Even his name is telling:
FEIGN = Make believe with the intent to deceive
Liang Feigl-Ding = he FEIGNs the Thing

pseudo experts

I believe that the DING person is a typical example of how the WEF clan grooms “future leaders and (pseudo) experts” under their umbrella of money and sponsorship.

This was discussed in the Investigative Corona Committee no 65, in the german held interview with Ernst Wolff, who has specialized himself deeply with scrutinizing the power structures behind the WEF - as it goes way beyond the public face and official appearances. I felt that interview was a crucial, important piece of the puzzle - giving deep insight why we have oddly young leaders and expertsin our faces…

I don’t have any access to my main computer right now, so i had to use my primitive language trying to point at the deliberate phenomena that guys like Feng (and New Zealand's PM or Canada’s psychos Trudeau) are NO coincidence.

They are pseudo experts and leading puppets having all gone to the same think tank schools, so to speak, groomed to do exactly what they are doing now.
 
Finally a news about someone who died "from covid" after a vaccination comes out in the local news. It's about two doctors who died within two days:

Both doctors of the Prokuplje Health Center who died of covid-19, vaccinated with two doses

The director of the Health Center in Prokuplje, Verica Bojčić, stated today that two specialist doctors who worked in the ambulance in Žitni Potok died of covid-19.

Bojcic told the Beta agency that both doctors were vaccinated with two doses of the coronavirus vaccine, but that the fatal outcome of their illness was because they did not recognize the symptoms of the infection in time.

As she emphasized, these are colleagues who were about to retire Lj. M. (63) and Z.I. (64) in whom complications occurred quickly and were admitted to the Kruševac and Prokuplje hospitals with pneumonia, where they soon died.

First, internist Ljiljana Janković passed away two days ago. She died on the way to the covid hospital in Kruševac. General practitioner Zvonko Ilić, who worked in the same clinic, passed away yesterday, and his wife is in serious condition.

 
Born into a middle-class Jewish family, Chomsky attended an experimental elementary school in which he was encouraged to develop his own interests and talents through self-directed learning. When he was 10 years old, he wrote an editorial for his school newspaper lamenting the fall of Barcelona in the Spanish Civil War and the rise of fascism in Europe.
That such a prominent Jewish esteemed figure - who has spent his entire career "as a political dissident for his analyses of the pernicious influence of economic elites on U.S. domestic politics, foreign policy, and intellectual culture" - can call for the same treatment perpetuated against the Jews in Nazi Germany is beyond shocking. The unvaxxed should do the right thing for the Greater Good! Does he not comprehend that he's endorsing internment/concentration camps if it becomes necessary?! Is he really that misinformed that he's equating Covid with smallpox?! That someone with his background and mindset can have such an opinion is beyond pathetic! Or perhaps he showing his true colors.
 
It is indeed fascinating how the “Dark Corona” reveals the true colors of people’s egos. I mean the way this Planedmic has made so many masks fall of (earlier) highly respected personalities.

In a way… it was about time !! We were already living in a mad house before Corona, but it wasn’t easy to spot the ‘traitors’ (or spies) because they were often masked as mr nice guy.

It hurts when illusions burst - no doubt - but the pain will vane, and we have the opportunity to tap into wisdom, with all the spots and scars. I call that real balance made from life experience.
 

ACLU slammed for claiming mandatory Covid vaccination ‘FURTHERS civil liberties’ & saying right to bodily autonomy not ‘absolute’​



The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) was publicly condemned on Thursday after arguing that mandatory Covid-19 vaccination actually advances civil liberties instead of compromising them.
In an article for the New York Times – which the ACLU posted on its official Twitter account – ACLU National Legal Director David Cole and colleague Daniel Mach defended vaccine mandates by claiming that the right to bodily autonomy is overruled when others are put at risk.

“Do vaccine mandates violate civil liberties? Some who have refused vaccination claim as much. We disagree,” the pair declared, revealing that the ACLU sees “no civil liberties problem with requiring Covid-19 vaccines in most circumstances.”
“In fact, far from compromising civil liberties, vaccine mandates actually further civil liberties,”
they continued, arguing that mandatory vaccination protects “the most vulnerable among us,” including those with disabilities, children, and “communities of color.”
The article justified the mandatory jabs, arguing that the right to bodily autonomy is not “absolute” and saying in some cases intrusions are warranted.
Vaccines are a justifiable intrusion on autonomy and bodily integrity. That may sound ominous, because we all have the fundamental right to bodily integrity and to make our own health care decisions. But these rights are not absolute. They do not include the right to inflict harm on others.
Cole and Mach even went so far as to claim that the “real threat to civil liberties” is states which ban vaccine mandates and defend the right to bodily autonomy.
“Avoiding a deadly threat to the public health typically outweighs personal autonomy and individual freedom,” Cole and Mach declared, concluding, “We care deeply about civil liberties and civil rights for all – which is precisely why we support vaccine mandates.”
The ACLU received heavy backlash on social media, with critics accusing the organization of having “lost the plot.”



“Never donating again. You’re supposed to support individual liberty,”
responded one fully vaccinated user, while RedState Deputy Managing Editor Brandon Morse questioned, “Who are they trying to convince with this tweet? Us or themselves?”
“Having the state force citizens to inject their bodies with a medicine they don't want is a victory for civil liberties actually, says the @ACLU,”
quipped journalist Glenn Greenwald, who added that although he’s happy that he and his family got vaccinated, it’s “because it was my choice and theirs, after informing ourselves,” and not the government’s decision.
 

A new study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that three-quarters of individuals who became infected with COVID-19 at a public event in a Massachusetts County had been fully vaccinated.

However, what they failed to make public was that within that cohort, “A preliminary analysis matching cluster-associated COVID-19 cases with the state HIV case surveillance data identified 6% cases with verified HIV infection.”

fig-1-4.png

Fig 1 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm

Why is this significant? In the United States HIV infection affects only 0.36% of the population. Why is there then a rate of 6% HIV positivity in this cohort? A rate that is 17 times higher than the National average? Since it can take anywhere from 3-6 months to determine HIV status, we suspect this rate will rise over the next few months in vaccinated individuals.

Hmmm.... interesting.
 
A fun little factoid - NOT!

Supreme Court Ruling on Transhumanism




That patent # has been referenced before in this thread - note the 2020 and 060606. Surprised they left the N off the WO.

Why do I get the feeling that corporation personhood will end up with more "human rights" than actual people!
Hehe Guess what I got when I posted it on FB :-)
Worth digging deeper to prove them wrong as usual.

US Supreme Court ruling did not allow patenting of vaccinated people​

Claire Savage, AFP USA Facebook Twitter Email Published on Tuesday 20 July 2021 at 19:50
Copyright AFP 2017-2021. All rights reserved.

Social media posts claim a 2013 US Supreme Court ruling means that people vaccinated against Covid-19 are no longer legally human and are therefore patentable. This is false; the decision makes no mention of vaccines, and experts say the court ruled that nothing naturally occurring -- including humans -- can be patented.​

"LEGALLY the vaccinated are no longer human," says a July 12, 2021 Instagram post.
"In a 2013 court case Pathology v Myriad Genetics, inc, in the US, the Supreme Court ruled that... if a human genome is modified by mRNA vaccines (which are currently in use), then the genome can be patented," the post says, referring to the messenger ribonucleic acid technology employed in the most widely used Covid-19 shots.
"This means that everyone who has received the vaccine is now technically 'patented' and something that is patented is 'proprietary' and will be included in the definition of 'transhumans'."
9bddca52d900d824abfb55e164aae3a4.jpeg
Screenshot of an Instagram post taken on July 19, 2021
More examples of the claim appeared on Instagram here and here as well as in a Facebook post that said: "If You Have Been Vaxed You Are now Owned."
It is part of a torrent of inaccurate claims about vaccines that have proliferated across the internet as countries around the world seek to immunize their populations against Covid-19. AFP has also previously debunked the conspiracy theory that global elites are using the pandemic as a pretext to control the population.
The Supreme Court case referred to in the claim "is not related to the question of determining who/what is human and what is not," Ana Santos Rutschman, an expert in vaccine law and assistant professor at St Louis University's Center for Health Law Studies, told AFP.
"There's no relationship between this case and any claim related to the administration of any type of vaccine, including mRNA vaccines," nor is there a "case or law saying that after any type of medical intervention (including receiving a vaccine) someone ceases to be considered a human for legal purposes," Rutschman said.
Instead, the Supreme Court found in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc that isolated segments of human DNA could not be patented. The unanimous decision on June 13, 2013 overturned exclusive rights to use genes but allowed companies to patent their developments of synthetic, so-called complementary DNA.
A search of the court's decision found no mention of the words "vaccine" or "vaccines," and the emergency use authorizations for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines came more than seven years after the case was decided.
Experts have also repeatedly rejected the unsubstantiated claim that mRNA vaccines can modify human DNA, which AFP debunked here and here.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that mRNA vaccines are a new form of immunization designed to "teach our cells how to make a protein -- or even just a piece of a protein -- that triggers an immune response inside our bodies." It adds that the shots cannot "affect or interact with our DNA in any way."
Jennifer Piatt, of Arizona State University Center for Public Health Law and Policy, called the social media claim "ridiculous" and "a complete misstatement of how the vaccines work and what that court case said."
First, "there is no possibility for an altering of the human DNA via the Covid-19 vaccines like these posts would suggest," said Piatt, who is also a senior attorney with the Network for Public Health Law.
Next, the claims try to "manipulate the language of the Supreme Court's decision to argue that humans could be patentable. That's simply ludicrous... they're looking at it through a lens that isn't even there in the court's decision."
The case held that anything naturally occurring is not eligible for a patent, said both Piatt and New York University School of Law's Rochelle Dreyfuss.
"Your body can't be patented," said Dreyfuss, who is an expert on intellectual property law.
"The court looks at whether something is actually in nature, but it's never asking the question, 'Is this a human being?'" Dreyfuss said, describing the social media posts as "bonkers."
 
Summary:
They Do NOT want people to survive. They want people to die! En masse, if preferable: 7.6 billion please! So they can have their 200 000 000 Vaxxed Zombie Slaves switchable on-off like a robot via 5G microwaves.

When I heard this red part "the blood" rose in me and a weird itch started at the inside of my palm. Probably what French revolutionists felt, when they rolled out the guillotines.

This is why Australia and USA is building Covid Concentration Camps or shall we call them Blood Donation Vampire Camps. The goal is to usher the Unvaxxed Away and use them as Blood Bags for the Rich & Important [who are probably even Not Vaxxed], who desperately need Unvaxxed Blood to survive.

Wait a minute...
Yes it is interesting to ponder on exactly who is vaxxed with the actual vax. None of the handlers will be obviously and probably quite a few of their "useful" minions won't be. After all the PTB need to have someone to do their dirty work who won't drop dead halfway through an important mission. I would love to know....some of them must have sold their souls and bargained with the devil. :evil:
 
Canadians are letting Trudeau know more and more that they are not fooled by his concern about their health.

Poor Justin. I bet he was cowering in the toilet. He must be feeling devastated that the Canadian people don't love him anymore and he is not able to work out why. I can almost - but not quite - feel sorry for him.
 
A fun little factoid - NOT!

Supreme Court Ruling on Transhumanism




That patent # has been referenced before in this thread - note the 2020 and 060606. Surprised they left the N off the WO.

Why do I get the feeling that corporation personhood will end up with more "human rights" than actual people!

that was the first and foremost objection I found worth mentioning when they started introducing and pushing for mRNA vaccines. 'They're already doing it with corn, I'll die before I let them inject me with claims on my genome'

And I thought it was just a worst-case rhetorical hyperbole I was making...
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom