Just started reading David Stove's "Darwinian Fairytales". Excellent so far! The author believes in Darwinian evolution, so we need to keep this in mind, but his focus is more philosophical and he brings a major piece to the puzzle that we haven't talked about a lot yet I think: namely the incredibly (!!) pathological thinking in Darwinism then and now!
For starters,
Darwinism is THE ultimate schizoidal declaration! Men are mere animals, engaged in a ruthless fight for survival and producing offspring! And Stove points his finger to something that should be obvious and that is also supported by the Cs' cosmology: namely that there is a massive distinction to be made between humans and animals - we live in different worlds (or densities)! But as always with the materialist swines, they want to drag us all to their level of pigs. And they commit fallacy after fallacy in doing so, making up all these incoherent claims about human nature and history that the author delightfully brings to light.
Some preliminary thoughts: Darwinists, including those in evolutionary psychology, always come up with these stories about why even though it doesn't
seem that way at all, life can totally be reduced to a materialist struggle for survival. Nobility, altruism, consciousness and so on only
seem to paint a different picture, but at the end of the day, it all serves survival, full stop. What a dim view of the world. It - again! - does completely away with anything higher, any true spiritual striving. As if consciousness didn't exist. As if good and evil didn't exist!
Now, the traditional, religious view strikes me as far more accurate and sensible. There are two distinct elements there:
First, the struggle between our base, animal nature and our higher nature (the flesh vs. the spirit). This seems to provide a far better perspective to analyze what happened historically and what happens now. Of course, our animal nature plays a big role, and it's important to study it as "the machine". But we are not animals! The history of humanity is also a history of the fight between the flesh and the spirit in each individual, playing out and producing certain results in a myriad of ways. We
can be better than our animal nature or "flesh", and indeed often are (and perhaps were more so in the past), despite all the efforts to drag us down.
Perhaps equally important, instead of just eliminating our higher impulses from the equation, a more conclusive view would be to also regard human shortcomings as a
distortion of our spirituality, a
distortion of our higher impulses! Which brings us to
Second, the idea of a "fall", or "original sin". This of course is also in line with what the Cs said, namely that by a conscious choice, humanity got entangled with STS and offered the "evil forces" a way to manipulate our consciousness, to
divert and distort our spiritual force.
What seems to have happened is this: by our "fall", we allowed someone to tinker with our DNA/biology, creating a "backdoor" as it were (the Cs mentioned jealousy for example as the result of such tinkering). Through this backdoor, the higher evil guys can "hack us", using the media, pathological ideas, false flags etc. - think of Martha Stout's "paranoia switch" and countless other examples.
To give an example of how this framework makes more sense than the crazy and illogical Darwinian story: It is often claimed by evolutionary psychologists (such as Bret Weinstein of IDW fame) that we "evolved" tribal behavior, which now stands in the way in a globalized society, and that we need to overcome this. First thing to point out is that he seems to commit what David Stove calls the "Caveman Fallacy": either we really are determined by pure Darwinism and therefore can't change; or we can overcome Darwinian impulses using consciousness, but then there's no reason at all to believe that people in the distant past couldn't
also have used their consciousness to decide stuff, against Darwinian impulses, thus screwing the whole Darwinian narrative of a dog-eat-dog world of natural selection. Darwinians seem to make the mistake of considering past humans as mere animals (sic), primitive cave men without consciousness living in a Darwinian jungle. And since their thinking is so rooted in biological evolution via random mutations/natural selection, it's easy to see why they can't recognize the "quantum leap" between animals and humans. But humans were not animals then as they are not animals now.
So here's a different version of the story: What if practical considerations and survival are just
one factor to explain tribalism? What if our ancestors valued spiritual community, being among friends and forming deep relationships, higher goals and so on just as much as we do? What if indeed such values can be
stronger than the survival instinct? Wouldn't many people prefer to die relatively young among their brothers and sisters in a fulfilled spiritual community, striving towards nobility and higher values, than surviving until old age alone in the Darwinian jungle?
Following that line of thought, today's tribalism is not
only, and maybe not even primarily, based on a simple drive for survival. It's also the soul's longing for community, for higher values, for spiritual striving and meaning. But this impetus was hacked by STS forces, so that people fall like flies to pseudo-communities such as "the left", "the right", various ideologies and so on.
It's not merely our "animal nature" but a distortion of spiritual expression, a distortion of our souls - a redirection of our spiritual energy, using their "hacking", which produces negative energy.
So it seems to me that it's important to study our machine as the product of biological tinkering and mind-hacking, but that many of the far-fledged evolutionary "fairy tales" and "explanations" are not that helpful and distort our view of history. Rather, we should take Collingwood seriously and try to put ourselves in the shoes of our ancestors as best we can instead of embracing the deeply pathological, materialistic view of Darwinism that considers men to be mere animals, or even worse.
In other words, the history of humanity is not characterized by Darwinian evolution, but a spiritual "fall" and the subsequent "upper hand" of evil in the eternal struggle between good and evil in our hearts. It's a struggle at the 3D level,
not the 2D level!
So to sum up, it seems the Cs' teachings are spot-on and the process looks something like this:
- Observe reality left and right so that you learn to recognize the ongoing "hacking job" both on the mind and on the body
- Strive towards overcoming "the flesh" via conscious suffering: feel the pain that is produced by seeing and getting rid of the "hacks", realizing your illusions and malicious bodily programming
- This new painful awareness in tandem with painfully struggling to stop the expression of the "malware" leads to DNA changes
- These DNA changes in turn "tune" you to an even better awareness to create a feedback loop between awareness and DNA changes (the Cs said our DNA acts like an "antenna" for the information field)
- Once this feedback loop reaches critical mass, a tipping point might be crossed and off we fly into the next "evolutionary" phase, having fought our way out of "the fall"!
Anyway, even though I'm at the very beginning of the book, I wanted to share these thoughts. I'm looking forward to continuing reading it!