The incidence of cancers has increased exponentially worldwide since the universal COVID-19 vaccination program began at the end of 2020.
Maybe this should go in the Our Orwellian World forum.

1761387003306.png


 
The latest batch is involving some small visceral arteries like thrombosis in the splenic artery, mesenteric artery, etc. and none of the affected had a particularly bad head cold. All of them tested positive for COVID-19 prior to the event.
The person with the splenic artery thrombosis survived. Initially, he was discharged instead of the "stay-on-the-safe-side 24-48 hour observation" for a person with a spleen infarct. What happened next was that his spleen ruptured in his abdominal cavity at home, and he went into a shock. He was reanimated at the hospital, and eventually his spleen was removed. He was discharged shortly afterward with instructions to get vaccinated for all the bacterial agents that your spleen is supposed to fight against, including the pneumococcal vaccine. Which, thanks to the Catalonians, we now know better:


Adjusted Risk (Hazard Ratios):

After controlling for age, sex, influenza vaccination, and major comorbidities:

  • PCV13 [13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine]
    • 1.83× higher risk of pneumococcal pneumonia (95% CI 1.49–2.24).
    • 1.55× higher risk of all-cause pneumonia (95% CI 1.42–1.70).
    • 1.91× higher risk of death from all-cause pneumonia (95% CI 1.45–2.52).
  • PPSV23 [23-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine]
    • 1.21× higher risk of pneumococcal pneumonia (95% CI 1.10–1.36).
    • 1.24× higher risk of all-cause pneumonia (95% CI 1.18–1.31).
    • No reduction in mortality.
In other words:

cb4b26d7-89c1-4a0e-9979-53b2fcfefcee_1174x1156.webp


So even for pneumococcal bacterial vaccines, no reassurance at all. A few days prior to the publication of this study, a woman came to see me because "I have this cough since I got the pneumococcal vaccine one month before".

The patient decided not to get vaccinated after I explain the latest data, but I would not be surprised if a well intended bureaucrat convinces him of the contrary.
 
Don't know where to post this information, but it's important to share, and was maybe already discussed somewhere else on the forum.
It's a US nurse who warns about the fact that now, some hospitals set a policiy to vaccinate anyone who come into their establishment and visibly, they seems not to inform well about, they act as "bordeline" with a paper to sign for people needing a surgery, but better to listen to what she explains :


Is it possible that some hospitals would dare to do this without clear patient's consent in the US ? When you look how much they could be charged in front of a tribunal, I have hard to think they would dare to do it. This remains good to know or at least keep an eye opened about when you have to go to an hospital.
 
Last edited:
Don't know where to post this information, but it's important to share, and was maybe already discussed somewhere else on the forum.
It's a US nurse who warns about the fact that now, some hospitals set a policiy to vaccinate anyone who come into their establishment and visibly, they seems not to inform well about, they act as "bordeline" with a paper to sign for people needing a surgery, but better to listen to what she explains :


Is it possible that some hospitals would dare to do this without clear patient's consent in the US ? When you look how much they could be charged in front of a tribunal, I have hard to think they would dare to do it. This remains good to know or at least keep an eye opened about when you have to go to an hospital.
Immediate thoughts is they can't give you any kind of medicine without informing you what you are being given and getting your consent in non-emergency situations.

Obviously in an emergency they'll treat you based on the judgement of those attending to you but I think the intervention will only be related to resolving the emergency in question.

In situations like the above where we are getting sensationalist claims via X, I'd verify it by reference to actual legislation and / or the view of an informed hospital administrator.

Something that comes to mind on the above clip - how would they even know what vaccines you had / did not have. My understanding is there is no one single integrated IT system all hospitals use to talk to each other and cross-share patient information.
 
One thing that has started to catch my attention lately is the increasing but noticeable bleeding through of alternative topics such as COVID, vaccines, and lockdowns into more mainstream areas of YouTube. One area I’m seeing this a lot is in the productivity “hustle to earn your million” space. While these podcasters are often neutral politically (or presented that way, at least), you’ll see people like Jordan Peterson and behavioral experts who aren’t well-liked by leftist crowds.

One highlight video that has been doing the rounds in the last few days (so much so that even my mother sent it to me) is actually from a year-old interview with biologist Dr. Bret Weinstein, who spends a portion of it talking about COVID and the vaccine. I don’t watch this channel myself (Diary of a CEO), but the podcaster is popular with younger audiences who have a productivity or entrepreneurial focus. At the time of writing, he has over 13 million subscribers. It seems like he chases the hot and often sensationalist topics, whatever they might be. But I think it’s interesting that this increasingly includes more fringe alternative topics such as the COVID vaccine and lockdowns, presumably because the podcasters are seeing these topics pull larger audiences in their video statistics.

Facebook reel video (16 mins):
132K views · 2.2K reactions | The BANNED Professor's BRUTALLY Honest Opinion On COVID-19 & Dr Fauci... | Dr Bret Weinstein | The Diary CEO

Full YouTube video (plays on the topic):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cFu-b5lTMU&t=6768s

While Weinstein’s account of COVID’s origins, like most in the alternative space, might not match the Cs’ answers on the topic, I find it very intriguing that such blasphemous perspectives are slipping deeper and deeper into more general channels. In the case above, I suspect the podcaster is looking for any topic that will be good for his business, which might be why he decided to share the COVID clip recently. But I think that in itself really tells us something.

P.S. He even interviewed Kamala Harris recently. Unsurprisingly, the comments section is more entertaining than the interview itself.
 
One thing that has started to catch my attention lately is the increasing but noticeable bleeding through of alternative topics such as COVID, vaccines, and lockdowns into more mainstream areas of YouTube.
Yeah, there is also "super mainstream" mind programming going on. Look at this video, it's horrifying. If you want to uncover the hidden agenda, just imagine that these animals are humans!

I Saved 1,000 Animals From Dying

In the beginning of the video, MrBeast, a prominent YouTuber with 448 mllion subscribers, microchips a rhino and vaccinates giraffes by shooting them with flying needles from a helicopter. A wildlife "expert" tells him that these giraffes have no chance of survival if they catch "one of these diseases," so MrBeast concludes that he is saving their lives by forcefully vaccinating them. Brilliant Covidian logic. :rolleyes:

And the video wouldn't be complete without a not-so-Freudian slip:
[4:49] MrBeast: We're on a kill streak! Although we're not killing them, we're saving their lives!
In the eyes of the "elites," we are so stupid that they can play with us and inject us with whatever they want. They view themselves as "saviors" or "gods," and so does MrBeast, in some way, by expressing an "otherwordly generosity." The comets will set things straight, but, until then, buckle up! ☄️
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom