Date 02.11.2020
Germany's health minister has called for a "national effort" as the country begins a partial shutdown. Meanwhile, the WHO chief has gone into isolation after contact with an infected person. Follow DW for the latest.
Germany began a monthlong partial lockdown on Monday as part of efforts to curb the momentum of the coronavirus that has infected half a million people across the country.

As the new lockdown came into force, the Robert Koch Institute for infectious diseases announced a drop in cases, with just over 12,000 new infections, though the figure is often lower on the first day of the week as not all health authorities report on the weekend.

Infections of COVID-19 have been increasing sharply in recent weeks, with record caseloads becoming the norm, and Chancellor Angela Merkel has introduced stringent measures on public life as a result.

Some have described the lockdown as a lighter version of the one seen in the spring, as schools and shops will remain open, churches will be allowed to hold services and protests will not be banned. Nevertheless, all restaurants and bars will be closed, meetings in public will be restricted to just two households and all recreational centers, such as pools and gyms, will be shut.

State and federal leaders will meet again in 10 days to assess if the new measures need to be tightened further still or whether they may be eased in December, depending on the rate of infections.

Read more: Coronavirus: Merkel promises to shore up German economy

German Health Minister Jens Spahn urged citizens to significantly reduce their contacts in order to deal appropriately with the "situation of the century" and that a "national effort in November" is required, he told public broadcaster ZDF.

Meanwhile, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is going into isolation for at least a few days after he revealed he had been in close proximity of someone who has since tested positive.

"I have been identified as a contact of someone who has tested positive for #COVID19. I am well and without symptoms but will self-quarantine over the coming days, in line with WHO protocols, and work from home," Tedros said in a tweet.

Europe

Prince William contracted the coronavirus in April but did not announce it publicly for fear of worrying people.

The heir to the throne in the UK had struggled to breathe due to the virus, according to a report in the British tabloid the Sun, and corroborated by the BBC.

He contracted the virus around the same time as his father, Prince Charles, was confirmed to have it.

Slovakia tested millions of citizens over the weekend in an effort to stamp out the virus by conducting mass checks.

Defense Minister Jaroslav Nad said that 2.58 million Slovaks took the test on Saturday, and 25,850, or 1%, tested positive and must go into quarantine.

The scheme, a first in a country of comparable size, is being closely monitored by other nations looking for ways to stem the spread of the virus and avoid overwhelming their health systems.

The testing was free and voluntary, but the government will impose a lockdown on those who do not participate, including a
ban on going to work.

Machu Picchu in Peru has reopened after almost eight months without receiving visitors due to the pandemic.

The Inca citadel will allow 675 tourists a day for social distancing purposes, a figure that would normally be nearer 3,000 pre-pandemic.

US President Donald Trump has criticized several European countries for announcing "draconian" lockdowns as his reelection campaign enters its final straight.

Speaking at a campaign rally in Michigan, he warned voters that his Democratic rival Joe Biden would mimic those tough measures.

Ryanair cuts flights over new COVID-19 restrictions

Ryanair DAC stated on Monday it will reduce the airline's number of flights by 20% in September and October due to low flight-booking over the last ten days.

The decision comes after multiple EU countries have re-introduced strict measures to battle a new spread of the coronavirus. Ireland, Spain, France and Sweden are among the countries that will be affected by the changes in the flight schedule.

The airline criticized the Irish government's decision to restrict the movement of all on-arrivals for two weeks and showed support for German and Italian policy, describing it as a "realistic and proportionate method of supervising safe intra-EU travel."

Black Americans Hesitant On Vaccine
Z-Hedge 11-1-20
Many researchers and experts around the world are in agreement that a safe, effective and cheap COVID-19 vaccine is still months away. Still, that isn’t stopping politicians from pressuring vaccine makers, misinformation from spreading across social media and the digital realm, and Kamala Harris casting doubt on any vaccine under Trump.

In fact, as Statista's Willem Roper points out, new data shows how the public is growing more skeptical of a potential vaccine, and how that skepticism is being amplified within Black communities in the country.

According to a joint survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation and The Undefeated, 49 percent of Black respondents said they either probably won’t or definitely won’t get a COVID-19 vaccine even if it was deemed safe by scientists and provided for free. That’s a large discrepancy when compared to Hispanic and white respondents, with 37 percent and 33 percent, respectively, saying they probably or definitely won’t take the vaccine.
You will find more infographics at Statista

The survey and writers with The Undefeated focus on Black American’s distrust with the current health care system, as well as with politicians in charge of informing people on vaccine plans. The survey goes on to show how 46 percent of Black parents say the pandemic has had a major impact on the ability to afford basic necessities, with a third of Black parents saying the pandemic has had a major negative impact on the ability to care for their children


From California, I expected no less the last minute push of wishful thinking.

Stanford study finds Trump rallies caused over 30,000 COVID cases, led to over 700 deaths
STANFORD, Calif. - According to a new study from Stanford University, President Donald Trump's campaign rallies have led to over 30,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and likely caused the death of 700 Americans.

SF Chinese New Year Parade canceled in 2021

15 hours ago

Line 1
INFO - It is unlikely that the #reconfinement [less restrictive] is enough to regain control of the epidemic by Christmas according to documents published by the scientific council. (The world)
Line 2
Proof that people are laughing at us: In the note from the Scientific Council of October 26, it is written that confinement was spreading the virus! I'll give you a screenshot and you can check it yourself on page 9!https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/note_c

A shopkeeper calls the Elysee to warn Macron that small traders will enter into resistance. #Confinement#Reconfinement
 


The UK drugs regulator is planning to use artificial intelligence to sift through the “high volume” of reports of adverse reactions to Covid-19 vaccines in the coming months, as it prepares for an inoculation programme of groundbreaking scale.

A government contract shows the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority has paid a software company called Genpact UK £1.5m to develop an AI tool to “process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine adverse drug reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details . . . are missed”.

The need for a powerful tool to sort through what are forecast to be a huge numbers of adverse reactions, speaks to the scale of the vaccination programme in the months ahead.

The types of vaccine being developed by many of the pharmaceutical companies are also relatively new, such as the MRNA and chimpanzee adenovirus vectors, making it hard to predict how they will interact with millions of people’s immune systems when they leave clinical trials.

“You’re talking about vaccines that have potential liabilities, it’s an unknown unknown,” said Gary Nabel, chief scientific officer at pharmaceutical company Sanofi, which is currently working on two Covid-19 vaccine candidates. “As big as a 30,000-person trial is, when these go out into the world of millions of people, things will happen.”

Mr Nabel recalled the famous vaccine developer Maurice Hilleman telling him, “every time I launch a new vaccine, I hold my breath for the first 30m doses”.

The MHRA told the Financial Times that, based on previous vaccination campaigns, there would be between 50,000 and 100,000 reports of suspected side effects for every 100m doses over a 6-12 month period.
 
An example of Power to the People!

North Carolina Citizens Defy Proposed Mandatory Mask Law – City Council, Stunned By Turn Out, Backs Down​


Some good news this week as apparently there is still a pulse among liberty-minded citizens in one small North Carolina town that turned out in mass to defy the City’s attempt to mandate mask requirements.

When told they had to wear a mask to participate in the meeting, they refused, and the City Council and local police backed down in front of the angry crowd.

This is the kind of action it is going to take across the country to stop medical tyranny.

North Carolina Citizens Defy Proposed Mandatory Mask Law – City Council, Stunned By Turn Out, Backs Down


Waynesville Caught Off Guard By Public Outcry Over Proposed Mask Mandate​



by Becky Johnson (excerpts)


Waynesville leaders backed down from a proposed local mask mandate Tuesday night after nearly 100 people packed town hall to voice their opposition.

Tensions rose before the meeting ever began when the assembled crowd — who were being held in the lobby until the doors opened — learned there wasn’t going to be enough room for them all in the town board room.

Those wishing to speak were told to fill out forms and wait until their name was called. This didn’t sit well with many in the crowd, who demanded the meeting be moved to the sidewalk outside so that everyone could see and hear it — touching off a loud chant of “Take it outside.”

Town staff and police officers eventually quelled the crowd and convinced them that waiting for their turn to speak was the only option. Another uprising ensued after the waiting crowd was told they couldn’t come in without a mask when their turn rolled around.

The vast majority weren’t wearing a mask, given the whole reason they were there in the first place was to speak against the proposed mask mandate.

Some claimed exemptions for religious and health reasons, but others simply said they weren’t going to wear one and it would violate their rights to be denied entry to a public hearing on that grounds.


In the end, masks were offered but not compulsory.

The mezzanine outside the town board room, which was packed shoulder to shoulder, well exceeded the fire code capacity. But attempts to disperse some of the waiting crowd to the main lobby downstairs was likewise abandoned as fruitless.

By now, more police officers had been called in to help manage crowd control. The five town board members had arrived through a back door of town hall and were being held in a private room until the meeting began.

Once the doors opened, the first 20 people in line got inside and claimed the limited seats. The rest could listen to audio from the meeting streamed over a speaker, but given the large crowd, only those in close proximity could hear what was transpiring.

Several in attendance left after seeing they wouldn’t be admitted. Others continued to try to gain entry past police officers guarding the doorway. Staff meanwhile attempted to assure everyone they would eventually get a chance to speak — something that ultimately didn’t happen, however.

One by one, those who had filled out a slip of paper to speak came in to take their turn at the mic. Town Attorney Bill Cannon tried to ban the audience outside the doors from clapping and cheering for speakers, threatening on several occasions to cut off the public hearing if it continued. Eventually, the door to the meeting room was simply closed to keep the sounds of clapping out.

To the chagrin of the waiting masses, Cannon cut off the hearing after 32 minutes, saying the allotted time for the hearing was up. Many still waiting outside to speak, who were previously told by town staff they would get their turn, were upset that the town cut off the public hearing.

Although the public hearing was officially closed, every town board meeting has a designated period of general public comment mandated by law to give constituents the chance to address their local elected officials.

So, some who didn’t get their turn during the official public hearing instead decided to speak during the generic public comment session. However, they were cut off if they mentioned the word “mask.”

They were told they weren’t allowed to talk about masks during the public comment period because it had already been covered in the public hearing — despite most not actually getting to speak during the 32-minute hearing.

When a 16-year-old took the podium, as soon as she mentioned the word “mask,” Cannon interjected.

“Ma’am, this is not the public time period for talking about the ordinance and the masks,” Cannon said.

Several in the audience chimed in calling for the young speaker to be given a break.

Janet Presson was among those who didn’t get to speak in the public hearing and was barred from talking about masks during the public comment period, as well.

“We were told they were done with the mask issue and you couldn’t say the ‘m’ word,” Presson said. “They did everything they could to silence our voices.”

She said the town was clearly unprepared to handle the turnout.

“I think they were dumbfounded and horrified,” Presson said. “Mask mandates are a major issue that affect every single person. It is a hot-button issue. They should have done some better planning.”

The latest indication is the town leaders will not sign the mask proclamation tonight as originally believed.

Watch the video:



hqdefault.jpg




Ron Paul also covered this in his daily broadcast, The Liberty Report.

How To Beat The Lockdowners​

When city authorities in Waynesville, NC, announced that they were considering a city mask mandate they had no idea what was about to hit them.

At the city council meeting at which the discussion was to take place, a massive show of citizen opposition and participation stole the show from the mandate promoters.

Also today, why is flu disappearing in the US and elsewhere as Covid “cases” continue to rise?

Source: MedicalKidnap.com; TheMountaineer.com
 
Hello,

So you know how the UK announced a 4 week lockdown... Well, it may be extended.
Yes well we've seen this all before and sadly the lockdown will most likely be extended. Welcome to slavery. I'm not sure what to make of all this manipulated and 'staged' suffering, or how some people just seem to embrace it like it's their lifeline. :huh:

It's kind of weird, but the 'battlegrounds' for this fight (when it comes to countries) seem to be almost the opposite of what occurred during the 1930s-40s. The 'losers' from that time are the 'winners' this time around and the most oppressed from then are the most motivated this time around. Well, it makes me wonder.
 
for france, between the last restrictions of confinement and the obligation to wear a mask in certain cities or even departments (example Seine et Marne since 30/10/20) and the so-called Islamic "attacks", I had the frightening thought: what if they were preparing martial law?

on top of that they talk about 3rd wave, for me that means, mask for life and restrictions for life!

how to resist without violence?
Well there are many ways... And the first is start talking to people, or at least reaching out to people, especially those who have been most maligned.
 
Yes well we've seen this all before and sadly the lockdown will most likely be extended. Welcome to slavery. I'm not sure what to make of all this manipulated and 'staged' suffering, or how some people just seem to embrace it like it's their lifeline. :huh:

It's kind of weird, but the 'battlegrounds' for this fight (when it comes to countries) seem to be almost the opposite of what occurred during the 1930s-40s. The 'losers' from that time are the 'winners' this time around and the most oppressed from then are the most motivated this time around. Well, it makes me wonder.

The thing that has terrified me about 2020, the longer it plays out, is the reaction of the masses to the virus rather than the virus itself.

In the main I've found bourgeois type people to be the scariest as they are the ones who have bought into the technocracy the most.

I'm finding the biggest challenge I'm facing is to accept that the outcome of all this, in that it won't be good and that unlike any other time in my life, I don't even know of I'll be around to see 2022, let a lone 2025. These psychos could do anything, put you in a quarantine camp, kill you... Inject you with whatever they are cooking, kill you. Literally they have absolute power now and we're just being marched like sheep. Like what can people do when the majority are so brainwashed? If the majority want this new pathological reality, then who is anyone of us to say they can't have it?

So I guess I'm just trying to make peace with myself as tomorrow literally isn't guaranteed anymore, not with the global takeover of the pathology.
 
The thing that has terrified me about 2020, the longer it plays out, is the reaction of the masses to the virus rather than the virus itself.

In the main I've found bourgeois type people to be the scariest as they are the ones who have bought into the technocracy the most.

I'm finding the biggest challenge I'm facing is to accept that the outcome of all this, in that it won't be good and that unlike any other time in my life, I don't even know of I'll be around to see 2022, let a lone 2025. These psychos could do anything, put you in a quarantine camp, kill you... Inject you with whatever they are cooking, kill you. Literally they have absolute power now and we're just being marched like sheep. Like what can people do when the majority are so brainwashed? If the majority want this new pathological reality, then who is anyone of us to say they can't have it?

So I guess I'm just trying to make peace with myself as tomorrow literally isn't guaranteed anymore, not with the global takeover of the pathology.
Can you tell me what "bourgeois" means to you? I googled it and this is what came up:
What does it mean to be called bourgeois?

(Entry 1 of 4) 1 : of, relating to, or characteristic of the social middle class. 2 : marked by a concern for material interests and respectability and a tendency toward mediocrity. 3 : dominated by commercial and industrial interests : capitalistic.

They may be boring 'normies' and possibly even stupid, especially if they don't question, but are they scary? Or just sad and pathetic?
 
The crew at Advocate Me lawyers are still plugging away. The latest initiative is Cops for Covid Truth. A New South Wales Police Senior Constable has penned an open letter to the New South Wales Police Commissioner and has offered it on the above website for other police officers, members of other forces and civilians to sign.

It draws on the facts of Covid, details how implemented restrictions are in conflict with both law and international treaties and calls on members of the police force to not enforce measures that are outside of the rule of law including any measures to do with mandatory vaccinations.

An interesting one to follow, though it could be just the move needed to use the military to enforce such measures.

Following on from the above, Australian Lawyer Peter Little - who mostly does pro bono work - has taken up the cause of the above letter and is presenting it to Victoria police in order to attract more signatories, he has also presented the material in the letter (as well assume other stuff) to the police as crimes to be investigated. Apparently 70 NSW Police and other forces members have signed the letter so far.

34:07

As an aside, and :offtopic: he also raises something about a 1967 Rain-making Control Act (Victoria) and he's done an FOI request for administration documents connected to that Act, but the FOI comes up empty which he thinks is suspicious. A quick read over the Act shows that it had amendments made to it as late as 1999 so if amendments have been made to it and there's no record of parliamentary discussion or correspondence about it, then it is very suspicious.
 
Well there are many ways... And the first is start talking to people, or at least reaching out to people, especially those who have been most maligned.

I always try to listen to people and help them...
But some people don't want to see or hear... or I'm not good at helping them... it's possible...
Thank you for your advice.


j'essaie toujours d'écouter les gens et de leur venir en aide...
Mais certains ne veulent pas voir ou entendre... ou bien je ne suis pas douée pour les aider.. c'est possible...
merci pour votre conseil.
 
Hello Sottreader

As I read you, I tell myself, and I may be wrong, that you are exactly in the spirit requested by STS 4D: Pessimism, no vision of a future other than pathological, etc.
Too bad for you....
So let me give you some of my thoughts:

First of all, what is "being bourgeois" ????
-A person who belongs to the bourgeoisie, the middle class or the ruling class.
-In the Middle Ages and under the Ancien Régime, a well-to-do inhabitant of a town, a city, who is a commoner, but who has obtained, within the communal framework, certain privileges.
-Old. Individual without distinction, who has only vulgar tastes; foreign to the things of art.
-In Switzerland, a person who has the right to live in a commune.

There are surely other definitions....
And you can surely find a definition that will suit you personally
You know, we're all somebody's “bourgeois”, or "the poor guy" or "the lucky guy", etc.

You don't know who you'll be in 2022 ??????
Don't worry: nobody knows.
It's still 2020, we're going to live in 2021, so 2022 and 2025...............

I think that everyone, to varying degrees, and perhaps without showing it, has moments of anxiety, pessimism, loneliness, etc.
Not to mention the people who have really caught this viral crap and who are having a hard time at the moment.
So if we want to talk about misery, we can talk about those who lost everything in Beirut, or in the last earthquake in Turkey.....
I continue ??????????
No

Thinking is creative
You think pessimistically: you increase the knot sack of Earth's pessimism.
Don't forget that this is how "they eat us".
When I'm sad and I don't see how I'm going to get through it, that's what I think about; "they're eating us," and for me, it's out of the question.
Might as well tell you that I'm changing course directly !!!
So, please, try to see life differently: it's true, we're in bad luck and the world has gone crazy.

But you are part of this forum.....
There must be a positive reason for you to be here with us, all of us together, right?

We're all in the same boat
With the difference that we are lucky to be in the boat led by Laura, with the help of the Cs
Come on, cheer up, we're still going to see a lot of things.
You have to be in shape for everyone "to be on the balcony and watch the show".

Tenderness
Channa

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
 
Hello Sottreader

As I read you, I tell myself, and I may be wrong, that you are exactly in the spirit requested by STS 4D: Pessimism, no vision of a future other than pathological, etc.
Too bad for you....
So let me give you some of my thoughts:

First of all, what is "being bourgeois" ????
-A person who belongs to the bourgeoisie, the middle class or the ruling class.
-In the Middle Ages and under the Ancien Régime, a well-to-do inhabitant of a town, a city, who is a commoner, but who has obtained, within the communal framework, certain privileges.
-Old. Individual without distinction, who has only vulgar tastes; foreign to the things of art.
-In Switzerland, a person who has the right to live in a commune.

There are surely other definitions....
And you can surely find a definition that will suit you personally
You know, we're all somebody's “bourgeois”, or "the poor guy" or "the lucky guy", etc.

You don't know who you'll be in 2022 ??????
Don't worry: nobody knows.
It's still 2020, we're going to live in 2021, so 2022 and 2025...............

I think that everyone, to varying degrees, and perhaps without showing it, has moments of anxiety, pessimism, loneliness, etc.
Not to mention the people who have really caught this viral crap and who are having a hard time at the moment.
So if we want to talk about misery, we can talk about those who lost everything in Beirut, or in the last earthquake in Turkey.....
I continue ??????????
No

Thinking is creative
You think pessimistically: you increase the knot sack of Earth's pessimism.
Don't forget that this is how "they eat us".
When I'm sad and I don't see how I'm going to get through it, that's what I think about; "they're eating us," and for me, it's out of the question.
Might as well tell you that I'm changing course directly !!!
So, please, try to see life differently: it's true, we're in bad luck and the world has gone crazy.

But you are part of this forum.....
There must be a positive reason for you to be here with us, all of us together, right?

We're all in the same boat
With the difference that we are lucky to be in the boat led by Laura, with the help of the Cs
Come on, cheer up, we're still going to see a lot of things.
You have to be in shape for everyone "to be on the balcony and watch the show".

Tenderness
Channa

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Thank you.

I was just being honest about my feelings. I can't force myself to be optimistic or positive if in fact I'm feeling pessimistic and negative.

As much as I'd like to believe I'm the captain of my ship, my life, I know very well that I'm but a small part of a bigger social, interconnected whole. That is to say I am part of society, I live my life by societal rules, I adhere to social conventions, I follow the laws of the land.

At least to me, it looks like the society has been completely taken over, in a short space of time and people are willing to accept things they wouldn't before, in the name of a virus. For example, I know if I was to say, use an airplane and not wear a mask, I will be targeted for special treatment. I know there are certain freedoms I used to have not even more than a year ago that I don't have now.

I sense a heaviness in the air, as if people are living pretending everything is normal, trying to be positive but nothing is normal, really. It's like being a kid in a family where at the dinner table everything appears normal but underneath the facade there are things that are far from normal. Most, if not all the fundamentals of society are being broken. Even social life has changed, the economy has been broken beyond repair and as soon as the government stops giving free money and the central banks realise they can't fix it by simply pumping "made up" money into the markets, then things will really get interesting.

I'm not sure how I can be positive in such a situation. I just feel kind of sad, a bit like I'm in a helpless situation, in the sense that I'm part of the whole and therefore my fate is pinned to the fate of the whole ultimately. Maybe it's a sense of melancholy.
 
Can you tell me what "bourgeois" means to you? I googled it and this is what came up:
What does it mean to be called bourgeois?

(Entry 1 of 4) 1 : of, relating to, or characteristic of the social middle class. 2 : marked by a concern for material interests and respectability and a tendency toward mediocrity. 3 : dominated by commercial and industrial interests : capitalistic.

They may be boring 'normies' and possibly even stupid, especially if they don't question, but are they scary? Or just sad and pathetic?

To me, it's the middle class... Those who are educated, doing relatively well and so feel justified in being confident in their thoughts owing to their place in society, which is generally a comfortable one.

I find them scary as they create the justifications for the pathology and make it appear different, as if it's something other than what it is. They are the ones who will say we have to do this because science (the new God) says so, because it's a moral duty, maybe even a patriotic duty.
 
Back
Top Bottom