View attachment 45785
Also,

Indian Bar Association serves legal notice upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist, WHO
A legal notice is served by Indian Bar Association (IBA) upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO) on May 25, 2021 for her act of spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfil her agenda.
A legal notice is served by Indian Bar Association (IBA) upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO) on May 25, 2021 for her act of spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfil her agenda.

The notice is based on the research and clinical trials carried out by ‘Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’ (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel, who have presented enormous data that strengthen the case for recommendation of Ivermectin in prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has ignored these studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin.
However, the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi have refused to accept her stand and have retained the recommendation for Ivermectin under ‘May Do’ category, for patients with mild symptoms and those in home isolation, as stated in ‘The National Guidelines for COVID-19 management’ last updated on May 17, 2021
In order to stop Dr. Soumya Swaminathan from causing further damage to the life of citizens of this country, IBA has decided to initiate legal action against her and as part of the process, a legal notice has been served upon her.

IBA has observed that the content of several web links to news articles/reports included in the notice served upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, 2021, which was visible before issuing the notice, has either been removed or deleted now.

IBA had anticipated this and therefore, we have downloaded soft copies of these news articles before issuing the legal notice. It is ludicrous on part of the forces resorting to such cowardly acts, for they do not know that they are providing very strong evidence of their desperate attempt at blocking information/news regarding Ivermectin.
 
Something strange is going on. My theory is “something” was introduced to the area to simulate an outbreak to cause fear of “variants”. Taiwan was an example of pretty much an entire year of living normal lockdown-free lives. Very low death rate which defied the narrative consensus. Now everyone is scrambling in fear, we have restrictions we didn’t even have last year at the peak of the outbreak, now we also have to wear masks everywhere outside including in your own car alone.
It sounds very unlikely that younger people with no history of serious or chronic disease would die suddenly of Covid and bizarre that Covid cases should suddenly spike for no obvious reason. What better way to "encourage" the vaccine hesitants to get the jab that to think they may die suddenly from Covid. This may well be the new scenario for all those areas where Covid cases are very low. Post mortems will probably show nothing exceptional. The PTB know well how to control the narrative here. Here is the UK there is concern about the new mutant strains in the Midlands. Heaven forbid that the populace will relax and think life is going back to "normal".
 
"Just say No!" I love that. It's going to be my new favourite word from now on, even though it's a long time since I've been a toddler! :-D

Love this (and the sentiment). That rapping video is priceless. I don't think any of us say NO often enough. I know I don't. My new favourite word too.
 
Love this (and the sentiment). That rapping video is priceless. I don't think any of us say NO often enough. I know I don't. My new favourite word too.
Favorite line from the rap video:

"They say 'Conspiracy Theory'; that's all that they do,
But it isn't just theory if it keeps coming True!"

The energy reminds me of this one...

It gives me a modicum of hope for the future that there are young and strong minds grappling with the problem of Authoritarian Power.
 
On 22 May 2021 The Guardian published a lengthy article with numerous external links about the international scientific controversy over the use of the drug hydroxy-chloroquine. This article has not been covered in this thread nor on SOTT.

World expert in scientific misconduct faces legal action for challenging integrity of hydroxychloroquine study

World expert in scientific misconduct faces legal action for challenging integrity of hydroxy chloroquine study

Australian and international scientists publish open letter defending Dr Elisabeth Bik and calling for science whistle blowers to be protected

Melissa Davey
- Sat 22 May 2021 06.01 BST

A world-renowned Dutch expert in identifying scientific misconduct and error, Dr Elisabeth Bik, has been threatened with legal action for questioning the integrity of a study promoting the drug hydroxy chloroquine to treat Covid-19.

The case, filed with the French state prosecutor by controversial infectious diseases physician Dr Didier Raoult, has prompted hundreds of scientists from across the world to publish an open letter calling for science whistle blowers to be protected.

In March 2020, Bik published a blog post analyzing a paper led by Raoult. His paper claimed the antimalarial drug hydroxy chloroquine was effective in treating Covid infections, especially when given in combination with an antibiotic.

Bik raised questions about the paper’s methodology, including that the researchers had failed to control for confounding factors. In strong clinical trials, the control group (who are given a placebo) and the treatment group (who are given the drug) should be as similar as possible so scientists can be confident any effects are from the medication alone.

Bik pointed out that patients should be of similar age and gender ratio, be equally sick at the start of treatment, and analyzed in the same way, with the only difference being whether they received treatment or not. She said the treatment and placebo groups in Raoult’s study differed in important ways that could have affected the results.

continued...
 
[59:25 - haven't watched yet]

Video: Petition to Revoke the Covid-19 Vaccines: Dr. Meryl Nass

Children’s Health Defense Science Advisory Board member and signee of the petition, Dr. Nass provides a plethora of shocking details showing massive malfeasance by the CDC and FDA that cost lives, prolonged the pandemic and protected the continued use of unprecedentedly dangerous covid vaccines.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This was originally published on The Whistleblower Newsroom.
 
Canadian 'Theologist' and Free Mason, Dr. Pierre Gilbert, declaring (in 1995)

'The Vaccines Will Have Liquid Crystals And Will Become Hostile In The Brain Cells
Which Will Become Micro Receivers Of EM Fields...'

Dr. Pierre Gilbert 1995 Speech (in French) Full Video with English Translation (180 mins)

Abbreviated version Dr. Pierre Gilbert in 1995 (60 mins)

This is from a speech Dr. Gibert allegedly held in a masonic meeting.
The YouTube version has been erased.

'In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is a contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind, creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make it possible to control people.'

I couldn't find anything useful about the man's biography or his occupation.

His speech may be giving us some clues about the dangers of the current vaccination program though.

What does he know and when did he know it?
 
Given that the vaxxed may be shedding toxic spike proteins, I'm happy for them to do so.

In fact I suspect they may find that they become lepers in the future.

I think this may inadvertently backfire.

I think we're moving to a position where being unvaxxed will be a conscious decision meaning a high percentage of the unvaxxed won't want to closely associate with the vaxxed. I think we may have a situation where at least socially, unvaxxed seek out other unvaxxed and look to avoid the vaxxed.

I saw that the US gov is pushing online dating websites to add labels to people's profiles as a way of socially pressuring the unvaxxed singles out there. I suspect these labels will actually increase matches between unvaxxed and unvaxxed and also inadvertently increase the likely success of these matches as both essentially will have much to share with regards this covid situation which then helps form the foundation of the relationship. In a way I expect most women out there will have heard about the impact to their cycles if they are unvaxxed and they closely associate with the vaxxed which makes me think any of these women who are single won't exactly be rushing to an openly vaxxed single... Lol!

I suspect they won't be dumb enough to push the above actually as no doubt they know that'll happen. What they'd want to do is pursue strategies where unvaxxed are isolated from each other, not strategies that allow them to seek each other out or make this process easier.
 
I think this may inadvertently backfire.

I think we're moving to a position where being unvaxxed will be a conscious decision meaning a high percentage of the unvaxxed won't want to closely associate with the vaxxed. I think we may have a situation where at least socially, unvaxxed seek out other unvaxxed and look to avoid the vaxxed.

I saw that the US gov is pushing online dating websites to add labels to people's profiles as a way of socially pressuring the unvaxxed singles out there. I suspect these labels will actually increase matches between unvaxxed and unvaxxed and also inadvertently increase the likely success of these matches as both essentially will have much to share with regards this covid situation which then helps form the foundation of the relationship. In a way I expect most women out there will have heard about the impact to their cycles if they are unvaxxed and they closely associate with the vaxxed which makes me think any of these women who are single won't exactly be rushing to an openly vaxxed single... Lol!

I suspect they won't be dumb enough to push the above actually as no doubt they know that'll happen. What they'd want to do is pursue strategies where unvaxxed are isolated from each other, not strategies that allow them to seek each other out or make this process easier.

I've had the same thought.

When I see a dating profile with a girl bragging about having had her shot, my reaction is "lol nope". Why would I want a relationship with a moron who's turned her body into a toxin factory, compromised her fertility, and demonstrated an inability to exhibit independent thought?

It's a wonderful filter.
 

Johns Hopkins Prof: Half Of Americans Have Natural Immunity; Dismissing It Is ‘Biggest failure Of Medical Leadership’

“Please, ignore the CDC guidance”
A professor with the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine has said that there is a general dismissal of the fact that more than half of all Americans have developed natural immunity to the coronavirus and that it constitutes “one of the biggest failures of our current medical leadership.” Dr. Marty Makary made the comments during a recent interview, noting that “natural immunity works” and it is wrong to vilify those who don’t want the vaccine because they have already recovered from the virus.

Makary criticised “the most slow, reactionary, political CDC in American history” for not clearly communicating the scientific facts about natural immunity compared to the kind of immunity developed through vaccines. “There is more data on natural immunity than there is on vaccinated immunity, because natural immunity has been around longer,” Makary emphasised.

“We are not seeing reinfections, and when they do happen, they’re rare. Their symptoms are mild or are asymptomatic,” the professor added. “Please, ignore the CDC guidance,” he urged, adding “Live a normal life, unless you are unvaccinated and did not have the infection, in which case you need to be careful.” “We’ve got to start respecting people who choose not to get the vaccine instead of demonizing them,” Makary further asserted.
The professor’s comments come amid a plethora of media generated propaganda suggesting that natural immunity isn’t enough, and that those who do not choose to take the vaccine should be socially ostracised. The likes of the World Health Organisation have even shifted the definition of ‘herd immunity’, eliminating the pre-COVID scientific consensus that it could be achieved by allowing a virus to spread through a population, and insisting that herd immunity comes solely from vaccines.
I trust Dr Seuss.jpg
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom