Try this video for a sadness tinged laugh:
In this episode of ICIC, Dr Reiner Fuellmich, together with medical journalist Hans Tolzin, explores the question of what studies and information modern science relies on in the field of virology and what facts actually exist to justify an assumption of invisible and dangerous viruses.
Hans Tolzin details the medical historical background starting with the first studies and publications by scientists at the beginning of the 20th century, points out serious gaps in field research and points out that there are numerous considerable deficiencies that have never been followed up or remedied, such as the gross neglect of differential diagnostics.
It is not only the virus theory that gives rise to major criticism. The apparent lack of care and ignorance in professional circles is also worrying. For it is on these assumptions that organisations and institutions are based which are said to be responsible for the health of the world's population, which propagate medicines, therapies and vaccinations and which people blindly trust and believe.
After these findings, the corrected questions arise: Is there really a so-called "isolate"?
is there really a so-called "isolate" of a virus, especially a "corona" virus, or do the available photos show something completely different, and if so, what? Why is no attention paid to this question and why are discrepancies in the definition of terms tolerated in science? Correctly, one should not speak of a "virus isolate" but of a "high purification" in order to finally obtain incontrovertible proof of a "virus". These facts raise further explosive questions and contain inflammatory material to finally bring light into the darkness of virology.
In so many levelsHow many more must fall before the direction of the narrative publicly changes remains to be seem. The guilty are still walking free and would never take responsibility for their actions and what seems to be in my opinion, a spiritual attack and crimes against humanity.
I assume this dr. didnt get the jab...could it have been a wet project??“Died Suddenly”
“Unknown causes”
“Passed Away Suddenly”
“Passed away Unexpectedly”
Dead is dead...further experiences in 3rd density are OVER.
My puzzlement, my question keeps coming back to what the heck are these people experiencing on the other side, of this “suddenly dead”?
Imagine the situation, knowing what we know...
Boom, you’re suddenly dead, out of your body, and the dawning of realization comes upon your heightened awareness.
Was this pre-planned?
Die by Big Pharma?
Were you Taken out, or...was this really planned, a sacrifice of self, an altruistic end?
View attachment 69440
I looked her up and she was very pro jab and pro conventional medicine to the point of aggressively debunking alternative medicine except for gender affirming treatment which may have been a reason for her demise - she was 77.I assume this dr. didnt get the jab...could it have been a wet project??
TY Jeep....I assumed that "SkepDoc" meant skeptic of conventional/official medical industrial complex.I keep reading of people dying suddenly/unexpectedly from youth to elderly - young athletes more and more with one originally from a local suburb passed away at his college in Colorado:
Jack Madison, a sophomore from Bexley, Ohio, on the Colorado College men's tennis team, died in his sleep while at home from college on Jan. 2 - 20 years old.
Hunter Brown, a 21-year-old Air Force football player, died unexpectedly on Monday following a “medical problem” close to his dorm, according to the school. Hunter Brown’s death preceded that of Madison.
Jack Madison Colorado College tennis player Dead at 20, Cause of Death
Jack Madison Colorado College tennis player Dead at 20, Cause of Deathwww.dailynationpakistan.com
And today's paper detailed the death of Lisa Marie Presley after a medical emergency at age 54:
[screenshot]
View attachment 69478
These high profile deaths can be explained away less and less in that people simply have never dropped dead at this rate at any time in the past other than the great flu epidemic - also due to bad medical practice.
Like many of you, I have children and grandchildren who took the vax and I fear their days are numbered. Horrific to think about.
I looked her up and she was very pro jab and pro conventional medicine to the point of aggressively debunking alternative medicine except for gender affirming treatment which may have been a reason for her demise - she was 77.
I meant to reply to your assumption earlier, so, as @JEEP responded, I’ll clarify my reason for posting.TY Jeep....I assumed that "SkepDoc" meant skeptic of conventional/official medical industrial complex.
What makes you think her death is a wet project?I assume this dr. didnt get the jab...could it have been a wet project??
From Dr. Harriet Hall's wiki:I looked her up and she was very pro jab and pro conventional medicine to the point of aggressively debunking alternative medicine except for gender affirming treatment which may have been a reason for her demise - she was 77.
On June 15, 2021, Hall published a book review of Irreversible Damage in Science-Based Medicine, stating that the book "brings up some alarming facts that desperately need to be looked into", that the affirmative care model for gender dysphoria "is a mistake and a dereliction of duty", and that the current political climate has made scientific study of these matters nearly impossible.[34][35] Within two days, the review was replaced with a retraction notice authored by Steven Novella and David Gorski. They stated that the health protocols for dealing with gender dysphoria in children were misrepresented and argued that an increase in gender dysphoria diagnoses can be explained without invoking a theory of social contagion, as well as stating that the science behind gender-affirming care indicates it improves mental health.[36] Novella and Gorski emphasized that Hall is still an editor in good standing at Science-Based Medicine, and praised her history of promoting good science.[34] Science-Based Medicine also published a series of articles from doctors specialising in LGBTQ+ health care.[37][38][39] Journalist Jesse Singal criticized Novella and Gorski's retraction of Hall's original article and the factual accuracy of the follow-up articles.[40][41][42][43] Hall's review was republished at Skeptic.com, and an updated version that responds to the critiques has been published on her personal website.[35][44]