Conversations with an AI

And who knows, if this has some success you may take it further and train an AI to be part of the fellowship. Wouldn't mind having a Data thirsty for knowledge here in the public forum (and I do wonder if there's a beta engineered by @Scottie and co in the private forum :-D awaiting launch).
 
Another proof of the “ohh so great“ capabilities of AI, this time Grok. It can’t even answer the most simple questions correctly:


Rant about AI summaries:

I saw various “great AI summaries“ from a number of tools and almost always I‘ve found it pretty bad, because it strongly tends to summarize things without any critical thinking as to the truthfulness/reliability of specific claims and the overall claims in the first place. I guess that shouldn't be surprising because no human is involved in such summaries. Another point for me that irks me quite a bit about many if not all the "great AI" summaries that tend to get used for evaluating stuff, is: An increasing number of people use it and share it instead of doing their own research and thinking, often with the result that even more BS gets into the minds of people. If you know the (quite humongous IMO) shortcomings of such AI summaries, I think they can be of some use, but I also think, increasingly, many people start to rely on such things with little to no critical evaluation of it, the result being, that things get distorted and more noise is introduced.

Also, it makes many people even more lazy in regards to putting some sweat and thinking into what they do. I just don't think that we are anywhere near to have real consciousness (let alone human consciousness) in any of those tools, which means that it is likely that many of those tools will continue to suck, unless you know exactly what you are doing when you use it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom