anart said:
And your positing that this is acceptable? It's just the way it is so why is it a problem?
Of course not!
It was more the realization that most people (incl. me) are unconscious. From this realization, hopefully, comes the will to change.
anart said:
I sincerely doubt 'G' would waste time commenting on it all - though he might call it 'merde' -
as well as calling the idea of it all 'being the same', all 'the way it is' - 'merde' as well.
I would usually differentiate. Maybe my faulty preliminary understanding from reading ISOTM suggested the assumption that,
since most people are asleep, their various occupations, interests and ambitions are "all the same" that is, they lead to nothing.
IF I understand you correctly, I agree there are general (?) or even fundamental (?) differences between various ambitions,
esp. regarding how much nonrenewable energy is being used up (wasted) on those occupations (even if they don`t lead to an awakening process).
Puhh, am I confusing things here? I think I am.
I also wondered if the fact, that a lot of people own huge houses, spending lots of energy on it and their swimming pools, own several
big cars and who complain that they can slum in some southsea paradise only twice a year is not actually more extreme than this
guy`s single stunt, esp. since the former is considered normal.
anart said:
Why would this distinction, or lack of, matter in this case?
I doesn`t matter. That`s what I wanted to say (regard. Deckard`s post), but obviously my post just helped to confuse things.
I`m sorry for being obtuse. There are so many questions I have about The 4th Way, but I rather continue to find more answers in
the recommended books before posting questions prematurely!