Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

[psychegram]

Posting this year because it's from the Planet Lockdown movie, but I'm not 100% confident it's the right place since the interview goes well beyond the lockdown. It's with a Swiss (I think) businessman named Daniel Model. Apparently he declared himself and his house as a sovereign state as an act of deliberately absurdist spiritual resistance against the creeping tyranny of the nanny state.

He's either been reading this forum or reading Gurdjieff, because he talks a lot about the necessity of self-observation; turning the self into an object of study (as supposed to a subject); the utility of pain for learning; the impossibility of learning everything necessary in one life and therefore the necessity of reincarnation; the central importance of free will, and of developing the will; the acquisition of virtue; the importance of curiosity; and a whole lot else.

He also has a very kind, very engaging manner and is clearly possessed of an active mind.

Might be someone worthwhile for the chateau crew to reach out to, as he seems highly colinear.

 

[hlat]

Anyone drinking tonic water and can recommend a particular brand? I've found a lot have bad GMO or artificial sweeteners. What I'm trying now is by brand Fever Tree, which has 4 non-GMO versions: Indian (not light), elderflower, Mediterranean, and lemon.

Fever-Tree Products

Listing page of Fever-Tree's mixer drinks

fever-tree.com

There was another brand without organic agave, but I remember reading agave is not good for our bodies, though I don't remember exactly why. I don't think the only reason was glycemic index.

 

[Yupo]

Anyone drinking tonic water and can recommend a particular brand? I've found a lot have bad GMO or artificial sweeteners. What I'm trying now is by brand Fever Tree, which has 4 non-GMO versions: Indian (not light), elderflower, Mediterranean, and lemon.

Fever-Tree Products

Listing page of Fever-Tree's mixer drinks

fever-tree.com

There was another brand without organic agave, but I remember reading agave is not good for our bodies, though I don't remember exactly why. I don't think the only reason was glycemic index.

Agave nectar is very high in fructose. Quinine is very bitter, so tonic water is sold sweetened, either with sugar or artificial sweeteners. I have not found one with stevia. Most sugar-free versions I've see have Sucralose. I go for the least expensive, sugar free, house brands. These are about half the price of the big name products, and most likely the same composition. I drink about 2 liters a week of it, usually mixed with something else (not alcohol).

 

[hlat]

Most sugar-free versions I've see have Sucralose. I go for the least expensive, sugar free, house brands.

What are the ingredients in the sugar free tonic you buy? Sucralose is an artificial sweetener that is not good for us. I've chosen to buy tonic with sugar rather than artificial sweeteners.

I have not found one with stevia.

Here is a brand using stevia.

Zevia Tonic Water Mixer

Our sugar free Zevia Mixers are here to save your cocktail game. Traditional tonic without the sugar, calories, or artificial sweeteners? Yes please! Crisp, with a citrus bite and quinine, Zevia Tonic Water makes it easy to unwind and enjoy a premium gin and tonic at the end of a very long day...

shop.zevia.com

I'm not sure whether stevia is ok or whether stevia is no good like xylitol or erythritol.

 

[Joe]

6 people. Madness.

WATCH: Covid police raid Canadian home, violently arrest occupants after neighbor tattles on 'illegal' gathering of 6 people

A video circulating on social media shows police in Canada's Quebec province raiding a home and arresting at least two people, reportedly after a neighbor told authorities they were gathering in violation of Covid-19 rules.

www.rt.com

The incident reportedly occurred at a home in Gatineau, just across the Ottawa River from Canada's capital city, on Thursday. The New Year's Eve gathering of six people included individuals from outside the home, making it a violation of Quebec's ban on such get-togethers.

 

[Ruth]

West Virginia health officials mistakenly gave 42 people Regeneron IV Covid treatment instead of vaccine shot​

West Virginia health officials mistakenly gave 42 people Regeneron IV Covid treatment instead of vaccine shot

"It has been determined that this was an isolated incident," Julie Miller, an administrator for the Boone County Health Department, told CNBC by email.

www.cnbc.com

Dozens of people in West Virginia were mistakenly given Regeneron’s Covid-19 antibody treatment instead of the Moderna vaccine, the West Virginia National Guard announced Thursday.
The state’s National Guard said 42 people received the treatment, which is given intravenously, at a vaccination clinic staffed by the Boone County Health Department. The National Guard said it learned of the error on Wednesday.

Everyone who received the antibody treatment instead of the vaccine, which is given via a shot in the arm, have been contacted, Julie Miller, an administrator for the Boone County Health Department, told CNBC by email. She added that “we do not believe there is any risk of harm.”

So, they didn't want to kill them? How nice.

 

[Ruth]

Absolute attempted murder.

Humanity is being used as guinea pigs and these companies and politicians have zero liability. Criminal behaviour of the highest order.

Of course. How else would they kill people?

 

[Lucius]

I wonder what their aim is to limit meetings to 5-6 people. Of course, beyond the introduction of control, order and awareness that everyone is 'under supervision'.

I wonder if there is anything more behind this, why just five people. It is as they would like PTB to ban the spread of not so much Virus Covid but of knowledge, meetings.

6 people. Madness.

WATCH: Covid police raid Canadian home, violently arrest occupants after neighbor tattles on 'illegal' gathering of 6 people

A video circulating on social media shows police in Canada's Quebec province raiding a home and arresting at least two people, reportedly after a neighbor told authorities they were gathering in violation of Covid-19 rules.

www.rt.com

 

[gnosisxsophia]

How thing’s have changed in 17 years...

Retailers who cash in on community fears about SARS by exaggerating the health benefits of surgical masks could face fines of up to $110,000.

NSW Fair Trading Minister Reba Meagher yesterday warned that distributors and traders could be prosecuted if it was suggested the masks offered unrealistic levels of protection from the disease.

"I'm sure everyone would agree that it is un-Australian to profiteer from people's fears and anxieties," Ms Meagher said.

Farce mask: it's safe for only 20 minutes

www.smh.com.au

 

[psychegram]

I wonder what their aim is to limit meetings to 5-6 people. Of course, beyond the introduction of control, order and awareness that everyone is 'under supervision'.

I wonder if there is anything more behind this, why just five people. It is as they would like PTB to ban the spread of not so much Virus Covid but of knowledge, meetings.

My guess is the purpose is simply to prevent socialization. The average family is 4 people. Banning any gathering larger than that is in effect simply a ban on gatherings. This all but guarantees that, now that people are unable to socialize in public, they are also unable to socialize in private. On top of that, by encouraging snitching by neighbors - which was how this particular group got busted - the policy causes the disintegration of the social fabric on neighborhood scales. The overall result is a radical degree of atomization that leaves every individual completely isolated and, therefore, at the mercy of the state.

 

[Nienna]

Now, all of them are strong believers in the lies. They have now informed their mother/grandmother that they will not do anything for her anymore, like visiting, grocery shopping etc, unless she agrees to take the vaccine. I don't know what she will decide. I mean, geezz how cold hearted and just outright cruel are these people?

It seems that the dehumanizing of the people is really working, isn't it?

 

[SOTTREADER]

My guess is the purpose is simply to prevent socialization. The average family is 4 people. Banning any gathering larger than that is in effect simply a ban on gatherings. This all but guarantees that, now that people are unable to socialize in public, they are also unable to socialize in private. On top of that, by encouraging snitching by neighbors - which was how this particular group got busted - the policy causes the disintegration of the social fabric on neighborhood scales. The overall result is a radical degree of atomization that leaves every individual completely isolated and, therefore, at the mercy of the state.

I also think the state is trying to have the monopoly over who people socialise with. The state wants to be the only thing people socialise with. People are to be disconnected from each other and only connected to the state. I think this is the other thing they are trying to do, which is quite audacious.

A part of me thinks that the governments are acting in such a way as to try and reconfigure society for 4D or the upcoming wave. In 4D I've heard that societies are arranged into social memory complexes. I think by pushing for transhumanism and AI, governments are trying to substitute in something artificial and maybe by this, they may try and mask 4D by claiming it is in fact just an evolved 3D state which we technologically created. REMEMBER, when 4D comes, people won't have a way to conceptualise it. There will be an opportunity at this early juncture for someone to define reality to others, what it is and why it has changed.

Also by tinkering with our DNA and pushing everyone to get these mRNA / DNA vaccines, I feel like they are anticipating physiological changes that may be brought on by the wave. When these changes come in, I feel like they'll claim it's the vaccines thereby maintaining the illusion they are still in control.

Ultimately I feel like governments are pushing to monopolise all aspects of life so that when nature transforms, they can claim that in fact everything is exactly the same other than we've made a technological jump, driven by them and maintained by them. That way they hope to keep people locked into their grid in 4D.

 

[psychegram]

I also think the state is trying to have the monopoly over who people socialise with. The state wants to be the only thing people socialise with. People are to be disconnected from each other and only connected to the state. I think this is the other thing they are trying to do, which is quite audacious.

A part of me thinks that the governments are acting in such a way as to try and reconfigure society for 4D or the upcoming wave. In 4D I've heard that societies are arranged into social memory complexes. I think by pushing for transhumanism and AI, governments are trying to substitute in something artificial and maybe by this, they may try and mask 4D by claiming it is in fact just an evolved 3D state which we technologically created. REMEMBER, when 4D comes, people won't have a way to conceptualise it. There will be an opportunity at this early juncture for someone to define reality, what it is, why it has changed for others.

Also by tinkering with our DNA and pushing everyone to get these mRNA / DNA vaccines, I feel like they are anticipating physiological changes that may be brought on by the wave. When these changes come in, I feel like they'll claim it's the vaccines thereby maintaining the illusion they are still in control.

Ultimately I feel like governments are pushing to monopolise all aspects of life so that when nature transforms, they can claim that in fact everything is exactly the same other than we've made a technological jump, driven by them and maintained by them. That way they hope to keep people locked into their grid in 4D.

Something similar has occurred to me, that much of the push for transhumanism is an attempt to create an 'artificial' 4D state in which STS maintains top-down control. Alternatively, it's meant to lock things up in such a way that control is maintained into 4D.

But then we don't really know what 4D is, exactly. It may well be that there's a necessary technological component to it regardless of polarization, and the technology might itself be similar in either case, with the key difference being not what is used, but how it is used. As an obvious example, computer networks can be a tool for establishing perfect top-down control of populations via surveillance and ultimately brain chips; while at the same time, computer networks can be used to build a horizontal, self-organizing social structure in which there is no central controlling node. At the level of network architecture, it's the difference between server-based systems and peer-to-peer, and this is a fundamental tension that goes back to the very beginning of the internet. Which ends up dominating is probably not so much a technical question - both models are enabled by the same basic technology - as a question of the state of consciousness of the participants.

 

[SOTTREADER]

I also think the state is trying to have the monopoly over who people socialise with. The state wants to be the only thing people socialise with. People are to be disconnected from each other and only connected to the state. I think this is the other thing they are trying to do, which is quite audacious.

A part of me thinks that the governments are acting in such a way as to try and reconfigure society for 4D or the upcoming wave. In 4D I've heard that societies are arranged into social memory complexes. I think by pushing for transhumanism and AI, governments are trying to substitute in something artificial and maybe by this, they may try and mask 4D by claiming it is in fact just an evolved 3D state which we technologically created. REMEMBER, when 4D comes, people won't have a way to conceptualise it. There will be an opportunity at this early juncture for someone to define reality to others, what it is and why it has changed.

Also by tinkering with our DNA and pushing everyone to get these mRNA / DNA vaccines, I feel like they are anticipating physiological changes that may be brought on by the wave. When these changes come in, I feel like they'll claim it's the vaccines thereby maintaining the illusion they are still in control.

Ultimately I feel like governments are pushing to monopolise all aspects of life so that when nature transforms, they can claim that in fact everything is exactly the same other than we've made a technological jump, driven by them and maintained by them. That way they hope to keep people locked into their grid in 4D.

Expanding more on this idea as it has been on my mind lately. I really do think that part of the agenda is in anticipation of what's to come and how things will play out. I feel like they are trying to anticipate multiple things and are coming up with mitigation plans. You have to know that 4D possesses quite the considerable threat to governments and their ability to wield power and control. One could argue that 4D is an existential threat to the power structure of our current civilisation.

On top of this we know that 4D Lizzies and other STS Beings affiliated with 3D humanity want to maintain control over us and I think that it was once said they may even try to keep us in 3D permanently. On this though, it was dismissed as something that could not be physically achieved.

So to me it seems that they will try and anticipate many changes to come and institute these changes AHEAD of time by way of subbing in caricatures so that they can maintain the narrative as reality changes. They can say that reality is changing because we're making it change, we're driving it by our technology. In 4D where our perception can have very powerful influences on physical reality, who's to say that their audacious plan may not work at least to begin with?

People don't have the concepts that we have here. We don't even know how these things will play out. This huge knowledge gap provides a BIG OPPORTUNITY for exploitation by nefarious forces who may be aware of what's to come and have a stronger idea of how things will play out.

Another thing of how certain things may not make sense now but they may if you think of the end game: they are busy dismantling traditional notions and introducing notions where things aren't grounded in nature as we know or understand it e.g. continuum of genders and other such things. In 4D though, do such concepts hold truer?

Transhumanism, being connected to the Borg, AI, 5G internet of things, nano technology etc don't we think all these are things that are being built to control our understanding of 4D. Are they being built so that to us, these things will constitute 4D reality itself?

Doesn't the borg, AI, transhumanism all sound like a carricatured notion of a social memory complex for example?

The Law of One Definitions

The Law of One Category Definitions

www.lawofone.info

Questioner: At what stage does a planet achieve social memory?

Ra: I am Ra. A mind/body/spirit social complex becomes a social memory complex when its entire group of entities are of one orientation or seeking. The group memory lost to the individuals in the roots of the tree of mind then become known to the social complex, thus creating a social memory complex. The advantages of this complex are the relative lack of distortion in understanding the social beingness and the relative lack of distortion in pursuing the direction of seeking, for all understanding/distortions are available to the entities of the society.

Now to claim that the above is a result of YOU, the government rather than nature or evolution of life, what do you have to do? Hmmm..... think about it.

 

[SOTTREADER]

BANNED BY YOU TUBE: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM (Created 31 Dec 2020)

⁣Office for National Statistics website: https://www.ons.gov.uk CDC report on Pfizer vaccine adverse reactions: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf (T

brandnewtube.com

Rachel Elnaugh who is someone I keep track off nowadays had an interesting thing to say here.

By doing some high level data analysis she thinks the UK has shifted away from the Pfizer vax (and giving people 2nd injections of it) due to accumulating adverse effects.

She reckons they'll now pivot to the Oxford vax and they will also hide adverse effects under new covid strains. She thinks that the new mutant strain was introduced as a smoke screen to hide accumulating adverse effects and the strain people who suffer from this will put on the NHS.

Like me, she thinks the government want to stop all in-person conversations and socialising as they want complete control and monopoly on the message. All communication is to be digital as this can be monitored and analysed.