Superb caricature, the first one. Incredible but true. He is a very bad person, in fact he is evil.
Since there are much more 'vaccinated' people than unvaxxed in France, these numbers are quite coherent with the situation... FWIWFrance: number of deaths and hospitalizations due to Covid since January 2022. In red, vaxxed people. In blue unvaxxed people:
In a sample of 100 people, there are 80 people who are vaccinated, and 15 have died, of the remaining 20 unvaccinated 15 have also died, there are in percentage more unvaccinated deaths, than vaccinated despite the higher number of vaccinated, in my example.Since there are much more 'vaccinated' people than unvaxxed in France, these numbers are quite coherent with the situation... FWIW
I was told by the experts that vaccines would stop people from getting covid, ending up in hospital and dying from covid. Based on this information which the experts very confidently told us I conclude the numbers are quite incoherent.Since there are much more 'vaccinated' people than unvaxxed in France, these numbers are quite coherent with the situation... FWIW
In yet another sign that the covid vaccination agenda of globalist institutions did not do quite as well as they had originally hoped, the Rockefeller Foundation has revealed that it (along with other non-profits) has been pumping millions of dollars into a behavioral science project meant to figure out why large groups of people around the world refuse to take the jab.
The "Mercury Project" is a collective of behavioral scientists formed by the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), a non-profit group which receives considerable funding from globalist organizations and governments. The stated goals of the project are rather non-specific, using ambiguous language and mission statements. However, the root intentions appear to be focused on using behavioral psychology and mass psychology elements to understand the global resistance to the recent covid compliance efforts.
Mercury groups will be deployed in multiple nations and regions and will study vaccine refusal and the medical "disinformation" that leads to it. They are operating with the intent to tailor vaccination narratives to fit different ethnic and political backgrounds, looking for the key to the gates of each cultural kingdom and convincing them to take the jab.
The Rockefeller Foundation and the SSRC note:
The SSRC and the Mercury Project are not only receiving funding from foundations, but also government based institutions. In June of 2022 the Mercury Project received another $20 million from the National Science Foundation, which claims to be an "independent" agency of the United States government. Meaning, fabricating effective covid propaganda is becoming a money train for the small groups of behavioral researchers and psychologists that jump onboard."Following the characterization of inaccurate health information by the U.S. Surgeon General as an "urgent threat," and by the World Health Organization as an "infodemic," the SSRC issued a call for proposals to counter the growing global threats posed by public health mis- and disinformation and low Covid-19 vaccination rates, and received nearly 200 submissions from around the world.
...With Covid-19 prevalent and rapidly evolving everywhere, there is a pressing need to identify interventions with the potential to increase vaccination take-up."
The purpose of the NSF partnership with the Mercury Project is outlined on the SSRC website:
The Mercury Project lists these bullet points as their focus:"This innovative partnership will support research teams seeking to evaluate online or offline interventions to increase Covid-19 vaccination demand and other positive health behaviors, including by targeting the producers and/or consumers of inaccurate health information and/or by increasing confidence in reliable health information."
In other words, their focus is propaganda, propaganda and propaganda. The very basis of the existence of the Mercury Project presupposes that individuals cannot be trusted to make up their own minds about the information they are exposed to, and that they must be molded to accept the mainstream narrative. It also presupposes that mainstream or establishment information is always trustworthy and unbiased."Funded projects will provide evidence about what works-and doesn't-in specific places and for specific groups to increase Covid-19 vaccination take-up, including what is feasible on the ground and has the potential to be cost-effective at scale. Each of the 12 teams will have access to findings from the other teams while exploring interventions including, but not limited to:
Conducting literacy training for secondary school students in partnership with local authorities to help students identify Covid-19 vaccine misinformation.
Equipping trusted messengers with communication strategies to increase Covid-19 vaccination demand.
Using social networks to share tailored, community-developed messaging to increase Covid-19 vaccination demand."
The widespread non-compliance against covid vaccination mandates despite extensive government pressure is perhaps one of the most underappreciated events of the past century. It is likely the reason why political elites and the corporate media went from a non-stop fear campaign against the public to almost no mention of covid within a matter of weeks. It was as if the populace was being put through two years of waterboarding and then one day the torture simply stopped without explanation.
If vaccine passport laws had been implemented through western nations on the scale that governments and globalists were demanding, then the last vestiges of personal freedom would now be erased permanently. All individual rights would become privileges granted by authorities and contingent on your submission to whatever covid booster shots or medical procedures happen to be in vogue at the time. Think about it: If they had gotten what they wanted, the west would look exactly like China does right now, or worse, with no economic participation without an up-to-date covid pass.
And, the threat still lingers. Why the Mercury Project feels the need to compose vaccine propaganda for a virus with a mere 0.23% median Infection Fatality Rate is not explained. And, if vaccination numbers from agencies like the CDC are accurate, then the population has already achieved herd immunity anyway (perhaps their numbers are not accurate?). Why are globalist groups so obsessed with 100% vaccination for covid? This is never explained.
They will say it's all about saving lives, but if only 0.23% of people on average are at risk regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not, then public health is not really a believable explanation. It would seem that the Mercury Project's purpose is more about influencing people to vaccinate despite the science rather than in the name of science.
Tuskegee all over again?I was told today by a friend who works with a lot of migrants that end up in the UK that the NHS is recommending them to get 5 shots of the covid vaccine. This was specifically aimed at the ones who have tuberculosis, and justified because they have suppressed immune systems. They didn't specify if this was one shot or a regular course of 5 doses.
UR published an article about the MSM conspiracy of silence yesterday, noting that it caused scientists being not aware of Sachs' stanceMSM Blackout Jeffrey Sachs' paper on Covid Lab origin
When I brought Sachs’ interview to the attention of an eminent academic scholar with whom I’ve been friendly for many years, he was stunned
An amazing article.
Sachs is not only remarkably candid; he’s also remarkably knowledgable about the issue.
Another prominent academic had a similar reaction:
That’s one hell of an interview, no doubt about it.
Everyone who has listened to that interview has been very impressed, and a leading figure in the Covid origins debate sent me the following note after I brought it to his attention:
This is an amazingly good interview on Sachs’s part – clear, forceful, humorous and all the more compelling because he started off on the other side of the issue. Interesting what a deep perspective he has now developed, tracing the train of events back to Fauci’s acquisition of the biodefense portfolio.
Sachs has demonstrated his political courage in other areas as well, strongly dissenting from the near-total uniformity of public opinion on the Ukraine war and our relations with China.
"Of course, we know kids can still get sick and we've seen a rise in pediatric hospitalizations," he said. "But compared to the older cohorts in general with COVID-19, they just don't get as ill." {brilliant}
Some parents jumped in with two feet when vaccines became available for this age cohort. Others still have lingering questions or concerns and I think it's important that they take their time to get those questions and concerns addressed."
While this may mean waiting for more data or speaking to a health-care provider, Bogoch said, with time he believes more children between the ages of 5 and 11 will receive their first two doses, as well as a booster.
As of Aug. 14, a little more than 42 per cent of children aged 5-11 had received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, far below the uptake seen in older age groups.
On Friday, Canada's chief public health officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, announced that Health Canada had authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as a booster for children 5-11.
The dosage for children 5-11 is smaller at 10 micrograms for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, compared to 30 micrograms for those 12 and older.
While the risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 is "generally rare" for this age group, she said it "is preventable if you get vaccinated."
“Thankfully, most young people have mild illness, but that's not zero risk. We know that some people do get seriously ill {but not Children, she does not add}. So this is an important opportunity to make sure that we get them the protection,” said Henry at a news conference in Victoria late Tuesday morning.
She says getting kids vaccinated in a timely manner is vital, as they head back to school and daycare in a few weeks.
Henry is confident that the vaccines are safe and is encouraging those with concerns to talk to their family doctors. {who are not allowed to say a word or I'll call the Collage of Physicians on them as I've done before, she does not say.}
“Come on into the clinic and we have child-friendly and experienced immunizers who know how to make it a positive experience for your child,” she said {oh goodie}.
Ecotoxicology studies - keep 'em rolling
Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse
Aug 26
A few days ago, I found a paper that reported a very important finding about the impact of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on different organs and systems (Toxicity of spike fragments SARS-CoV-2 S protein for zebrafish: A tool to study its hazardous for human health? - PubMed). It had slipped my radar, because when searching for papers that highlight effects that could be related to COVID jabs, I do not tend to search in Ecotoxicology journals, but I do search those journals for my own research on wildlife health. The authors of that paper had investigated the effects in zebrafish, and their research was originally written as a biomedical paper, submitted in October 2020 (Zebrafish studies on the vaccine candidate to COVID-19, the Spike protein: Production of antibody and adverse reaction). They used the zebrafish, Danio rerio, as a model species. This is common for biomedical studies, due to its high genetic homology and cellular physiology likeness with humans (see The importance of Zebrafish in biomedical research - PubMed), but the paper was presumably rejected, given that it was only published until recently, in the journal The Science of the Total Environment, and the scope of the paper changed. The authors had to change the aim of the paper to be able to say the same thing! I applaud their creative way of bypassing censorship.
I have now found other papers in ecotoxicological journals which have provided evidence that, although not being the aim of the studies, cannot be ignored in the context of COVID-19 mass vaccinations. For instance, Oliveira Gonsalves and co-authors published an interesting and well-designed paper on the effects of environmental exposure to Spike peptides on adult female Guppy fish. The paper “Can spike fragments of SARS-CoV-2 induce genomic instability and DNA damage in the guppy, Poecilia reticulate? An unexpected effect of the COVID-19 pandemic?” (Can spike fragments of SARS-CoV-2 induce genomic instability and DNA damage in the guppy, Poecilia reticulate? An unexpected effect of the COVID-19 pandemic - PubMed) is chilling.
The authors aimed to examine the potential mutagenic (that is, that lead to an increase in genetic changes to the genome) and genotoxic (damage to the DNA) effects of exposure to Spike peptides. For this, they used synthesized Spike peptides, named PSPD-2002 (amino acid sequence: Gln-Cys-Val-Asn-Leu-Thr-Thr-Arg-Thr-COOH; molecular weight 1035.18 g/mol). They created two experimental groups, the exposed and the controls. All fish were acclimatized for days in the tanks that contained freshwater without chlorine. After acclimatization, 40 μg/L of PSPD-2002 was added in the water of the exposed fish, and the animals remained in this environment for 10 days. This concentration is relevant, given previous studies on the number of viral particles containing Spike in the water and on Spike mRNA detection in the water.
After 10 days of exposure, the guppies that were exposed to the Spike peptides had nuclear alterations and DNA damage in the blood (not observed in the control fish), which means that the protein can cause genomic instability and genotoxicity. They also found that the genomic damage and mutations were directly correlated with an increase in lipid peroxidation in the brain and liver of the exposed fish, and inversely correlated with the activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzymes, which are key to modulating inflammatory status.
The results are worrying, given that the higher the DNA damage and mutation rates, the more likely it is that cellular DNA cannot be repaired. If this happens, then the cell cycle can become altered, genetic expression can become deregulated, and diverse types of cancer can ensue, because of exposure to Spike peptides. This is in addition to the observed chances in lipid metabolism, which can also lead to neurological, metabolic, and endocrine alterations. Not that VAERS, Eudravigilance, Yellow Card and other monitoring systems are finding any of this in vaccinated people, right?
This is not the only study that has found evidence of toxicity due to environmental exposure to Spike fragments. Similar effects have already been shown for amphibians, fish, and insects (see: Toxicological insights of Spike fragments SARS-CoV-2 by exposure environment: A threat to aquatic health? - PubMed, Shedding light on toxicity of SARS-CoV-2 peptides in aquatic biota: A study involving neotropical mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) - PubMed, Toxicological impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the health of the neotropical fish, Poecilia reticulata - PubMed). Namely, those studies have shown that Spike peptides can induce anxiety behavior, increase in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) – an enzyme that is very important for the nervous system, and that breaks down acetylcholine, the neurotransmitter that allows communication between neurons and muscle cells. The animals exposed to Spike peptides also had developmental and growth alterations and an increase in reactive oxygen species, hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, which tend to be excellent ways to ensure marked inflammation and cell damage.
Taken together, the studies that I mention here confirm that even short-term environmental exposure to Spike peptides are sufficient to affect the health of animals.
As a scientist that investigates immune responses and health of wild animal populations, I am worried about the implications of their results for wildlife, and I am also interested now in addressing similar possibilities in my study species. However, the implications certainly extend beyond wildlife.
Even though the authors noticeably steered clear of any mention of the implications of their findings for the synthetic Spike, it would be irresponsible to ignore such potential consequences. A very large portion of humanity has received one or many doses of Spike protein following endogenous production after receiving synthetic mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna products) or adenoviral vectors (AstraZeneca, Janssen, Cansino or Sputnik), or following direct inoculation of full-length Spike or Spike peptides (Novavax). If the reported effects occur after environmental, what could be the consequence of receiving or producing quite a lot of Spike protein due to the COVID injections?
Before anyone exclaims “but this was seen in fish, and we are not fish”, I would like to remind you that we are genetically very similar (after all, teleost or bony fish were the first jawed vertebrates to appear), and humans have the same immune system, and molecular and cellular physiology as bony fish. Any responsible scientist that is not paralyzed with fear would be forced to ask: a) what happens to vaccine-induced Spike and its peptides following catabolism?, ii) do the observed mutagenic and genotoxic effects occur in vaccinees?, iii) are vaccine-induced Spike proteins, or Spike peptides, eliminated via saliva, urine, semen and feces?, and iv) if so, can contact with thosepeptides lead to skin or mucosal absorption and cause potential toxic damage?
Well, well… How very curious that after so much obtuse criticism received by those who consider Veterinarians and Wildlife Researchers to be “unable to understand things related to humans”, even when they involve core concepts immunology, microbiology, epidemiology, toxicology and molecular biology which are mostly equal among mammals, it is precisely research that focuses on free-living animals which is providing the very much needed data to help us understand the ever growing list of post-jab effects, including system alterations and cancer.
Let us let the animals that we study keep talking to us via research. It seems to me that animals have much more to say than humans at this point, and with no conflict of interest!