Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

Found this on twitter. Not exactly sure how true it is, however it is beyond evil.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1650738601787793408

“The vaccine decreases the ability to produce white blood cells by 50% from your first vaccine…your ability to make another generation of white blood cells takes 8 weeks…which is why they set it up at 8 weeks…to hit it again…you hit the white blood cell ability while they’re down…they decrease the saline in the second vaccine…and increase the harmful ingredients…so now you have a shift in the ingredients. The second dose decreases your ability to produce white cells by an additional 25%…you’ve wiped out 75% of your Military…and the ability to make your Military. Then the Booster…it has 81 strands of foreign bacteria…that your cells have never come across. You don’t have the antibodies to fight it…your body only has 25% of your white blood cells functioning. Chronic inflammation appears where you had a predisposition…if you have gastric, respiratory, skin autoimmune issues, cancer, etc…all becomes accelerated…as it hits the Central Nervous System causing ‘fight or flight’…and your body is in a constant inflammatory state. Then you get your Second Booster which has 8 strands of HIV…which shuts everything down…incrementally. If you Google this…it’s HIV. We have people walking around with no immune system or the ability to make one…with 81 foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV…with an advanced aging process. Once you cannot make white blood cells…you’ll become dependent on boosters for life…like a Diabetic that needs insulin…” -Anonymous Big Pharma Whistleblower
 
Fallen_735 said:
Found this on twitter. Not exactly sure how true it is, however it is beyond evil.
Click to expand...
If this is true, then there must be quite a strong counterbalancing force keeping these (heavily vaxxed) people alive for more than 2 years. Yes, some people are collapsing, but the streets are not filled with dead bodies! Consciousness protection?
 
Last edited:
stellar said:
How many people have Delta 32?



Image result for gene delta 32


"CCR5-delta32" is a deletion mutation of a gene which only 1% of the total population has two copies of this gene and individuals who carry two copies of this genetic mutation are immune to Smallpox, The Bubonic Plague (Black Death) and resistant to HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

Could the mRNA shots have been specifically targeting this gene with the lipid nanoparticles? It seems most prevalent in very interesting locations on the globe.
Click to expand...
reminded me of:

(Ryu) To go back to Pierre's comment, are Covid vaccines used as ethnic weapons?

A: Can be. Docking elements included.

Q: (L) So the vaccine has things in it that are docking elements for later propagation of some kind of pathogen?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) And the targeted population is Kantekkians, i.e. true Semites, i.e. Caucasians (in the sense of peoples from the area of the Caucasus).

(L) Targeted in what way? For download, or for the ethnic-specific weapons?

(Pierre) For both. Well, the vaccine. They have a mutation that over-expresses the ACE2 protein. They're more likely to get the effects of the vaccine.

A: Yes
 
US "vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission".

FDA: Vaccines Don’t Have To Prevent Infection Or Transmission | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
FDA: Vaccines Don’t Have To Prevent Infection Or Transmission
BY TYLER DURDEN
TUESDAY, APR 25, 2023 - 12:55 PM
Authored by Zachary Steieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Vaccines don’t have to prevent infection or transmission to be cleared in the United States, the country’s top regulatory agency said in a new document.

“It is important to note that FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission,” Dr. Peter Marks, a top official at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said in the document.

Marks was writing as he rejected nearly all recommendations from a group of experts that advised the FDA to update the labels for the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccines are traditionally known as drugs that prevent an illness. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for years said a vaccine is a product that “produces immunity” while vaccination is an injection of an infectious organism “in order to prevent the disease.” The agency changed its definitions after people correctly noted that COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent infection.

The Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines, a group of experts, had called for the FDA to make clear that the COVID-19 vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission.

“There is a widespread (but inaccurate) notion that efficacy against infection and transmission have been established by substantial evidence, and that these vaccines contribute to herd immunity,” the group said, pointing to claims from President Joe Biden, the head of the CDC, and Dr. Anthony Fauci that vaccinated people would not get sick or infected.

Biden, for instance, falsely said in 2021 that “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.”

“To remedy this situation, language clarifying that phase III trials were not designed to determine and failed to provide substantial evidence of vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission or death must be added to labels,” the coalition said. SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19.

While it’s uncommon to include in product labeling what a product has not been proven to do, there are cases where it’s necessary due to inaccurate assumptions, the coalition said. They pointed to the FDA stating that the influenza medicine Tamiflu “has not been shown to previous serious complications of influenza” after the drug’s manufacturer said it reduced complications by nearly half.

Marks rejected the request, writing that the petitioners included “selected statements by U.S government officials suggesting that vaccination against COVID-19 may prevent infection or transmission” but omitted statements from Fauci and others that later acknowledged vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission.

“In responding to your Petition, we are not agreeing or disagreeing with any of the statements that are selected in the Petition,” Marks said. “Rather, we are observing that the statements referenced by the Petition do not demonstrate a commonly held belief that the clinical trials provided substantial evidence of efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We are not convinced that there is any widespread misconception about this.”

The head of the CDC, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, is among those maintaining to the present day that the vaccines at one point completely prevented transmission and symptomatic illness.

Trial data showed high efficacy against symptomatic illness but not 100 percent efficacy. Real-world data has shown lower effectiveness. The trials were not designed to measure transmission, the FDA has said in various documents.
Click to expand...
 
Andrew Bridgen MP has been expelled from the Conservative party in the UK after questioning the narrative on the plandemic and vaccines in parliament. Of course they pull the antisemitism card on him, despite the fact that his crime was to quote from a Hebrew University paper

www.theguardian.com

Former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen expelled permanently from party

North West Leicestershire MP has sat as independent since losing Tory whip after comparing use of Covid jabs to Holocaust
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Andrew Bridgen, the formerly Conservative MP who lost the Tory whip after comparing the use of Covid vaccines to the Holocaust, has been expelled permanently from the party.
Click to expand...
Bridgen wrote: “As one consultant cardiologist said to me this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.”
Click to expand...
In a statement, Bridgen said his expulsion “only confirms the culture of corruption, collusion and cover-ups which plagues our political system”. He said: “I have been a vocal critic of the vaccine rollout and the party have been sure to make an example of me. I am grateful for my newfound freedom and will continue to fight for justice for all those harmed, injured and bereaved due to governmental incompetence.”
Click to expand...
He also had the support of the articles' author and numerous Jewish scientists and doctors who wrote to the PM in support of him, stating that overusing the antisemitism accusation diminishes real antisemitism. He was also invited to speak at a synagogue last week...

There is a good interview with Andrew Bridgen up on UKColumn:

Standing Up To Be Counted: Andrew Bridgen MP speaks to UK Column about Covid–19 policy and vaccine concerns

Andrew Bridgen spoke out in Westminster regarding vaccine harms. His reward? Withdrawal of the Conservative party whip. Join us to hear what the mainstream media will not share.
www.ukcolumn.org www.ukcolumn.org

He comes across as a very down-to-earth MP. He gives a bit of his own background (biology, genetics and virology at university, Royal Marines, and then successful businessman prior to his political career)

Highlights:

  • He was lied to by Boris Johnson, who told him a full impact assessment had been carried out into pandemic measures. Because of this reassurance he voted in favour (for the last time) of the second lockdown.
  • He voted against all pandemic policies after this point. Says he saw the effects of lockdown rules on his constituents, including more suicides over a month than he would have expected over two years.
  • He was invited to a party at Westiminster while knowing what the governments plans were for the Christmas lockdowns. He wrote to Boris about how bad an idea this was given the rules everyone else were being told to follow. Of course, then Partygate happened...
  • Being interviewed as an MP many time he knows a lot of people working in media who all knew that MP's were wearing masks and social distancing in front of cameras and not while off screen (even though many of the media personnel had to wear masks/have vax etc.)
  • 86% MHRA funding comes from big pharma, which they also invest in (MHRA are proud these days to be an 'enabler' rather than a 'regulator')
  • Midazolam (respiratory suppressant) administered to patients who already had respiratory problems.
  • Concerned about the WHO international pandemic treaty and its potential for control. Points out that they are more interested in their treaty and not interested at all in finding out where Sars-Cov-2 actually came from.
  • Asked why MP's won't engage in the subject of pandemic and vaccine failures. He believes many are fearful and being warned off, his own case being an example to others as to what happens when you question the narrative.
  • Suggests that MP's have "effectively ended democracy, made ourselves redundant". They "inflict things" on people rather than being servants of the people.
  • Believes big pharma has captured regulators and democracy world wide and MP's do not think they can take it on.
  • He also calls out digital currencies, digital ID's and WHO international regulations as potential control mechanisms.

He pretty much hits every point and seems to genuinely care about where things are going.

Looks pretty clear why he has been expelled from the Tory party...

Unfortunately I think he has too much faith in trying to get people to bring up these topics with their MP's/representatives to get them debated - looks to me like he is an example of exactly what happens when you take that route.

Looks like he may now be looking to join Lawrence Fox's Reclaim Party.
 
Interesting study in the Journal of Clinical Medicine:

www.mdpi.com

Long-Term Adverse Effects of Mild COVID-19 Disease on Arterial Stiffness, and Systemic and Central Hemodynamics: A Pre-Post Study

COVID-19-associated vascular disease complications are primarily associated with endothelial dysfunction; however, the consequences of disease on vascular structure and function, particularly in the long term (>7 weeks post-infection), remain unexplored. Individual pre- and post-infection...
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com

The researchers conclude that even mild Covid can result in arterial stiffness and vascular impairment, suggesting autoimmune response to the disease as the cause.
No mention of vaccine status of the subjects, however…

Abstract​

COVID-19-associated vascular disease complications are primarily associated with endothelial dysfunction; however, the consequences of disease on vascular structure and function, particularly in the long term (>7 weeks post-infection), remain unexplored. Individual pre- and post-infection changes in arterial stiffness as well as central and systemic hemodynamic parameters were measured in patients diagnosed with mild COVID-19. As part of in-laboratory observational studies, baseline measurements were taken up to two years before, whereas the post-infection measurements were made 2–3 months after the onset of COVID-19. We used the same measurement protocol throughout the study as well as linear and mixed-effects regression models to analyze the data. Patients (N = 32) were predominantly healthy and young (mean age ± SD: 36.6 ± 12.6). We found that various parameters of arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics—cfPWV, AIx@HR75, and cDBP as well as DBP and MAP—responded to a mild COVID-19 disease. The magnitude of these responses was dependent on the time since the onset of COVID-19 as well as age (pregression_models ≤ 0.013). In fact, mixed-effects models predicted a clinically significant progression of vascular impairment within the period of 2–3 months following infection (change in cfPWV by +1.4 m/s, +15% in AIx@HR75, approximately +8 mmHg in DBP, cDBP, and MAP). The results point toward the existence of a widespread and long-lasting pathological process in the vasculature following mild COVID-19 disease, with heterogeneous individual responses, some of which may be triggered by an autoimmune response to COVID-19.
Click to expand...

Conclusions​

We found that various parameters of arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics respond simultaneously to the mild COVID-19 disease in predominantly healthy individuals. While we were unable to demonstrate this effect on all of the parameters tested, the worsening of values of those found to be responsive (cfPWV, AIx@HR75, cDBP, DBP, and MAP) points toward the existence of a widespread and long-lasting pathological process in the vasculature following the infection.
The detected responses to COVID-19 disease are not straightforward but rather deteriorate with the time since the onset of COVID-19 infection and age.
Within the period of 2–3 months following infection, our models demonstrated a clinically significant progression of vascular impairment.
Finally, we discovered that individual responses to COVID-19 are likely heterogeneous and possibly moderated by age.
Emerging evidence suggests that post-recovery autoimmune response to COVID-19 may be the cause of this phenomenon, although we can only speculate on its origin.
Click to expand...
 

Australia smashed by nasty triple wave of flu, cold and Covid​


In Australia they are asking kids as young as 6months old to get vaccinated against influenza.
Flu season is well on the way and to help reduce the stress on hospital, get vaccinated to prevent.

It seems that from the moment people were scared of the future which would or would not happen they were done with falling for the manipulation. Get vaccinated in case you get blablabla. Nobody talks about possible effects especially for small kids but the priority is to reduce the stress on hospitals. What the heck!

Another brainwash on the way
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom