Also I was reading certain things about royal family, some people here seems to have different opinions, I am not sure what exactly is the truth, I did not spend time with the queen personally to see what she really does. So I do not want to put labels on her or to insult her or members of the royal family. Also, yes I maybe and probably have lack of knowledge if I compare myself to you Laura, in certain areas of course. But again I want to learn and I want to stay humble and look on the the things from bird perspective so to say.
You don't necessarily have to spend time with the Queen or her family personally, you only have to be educated about how to see the unseen, or how to read between the lines, and how to pick up clues by close and careful examination of what is available in the form of data.
I have experienced firsthand being lied about, defamed, slandered, libeled, threatened, stalked, my family and friends attacked and threatened, and so on. As I noted elsewhere a very early version of the libtard approach to reality was dealt to me and mine, and my work, and I think many of us learned a great deal from that experience. All during that time, the truth of who I am and what I am and what I work to accomplish was easily available to any of the defamers, but they chose to believe the lies and not the words of persons with first-hand knowledge. Thanks to that series of events, which transpired over years and nearly put me in an early grave, I launched into an in-depth study of psychopathology the result of which was knowledge that we have widely shared over the years and which is even now becoming ever more needed and popular among those searching for answers. And another thing that many of us took away from that experience was an ability to "smell" when a similar thing was being done to another person. The instant you catch a whiff of that, you need to stop and think, go back to the beginning, and examine everything you have read, seen, heard or thought about a given situation.
Now, let me be clear here since some people need whacks on the head to get them to pay real attention to the written word. At the beginning of this kerfuffle, I wrote that "I think that the Queen is a good person within the parameters of her knowledge and experience." I wasn't making some kind of claim about her being a grand "STO" being (a term that gets used rather loosely and inaccurately around here sometimes). She isn't perfect; nobody is. Phillip was a curmudgeon, and probably a bit of a rake on the side, but in general, he did his duty and kept his word. I've known men like him and they often put their foot in their mouths but do not mean anything evil by it. But way more is made of his remarks that are off-the-cuff and out-of-line than they actually deserve. Let me give you an example: I once joked that "well, we aren't going to get out of this life alive..." followed by some silly remark, and my attackers had a field day claiming that I was leading a suicide cult! I mean, how obvious is it that none of us is going to get out of this life alive, which was my joke??!!
Prince Charles (I prefer to call him "Chuckie" with pejorative intent) is a kind of hypocritical slimeball. I'm pretty sure if he lives long enough to become king, the monarchy will be ended with him. He's just not likeable and I perceive that his "good works" are more show than substance.
Prince William is a decent kid (well, man, now) and his heart is in the right place. His wife normalized him a great deal and his suffering at his mother's death gave him depth.
Prince Harry is a psychological mess in the clutches of a nasty woman. 'Nuff said.
Most of the rest of the so-called royals, are no better than they ought to be, as the saying goes. It's a class of people that live on State Welfare and they all need to get a job and do something useful with their lives. (Some of them are actually doing that.)
As for the monarchy itself, it should have been done away with when Edward VII abdicated, if not before that. It's a ridiculous, archaic institution. On the other hand, it does do a great deal in the way of sponsoring charitable works. The USA has Hollywood and that mess of psychological deviants there that pose as American Royalty. They do precious little (with some exceptions) in the way of charitable works. So it could be said that the UK monarchy is something like a lodestone for good works even if there is corruption here and there as there is in ANY institution that has been around for awhile and operates with a bureaucracy. Just read Ponerology for details of how that happens.
Having said that, even with the charitable works, the monarchy costs way more than it is worth.
But human nature is funny (peculiar); in France, they killed off most of their nobility and royals, but they are the most avid royal watchers in the world.
Getting back to the Queen, she's an inter-generational anachronism, one of the few British monarchs who actually was/is a decent person trying to do a difficult job in the best way she can, under very trying circumstances. I really think the whole institution should end with her. She's been a class act from the beginning, and the mic needs to drop when she leaves the stage.
