Cow being abducted

[Laura]

While delving into the floating cows phenomena I stumbled onto this post on a forum, so I'll quote it :

This is part of a Japanese dairy farming/milk commercial advertisement that the client apparently rejected but the creator thought it was too good to waste so it was recycled and circulated on the internet as a joke.

Area51 productions is just one person, his friends call him Daz and he's a moderator on my forum and is the person who originally posted it, after a little research to find its origins proved it a fake he removed it from his videos.

But it’s one of those that just keeps resurfacing every few months.

Regardless it’s a known hoax/fraud/proven fake.

source: _http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=alienabduction&action=display&num=1207234930

Can't prove or disprove the veracity of this claim though.

You can bet your booties that if a real video like that got out there, that is exactly how they would cover it up and explain it. Same thing with the alien autopsy video though it took them a few years to find the right person to "claim to have done it."

 

[Tigersoap]

You can bet your booties that if a real video like that got out there, that is exactly how they would cover it up and explain it. Same thing with the alien autopsy video though it took them a few years to find the right person to "claim to have done it."

Oh yes anybody can make such claims afterwards and most people will accept it.
So there is maybe a possibility that this video is true then ? I still doubt it though, just to be on the safe-side :)
I haven't found much about this one that would prove to be a fake like some other viral advertising.

 

[Finduilas495]

I found the way people were making fun of the cow in the youtube comments quite disturbing. It's (i) heartless and (ii) none of them seems to draw the connection to their own personal lives. I'm frequently baffled by the way people detach from the world they live in.

This video was shown on news but all of them laughed at it to ease a situation and make of it no big deal, maybe they would have second thought when seeing these pictures:

[images removed by moderator - and converted to links: MODERATOR WARNING - VERY GRAPHIC IMAGES ARE AT THESE LINKS]
_http://www.galaksija.com/mute1.jpg

_http://www.galaksija.com/mute7.jpg

This is horrible death by the way!

Yes, one would hope that this would open people's eyes and wake them up. After reading a comment on another forum today about people laughing and applauding while watching human mutilation in a horror movie, I'm not so sure about the second thoughts part though... I still find the fact hard to accept, but at least 5% of the people on this planet (if not more) care not one iota about anyone else, let alone an animal.

 

[Avi]

personlly I don't see whether the video is faked or not makes that much of a difference?

whether it is faked or authentic does not affect the truth - the fact that hyper-dimensional beings interact with our reality.

meaning that it is not necessary for the video to be real to validate the alien/hyper-dimensional interaction. yes, no one has stated it as such, per se, but when pondering this thread that thought came to mind.

for the sake of truth, is the video real or not? I don't know, I tend to think it is a hoax, but that does not mean I need some sort of validation - some "irrefutable evidence" that the phenomena is true, other realities being veiled from our everyday consciousness.

of course even if it were "irrefutable evidence" - there are lots of people, therefore lots of perceptions on this planet and I am sure, if for no other reason that to be contrary, there are people who would "refute" that which is undeniable.

take the evidence surrounding 9/11 for example.

an interesting video for sure in that perhaps it will cause people to think and wonder and investigate, but really other than serving as a catalyst of sorts I tend to view it as inconclusive and almost irrelevant to the whole debate/existence of hyper-dimensions. maybe irrelevant is a misleading choice of words but I hope you get the idea trying to convey.

also, FWIW, last night witnessed what I would say without reservation was UFO of some kind for the speed and trajectory of movement. About 10:00 pm, rose on the horizon at an inch-snail pace, a single light, looks like a star, creeping incrementally up and up, almost to a beat/rhythm, it looked to "jump" ahead, until rising to a certain altitude (few hundred metres estimate) and then traveled overhead. When overhead I could now view a series of lights that appeared to flash in a pattern and appeared to give the outline of triangular shape. Remember as it rose on the horizon it apppeared as a single light but then when overead I could see its "belly" and a series of lights and much wider base than before.

just moments before seeing this, literally, a craft flew by that was very close to ground level, but just far eneough away so as to make the full outline indefinable, but came in at an arc - was defninitely not a passenger plane on its way to the airport, curved back behind which turned me around as I was following its movement when the single light appeared on that horizon, noticed it just as I took my attention away from one object, then saw the other.

not the first time seeing something like this . . . . :/

 

[rylek]

You can bet your booties that if a real video like that got out there, that is exactly how they would cover it up and explain it. Same thing with the alien autopsy video though it took them a few years to find the right person to "claim to have done it."

Oh yes anybody can make such claims afterwards and most people will accept it.
So there is maybe a possibility that this video is true then ? I still doubt it though, just to be on the safe-side :)
I haven't found much about this one that would prove to be a fake like some other viral advertising.

Just a thought, if someone were recording a genuine abduction like this, wouldn't it be likely that the person would be abducted as well, with maybe further added bonus of having their memory wiped?

 

[aragorn]

Hi Bud,

A commentator provided a better version which you may want to check:

"Esta es una recreación para un video comercial realizado en Japón que se titula "Criaturas Bizarras del Japón". Este video corresponde al noveno episodio que habla de mutilación de ganado. El Video completo lo pueden ver en:

watch?v=46778aXXqtw

Donde se hace un recuento de los casos ocuridos en USA."

"This is a recreation for a commercial video released in Japan entitled "Bizarre Creatures of Japan." This video is for the ninth episode that talks about cattle mutilation. The full video you can see here:

watch?v=46778aXXqtw

Where there's an account of cases occurring in the USA."

Yes, that version is much sharper - looks a whole lot of more convincing than the grainy version. As Laura pointed out, spreading a version of that video that looks fake would probably be the best way to do damage control.

Here's the whole link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46778aXXqtw

 

[JonnyRadar]

Just a thought, if someone were recording a genuine abduction like this, wouldn't it be likely that the person would be abducted as well, with maybe further added bonus of having their memory wiped?

Not necessarily... John Keel lays it out in Operation Trojan horse - often some kind of "evidence" is selectively left or disseminated somehow in order to add to the confusion around the incident. I mean, there's an anchor embedded in a church door in Ireland that fell from an old-style clipper ship floating in the air. This stuff is all over the place...

I think what Herakles said is right on...

whether it is faked or authentic does not affect the truth - the fact that hyper-dimensional beings interact with our reality.

There are books and books and books filled with information about these kind of encounters, so whether one video is real or fake doesn't really change the situation. Looking at it as proof or non-proof is not the way to go, imo...

For anyone who's reading this thread and hasn't read Operation Trojan Horse, it's a must-read to understand the UFO/ultraterrestrial reality, osit.

 

[Laura]

The Cs have pointed out that the "smoke and mirrors" show is pretty much all about concealing the mutilations, the consumption of humans, etc, on the part of certain hyperdimensional beings. That's about the only explanation that makes much sense. I mean, some of the earliest material was about this topic (I really do need to get all those sessions posted, don't I?)

 

[EGVG]

The Cs have pointed out that the "smoke and mirrors" show is pretty much all about concealing the mutilations, the consumption of humans, etc, on the part of certain hyperdimensional beings. That's about the only explanation that makes much sense. I mean, some of the earliest material was about this topic (I really do need to get all those sessions posted, don't I?)

Omg Laura you do need to post those sessions please take the time to do so, I would very much appreciate it, and It would help a lot, cuz every session is packet with info. =)

EDU

 

[EGVG]

Just a note for those expecting pictures of a cow mutilation: these are images of a HUMAN mutilation. The link was posted many many years ago on the cass site, I believe. If I remember correctly, this case occurred in South America, but I can't remember the details, or if there was any investigation (if there was, it was probably scrubbed).

It was somewhere on the site. Here's the story for those interested.

From the article:

...acute hemorrhage in multiple traumatisms. There is a component of causa mortis by vagus stimulation" (implying cardio-respiratory arrest caused by extreme pain). "

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2010/11/most-disturbing-case-of-alien-abduction.html

(very disturbing photos at link)

Wow, thanks for the link, I have never ever seen something like this, I would thought that in case of a human mutilation the body would be 100% used, but this proves wrong, well in a weird way I'm pleased to see evidence of a allegedly alien to human mutilation. The case looks very weird, it just does not look like something an animal could do, and to left no blood shows that even to humans the task would have been very challenging,way to precise the "job" was done.

"...acute hemorrhage in multiple traumatisms. There is a component of causa mortis by vagus stimulation" (implying cardio-respiratory arrest caused by extreme pain). "The victim shows injuries with vital reaction characteristics, i.e., there is the component "torture". The suggested modus operandi is: incisions in soft parts and natural orifices using sucking devices".

This quote tells a lot of who may have been behind this murder case. Lets hope for more and more information and evidence on this subject.




EDU

 

[davey72]

Just a thought, if someone were recording a genuine abduction like this, wouldn't it be likely that the person would be abducted as well, with maybe further added bonus of having their memory wiped?

Perhaps they were protected by their own "knowledge"

 

[dannybananny]

Just a thought, if someone were recording a genuine abduction like this, wouldn't it be likely that the person would be abducted as well, with maybe further added bonus of having their memory wiped?

Why to abduct someone when majority of people will discard it as a fake or will find many reasons to not look into it because it doesn't go along with their program(concept of reality). And it isn't really been broadcast ed on TV channels, except maybe few and that isn't enough to get a domino started.

 

[Buddy]

Thanks Jerry and Aragorn for the info about the clearer version and links! :)

 

[Nawd]

On the human mutilation subject, I have to object to it being real.

First of all, the shadows are all incorrect:
-Photograph 1: You would have to be taking a picture from not only the far left corner, but also a flash from the middle. In other words, the person taking the picture, not only had to have had a major light source from the left (like stands/flashes) but also one close to the camera, like another flash from another camera. OR there are two other people flashing a picture at the same time. OR someone had a lightstand on the left which created the shadow of just the head, another light source ( like a window) that equaled a bright light source (window} just 30 degrees lower than the flash, AND At the same time. Not only that, but there is a shadow under the victims right arm, which also indicates a major flash from that angle as well.

Injuries:
The 'gunshot' looking wound in his arm seems to be much clearer than any other injuries. Which makes it also more look like a fake. The burn marks on his face and chest, indicate that his head does not belong to his body. The degeneration of his mouth and eyes indicate that the parts of his face, died or succumb to natural degeneration before his body (which could mean that it was added on digitally.)

The burns on his chest seem to have not actually burned the hair. Also it just looks 'black' not an actual injury.

Picture 2 looks like nothing to me. A mess.

Picture 3; The "hole" and the red spot, does not match what would happen in bruising, it wouldn't ever happen. It's not possible with the human body. That hole can not represent a hole in the skin. Nor the bruising. It could be a bruising of course, but not in the event of an actual hole. Not possible. IMO, its fake.

It It appears that the lower intestine are gone in one of the pictures.
Then in others, it is facing up and then facing down. What is the
rules in treating dead bodies these days?

Still there are many other things that seem very fake. I'm not even sure they show the
same body/head in many of them. I do not think it's an alien abduction, If anything
it's 'proof of a hit' for some hit man with crappy photoshop skills....after he offed like four or five other people and put them all together.

Just my thoughts.

 

[EGVG]

On the human mutilation subject, I have to object to it being real.

First of all, the shadows are all incorrect:
-Photograph 1: You would have to be taking a picture from not only the far left corner, but also a flash from the middle. In other words, the person taking the picture, not only had to have had a major light source from the left (like stands/flashes) but also one close to the camera, like another flash from another camera. OR there are two other people flashing a picture at the same time. OR someone had a lightstand on the left which created the shadow of just the head, another light source ( like a window) that equaled a bright light source (window} just 30 degrees lower than the flash, AND At the same time. Not only that, but there is a shadow under the victims right arm, which also indicates a major flash from that angle as well.

Injuries:
The 'gunshot' looking wound in his arm seems to be much clearer than any other injuries. Which makes it also more look like a fake. The burn marks on his face and chest, indicate that his head does not belong to his body. The degeneration of his mouth and eyes indicate that the parts of his face, died or succumb to natural degeneration before his body (which could mean that it was added on digitally.)

The burns on his chest seem to have not actually burned the hair. Also it just looks 'black' not an actual injury.

Picture 2 looks like nothing to me. A mess. (well obviously)

Picture 3; The "hole" and the red spot, does not match what would happen in bruising, it wouldn't ever happen. It's not possible with the human body. That hole can not represent a hole in the skin. Nor the bruising. It could be a bruising of course, but not in the event of an actual hole. Not possible. IMO, its fake.

It It appears that the lower intestine are gone in one of the pictures.
Then in others, it is facing up and then facing down. What is the
rules in treating dead bodies these days?

Still there are many other things that seem very fake. I'm not even sure they show the
same body/head in many of them. I do not think it's an alien abduction, If anything
it's 'proof of a hit' for some hit man with crappy photoshop skills....after he offed like four or five other people and put them all together. (I really don't think so)

Just my thoughts.

Really...look I know its hard to cope with this kind of info, but your just rambling, your thoughts on the subject seem forced to believe that the case is not true, when in fact the case is really clear, and has all the evidence to show that this was not a man made murder.

EDU