that we learn in school. We do not see that this is a different density. A: Only because you know it is there. You cannot measure that which is above your level! Of perception, when you are using measuring tools which only can measure that which you perceive. Q: (A) We are the form makers. I mean it’s not Nature that is creating, it is us seeing order in potential disorder. And we see more order than animals, so it seems. Is this what is meant by higher density, being able to see more order? A: Well, close, maybe, but you are attempting to employ a mirror to see outside.
What we are trying to understand is: you have described seven densities. Three physical densities, three ethereal densities, and the one in the middle, the variable density. What we are trying to find out here is some way to express this mathematically. Some way to understand this in the universal language of mathematics. Because, if we could do that, mathematically speaking, that would help our understanding and perceptual abilities. A: Yes, but first you must unravel the part of the puzzle which has nothing to do with mathematics. You would have your best luck finding the mathematical formula while in a “dreamstate,” or under hypnosis, or in meditation before a psychomantium.
(A) Now, I want to come back to physics. We have this paper from the French guy Chardin, who speaks about anti- gravity and relates it to a double structure of the universe; that anti- matter is just located, not in our universe, but in another universe… {Sound of helicopter on tape for the next few seconds} A: The two are exchangeable, much like an ion exchanger. Q: (A) The two are exchangeable, but it’s about us. We are apparently are made of matter rather than anti- matter, or there is another us that is made of anti- matter? I don’t think that we are exchangeable. We are apparently living in a universe of matter rather than anti- matter. A: Exchangeable. Q: (A) The loop dimension of Kaluza- Klein… when I was asking about extra- dimensions, the answer was that there were no ‘extra’ dimensions, but forget terminology, there is this theory of Kaluza- Klein that there is this loop dimension, this 5th dimension and the question is: this is a way toward UFT, and I would like to have a hint if adding this loop, or cylinder dimension, is the right step? {Helicopter sound continues.} A: Yes.
Eric Laithwaite. Did he discover the secret of antigravity? A: To an extent. Q: Was his death, shall we say, assisted? A: Yes.
Do monopoles exist? A: Yes. Q: My thought was that if monopoles exist, the only way they can exist is that if somewhere, under some conditions, the opposite of the pole exists… I mean they cannot exist in third density without being a duality… (A) Yes… A: And third density cloaks so many truths. Q: Do you say cloaks in the sense that it cloaks the monopoles from our observation? A: Measureability.
Q: Okay, the first item on the list is dealing with this rail- gun business and it was here where I was planning to start. What priority does this have with the ‘project’? A: The rail- gun is useful if only as an employment oriented “door- opener” for you. Q: I found that this Bulgarian guy who died, this Marinov… A: Electromagnetic accelerator. Q: Does it concern this Marinov, he wrote an equation which is something unusual and he claims that the equation which physics is using is wrong, false, so this comment about electromagnetic accelerator refers to the paper by Marinov? A: Close.
Next, I have sono- luminescence. Which was set apart. What is it? What is its priority with respect to the electromagnetic… A: Dual reality structure.
(A) Well I have a question: are we supposed to be happy in this life? (L) Well, if you are not, you aren’t doing it right. (A) Is that true? A: No, it is not.
A: Because, as you know, mathematics is a concrete field of study, as opposed to an abstract one. Oh yes, there is theoretical mathematics, and some types of mathematics involve variable interpretation. But… in general terms, we are speaking of a scientific field which connects concepts in order to uncover truths. Therefore, to employ mathematical communication in this conduit would likely rob one of the free will initiative in respect to learning.
there was some information about a VERY distant and intense explosion seen with the Hubble telescope… I am interested in what this was. A: Reflection of other universe’s genesis. Q: What other universe? A: They all start, and end that way! Q: (A) Other universe? A: What is “big bang” Arkadiusz? Q: (A) Well, it was a big bang, certainly, but it was in OUR universe and not some other universe… A: But what was the origin? And from where? All is one and one is all. Q: (A) What was the origin of what? Our universe? Or the origin of this explosion? Or the origin of everything? A: Yes, yes, yes. Q: (A) Okay. What was the origin of our universe. This I don’t know. This I want to know. This is okay to use just words, but if you use mathematical models… A: That is where you come in. Q: (A) Well, goody! A: Each colossal begets its light to where there was no light. And where once there was all light!
all of creation, of existence, is contained in 1, 2, 3!!! Look for this when you are trying to find the keys to the hidden secrets of all existence… They dwell within. 11, 22, 33, 1/ 2, 1/ 3, 1, 2, 3, 121, 11, 111, 222, 333, and so on! Get it?!?! Q: When you say that the secrets of all existence dwell within 1 2 3 or variations thereof, what kind of secrets are we talking about here? A: All. Q: Well, name two at the top of the list just so I know where we are going here? A: You can do that! Q: Are we talking about secrets of physics? A: Yes. Q: Are we talking about secrets as in encoded words? A: Yes. Q: Are we talking about the Fibonacci series? A: Yes. Q: (A) Continuous fractions? A: Yes. Q: (A) That means all… A: Yes.
Q: That brings this up: if a person has a life plan and do not seem to be following it because they are distracted for one reason or another, do dire things happen in such cases? A: Yes.
All there is is lessons. When one understands this, one no longer searches for the non- existent and unnecessary, safety net.
the sun’s companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come? A: Flat elliptical. Q: (A) But how close will it come? A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much… A: Less. Q: (A) Less? A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, elliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their moons.
what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more? A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun. Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to happen? A: Yes. Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years? A: 0 to 14.
two things are going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are two different things? A: Yes. Different, but related.
I understand that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every 3600 years.
we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied by a plane convergence. A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration. Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it’s supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border. A: Realm. What is root of “realm?” Q: (L) Reality. A: Yes. How does the magnetic field “plug in?” Other planchette, please. Carbon disturbance, as someone “melted” crystal on top. [We replaced planchette.] We want to stay on this general subject matter through this session, for your sake.
concerning this companion star; we were told that its mass is less than the sun, can we have a figure on how much less? A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun. Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to approach the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means that the sun will really start to feel its gravity, and because of this, the solar system will start to move with respect to other stars, so all the constellations will shift, is this correct? A: More like a slight “wobble” effect. Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth? A: Only through measurements.
Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection? A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.
What is the period of pole shift? A: 100,000 years, roughly.
this period of time after this realm border, is this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it? A: No.
After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic structures? A: No. Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch and everything is going to be different? A: The key is awareness. Q: (L) Are there going to be people… A: Yes.
Now, frivolous question number one: Do you guys like Pink Floyd? A: “Like” is a bit off base. Q: (L) What would be more ‘on base?’ A: Absorb. Q: (L) Do you absorb Pink Floyd? A: We are Pink Floyd, and all other facets of your higher consciousness.
Now, one question that we were discussing earlier is: how can the close approach of the companion star cause an increase in the Sun’s gravity when there is no reason why it should change anything since gravity is a function of mass? A: But do you rally know all there is to know about gravity?
Okay, why does this increase in the Sun’s gravity have anything to do with electromagnetism? We were told that the Brown star will not radiate any radiation, so, in particular, no electromagnetic radiation. So, where does electromagnetics come in? I do not understand… A: Gravitational pull incites electromagnetic impulse. Q: (A) Okay, that means we go beyond gravitational theory, and this is part of Unified Field Theory? A: Yes, exactly!! The complete UFT was withheld from you!
A: You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. “Alice likes to go through the looking glass” at the Crystal Palace. Atlantean reincarnation surge brings on the urge to have a repeat performance.
______________
MORE QUOTATIONS LATER!!!
Thassa
Jedi
The selection goes on!
____________________________
we were told that there is some interaction between gravity and EM wave, and this is what UFT is about… If we use other dimensions which we are supposed to use in this UFT, going with Kaluza- Klein, then the very concept of mass is something which is not so clear, and mass can be variable… A: Yes, variability of physicality.
Can we have a UFT which unifies EM and gravity and does not include the concept of other densities. In other words, can we put in a textbook all about the gravity and electromagnetics, and a student could learn all of this and still know nothing about other densities? A: No. Other densities become apparent when… Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von Neumann knew about these other densities? A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Just a thought: having UFT and being able to manipulate different fields within it, creates different effects. So, as we understand it in the apparent present state of science, we have to spin something in space in order to create gravity. But, with the UFT, one small offshoot is that one could create real gravity without spinning anything. So, the problem of weightlessness is really already solved… A: Elementary my dear Terry, elementary. Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space station and all the trouble they are having readapting to gravity when they come back, is all a game… A: When you “let the cat out of the bag,” you create an entire feline “nation.” Q: (T) So, we are capable of “Star Trek” right now? A: In a sense, but there is so much more than that.
Crystals make density and dimensional windows open from “time to time” thus making the oblivious quite obvious.
Q: (L) Now, the big question is: what are we supposed to DO with this information? A: As with all else, it is not what you should do with it, it is just that you have it.
A: Your experiences never end, only transform. No bodycentrics need apply.
(L) Well, you once said something about the transition to 4th density creating a ‘level playing field.’ Then, the people will wake up and there will be a battle between the humans and aliens… A: Yes. Q: (L) And if it is a more level playing field, then the situation would not quite be the same as the Conquistadores against the Aztecs and the Native Americans against the Europeans and… A: Wrong, all in that drama were at 3rd density. The rabbits, rats, dogs, etc. are not on a level playing field with you!
You say knowledge protects. It protects against WHAT? A: Many things. One example: post transformational trauma and confusion.
Well, if a person transitions directly from 3rd to 4th density without cycling through 5th density via dying, that implies that persons can transition directly from 3rd to 4th density without dying. Is that correct? A: Yes. Q: (L) How does that feel? How is that experience… A: Alice through the looking glass.
knowledge is supposed to protect from trauma and confusion. On the other hand, all is lessons, so trauma is a lesson. Why are we supposed to work to avoid a lesson? A: You are correct, it is a lesson, but if you have foreknowledge, you are learning that lesson early, and in a different way.
Knowledge protects in the most amazing ways. Mathematics are “taught’ in your realm in such a way that only a select few will learn. And mathematics is the language of all creation. For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes. Suggest those present who still need to, learn algebra.
A: The doors are opened to revelation by contemplating the past which is really the present.
I also read about these WIMPs, or Weakly Interactive Massive Particles, that they say are at the core of the sun, and that somehow they modulate the sun’s internal temperature. Do these WIMPs exist? A: All exists which is imagined.
looking for clues about Lodz, we came upon these pages of the guy from Lodz, whom I know. He speculates about faster than light particles. The main hypothesis is that neutrinos really travel faster than light. Is this the case? A: This is opening a doorway to hyperspace. Q: (A) You mean investigating this question? A: Close. Q: (A) Or using neutrinos? A: Combine with those on the pathway of wormholes. Q: (L) Well, on that subject, when you said ‘pathway by the lightpoles,’ did you mean the poles of the Sun? A: Investigate.
were you referring to faster than light particles at the heart of the Sun, i.e. neutrinos? A: If so, look for a Russian scientist. Q: (A) Is the Russian scientist Sakharov? A: Sakharov! Q: (A) Is this related to the research that I was doing… A: Yes. And Sakharov was censored for reasons other than publicized.
what would be experienced by a person or space ship that goes into a black hole? What would it be like? A: Disintegration, followed by conversion to anti- material energy. Q: (L) So it would not come out on the other side in another universe? (A) It will. A: Yes, but not as matter. Q: (L) After something has gone into a black hole, can it then re- emerge into the material universe intact? A: No. Q: (L) So, once it’s gone in the black hole, it’s sayonara, hasta la vista? A: Stars are also portals of this nature. Q: (L) So, what we perceive as stars in the anti- matter universe would be black holes? A: No, windows. Q: (L) But, if you lived in this other universe on the other side of black holes to us, what would the black holes look like from there? A: Too complicated to explain. Q: (L) Well, give me a reference… A: That is just the point! You have no reference.
You mentioned hyperspace. What is hyperspace? A: 4th through 7th density, except 4th only perceives it, as “living in the doorway.”
You say that stars are portals. What, specifically, are they portals for, of, from or to? A: How about other dimension. Remember, density and dimensional concepts intersect. Density level relates more to conscious awareness, but dimensions house consciousness and all other. Q: (L) So, you can have many ‘houses’ along a row at one level and many at another level, in a vague sort of way? A: Close. Q: (A) Is the concept of density related to what Sakharov was doing? A: Close. Think of hyperspace as 4th dimension.
A: Worries are pointless, better to just take one step at a time. Q: (L) Yes, but you are always telling us to expect the unexpected, and to prepare for things to head them off, and if that is a possibility, I would like to be prepared for it… A: Are you dissatisfied? Q: (L) No, I’m not dissatisfied. I just want to be prepared for any unexpected, bizarre things, because all kinds of unexpected bizarre things happen to us. All the time! A: Then you are prepared.
I want to ask about Lodz. Did we already get the clue and it’s… A: You are on the right track. Q: (A) Now, this business about Sakharov, is this related, or better, when I think about Sakharov, I think about his theory that space, time metric can change signature; that space/ time geometry builds a kind of singularity, changes the algebraic structure of the metric tensor; and I was trying to relate it to changing of density at some point… A: Yes. Sakharov knew the answer was in the pentagon. Q: (L) Do you mean ‘pentagon’ as in the government building, or as in the geometric structure? A: Why do you suppose they are linked? Why is the “pentagon” a pentagon? Q: (L) I don’t know. Why is it? A: Answers are within your grasp. Q: (L) When you say ‘grasp,’ does it relate to five fingers… (A) or to the fifth dimension? A: Yes, and what you possess. Q: (L) What do you mean ‘what you possess?’ A: The key is in this room and your office. But that is not the only meaning. Suggest you begin your quest by looking for patriots.
What was this answer ‘yes’ to the changing of density and how it relates to what Sakharov was working on and how it connects to Kaluza Klein theories? A: Both. Q: (L) Well, I guess we are going to have to wait until I type it to make any sense out of it… A: Geometry… pentagon and hexagon, algebraic equations… Q: (A) Pentagon and hexagon algebraic equations… (L) What is the connection between the pentagon and hexagon? A: Discover. Q: (A) In physics and mathematics we write a triangle to symbolize certain operations in three- dimensional space. One draws a square to symbolize wave equations in 4 dimensional space. One draws a pentagon to symbolize equations in 5th dimensional space, and a hexagon to symbolize equations in 6 dimensional space. A: Goodnight.
A: Patience charts course, not pressure.
Q: (L) Is what he is saying true? A: “True” and false are one when all is sanctified. Q: (L) That doesn’t help us a bit! A: Futures all exist, but are infinite.
A: Answers come when you back up and worry not. Q: (A) What do you mean ‘back up?’ A: Go back.
A: Do you not know that your mind either contains already, or can access all that exists?
In this session with Santilli there was repeated at least twice the term ‘matrix.’ Laura made a comment that maybe it was a three dimensional matrix. So I was thinking about this matrix and I have two possibilities. If it is related to the number 3, it can be a matrix that is flat and 3 by 3. Or, it can be any matrix that is three dimensional rather than flat. Which of these, if any, is the concept mentioned in the session? A: Three dimensional 12 by 12. Q: (A) 12 by 12 by 12? A: Yes. Q: (A) Why number 12? What is so particular about number 12? A: Try it and see.
we have been told that time should not be mixed with space in a UFT, and now we have this time again… A: Do we??? Q: (A) Yes, because we have been told that the Galilei group which treats space different from time is better than the Lorentz group which treats space as equal to time. A: But, the link, the link is the bridge, not necessarily a sum of the parts, in other words, that link does not need to belong to either to exist.
Now, pentagon. There was this pentagon we talked about last time. Pentagon and then hexagon. My guess is that the pentagon is related to the wave equation in 5 dimensions. I want to ask about this… A: If one seeks to unify, one needs a common source. If “time” really were the 4th dimension, what if it sprang from, or was born of a fifth. Now, how or where does one “plug” gravity into the equation? Q: (A) Normally gravity is plugged into the equation as part of the geometry of space and time, except if Newton and Galilei, who consider time as different… A: Ah, now enter those sneaky pentagons and hexagons.
All STS always seek the path of least resistance first.
I was following another clue, Einstein’s UFT, and I looked at 1936 and he published a paper then describing Einstein- Rosen Bridge. A: Yes. Q: (A) This is a bridge between two different realms, so to say. A: Yes. Q: (A) But there is nothing in this idea, really, that relates to UFT. A: That is not true. Q: (A) There was nothing in this idea which relates to hyperspace in the sense of fifth dimensions, pentagons, hexagons. At least I could not see it. A: Yes. Q: (A) So there is another piece of information which has to be put together with this idea to lead to the UFT, yes? A: Yes.
Another clue that we were following was Von Neumann. We have this info about the Philadelphia Experiment, probably from Bielek. It says that Von Neumann took over the project in March of 1942, after Tesla. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: (A) It says that in 1943, Von Neumann installed a third generator… A: Yes. Q: (A) I have trouble with this because Von Neumann was a mathematician, and I can hardly imagine him installing generators which involves knowledge of electronics, physics, and so on. What was the truth? A: Von Neumann was not unassisted. The mathematics apply to a language which translates quite naturally to EM principles. His involvement on that aspect was coerced. Q: (A) What kind of mathematics? A: What is the light one observes in the presence of a charged EM field? Algebra. Q: (A) Algebras of operators? A: Calculus. Q: (A) Now, in this paper they also mention a mathematician by the name of Levinson who wrote the so- called ‘Levinson Time Equation.’ Was there such a mathematician participating in the project? A: Yes, but only after. Not in ’43. Q: (A) There is also mention of Hilbert, another mathematician, and it is said that ‘Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert space which describe multiple space and multiple realities mathematically. These equations for multiple space became very important in the project.’ Is that correct? A: Again, this was after the “Experiment.” The “Project” continues. Q: (A) Who are the scientists known to me who participate in the Project that continues, if any? A: Not necessarily known to you.
about the relation of quantum theory to all of this. Hilbert dealt with quantum theory. Is it true that, from UFT, like Einstein dreamed it, that one can derive quantum theory? A: Yes. Q: (A) What is the relation of this Hilbert Space business to multiple realities. I don’t understand this. Can I have a clue? A: What do you not understand? Q: (A) I do not understand what Hilbert’s Mathematics have to do with Multiple Realities. I understand multiple realities can have all kinds of wormholes and bridges… A: The wormholes are the bridges. His mathematics have to do with how one passes through parallel realms in order to traverse extreme distances within the same originator realm without altering the perceived passage of time. Q: (A) That’s interesting to think about. A: In other words, “zero time,” and the folding of space. This is where the complete Unified Field Theory would come into play. You see, the problem needing solution is to demonstrate how space and time are interchangeable, and how gravity and magnetism are born of the same source, with the application of electromagnetic fields as the key to utilizing all realms simultaneously. Goodbye.
A: Wait and see. Now: study supernovae!
I have a question about UFT. A piece from Einstein’s biography says that in 1931, Einstein and Mayer re- formulated Kaluza’s five dimensional theory, retaining a four- dimensional space- time. I would like to know if it was a step back or a step forward when they did this? A: Step back, then forward. Q: (L) The paper was a step back and then they stepped forward in secret? A: Close.
Next question: three weeks ago you mentioned in relation to UFT pentagons and hexagons. I have here a pentagon and a mathematical formula under pentagon which for me, relates to a pentagon, and it has x, y, z, three dimension; time, which is one dimension, and perhaps the fifth dimension, which corresponds to the fifth. Is this association of pentagon with this mathematical symbol below correct? A: Yes. Q: (L) I want to ask if you ever told us to do something with a Tesla coil which I failed to record or got lost somewhere? A: Maybe. Gravity waves, pentagon is the foundation; hexagon is the conclusion.
Related to these gravity waves, in 1936 Einstein wrote a paper which was rejected, in which he claims to have discovered that there are no gravity waves. When you talk… A: Cloak for others. Einstein knew differently, but was forced to comply for political and security reasons. Q: (A) Should gravity be quantized as other fields? A: It can be. Q: (A) But, if it is quantized, it will be gravitons, and you said that there are no gravitons… A: Gravitons are really electrons within a time vacuum.
Physicists today and for the past 5 or 10 years have been trying to build a theory of everything which is built on the idea of strings - that everything is composed of oscillating strings - they call it SuperString Theory. Is the idea of strings any good? A: No.
Now, in many of these internet papers on UFT we find the name of Bearden. I have here a page: ‘Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy’. [Reads abstract] This guy wrote several books and several papers. Is there any truth in what he is saying? A: Yes. Q: (A) Is it worthwhile to study? A: Yes. Q: (A) Are there lies there too? Is he lying too? A: Maybe some mixed in to cloak for safety sake. Q: (A) Is his idea of scalar electromagnetics sound? A: Close.
A: Seek that which is elusive…
we have found this Novosibirtsk group. They apparently have some kind of detectors and some kinds of ideas according to this Russian guy Kozyrev, which enable them to measure instantaneous signals caused by some kind of irreversible events, such as when the comets hit Jupiter. I would like to know if the effect they have measured is a real, new effect? A: Not “new” of course, but this is most interesting, because now we are dancing on the threshold of gravity waves, the very same thing we have been hinting at for so long, as you measure it in your linear perspective. The unusual condition that has arisen in Russia has created a bubble within the framework of the world power structure which has allowed some concussive “discoveries” to be occasionally leaked out into the open. This, of course, presents unique but potentially hazardous opportunities for you in your research.
Q: (L) I swear! I will not breathe a word! A: It matters not to us, we will love you eternally, in any density.
Q: (L) Is the binary system in the eye of the Gorgon in the constellation Perseus, which is a star named Algol, one which contains a star and a black hole? A: Quasars determine these.
A: Well, we must caution you that for those who presume “nothingness,” there is usually a transitory period of total unconsciousness for preparatory and readjustment to 5th density purposes.
Q: (L) Would one say that being at 5th density was a pleasant experience, or just an intense one? A: Intense, but not as you would imagine this. Q: (C) I assume that it is intense without the negative aspects, that it would be good… A: No. Negativity, yes that is there, but there is not the underlying fear of physiological damage that one perceives in third density due to genetic body response through hormonal brain swarms. Q: (C) Okay, so what does one do in everyday life once one has become adjusted to 5th density? A: “Everyday life” does not apply. Q: (C) Take it as a term. (L) In other words, what does one do in 5th density? (C) Yeah, what is one’s activity? A: Consider it a sort of timeless pondering learning.
A: We are timeless, so therefore, timely as well!! Gravity is the foundation of all material existence. Therefore, gravity waves are of instantaneous imprint, as they rule all time in extant by nature.
Q: (A) But I am confused because if gravity waves are instantaneous, then how come we are waiting for a gravity wave that is coming… A: The instantaneous nature of it is that which is perceived if one has the necessary equipment. After all, you know by now that gravity has the feature of “bending” time, space, light, etc. Q: (A) So the wave that is supposed to come is NOT instantaneous. (L) Are you talking about The Wave? (A) The Wave. (L) I don’t think they ever said it was a gravity wave. A: Correct Laura. Q: (L) If I remember correctly, they said it was a wave of ‘hyperkinetic sensate.’ A: Yes. Q: (L) What does hyperkinetic sensate mean? A: Your being merging with hyperspatial energy. Q: (L) Cool! A: Matter/ antimatter. One features atomic particle based matter, the other features pure energy in conscious form. Gravity is the balancing binder of it all. Q: (C) I have always seen energy as atomic. A: That is material energy.
_________________
THE CULLING WILL FOLLOW SOON...
____________________________
we were told that there is some interaction between gravity and EM wave, and this is what UFT is about… If we use other dimensions which we are supposed to use in this UFT, going with Kaluza- Klein, then the very concept of mass is something which is not so clear, and mass can be variable… A: Yes, variability of physicality.
Can we have a UFT which unifies EM and gravity and does not include the concept of other densities. In other words, can we put in a textbook all about the gravity and electromagnetics, and a student could learn all of this and still know nothing about other densities? A: No. Other densities become apparent when… Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von Neumann knew about these other densities? A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Just a thought: having UFT and being able to manipulate different fields within it, creates different effects. So, as we understand it in the apparent present state of science, we have to spin something in space in order to create gravity. But, with the UFT, one small offshoot is that one could create real gravity without spinning anything. So, the problem of weightlessness is really already solved… A: Elementary my dear Terry, elementary. Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space station and all the trouble they are having readapting to gravity when they come back, is all a game… A: When you “let the cat out of the bag,” you create an entire feline “nation.” Q: (T) So, we are capable of “Star Trek” right now? A: In a sense, but there is so much more than that.
Crystals make density and dimensional windows open from “time to time” thus making the oblivious quite obvious.
Q: (L) Now, the big question is: what are we supposed to DO with this information? A: As with all else, it is not what you should do with it, it is just that you have it.
A: Your experiences never end, only transform. No bodycentrics need apply.
(L) Well, you once said something about the transition to 4th density creating a ‘level playing field.’ Then, the people will wake up and there will be a battle between the humans and aliens… A: Yes. Q: (L) And if it is a more level playing field, then the situation would not quite be the same as the Conquistadores against the Aztecs and the Native Americans against the Europeans and… A: Wrong, all in that drama were at 3rd density. The rabbits, rats, dogs, etc. are not on a level playing field with you!
You say knowledge protects. It protects against WHAT? A: Many things. One example: post transformational trauma and confusion.
Well, if a person transitions directly from 3rd to 4th density without cycling through 5th density via dying, that implies that persons can transition directly from 3rd to 4th density without dying. Is that correct? A: Yes. Q: (L) How does that feel? How is that experience… A: Alice through the looking glass.
knowledge is supposed to protect from trauma and confusion. On the other hand, all is lessons, so trauma is a lesson. Why are we supposed to work to avoid a lesson? A: You are correct, it is a lesson, but if you have foreknowledge, you are learning that lesson early, and in a different way.
Knowledge protects in the most amazing ways. Mathematics are “taught’ in your realm in such a way that only a select few will learn. And mathematics is the language of all creation. For example, advanced math studies, such as algebra, provide the keys to unlocking the doors between the matter and antimatter universes. Suggest those present who still need to, learn algebra.
A: The doors are opened to revelation by contemplating the past which is really the present.
I also read about these WIMPs, or Weakly Interactive Massive Particles, that they say are at the core of the sun, and that somehow they modulate the sun’s internal temperature. Do these WIMPs exist? A: All exists which is imagined.
looking for clues about Lodz, we came upon these pages of the guy from Lodz, whom I know. He speculates about faster than light particles. The main hypothesis is that neutrinos really travel faster than light. Is this the case? A: This is opening a doorway to hyperspace. Q: (A) You mean investigating this question? A: Close. Q: (A) Or using neutrinos? A: Combine with those on the pathway of wormholes. Q: (L) Well, on that subject, when you said ‘pathway by the lightpoles,’ did you mean the poles of the Sun? A: Investigate.
were you referring to faster than light particles at the heart of the Sun, i.e. neutrinos? A: If so, look for a Russian scientist. Q: (A) Is the Russian scientist Sakharov? A: Sakharov! Q: (A) Is this related to the research that I was doing… A: Yes. And Sakharov was censored for reasons other than publicized.
what would be experienced by a person or space ship that goes into a black hole? What would it be like? A: Disintegration, followed by conversion to anti- material energy. Q: (L) So it would not come out on the other side in another universe? (A) It will. A: Yes, but not as matter. Q: (L) After something has gone into a black hole, can it then re- emerge into the material universe intact? A: No. Q: (L) So, once it’s gone in the black hole, it’s sayonara, hasta la vista? A: Stars are also portals of this nature. Q: (L) So, what we perceive as stars in the anti- matter universe would be black holes? A: No, windows. Q: (L) But, if you lived in this other universe on the other side of black holes to us, what would the black holes look like from there? A: Too complicated to explain. Q: (L) Well, give me a reference… A: That is just the point! You have no reference.
You mentioned hyperspace. What is hyperspace? A: 4th through 7th density, except 4th only perceives it, as “living in the doorway.”
You say that stars are portals. What, specifically, are they portals for, of, from or to? A: How about other dimension. Remember, density and dimensional concepts intersect. Density level relates more to conscious awareness, but dimensions house consciousness and all other. Q: (L) So, you can have many ‘houses’ along a row at one level and many at another level, in a vague sort of way? A: Close. Q: (A) Is the concept of density related to what Sakharov was doing? A: Close. Think of hyperspace as 4th dimension.
A: Worries are pointless, better to just take one step at a time. Q: (L) Yes, but you are always telling us to expect the unexpected, and to prepare for things to head them off, and if that is a possibility, I would like to be prepared for it… A: Are you dissatisfied? Q: (L) No, I’m not dissatisfied. I just want to be prepared for any unexpected, bizarre things, because all kinds of unexpected bizarre things happen to us. All the time! A: Then you are prepared.
I want to ask about Lodz. Did we already get the clue and it’s… A: You are on the right track. Q: (A) Now, this business about Sakharov, is this related, or better, when I think about Sakharov, I think about his theory that space, time metric can change signature; that space/ time geometry builds a kind of singularity, changes the algebraic structure of the metric tensor; and I was trying to relate it to changing of density at some point… A: Yes. Sakharov knew the answer was in the pentagon. Q: (L) Do you mean ‘pentagon’ as in the government building, or as in the geometric structure? A: Why do you suppose they are linked? Why is the “pentagon” a pentagon? Q: (L) I don’t know. Why is it? A: Answers are within your grasp. Q: (L) When you say ‘grasp,’ does it relate to five fingers… (A) or to the fifth dimension? A: Yes, and what you possess. Q: (L) What do you mean ‘what you possess?’ A: The key is in this room and your office. But that is not the only meaning. Suggest you begin your quest by looking for patriots.
What was this answer ‘yes’ to the changing of density and how it relates to what Sakharov was working on and how it connects to Kaluza Klein theories? A: Both. Q: (L) Well, I guess we are going to have to wait until I type it to make any sense out of it… A: Geometry… pentagon and hexagon, algebraic equations… Q: (A) Pentagon and hexagon algebraic equations… (L) What is the connection between the pentagon and hexagon? A: Discover. Q: (A) In physics and mathematics we write a triangle to symbolize certain operations in three- dimensional space. One draws a square to symbolize wave equations in 4 dimensional space. One draws a pentagon to symbolize equations in 5th dimensional space, and a hexagon to symbolize equations in 6 dimensional space. A: Goodnight.
A: Patience charts course, not pressure.
Q: (L) Is what he is saying true? A: “True” and false are one when all is sanctified. Q: (L) That doesn’t help us a bit! A: Futures all exist, but are infinite.
A: Answers come when you back up and worry not. Q: (A) What do you mean ‘back up?’ A: Go back.
A: Do you not know that your mind either contains already, or can access all that exists?
In this session with Santilli there was repeated at least twice the term ‘matrix.’ Laura made a comment that maybe it was a three dimensional matrix. So I was thinking about this matrix and I have two possibilities. If it is related to the number 3, it can be a matrix that is flat and 3 by 3. Or, it can be any matrix that is three dimensional rather than flat. Which of these, if any, is the concept mentioned in the session? A: Three dimensional 12 by 12. Q: (A) 12 by 12 by 12? A: Yes. Q: (A) Why number 12? What is so particular about number 12? A: Try it and see.
we have been told that time should not be mixed with space in a UFT, and now we have this time again… A: Do we??? Q: (A) Yes, because we have been told that the Galilei group which treats space different from time is better than the Lorentz group which treats space as equal to time. A: But, the link, the link is the bridge, not necessarily a sum of the parts, in other words, that link does not need to belong to either to exist.
Now, pentagon. There was this pentagon we talked about last time. Pentagon and then hexagon. My guess is that the pentagon is related to the wave equation in 5 dimensions. I want to ask about this… A: If one seeks to unify, one needs a common source. If “time” really were the 4th dimension, what if it sprang from, or was born of a fifth. Now, how or where does one “plug” gravity into the equation? Q: (A) Normally gravity is plugged into the equation as part of the geometry of space and time, except if Newton and Galilei, who consider time as different… A: Ah, now enter those sneaky pentagons and hexagons.
All STS always seek the path of least resistance first.
I was following another clue, Einstein’s UFT, and I looked at 1936 and he published a paper then describing Einstein- Rosen Bridge. A: Yes. Q: (A) This is a bridge between two different realms, so to say. A: Yes. Q: (A) But there is nothing in this idea, really, that relates to UFT. A: That is not true. Q: (A) There was nothing in this idea which relates to hyperspace in the sense of fifth dimensions, pentagons, hexagons. At least I could not see it. A: Yes. Q: (A) So there is another piece of information which has to be put together with this idea to lead to the UFT, yes? A: Yes.
Another clue that we were following was Von Neumann. We have this info about the Philadelphia Experiment, probably from Bielek. It says that Von Neumann took over the project in March of 1942, after Tesla. Is this correct? A: Yes. Q: (A) It says that in 1943, Von Neumann installed a third generator… A: Yes. Q: (A) I have trouble with this because Von Neumann was a mathematician, and I can hardly imagine him installing generators which involves knowledge of electronics, physics, and so on. What was the truth? A: Von Neumann was not unassisted. The mathematics apply to a language which translates quite naturally to EM principles. His involvement on that aspect was coerced. Q: (A) What kind of mathematics? A: What is the light one observes in the presence of a charged EM field? Algebra. Q: (A) Algebras of operators? A: Calculus. Q: (A) Now, in this paper they also mention a mathematician by the name of Levinson who wrote the so- called ‘Levinson Time Equation.’ Was there such a mathematician participating in the project? A: Yes, but only after. Not in ’43. Q: (A) There is also mention of Hilbert, another mathematician, and it is said that ‘Hilbert, the mathematician who devised equations for Hilbert space which describe multiple space and multiple realities mathematically. These equations for multiple space became very important in the project.’ Is that correct? A: Again, this was after the “Experiment.” The “Project” continues. Q: (A) Who are the scientists known to me who participate in the Project that continues, if any? A: Not necessarily known to you.
about the relation of quantum theory to all of this. Hilbert dealt with quantum theory. Is it true that, from UFT, like Einstein dreamed it, that one can derive quantum theory? A: Yes. Q: (A) What is the relation of this Hilbert Space business to multiple realities. I don’t understand this. Can I have a clue? A: What do you not understand? Q: (A) I do not understand what Hilbert’s Mathematics have to do with Multiple Realities. I understand multiple realities can have all kinds of wormholes and bridges… A: The wormholes are the bridges. His mathematics have to do with how one passes through parallel realms in order to traverse extreme distances within the same originator realm without altering the perceived passage of time. Q: (A) That’s interesting to think about. A: In other words, “zero time,” and the folding of space. This is where the complete Unified Field Theory would come into play. You see, the problem needing solution is to demonstrate how space and time are interchangeable, and how gravity and magnetism are born of the same source, with the application of electromagnetic fields as the key to utilizing all realms simultaneously. Goodbye.
A: Wait and see. Now: study supernovae!
I have a question about UFT. A piece from Einstein’s biography says that in 1931, Einstein and Mayer re- formulated Kaluza’s five dimensional theory, retaining a four- dimensional space- time. I would like to know if it was a step back or a step forward when they did this? A: Step back, then forward. Q: (L) The paper was a step back and then they stepped forward in secret? A: Close.
Next question: three weeks ago you mentioned in relation to UFT pentagons and hexagons. I have here a pentagon and a mathematical formula under pentagon which for me, relates to a pentagon, and it has x, y, z, three dimension; time, which is one dimension, and perhaps the fifth dimension, which corresponds to the fifth. Is this association of pentagon with this mathematical symbol below correct? A: Yes. Q: (L) I want to ask if you ever told us to do something with a Tesla coil which I failed to record or got lost somewhere? A: Maybe. Gravity waves, pentagon is the foundation; hexagon is the conclusion.
Related to these gravity waves, in 1936 Einstein wrote a paper which was rejected, in which he claims to have discovered that there are no gravity waves. When you talk… A: Cloak for others. Einstein knew differently, but was forced to comply for political and security reasons. Q: (A) Should gravity be quantized as other fields? A: It can be. Q: (A) But, if it is quantized, it will be gravitons, and you said that there are no gravitons… A: Gravitons are really electrons within a time vacuum.
Physicists today and for the past 5 or 10 years have been trying to build a theory of everything which is built on the idea of strings - that everything is composed of oscillating strings - they call it SuperString Theory. Is the idea of strings any good? A: No.
Now, in many of these internet papers on UFT we find the name of Bearden. I have here a page: ‘Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy’. [Reads abstract] This guy wrote several books and several papers. Is there any truth in what he is saying? A: Yes. Q: (A) Is it worthwhile to study? A: Yes. Q: (A) Are there lies there too? Is he lying too? A: Maybe some mixed in to cloak for safety sake. Q: (A) Is his idea of scalar electromagnetics sound? A: Close.
A: Seek that which is elusive…
we have found this Novosibirtsk group. They apparently have some kind of detectors and some kinds of ideas according to this Russian guy Kozyrev, which enable them to measure instantaneous signals caused by some kind of irreversible events, such as when the comets hit Jupiter. I would like to know if the effect they have measured is a real, new effect? A: Not “new” of course, but this is most interesting, because now we are dancing on the threshold of gravity waves, the very same thing we have been hinting at for so long, as you measure it in your linear perspective. The unusual condition that has arisen in Russia has created a bubble within the framework of the world power structure which has allowed some concussive “discoveries” to be occasionally leaked out into the open. This, of course, presents unique but potentially hazardous opportunities for you in your research.
Q: (L) I swear! I will not breathe a word! A: It matters not to us, we will love you eternally, in any density.
Q: (L) Is the binary system in the eye of the Gorgon in the constellation Perseus, which is a star named Algol, one which contains a star and a black hole? A: Quasars determine these.
A: Well, we must caution you that for those who presume “nothingness,” there is usually a transitory period of total unconsciousness for preparatory and readjustment to 5th density purposes.
Q: (L) Would one say that being at 5th density was a pleasant experience, or just an intense one? A: Intense, but not as you would imagine this. Q: (C) I assume that it is intense without the negative aspects, that it would be good… A: No. Negativity, yes that is there, but there is not the underlying fear of physiological damage that one perceives in third density due to genetic body response through hormonal brain swarms. Q: (C) Okay, so what does one do in everyday life once one has become adjusted to 5th density? A: “Everyday life” does not apply. Q: (C) Take it as a term. (L) In other words, what does one do in 5th density? (C) Yeah, what is one’s activity? A: Consider it a sort of timeless pondering learning.
A: We are timeless, so therefore, timely as well!! Gravity is the foundation of all material existence. Therefore, gravity waves are of instantaneous imprint, as they rule all time in extant by nature.
Q: (A) But I am confused because if gravity waves are instantaneous, then how come we are waiting for a gravity wave that is coming… A: The instantaneous nature of it is that which is perceived if one has the necessary equipment. After all, you know by now that gravity has the feature of “bending” time, space, light, etc. Q: (A) So the wave that is supposed to come is NOT instantaneous. (L) Are you talking about The Wave? (A) The Wave. (L) I don’t think they ever said it was a gravity wave. A: Correct Laura. Q: (L) If I remember correctly, they said it was a wave of ‘hyperkinetic sensate.’ A: Yes. Q: (L) What does hyperkinetic sensate mean? A: Your being merging with hyperspatial energy. Q: (L) Cool! A: Matter/ antimatter. One features atomic particle based matter, the other features pure energy in conscious form. Gravity is the balancing binder of it all. Q: (C) I have always seen energy as atomic. A: That is material energy.
_________________
THE CULLING WILL FOLLOW SOON...
PerfectCircle
Jedi Master
They are, thank you.
I personally cannot grasp it in my mind yet around black holes and their connection with antimatter.
I personally cannot grasp it in my mind yet around black holes and their connection with antimatter.
Thassa
Jedi
I don't think they are related...
As far as I remember, they said antimatter was a "passage through dimensions."
You might like my complete list, but there are also included some "3D stuff." Like the building of pyramids and sexuality of Adolf Hitler.
What I'm doing here is selecting the parts of that list that (I think) are not "3D stuff."
(This list goes until around 1998, right now I'm analysing the sessions of 2000)
Cassiopaeans – Google Drive
drive.google.com
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
