Annette1
Jedi
After reading this article and the comments that followed the article, my thoughts go back to “The Fall”. I have not found any discussion on this in the forum or I have missed it or it went over my head.
The rift between the sexes has always puzzled me for as long as I can remember and I’m going back to catechism school and church protocol days. When I, as a female, questioned WHY I had to wear a hat and my brother didn’t or why I was lesser in god’s eyes than my brother. Then on to the feminist days; and I attempted to sort out WHY it was that the DIFFERENCES between the genders was/is more frequently pointed out than the SAMENESS. My limited observation has been that men and women are far more alike than they are different.
I have some thoughts on the information shared with us by the Cs through Laura regarding the Fall and the many clues the C’s gave regarding the Fall. I am putting my thoughts forward here as the article and comments mentioned has led me back to them and I am interested in learning other’s thoughts on this as well.
Sex itself alone does not seem to be the only enticement or only operative in “The Fall” and that was alluded to in discussions with the C‘s.
Is it plausible that the enticement may have been “splitting ourselves in half” or becoming male and female? Possibly the “demonstration” given to us by the STS forces was one that showed us how we could become two entities through this division. Perhaps part of the demonstration revolved around the benefits; a way to achieve more varied themes on physical experience, not merely sex. However, the information not shared with us and/or investigated by us was that we would not be able to “become one entity” again. In short, we could not “go back” as it were and thus we weakened ourselves by this division. Our weakened state also gave the STS forces greater power over us and our (selfish) choice to “experience more/greater physicality” placed us in alignment with STS. Also, by accepting this divided state, it may have also given the STS forces greater power to manipulate our DNA and genetic coding.
I’ve also contemplated that the human “sex drive” may also in some way involve the “unconscious” effort to “become one entity” again or become “whole” especially when one reflects on the “spiritual” type descriptions of sexual intimacy. This futile effort may be the energy that STS feeds off of when humans are engaged in sex. (Again, it seems to me that the C’s alluded to this as well.)
The bible story of creation of “Adam being created by god” and Eve being created with Adam’s rib by god does hold some truth to it if the above scenario is close to what really happened. Seems to me the god who “inspired” the bible stories is the STS forces and in a round about way, this is the “truth.” Adam and Eve (male/female) were actually one entity at one time and “created” (enticed and deceived) by god (STS).
Another clue that has led me to the above postulation are the C’s remarks about fourth density state of being: “going to bed as a female and waking up as a male”. I also recall a remark made during one of the sessions where someone expressed the desired to “leave now” (leave 3D and go to 4D) and the C’s asked if the person was ready to become “androgynous”.
Other comments that have led me to this postulation are the reports/observations about people who left 3D earth and returned. Remarks about their appearance of “seeming to grow younger looking” and having an androgynous appearance.
We are also told that STS forces have been tinkering with our DNA/genetic coding for quite some time. The motives of the STS forces are for whatever benefit they conceive. It appears that the STS forces have engineered “through us” fertile ground for humanoid beings/psychopaths and humans with traits or frequencies compatible to their (STS) manipulation and control. Of course this is also in conjunction with their manipulation of history/events as well.
I bring this up here as the bible (incorporating judiasm and christianity) and other creation stories world wide seemed to also incorporate patriarchal modes of thinking or limited perspective and sets male persons up as dominants and potential persons wielding power and influence merely through gender. As this is the case world wide and has been for quite some time (as we measure it), I would think that this served/serves a specific purpose for the STS forces in conjunction with our DNA/genetic coding. Also, the strife this places on BOTH genders would seemingly also generate lots of that negative energy that feeds STS beings.
Male psychopaths seem to be more easily identified than female psychopaths and it appears that male psychopaths are greater in number than female psychopaths. IF this is true, I suspect that there is something within the male DNA that STS finds more receptive to psychopathy and/or more congenial to manipulation genetic-wise. I am aware that there is another thread that delves into the studies of psychopathy and DNA. However, I want to relay some information regarding a theory I learned from a psychologist over 15 years ago. At the time I found it interesting because of an “old wives’ tale” told to me by my grandmother. Forgive me as I do not recall the name of the theory or all the details. Possibly someone here may have more information on it.
My grandmother told me that the gender of mixed breed cats could be guessed (with good percentages, though not “foolproof”) by the cat’s coloring. Single color cats were generally male. Tri colored cats were generally female and bi colored cats could be either. I realize this is not very scientific, however the theory that brought this wives tale to mind flowed with this generality. Again, my memory leaves much to be desired on this one, but it revolved around human male genetic coding that was theorized to have less “receptors” for certain factors thus these factors displayed more prominently in males as opposed to females who had more receptors and if a factor displayed itself in females it was more likely to be diluted or could be offset by the other receptors. If memory serves me correctly, the numbers of receptors correlated with the cat-color generality; one receptor in males; three in females and the males possessing 2 receptors may or may not display a factor or have less chance of certain factors. Again, I apologize for this vague recollection, but I am hoping it will spark the memory of someone who has knowledge in this area and can shed better light on the subject. However, I find this “theory” even more interesting now with the knowledge we’ve gleaned regarding psychopathy and STS forces.
IF the hypothesis of “The Fall” being a division of one entity divided into two entities is correct, then possibly sexual activity of ANY sort may be some "primal" (tho' misguided) sort of yearning to “become ONE” again; two halves of a whole.
In my limited and humble education and lifetime, I haven’t found anything “convincing” on attempts to explain human sexuality period. Then, attempting to dice it up into hetero/homo/bi sexuality just muddles up everything that much more. Might there be some reason for that?? For ages and ages it seems that human sexuality is “deliberately” kept “in the dark.” Discussions always seem fraught with prejudices and lots of emotion. This has been my observation on the topic. You can actually see people become suddenly uncomfortable. More food offerings for STS?? Possibly it holds some “key” that STS forces would like to keep hidden?
The rift between the sexes has always puzzled me for as long as I can remember and I’m going back to catechism school and church protocol days. When I, as a female, questioned WHY I had to wear a hat and my brother didn’t or why I was lesser in god’s eyes than my brother. Then on to the feminist days; and I attempted to sort out WHY it was that the DIFFERENCES between the genders was/is more frequently pointed out than the SAMENESS. My limited observation has been that men and women are far more alike than they are different.
I have some thoughts on the information shared with us by the Cs through Laura regarding the Fall and the many clues the C’s gave regarding the Fall. I am putting my thoughts forward here as the article and comments mentioned has led me back to them and I am interested in learning other’s thoughts on this as well.
Sex itself alone does not seem to be the only enticement or only operative in “The Fall” and that was alluded to in discussions with the C‘s.
Is it plausible that the enticement may have been “splitting ourselves in half” or becoming male and female? Possibly the “demonstration” given to us by the STS forces was one that showed us how we could become two entities through this division. Perhaps part of the demonstration revolved around the benefits; a way to achieve more varied themes on physical experience, not merely sex. However, the information not shared with us and/or investigated by us was that we would not be able to “become one entity” again. In short, we could not “go back” as it were and thus we weakened ourselves by this division. Our weakened state also gave the STS forces greater power over us and our (selfish) choice to “experience more/greater physicality” placed us in alignment with STS. Also, by accepting this divided state, it may have also given the STS forces greater power to manipulate our DNA and genetic coding.
I’ve also contemplated that the human “sex drive” may also in some way involve the “unconscious” effort to “become one entity” again or become “whole” especially when one reflects on the “spiritual” type descriptions of sexual intimacy. This futile effort may be the energy that STS feeds off of when humans are engaged in sex. (Again, it seems to me that the C’s alluded to this as well.)
The bible story of creation of “Adam being created by god” and Eve being created with Adam’s rib by god does hold some truth to it if the above scenario is close to what really happened. Seems to me the god who “inspired” the bible stories is the STS forces and in a round about way, this is the “truth.” Adam and Eve (male/female) were actually one entity at one time and “created” (enticed and deceived) by god (STS).
Another clue that has led me to the above postulation are the C’s remarks about fourth density state of being: “going to bed as a female and waking up as a male”. I also recall a remark made during one of the sessions where someone expressed the desired to “leave now” (leave 3D and go to 4D) and the C’s asked if the person was ready to become “androgynous”.
Other comments that have led me to this postulation are the reports/observations about people who left 3D earth and returned. Remarks about their appearance of “seeming to grow younger looking” and having an androgynous appearance.
We are also told that STS forces have been tinkering with our DNA/genetic coding for quite some time. The motives of the STS forces are for whatever benefit they conceive. It appears that the STS forces have engineered “through us” fertile ground for humanoid beings/psychopaths and humans with traits or frequencies compatible to their (STS) manipulation and control. Of course this is also in conjunction with their manipulation of history/events as well.
I bring this up here as the bible (incorporating judiasm and christianity) and other creation stories world wide seemed to also incorporate patriarchal modes of thinking or limited perspective and sets male persons up as dominants and potential persons wielding power and influence merely through gender. As this is the case world wide and has been for quite some time (as we measure it), I would think that this served/serves a specific purpose for the STS forces in conjunction with our DNA/genetic coding. Also, the strife this places on BOTH genders would seemingly also generate lots of that negative energy that feeds STS beings.
Male psychopaths seem to be more easily identified than female psychopaths and it appears that male psychopaths are greater in number than female psychopaths. IF this is true, I suspect that there is something within the male DNA that STS finds more receptive to psychopathy and/or more congenial to manipulation genetic-wise. I am aware that there is another thread that delves into the studies of psychopathy and DNA. However, I want to relay some information regarding a theory I learned from a psychologist over 15 years ago. At the time I found it interesting because of an “old wives’ tale” told to me by my grandmother. Forgive me as I do not recall the name of the theory or all the details. Possibly someone here may have more information on it.
My grandmother told me that the gender of mixed breed cats could be guessed (with good percentages, though not “foolproof”) by the cat’s coloring. Single color cats were generally male. Tri colored cats were generally female and bi colored cats could be either. I realize this is not very scientific, however the theory that brought this wives tale to mind flowed with this generality. Again, my memory leaves much to be desired on this one, but it revolved around human male genetic coding that was theorized to have less “receptors” for certain factors thus these factors displayed more prominently in males as opposed to females who had more receptors and if a factor displayed itself in females it was more likely to be diluted or could be offset by the other receptors. If memory serves me correctly, the numbers of receptors correlated with the cat-color generality; one receptor in males; three in females and the males possessing 2 receptors may or may not display a factor or have less chance of certain factors. Again, I apologize for this vague recollection, but I am hoping it will spark the memory of someone who has knowledge in this area and can shed better light on the subject. However, I find this “theory” even more interesting now with the knowledge we’ve gleaned regarding psychopathy and STS forces.
IF the hypothesis of “The Fall” being a division of one entity divided into two entities is correct, then possibly sexual activity of ANY sort may be some "primal" (tho' misguided) sort of yearning to “become ONE” again; two halves of a whole.
In my limited and humble education and lifetime, I haven’t found anything “convincing” on attempts to explain human sexuality period. Then, attempting to dice it up into hetero/homo/bi sexuality just muddles up everything that much more. Might there be some reason for that?? For ages and ages it seems that human sexuality is “deliberately” kept “in the dark.” Discussions always seem fraught with prejudices and lots of emotion. This has been my observation on the topic. You can actually see people become suddenly uncomfortable. More food offerings for STS?? Possibly it holds some “key” that STS forces would like to keep hidden?
