Current Reading

I am on "The Secret History of the World" (uff! this is enough for the rest of the year!) and "The Wave" I and II along with "Bringers of the Dawn" (on spanish) and hope to start soon a book I found "The Key to the Hidden things" by the christian cabalist Guillaume Postel (in spanish -it is the "absconditorium clavis", publishd in Amsterdam in 1646) and "The Fourth Way" by Ouspensky (in spanish). I am after Gnosis.
I dont even remember what I was reading before this :)
 
A few more books read back in December that I stumbled across, as we were cleaning house -- most are worthy of recommendation:

a) CE-VI Close Encounters of the Possession Kind by William Baldwin PHd, published by Headline Books. A sort of companion book to his Spirit Releasement Therapy, this short volume (126 pages) specifically addresses the alien reality which his patients have encountered, and details both his experiences and results in addressing their subsequent issues. He explicitly states up front that while he accepts that ETs exist, he is not sure in what form, and as the book progressess my feeling was that he believes in a disincarnate ET reality much more than a physical one. Some interesting case histories, and I would suspect that if you found SRT interesting and/or helpful, this one will fall largely into the same category. Estimated disinfo quotient: low

b) Secret Nazi Polar Expeditions by Christof Friedrich (aka Ernest Zundel), published by Samisdat Publishers. Extremely hard to find; I had to hunt for a long time. Spiralbound, 127 pages with numerous pictures. I picked this up due to a curiousity in both Zundel's earlier writings (he is obviously in a load of trouble now, but is it entirely warranted based upon the objective evidence?), as well as the C's comments re: Neu-Schwabenland and time machines. The text is rambling, with the thread throughout it all being that the Nazi's did have a number of expeditions to Antarctica, as well as the Northern Polar regions. Most interesting by far is that they had at least one documented expedition which found warm water lakes hidden in the mountains of Antarctica, and he recounts the details of their landing on this lake, and their limited (published) findings. There is no opinion offered as to WHY the National Socialists were exploring Antarctica, just a recounting of the evidence & history. Estimated disinfo quotient: low

c) Thunderbolts of the Gods by David Talbott & Wallace Thornhill. Published by Mikamar Publishing, 108 pages. I happened across this one in a roundabout fashion, but pleased that I did. A mix of history and the authors 'electric/plasma universe model', extending the theories of Velikovsky regarding cometary interludes in ancient history. Most fascinating by far are the graphical representations of laboratory plasma discharges, and a side-by-side comparison of the global phenomenon of various rock art drawings showing what appear to be largely the same figures. They extrapolate this to interplanetary plasma discharge models, and make the argument that this is what our ancestors saw en masse which caused them to chisel these same figures into stone, all over the world. Interesting & compelling reading, if not absolute proof. The book does drag a bit towards the end, particularly with all the special sections which reduce the flow of the arguments being made. Estimated disinfo quotient: low to medium.

PS -- I also picked up one of Halton Arp's VHS presentations from a conference at the same time (from the same website), and this too was intriguing, albeit for different reasons. Mr. Arp studied and worked with Edwin Hubble back when he was developing his redshift 'expension of the universe' model, and Mr. Arp takes very serious issue with this model, backing up his assertions with numerous examples. The primary argument being made is that redshift does not indicate expansion of the universe as Hubble's legacy would have it, but rather indicates variability of materiality, with, by his count, 7 levels of materiality being shown in the universe. Estimated disinfo quotient: low

d) Secret of the Andes by Brother Philip (aka George Williamson). Published by Neville Spearman, 151 pages, 1961. I happened across this one while re-reading Michael Topper's extracts from the New Thunderbird Chronicle; MT makes a comment along the lines of "...good channeled material has been around for decades now; a case in point being Secret of the Andes...'. A strange little book, with it's fair share of both fluff and late 50's UFO thinking, but one comment stood out for me. On page 37, they relate that the group has learned the '90 degree phase shift', which allows entry to the Universe of Timelessness. Along with a few other clues in the book, combined with other readings, I came to the conclusion that they were discussing the mechanics of entering & exiting 4th density. Don't rush out & buy this thinking it is a "how-to" book, as I think you will be disappointed in that regard, but it does offer a few tidbits to add to the databanks. The last 1/3 of the book is spent with various "Masters" relating primarily gobbledygook, but the first 2/3's are very quick, and not unenjoyable. Estimated disinfo quotient: unknown; just to weird to be rated.

Any questions on any of the volumes, please let me know and I will do my best to explain in better detail.

Cheers,

John
 
Laura said:
ScioAgapeOmnis said:
This might sound like a very silly question but how did you know the dog's name is Dusty (assuming that's the name)? I couldn't find any reference to that anywhere!
Quite simple. Because I know "JAR" and his dog! In fact, I believe that he was motivated to have a dog of that breed because he met our Sebastian who is also a Sheltie... my second. You don't want to get me started on Shelties... finest critters on the planet.
I remember seeing pics of Sebastian, and I find both dogs adorable - but I think that about all dogs so I guess it doesn't really count as a "compliment". Then again I'm not a fan of compliments! If they are honest then they're not compliments, they're just expression of an opinion, which can just as easily be "negative". But compliments, by definition, are dishonest and manipulative - they exist to either boost someone's own illusions about themselves, or to make someone like the person who's making the compliment, osit. They are only useful for the ego. If you value the ego, then you have a reason to say thanks. But if you don't, then why say thanks? If someone came up to you and said "you look so pretty today!", and you don't care about outer appearances, then by saying thanks you are basically lying to them and telling them that you do care! More than that, you're also telling them that you don't care about objectivity, and you don't care about their honest opinion you just want them to say what your ego wants to hear, that you enjoy compliments BECAUSE they are compliments, not for any actual objective value. You sure would be telling them a lot!

That's why compliments make me rather uncomfortable, because although I say thanks, I feel awkward doing so, because of what it implies. If I don't say thanks, it's considered "rude" and it bothers people, and it's very hard to get along and be on "good terms" with people if you constantly do such "rude" or other "anti-social" things. Speaking of "rude", what IS that!? That's another one of those strange words that always bugged me. Just like ethics and morals. If people don't like something about you but can't think of anything else to blame you for, they always pull out "rude" or "unethical" or something along those lines. Those words seem to be defined on the fly, but boy they sure carry a lot of weight in many people's minds, even if they carry no actual meaning along with that weight.

A synonym for "rude" is "discourteous"
"Courteous" is defined as: "Characterized by gracious consideration toward others."
So rude means to be "ungracious" and "inconsiderate" of others.
"Gracious" means: "Of a merciful or compassionate nature."
Compassion means: "Deep awareness of the suffering of another coupled with the wish to relieve it."

I thought it was interesting how they use one subjective word to define another and this can go on for a long time before you arrive at anything useful. Well this last definition at least gives me some idea of what might be going on here. It seems they're talking about empathy. So in my example if I don't say thanks, I'm being rude, and somehow that amounts to not having empathy. But I also understand that empathy alone can do a lot more harm than good (to both, self and others) if it is not coupled with knowledge. From Laura's and from Lobaczewski's work, I learned that psychopaths use our own sympathy towards them to hook us and blind us from seeing them as they are. Our governments do that on a macro scale. They recognize each other in a crowd because they lack this blind spot, since they lack empathy, and empathy tends to make us blind to the possibility that some people might not have any empathy at all.

So exactly how does anyone "suffer" if I do not thank them for their compliment? It seems a lot of people certainly get upset. Well STS beings get upset for only 2 reasons. Either they wanted something and did not get it, or they had something that they were deprived of. By not saying thanks, I don't think I deprived them of anything they already had. But it seems I did not GIVE them something that they so obviously expected in return for their "compliment". If they expected no return, they'd not get upset if they didn't receive something, osit. So what did they expect in return, and which part of them expected it and why? Well it seems that they wanted me to make their ego feel good for making my ego feel good. I mean that in the sense of saying thanks for a "compliment", not just for saying thanks to anything. I could be wrong though, it's just what comes to mind as the only reason for expecting the thanks - ego, self-importance. So then I'd have to sympathize with their self-importance, and if I do not, I'm rude? It seems that way, but I might be wrong of course. But if I'm right, then doesn't it mean that this is just another example of malicious "twisting" of definitions, where if you do not sympathize with someone's ego and self-importance, you're then "rude" and a "bad person"? Might this also be a consequence of the pathocracy?

Then why do I say thanks for compliments? Internal considering? Fear of being disliked or labeled anti-social or rude? Well when it happens at work, then yes I can say that I don't wanna be fired. But what about everywhere else? Maybe I'm just lazy, I don't want to bother having to "deal" with this issue every time some compliment comes along, so I take the "shortcut" and say thanks, which is just the easy and non-consequential way out? Maybe all of the above to an extent? Hmm..

Oh and I don't mean to imply that there is anything wrong with saying thanks. But it seems that because of a certain "twisting" of concepts, we're supposed to be thankful for everything, even if it originates from ego, selfishness, judgement, etc. You know if someone tries to force you to comply with what they want, and you refuse, sometimes they have the manipulative audacity to say, "You're so ungrateful!". That's what I mean.

All thoughts are welcome.
 
That's why compliments make me rather uncomfortable, because although I say thanks, I feel awkward doing so, because of what it implies. If I don't say thanks, it's considered "rude" and it bothers people, and it's very hard to get along and be on "good terms" with people if you constantly do such "rude" or other "anti-social" things. Speaking of "rude", what IS that!? That's another one of those strange words that always bugged me. Just like ethics and morals. If people don't like something about you but can't think of anything else to blame you for, they always pull out "rude" or "unethical" or something along those lines. Those words seem to be defined on the fly, but boy they sure carry a lot of weight in many people's minds, even if they carry no actual meaning along with that weight.
Hey, agree with you on this one. :)
For me, compliment always created uneasy feeling. Like probing the Ego.
In fact, when you give someone else a compliment, you just give yourself another gratification for you choice (in clothes, books, movies or way of life). Or getting false confirmation (he made the same decision or choice, so it's makes ME better, because I chose the same).

Another interesting aspect of "compliment" is gift recieving. I read elswhere that true warrior should never give when he is not asked for (or using the Work concepts - without sincere request). There are several reasons - unpredicted ramifications or ignoring someone elses free will.
BUT, if you choose to give, don't espect anything in return. In fact - better they will not give you one.
The perfect opportunity to exercise non-anticipation.

Personaly, I don't like gifts. Because, there are no such thing as free lunches or free gifts. :) For the attention you recieved, you forced to pay with YOUR attention or gratification of the giver. And if you won't do it - the giver will feel that you are rude and not appriciative enough of his kind character. This is clearly another manipulation, and in some cases, even vampiric attempts to get energy. Because you are forced to give away energy, by thanking the giver, by paying attention.
And frankly, most of the times it's makes me annoyed. The only exception I make, is in closest and private environment, and even then - this is not required, because the only gift you want to recieve - is not of material nature.

In my opinion, on the main traps that such "energy leaking" gifting creates, is our own thinking mode, that we "own" them something in return. So, when you recieve such "gift" you should indeed thank the giver (just to neutralize this vector of possible attack) but clearly know in your mind, that you don't have to give them anything in return.
Not attention and not any other gift. Your behavior shouldn't be any different toward this giver unless it's possible to make a gentle distance. Because if it's indeed vampiric - he will try to grab your attention once more.
Most of the people not at all conscious about it. They just feel a need for another portion of "ego" petting drug :)

Then why do I say thanks for compliments? Internal considering? Fear of being disliked or labeled anti-social or rude? Well when it happens at work, then yes I can say that I don't wanna be fired. But what about everywhere else? Maybe I'm just lazy, I don't want to bother having to "deal" with this issue every time some compliment comes along, so I take the "shortcut" and say thanks, which is just the easy and non-consequential way out? Maybe all of the above to an extent? Hmm..
Well, in my opinion, this is complicated issue. What is more important? To be true with yourself and toward the outside world all the time? Or to try to blend in the environment, in order to become somehow "transparent" in the eyes of the System, and be able to grow and develop without unnessesary interaptions? The trick that works for me today (it's wasn't always this way. One I learned to deal using only first approach), is a mix of both approaches. But it's also has it's price.
After you learn to see, what is really going on. To see the true intentions and wants of the people, very difficult to remain their "so called friend" or even have a simple conversation. You realize that you are not interested anymore in conversations about "nothing", about something that doesn't help you to grow or learn something new. And gradualy, you are becoming "not interesting" in the eyes of the people. Or to be exact - different, in the eyes of the System. And if you overcomed the initial shockes, when the System was regecting you, like growth or anomaly and trying to return you to your "right place", then you will have to deal with your choice. To live in sleepy world with your eyes wide open. And this is not simple at all.

Maybe that's why Gurdgieff said, that to tell truth all the time is a sign of weakness. When you see the true nature of something, very difficult to be silence and just to return a smile or tell "thanks", because what you really want to say, is "You are a liar!!!" And, in my opinion, to learn a way of STO, it's doesn't mean you have to confront everyone everytime. Choose your battles wisely. If you will create a needless conflict at work for example, you just will fall into hands of the System. Will open a vector of lot of possible attacks and energy drains. Sometimes, simple smile or "thanks" closes it. Let them be at their ignorance, because they are not looking for the truth. Somehow it's also honering their free will.
 
Hi all ,

I am currently going through a Carlos Castenada faze. I am currently on The Eagle’s Gift (last Chapter) and am about to start on The Fire from Within. It took me a while to really grasp the ideas put forward by C.C. in The Eagle’s Gift about the first second and third attention. But it is a great book and I am looking forward to reading the others.
Another book that I recently began is The Ultimate Truth of 9.11 by LKJ, which pretty much speaks for its self.
Last but not least, I love reading a little bit of fiction aside from the esoteric. It is sort of my ‘entertainment’. The recent book I finished is Imperial Earth By Arthur C. Clarke. It is a very good Sci-fi… if you like stories about clones….
Thanks for sharing all the good titles.
Nina
 
knowledge_of_self said:
Hi all ,

I am currently going through a Carlos Castenada faze. I am currently on The Eagle’s Gift (last Chapter) and am about to start on The Fire from Within. It took me a while to really grasp the ideas put forward by C.C. in The Eagle’s Gift about the first second and third attention. But it is a great book and I am looking forward to reading the others.

Thanks for sharing all the good titles.
Nina
Hi Nina, there is an online site that has posted the text from Castaneda's writings, and mp3's of the same content:

http://www.prismagems.com/castaneda/

It does not contain everything from each book, but attempts to include the most important topics. My personal favorite book of his is Active Side of Infinity, if you haven't read it yet put that one on your list. Kinda ties everything together. Enjoy :D
 
Hi Beau and all.

Thanks for the link; I’ll check it out for sure!
I haven’t read the Active Side of Infinity. But from what I understand that is his last book, and I am reading his books from first – last. I have to admit, the premises for the books has definitely changed. For the fact that the first and second book were mostly about hallucinogenic drugs and their affects, while the later books deal with more esoteric topics. Although, after reading back to the first two books, you can see in some places how Don Juan is telling Castaneda certain things that he totally over-looks until the later books. All in all I really resonate to Castaneda, and am planning to read all his books and also a book called, “I Was Carlos Castaneda : The Afterlife Dialogues”. By Martin Goodman.

Here is a link to Amazon where they also have a synopsis of the book…

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0609807633/sr=1-41/qid=1138830356/ref=sr_1_41/103-8786826-7127029?%5Fencoding=UTF8

[…] Carlos Castaneda comes back from the dead in a true-life spiritual adventure story set in the French Pyrenees, Machu Picchu, the Peruvian Amazon, and the American Southwest.

Four months after his death, the world-renowned writer, anthropologist, and mystic Carlos Castaneda turns up in the French Pyrenees. He meets with writer Martin Goodman. His purpose? To lead Martin beyond the fear of death and the confusions of mortality, and to offer a clearer understanding of the ultimate wisdom -- the wisdom to live the rest of our days in full and conscious harmony with the living earth.

Martin Goodman is a gifted storyteller who has infused “I Was Carlos Castaneda” with literary verve and humor. When, at their first encounter, an incredulous Goodman confronts Castaneda with reports of his recent death, Castaneda replies wryly, “Details. . . mere details.” And so the story begins. […]

I was wondering if anyone has read this book. It is interesting that Marin Goodman claims that C.C. “turns up” in the French Pyrenees, sounds to be quite interesting indeed.
Any thoughts?
Nina
 
Just finished "The Secret History of the World" and "The Wave I" by LKJ which were wonderful!

Next I have the following sitting on my desk ready to start:

"The Fourth Way" - Ouspensky
"States of Denial" - Cohen
"UFO's and the National Securty State" - Dolan
"Bringer's of the Dawn" - Marciniak
"The Sociopath Next Door" - Stout
 
knowledge_of_self said:
Hi Beau and all.

Thanks for the link; I’ll check it out for sure!
I haven’t read the Active Side of Infinity. But from what I understand that is his last book, and I am reading his books from first – last. I have to admit, the premises for the books has definitely changed. For the fact that the first and second book were mostly about hallucinogenic drugs and their affects, while the later books deal with more esoteric topics. Although, after reading back to the first two books, you can see in some places how Don Juan is telling Castaneda certain things that he totally over-looks until the later books. All in all I really resonate to Castaneda, and am planning to read all his books and also a book called, “I Was Carlos Castaneda : The Afterlife Dialogues”. By Martin Goodman.

Here is a link to Amazon where they also have a synopsis of the book…

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0609807633/sr=1-41/qid=1138830356/ref=sr_1_41/103-8786826-7127029?%5Fencoding=UTF8

[…] Carlos Castaneda comes back from the dead in a true-life spiritual adventure story set in the French Pyrenees, Machu Picchu, the Peruvian Amazon, and the American Southwest.

Four months after his death, the world-renowned writer, anthropologist, and mystic Carlos Castaneda turns up in the French Pyrenees. He meets with writer Martin Goodman. His purpose? To lead Martin beyond the fear of death and the confusions of mortality, and to offer a clearer understanding of the ultimate wisdom -- the wisdom to live the rest of our days in full and conscious harmony with the living earth.

Martin Goodman is a gifted storyteller who has infused “I Was Carlos Castaneda” with literary verve and humor. When, at their first encounter, an incredulous Goodman confronts Castaneda with reports of his recent death, Castaneda replies wryly, “Details. . . mere details.” And so the story begins. […]

I was wondering if anyone has read this book. It is interesting that Marin Goodman claims that C.C. “turns up” in the French Pyrenees, sounds to be quite interesting indeed.
Any thoughts?
Nina
Hi Nina. I read the book but it was like eating a bun with the hamburger missing! Where's the beef? It was interesting that Goodman claims he met a 'reconstituted' Castaneda (I think that's the way Goodman put it) in the French Pyrenees four months after Castaneda's death but Goodman's writing style was so vague that I gave up reading it! He would very briefly talk about his conversations with Castaneda (assuming it was not a fantasy) and then he would suddenly shift in focus and start talking about the "la-de-da" poetic scenery around him such as the lilies and daffodils (figuratively speaking of course). I didn't want to hear about his in depth descriptions of the 'lilies and daffodils,' I wanted to hear about his conversation with Castaneda! It was a frustrating read to say the least. Here's an example of how he writes:

http://www.martingoodman.com/recoveringcastaneda.htm

Recovering from Castaneda
Part 1 of a sequel by Martin J. Goodman


A year passes. Too much is impending in 1999 to worry about Castaneda. It's a crazy summer. Milan floods. Storms rage on to wipe out the Bahamas, wallop Florida, shut down New York. The mainland of Turkey crumbles into an earthquake, while a tidal wave sweeps across a coastal town whose harbour front drops beneath the sea. Then the earthquake heads west to march on Athens. Kosovo sheds tears, plots revenge, shakes off the dirt and wonders how to live again. Adults and children dance in the streets of East Timor to celebrate their independence, then flee into the mountains so as not to be butchered.

It has become a small world. Global consciousness is setting in. Horrors that would once have happened out of sight now come into our rooms to shock us. It gets to take more effort to seal myself away and pretend to be safe.

I pull the plug on the website I've been editing, pick up pen and paper instead of my laptop, and head back to my village in France.

***

Progress has snaked through the village. The road is widened. The place we stood when I first met Castaneda, a roadside where poppies used to glow in spring, is now asphalt. It's no longer so simple to stand in company of the crucified Christ, as we did then. The pedestal of his cross is now a joint between a railing and a wall. He's received fresh coats of paint too, as part of the improvements. Even the hairs of his armpits are delicately marked in brown, and his whole body shines beneath varnish.

It is changes like this that bring Carlos most to mind. For all of his teachings about the flexible nature of time, my memories of the landscape have been set to the day of his visit. I note how brambles now hang over a path that was clear then. How weeds have massed in a garden that last year was tidy. Regional subsidies were given to strip vines from vineyards and replace them with fruit trees. I note how these trees have suddenly swollen and spread into mature orchards.

My favourite tree, a young poplar just below my house in which a nightingale used to sing through the night, has been chopped down and lies in the river. The frog whose night-time calls were like beeps of a radio transmitter, so I joked that the French Resistance were still in the hills tapping out messages, is now silent.

The year seems one of loss more than of gain. The ease I once felt walking through the valley is now touched by fear.

Wonder transmuted into fear once before in my life. Working in Saudi Arabia, on an oil refinery in Yanbu, every free afternoon I drove out to the Red Sea. Snorkelling above the coral beds was the most exotic experience of my life. It was like being vast and hovering over your personal Grand Canyon, swarming with brilliant alien species of tropical fish.

There comes a point when the coral bed reaches a shelf, and you are looking over a cliff deep into the blue. I swam out into that space, and found I was not alone. A shark somewhat longer than myself was swimming with me. I turned, swam a breaststroke so as not to disturb the water and so attract the shark's attention, heading for the shallows. My head passed over the coral bed, then my torso, my legs. The shark could no longer reach beneath me and turn its head to bite. Now I felt free to splash, swimming as fast as I could for the shore.

I didn't snorkel the area again. The wonders I had seen remained with me, but I now understood how my pleasure was also ignorance. Stone fish dwelt in the sand, as dull and static as their name suggests, but step on one and there is no known antidote to their poison. Some of the most vivid pink coral is fire coral, one scratch from which inflames a limb. For a long while I floated in astonishment and looked in the face of a lion fish, a quivering ball of orange and white quills, never guessing how deadly those quills were.

The shark in the ocean was a wake up call.

What the shark did for the Red Sea, Carlos Castaneda seems to have done for the valley around my French home. He has turned it inside out in some way, so nothing is quite what it seems.

Deadliness flourishes. On one walk the only mushroom I see, more than a foot high, is the amanita mascaria that could see me in agonies with one nibble. The only creature, pinched thin and about eight inches long with a broad head, is an asp.

But it is not the obvious dangers that get to me most. I walk, and bursting out from the undergrowth ahead of me comes a golden swallowtail butterfly. Step further on, and a smaller butterfly of pure white rushes into the air. They are startled like birds can be startled. Their flight is not the meander of butterflies but a direct, zooming flight. The river is a corridor for butterflies, who stream by the side of most of my walks. In other years I've simply thought them pretty. Now they disturb me, pairs of them skittering in frenzies of mating.

I used to like the valley for its solitude. Now there's no such thing as solitude. It's not just the butterflies. These mountains are swarming with different forms of consciousness, nature busting its guts to make the most of the warm months.

I left Castaneda sitting in a cave in these hills. In a game I never really got the hang of he granted me ten questions, and I still have one left. I don't trust his word. I don't trust that he will reappear for my question as he promised. But if he does I think I know the question I will ask.

Why?

Why did you come and turn my world inside out, and then abandon me?

***

I watch a red squirrel leap across the river and frolic down the lane. It's just beyond the height of summer and the river is low. A rock juts out of the centre of its stream, coated white with minerals, and shortly after nine each morning a turtle climbs aboard. For several hours it sits there, soaking in the sunshine, before swimming off into the afternoon.

The magic of the Pyrenees is working for me again. It starts by shifting my attention from niggling concerns toward details in the landscape. The butterflies are one example, but after a time my attention becomes less obsessive. I step back from looking for irritants in my life and take in a broader view. The everpresent sound of the river's running waters suddenly surprises me and I take the time to appreciate it, so that the sound flows through and cleanses me somehow. I go cycling after a brief shower of rain, crest a hill, and freewheel through the most fragrant air I have ever tasted. Rain has moistened and released the scents of wild thyme, sage and rosemary, and now the sun warms the breeze that collects the perfume. I note the passing shadow of cloud as it undulates over a rock face, the passage of wind gusting through trees along the valley floor. At night I rise from my bed, walk out along the asphalt road, and lie on my back. The road, which receives as many bicycles as cars, still holds the heat of the day. Cool air passes over my face as I stare up into the sky, which offers a view clear through the blackness to the canopy of stars.

Nature accepts you as its own in such a place. Or perhaps it simply gives you space to accept the nature in yourself.

This valley is where I learned not to write.

It's hard to emerge from a writing day and blink out at a world that has continued in your absence. Hard to narrow your focus on the practicalities of staying alive, the niceties of society. Too many masterpieces of world literature have been wrung from miserable lives. As I developed my writing, my success in the world crumbled away. Those hours of writing were my refuge, where life was as sublime and various as I imagined it to be. Life in the streets was not like that. I would go out and I would stumble.

Here in the valley, life is as sublime and various as in my writing imagination. There is no chasm between them. The experience helps in writing for a public, because the public is no longer in a world apart. I can sit and write, but more importantly I can sit and not write for day after day and still be in the same space. I learned how to write, then I learned how to not write.

Castaneda compacted his lessons for me into twenty-four hours. He was a great teacher, but after weeks in this valley without him I come to see that he has left all his material behind. He wasn't a spider, drooling silken strands from his stomach. I don't think he was even a catalyst, conjuring things into being that couldn't have happened without him. He was more like a prism. I looked through him and saw the constant interweavings of the cosmos in many dimensions.

I sit in the valley and recall his teachings on the flexibility of time. This is a day of not writing, but it is a day when I am in that space that doesn't constrict possibilities. Time can expand. It can collect what is in the future and what was in the past so that they both settle in the present.

I begin to wonder if Carlos has made another appearance in my life, one I might have missed for some reason.

I turn around to have a look.

I am at a party. Nobody dances, they just talk and eat and drink. It is the previous Autumn, in Santa Fe. I am in an airy living room, open plan to the kitchen, smooth and rounded plastering to the walls, timber vigas spanning the ceiling, pinyon logs crackling in the kiva fireplace. It is a gathering of scientists and writers. The food and drink is ample, the conversation good. I can see that Carlos would like it here.

I look around. He is nowhere to be seen.

It is hopeless. I come to see that replaying a scene doesn't alter it. If he wasn't there he wasn't there. Wishful thinking won't change it.

Back in my mental rerun of the evening I turn to pick up a bottle and pour some white wine into the glass of my friend. The party is continuing, replaying itself, from the moment at which I re-entered it.

"Have you begun your book yet?" my friend asks. "Your book of the summer? When you met Castaneda?"

My friend is a best-selling writer, but more than that she is someone who has taken direct experience of ancient shamanic practices, most especially in her native Siberia, and brought them into her work as a psychiatric doctor. I trust her intuition, and have welcomed her encouragement.

"Not yet," I admit. "Just my notes. I think I will though."

We have already discussed the difficult choices of what stories to keep private and what to release. The choice isn't one of secrecy. Sometimes it is about respecting the privacy of people or of places. Generally it is understanding that some encounters shape the course of your own life, and once that has been effected their purpose is at an end. Other encounters reach beyond your own life. It's the difference between being given a direction on a street corner when you are lost, and being given a map. The street corner direction has reference to where you yourself are at a certain moment. It has a personal resonance. The map also helps you, though maybe no better than a spoken direction might have done. Beyond the help it gives to you it has a universal resonance. You recognize it as something to be passed on, for the use of others who enter the same territory.

"You must write that book," my friend insists. This is no earnest instruction. She is in party mood. She bounces on her stool in enthusiasm, her blonde hair catching the light, her blue eyes shining. "If you don't do it someone else will, and your book is the one we must have. Did I tell you of my meeting with Castaneda?"

"Recently?"

"Yes. Like you. After he died. Only mine was not like yours. It was in a dream. And he was dancing."

"You're sure it was Castaneda?"

"Oh yes. He was very clear. And what a dancer he is. Very extravagant. I kept my distance from him."

"Did you speak?"

"We did. But not in words. I just remember him looking at me, and then some message was lodged in my head. He was telling me to watch him and see how he was not dancing alone. He was dancing with his sexuality. It is important to keep a proper relationship with your sexuality, he says. That's all. Perhaps when you see him again, you can ask him to clarify this!"

She is playing with me, but as she sips from her glass her eyes look into mine.

"It is a funny thing," she says. "It is not exact. It is not identical twins. But when I look at you I see him. You and Castaneda have the same face."

***

This isn't the solution to my quest. I don't rush to a mirror to find Carlos Castaneda staring back at me. I never even think of doing that. Whatever Carlos was, and the nature of someone who makes a bracing appearance some months after his painful death bears looking into, he wasn't and isn't me. I understand in some ultimate way that we are one another, that there is no separation between things. I also know that a finger and a foot can both be part of the same body, but a finger isn't a foot. Carlos and myself are not the same person, whatever the wash of similarity that passes over us.

However I have set myself open. Recollection is taking me where it will. I know there is some clue in my friend's conversation at the party, and understand that I am on the track of something.

The party has continued when my memory comes back to it. Some people, including my friend, have left. A few of us are gathered around our host and hostess. Conversation has turned to a trip they have been planning to make for some years. It needs six people to travel together. Suddenly six of us are chosen, a date is set, and our hostess promises to make the booking.

When I phone to thank her for the party the following day, she lets me know how much I owe her. The booking is made, and has to be paid in full upfront. She is excited, because our favoured date at the end of July is available. It is right in the middle of the storm season. The six of us will travel southwest, toward the New Mexican border with Arizona, and spend twenty-four hours in a vast art installation known as the Lightning Field.

Next > The Lightning Field - part 2 of the sequel
 
[...] Hi Nina. I read the book but it was like eating a bun with the hamburger missing! Where's the beef? It was interesting that Goodman claims he met a 'reconstituted' Castaneda (I think that's the way Goodman put it) in the French Pyrenees four months after Castaneda's death but Goodman's writing style was so vague that I gave up reading it! He would very briefly talk about his conversations with Castaneda (assuming it was not a fantasy) and then he would suddenly shift in focus and start talking about the "la-de-da" poetic scenery around him such as the lilies and daffodils (figuratively speaking of course). I didn't want to hear about his in depth descriptions of the 'lilies and daffodils,' I wanted to hear about his conversation with Castaneda! It was a frustrating read to say the least. Here's an example of how he writes:[...]

Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to response. I see what you mean by the bun with the hamburger missing. He is definitely VERY visual in his writing. It’s almost as if he is trying to fill the page with this-and that… instead of writing about what he is supposed to write about. Still… if anyone else has any other thoughts to add please feel welcome.
Nina
 
reading Java now, so i had to put off reading all that Gurdjieff/Ibn Arabi stuff for a while:(, but they're next on my list among others...
 
I just finished

"The True Identity of Fulcanelli and The Da Vinci Code"

by our much loved Laura when I visited my father, telling him about it.
'Coincidentally' he just read another book on the 'true Da Vinci Code' which title unfortunatley escapes me right now. Anyway that book referred to some approximately 1,800 year old Koptic texts/scrawls which where discovered only in 1945.
After some shuffling around they ended up with the C.G. Jung Institute which had it on it's shelfs for some more years and finally published it in 1956 at which time my old man purchased them/it (the book).
After moving house several times the book sat in a 'second' row in his library out of sight for years only to resurfaced again just a few weeks ago.
When we talked about Da Vinci he pulled it out and said: "Here, why don't you take it with you!"

Wow!

EVANGELIUM VERITAS
The Gospel of Truth
Rascher Verlag Zurich 1956
Studien aus dem C.G. Jung Institute VI

Apart from the photocopies of the original Koptic scrolls it features translations in French, German and English.

Apparently the scrolls are copies from older text of words which came from Jesus mouth directly - well!? Suppressed by the Church the nature of the gospel is really gnostic and to my absolute delight corroborates the principles of the teaching of this very website!

Once I am done reading I shall transcribe (unless somebody finds it online!!! - I didn't) section's or all and make it available here.

If anybody in fact does know where to find the EVANGELIUM VERITAS, The Gospel of Truth online (not long ca. 20 pages) please share it!!!
 
This is not exactly what you were seeking, but is perhaps interesting nonetheless:

Alvin Boyd Kuhn said:
Another challenging reference comes to us from Irenaeus. According

29

to him (b. i, ch. xx, i) the Marcosian and Valentinian Gnostics were in possession of many Gospels. He says, "their number is infinite," and amongst those apocryphal works was one entitled The Gospel of Truth (Evangelium Veritas). This scripture, he says, "agrees in nothing with the gospels of the apostles." (Irenaeus, b. iii, ch. xi, 9.) Gerald Massey comments by saying that this gospel is probably the one referred to by Tertullian, who says the Valentinians were in possession of "their own gospel in addition to ours." (Tertullian, De Praescrip. 49.)

And Massey has presented a point of the greatest import which, carrying danger with it, has of course been discounted by orthodox scholarship. It is dangerous because it hints forcefully at the ancient Egyptian origin of all "gospels." Here was the most learned and intelligent element in early Christianity, the Gnostics, in possession of a Gospel on which they staked their very high position, called the Gospel of Truth. If it came from Egypt, the original word for "truth" would have been Maat, the goddess of truth, often written Maatiu. Massey steadily affirms that this is the original form of "Matthew." All the slurs and slights which he has received from orthodoxy may not be able to prove him wrong.
http://members.tripod.com/pc93/shadow.htm

There are mirrors of this same document out there, which muddies the search for the text itself. Hope it helps, at least a little...

Cheers,

John
 
Here is one: http://www.webcom.com/~gnosis/naghamm/got.html

Is yours a different translation?

Fifth Way said:
If anybody in fact does know where to find the EVANGELIUM VERITAS, The Gospel of Truth online (not long ca. 20 pages) please share it!!!
 
DonaldJHunt said:
Is yours a different translation?
This is it!
I love this forum!
Thanks Donald.
My translation is slightly different probably more 'word by word' but therefore it doesn't read as well as the one you found. Mine is also printed in verse form like a poem which made it look so much longer.

This is great! I hope others enjoy the reading as much as I do. And Donald: You saved me a lot of time typing.

Peace Alexander
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom