New animation from WEHI showing a whole bunch of molecular machines and cellular processes:
But beyond the character of his own subject, which is made up out of these mere appearances, he necessarily assumes something else underlying it, namely his I as it is in itself. Thus in respect to mere perception and receptivity to sensations he must count himself as belonging to the sensible world; but in respect to whatever pure activity there may be in himself (which reaches his consciousness directly and not by affecting the·inner or outer·senses) he must count himself as belonging to the intellectual world—though he doesn’t know anything more about it.
A thoughtful person must come to some such conclusion as this about all the things that present themselves to him. Even someone with a very ordinary mind is likely to have this thought, because we know that such people are strongly inclined to expect something invisibly active at work behind the objects of the senses; but they don’t learn anything from this because they soon spoil it by trying to make the ‘invisible something’ perceptible, i.e. to make it an object of intuition.·They do this by wondering ‘What is it like, this unknown something that lurks behind the appearances of things?’, when their only concept of what a thing can be like is made from the concept of how things appear to them.
Good question, thanks luc for your post !Could it be that we are causing this transformation? But that at the same time, our planet undergoes this transformation naturally?
What's been on my mind lately and what I want to further explore is this: the Cs said that the difference between 3D and 4D is simply awareness. Now the question is: how can we get there?
What could 4D awareness mean? The problem is that it's pretty useless to "imagine" some 4D world based on 3D understanding. It's also the problem of much of the channelled material - we imagine all kinds of weird beings with weird powers, but since our awareness is still limited, it just confuses us and leads to wrong conclusions.
Kant already saw this problem when he wrote in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals:
So we need to go beyond "how things appear to us" - but how? There is no simple or easy way it seems, only lots of pieces to the puzzle...
One may be this: Popper has a theory of "three worlds". The first world is the physical world. The second world is the world of experience - which includes 2D/animals. The third world is exclusively human: the world of the products of the mind. That is, speech, written language and so on.
The human mind develops collectively in a sort of feedback mechanism: we produce "products of the mind", and we take them in, which changes our minds, and therefore the products of our minds, and so on.
Now Popper has an interesting thought: the animal experience is severely limited, because it cannot distinguish between itself and its theories about the world. It has certain theories - if I do that, this will happen, I need to do this etc. - which are genetically determined, or in any event, the animal cannot question them. We humans, of course, can question our theories about the world, discuss them etc. (we are not identical to them), producing and reflecting "products of the mind"..
So, says Popper: what are the theories that WE as humans cannot escape? He believes what Kant called "a priori" truths could be such inescapable theories: time, causality and so on. He said that Kant has erred when he thought these concepts are "necessarily true" - Popper indeed believes these are genetically determined
Which of course leads to the question: if our concepts of time and causality, for example, are not necessarily true and genetically (or otherwise) determined, can these change? Does 4D awareness imply looking at the world without the perception of time and causality, for example? Or with a very different perception of these things - a removal of these "determined" filters? We cannot imagine how such a perception would be like.
Is it possible to change this "genetically determined" limited awareness? Animals don't seem to be able to go to the level of humans while still on earth; but 3D seems to be a special density where choices need to be made, and perhaps it IS possible to expand our awareness to 4D under certain circumstances.
How? And how does this relate to the STO/STS dynamic?
Here we report on a new paravian from the Cenomanian-Turonian (Late Cretaceous) of Río Negro province, NW Patagonia, Argentina. The new taxon exhibits a derived bird-like morphology of the forelimbs (e.g., robust ulna with prominent, anteriorly oriented, and proximally saddle-shaped radial cotyle and wide medial flange on metacarpal I) and a plesiomorphic foot with a raptorial pedal digit II.
Phylogenetic analysis recovers the new taxon in a monophyletic clade with Rahonavis, being the sister group of the remaining Avialae and more derived than other non-avian dinosaurs. Both exhibit derived forelimb traits in opposition with their plesiomorphic hind limbs. The position of the new taxon and Rahonavis as stem avialans indicates that Gondwanan basal paravians are represented by two different clades, at least. The new taxon probably constitutes a previously unknown grade in the avian-line theropods in which some flight-related adaptations of the forelimbs are present in cursorial taxa. The present discovery sheds light on the acquisition of flight-related traits in non-avian dinosaurs and on the still poorly known paravian radiation in Gondwana.
An interesting thing occurred to me today. It's about the 'is the coronavirus man-made' debate. Whether it's man-made is irrelevant here (although we kinda know it is).
The point is this: the belief that it's possible to tell whether a virus is man-made or not (which I haven't seen anybody dispute) is contrary to the belief in Darwinism.
If it's possible to tell a virus is man-made, it's by definition about detecting intelligent design. But if Darwinism is true, intelligent design can not be detected, because literally any life form could have evolved by random mutations and NS. Darwinists have gone far in denying even the slightest possibility that intelligent design could be detected in any life forms. Dembski and others have explained detecting intelligent design in great detail, and Darwinists did what they could to deny it all.
So people who have no problem with the idea of recognising a man-made virus but believe in Darwinian evolution are holding contradictory beliefs.
And there are plenty of such contradictions within the scientific community, most of which they're not even aware of.
This brings us back to Popper's World 3, the world of the "products of the mind". In a completely honest and open exchange of ideas, experiences etc., we can create a feedback loop among a group of minds, a resonance operating at a certain frequency, which could lead us "up" towards the truth. This is what we are trying to do here. Perhaps there is a certain "breaking point" in the process when our "hard-coded theories" (time, causality etc.) break down and we can move beyond them - our awareness changes, the Kantian "filters" are removed...
This would be the STO mode of ascension - we all collect and receive information, immediately "dispense" it, and attain an ever higher level as a group - everyone is acting as part of the "antenna array". Popper also says that teaching is crucial in the process, which fits this picture.
Now how does this fit into the idea of the Wave and our planet undergoing a transformation to 4D? Could it be that we are causing this transformation? But that at the same time, our planet undergoes this transformation naturally? This seems paradoxical to us, but maybe just because we still have these darn Kantian "filters" in place, these Popperian "hard-coded theories"...
Density means level of development as measured in terms of closeness to union with the one...Cycle.
A: "Passion" does not set one "free," quite the opposite!
Q: (L) But what if your passion is for knowledge?
A: That is not passion, it is soul questing.
Q: (L) What is it that gives some people this drive, this steamroller effect that they are determined to get to the absolute bottom of everything and strip away every lie until there is nothing left but the naked truth? What is the source of this desire?
A: Wrong concept. It is simply that one is at that point on the learning cycle. At that point, no drive is needed.
Q: (L) So, you more or less are there because some critical mass has been reached that 'jumps' you to the point where
seeking truth is simply who you are? It defines the parameters of your being. (MM) Are these learning cycles
similar to the layers... all over the earth, remember the red dust all over the earth?
Q: (L) Is it more like a 360 degree circle, and each person is a different point on the circle, and the whole thing cycles, and you never change relative to the people behind and in front of you, and the only real thing you can do to help anyone is to move the circle by moving yourself, thereby pushing the one ahead of you up, and pulling the one behind you into your previous place? And where you are on the cycle determines what you do?
A: It is a single cycle, yes. There is only one learning cycle, and where you are upon it, determines your
EXPERIENCES, and vice versa.
Q: (L) Is there ever any point where lines connect from one point on the cycle so that you can 'jump' from one point to
another? Like a wormhole in space or something?
A: Refer to facts 1 and 2 and 3.
Q: (L) So, no short cuts?
A: Now, refer to 3, 4 and 5.
Q: (L) So, certain events and circumstances could help a
person to make 'leaps?'
A: No "leap," acceleration.
You are all a duplicate of the universe within which you dwell. Your mind represents all that exists. It is "fun" to see how much you can access.
Q: (A) What?! A disc. Sometimes we ask them questions and we get answers to other questions... Last question: I am in a general state of desperation because there are so many things to learn, so many paths to follow, so many things to be investigated, so many theorems to prove, so many mathematical concepts that can be developed, and so many things beyond mathematics and physics that need to be investigated, crop circles, for instance, that I really don't know where to start. I don't want to go in a maze that goes nowhere... What to do?
A: When confronted with such a quandary, it is best to simply do, without prejudice, nor fear of error. Let the path create itself, in other words. And, on that note, good night.
Q: Okay, you said that memory is subjective and an atom is not. If memory is subjective, what you have just been describing means that each and every person has a slightly different perspective, even if they are involved with the same incident or the same time sequence.
A: Of course!
Q: But it also implies...
A: That is the treasury of learning.
Q: Who is the treasurer?
A: The learner.
Q: But still, what you said still implies that an atom has an
objective existence. Is this correct?
Q: Would you please tell us what constitutes objectivity?
A: The effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice "at the door."
Q: How does the effort on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door relate to the objective existence of an atom?
A: An atom, as with absolutely everything else, cannot exist without an observer.
Q: So, in the case of the objectivity of an atom, if the human observers are not objective, where is the observer who makes the atom objective, or does the atom not exist if there is no observer?
A: Yes. to the latter comment.
Q: Yes to which part?
A: The latter comment.
Q: So there must be an observer. Must the observer be human?
A: The observer must be a consciousness.
Q: If you say that an atom has an objective existence, yet it only exists if it is perceived by a consciousness, then an atom does not have an objective existence, correct?
Q: Okay, what is the distinction? You say that objectivity is the ATTEMPT on the part of the observer to leave prejudice at the door.
A: Without consciousness, there is neither objective or subjective!!
Q: So the crux is the attempt to leave prejudice at the door in the same manner as one would be non-anticipatory in order to create?
Q: Well, that is a VERY tricky... (A) Is consciousness objective?
A: Consciousness is objective, until it has the capacity to choose to be otherwise.
Q: What is the stimulus for the change, for the giving of the capacity to choose?
A: The introduction of prejudice.
Q: In a cosmic sense, cosmic consciousness, in the sense of The One Unified Consciousness, what is the stimulus there for the ability to choose?
A: When the journey has reached union with The One, all such lessons have been completed.
Q: But, that doesn't answer the question.
A: Yes, it does!
Q: (V) The next question - and I asked Laura about this - is it possible, in a meaningful way, to send healing energy, Reiki, directly to the subconscious through the ether tube connector symbol?
A: Yes. This has also been discussed. Application increases circuit imprint.
Q: (L) I think the way the question was asked before - does repeated applications of Reiki heal Karma even, and the answer was 'yes'. I think that something that heals Karma just about covers everything...since that is very often our major concern in this reality.
Q: Are the levels of initiation and levels of the staircase as presented by Mouravieff fairly accurate?
A: Yes, but different levels accessed in other so-called lives can relieve the intensity of some levels in "another" life.
Q: (L) So work on the self in different incarnations - assuming one is not an organic portal - can be cumulative? You can pick up where you left off if you screw up?
A: Yes. To some extent. For now, then, good night.
A: But why unhappy? Think, my dear... And remember, your consciousness operates on four levels, not just one!
Q: And what are these four levels?
A: Physical body, consciousness, genetic body and spirit-etheric body.
Q: Are those the four composites of the human manifestation in 3rd density?
A: 3rd and 4th. One leads oneself, through physical actions, as well as psychic ones, to develop these "problems" when one is preparing to "bump it up" a notch.
A: We are all the names of God. Remember, this is a conduit. This means that both termination/origination points
are of equal value, importance.
Q: (L) So, it is a blending of the aspects of God?
Q: (L) What do you mean? Does this mean that we are a
part of this?
Q: (L) So, it has to do with...
A: Don't deify us. And, be sure all others with which you communicate understand this too!
Q: (L) Nobody cares about Phillip and his sister?
A: Nobody "cares" about individual units of the universal consciousness.
Q: (L) We realize that, but we, as units in bodies of flesh...
A: One must get past the idea that there is some sort of "cheerleading squad" attached to individual consciousness units if one is to progress... it just doesn't work that way!
Q: (L) Well, does this mean to just forget the rest of the questions?
A: No. All questions have great value if the answers are
Q: (L) Last week, the remark was made, regarding spirit release and exorcism, that if it is done properly, by the right person, that there is no side effects or eventualities that would bring detrimental conditions to the individuals and location involved. What was meant by "done correctly?" What is the correct format or mode for exorcism?
A: Correct manner involves honesty and understanding that one has complete faith and awareness of the activities pursued. In other words, when one performs an act which they proclaim to be having a desired result, and they do not have faith in their own actions as, in fact, producing the desired result, then the effort will collapse because of their lack of faith. Whereas when one has complete faith and multidensity understanding, their activities are indeed truth and useful as prescribed and this is the correct way to pursue them.
Q: (L) Isn't faith a difficult commodity to acquire?
A: Not at all. When you have found something of truth you will receive demonstrations which locks in your faith.
I'm looking into reiki too;
Because in following the ways of monk, faker, yogi, according to the fragmented strength of ones nature, it will lead to suffering until a choice presents from this friction of yes and no, between sts and sto.
So I'm hoping reiki can both amplify and ease this friction.
If panspermia is true, then doesn't this prove there's life beyond earth?
If viruses were / are brought to earth from space, then this means there must be an abundance of life out there?
I think that means viruses must have come from a cell?
There's a symbiosis here that makes it hard to figure which came first?