[Debunking] Pasteur, the Stalin of medicine
- Thread starter Adaryn
- Start date
Hi Dant,
A while ago, I read up about alternative cancer treatment and encountered many references to the Oasis of Hope hospital in Mexico. The website is http://www.oasisofhope.com/ Most of the references, testimonies were positive. You may want to check it out. Best of luck to your father.
A while ago, I read up about alternative cancer treatment and encountered many references to the Oasis of Hope hospital in Mexico. The website is http://www.oasisofhope.com/ Most of the references, testimonies were positive. You may want to check it out. Best of luck to your father.
stardust
Jedi Master
A way to help the body to control the Ph is by drinking osmose water.Dant said:
You can find strip to mesure urinary pH, but don't take into consideration the first urine of the morning which is always acider than the others . Test during several consecutive days . Of course, it is not the mesure for the whole organism, but it can give a good indication in the case of excess of acidity .
For the blood pH , I think you can ask to a labo analysis...
M
Marie
Guest
Here is the follow-up to the text translated earlier by Carcosa. In a few places I selected the words according to perceived meaning rather than word for word (ex: "beaux vieillards" --> "healthy old people")
dant, there is already so much information given here for you to consider, but I’ll add some more and hope it helps.
There is a huge amount of info about alternative cancer treatment and cure from Hulda Regehr Clark, Ph.D., N.D. The following books are available: The Cure for All Cancers; The Cure for All Advanced Cancers; and The Cure for All Diseases (which has one of the longest chapters on curing cancer). These books are available from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, among others, as well as from Dr. Clark Store. Each new printing / edition has new information added.
I know that there was some doubt mentioned in another thread about Dr. Clark’s approach to disease by some (while others said it would benefit to kill parasites in any case), but I can only give my experiences and hope it helps. While I have no data I can relate about cancer being cured (I have bought the book or suggested it for quite a few people having cancer, but no one has taken it seriously and tried to cure themselves, being scared into doing the usual treatments with very bad results – at least it sounds like your father may not fall into this category), I have over 10 years of experience with her treatments with some amazing results. In 1996, my mother began having Multiple Sclerosis type symptoms. Mainly she had very poor control over her right leg. In just a few months, she deteriorated to the point where she was dragging her right foot on the ground when she walked and lifting her leg with her hands to get in and out of a car, etc. She got an MRI, and went to two of the "leading specialists" in the country. Neither one could say whether she had MS or not, although an MRI was supposed to be the definitive method to by which to judge. They said they couldn’t say she had it and they couldn’t say she didn’t. I don’t know if there was a flaw with the MRI. One of them told her that his usual patients were in a wheelchair and that at this point there was not much he could do for her. I told her if there isn’t anything he can do for you now, what will he be able to do when you’re in a wheelchair? Anyway…
Someone told me about The Cure for All Diseases and I got and read it. Having read other similar info over the years, I decided to try it. Within a few weeks the progress of whatever she had stopped and reversed. She only did the parasite program and used a zapper that I built using the parts list and instructions in the book and nothing else that was recommended. I have had very good results with the herbal parasite killing and zapper, as well as doing the kidney cleanse and liver cleanse programs.
Dr. Clark’s basic theory is that toxic pollution built up in tissues can invite parasites to cause havoc on health and lead to "opportunistic diseases." She uses the term parasite in two senses, the usual narrow one, as well as anything that lives on or in you, but more often the latter. She claims that you can stop any of the long list of diseases in the book in its tracks but will not fully heal until a thorough investigation to identify and clean up the toxic substances that started the process is completed. She advocates "self health," for everyone to take responsibility for their own health, become a “health detectiveᾠ and share all your findings with as many people as you can.
You can build a zapper (about $25 in parts) or buy one commercially built from Healthy Signs, PO Box 43 Yelm, WA 98597 USA toll free tel. 866-558-5323 also 360-894-5323 www.healthysigns.com email: healthysigns@yahoo.com. There is a manual zapper with copper tube hand holds that you must time yourself for $80 plus $5 to $6 shipping. You have to do three sessions of zapping - 7 minutes on, 20 to 30 min. off (waiting); 7 min. on, 20 to 30 min. off; 7 min. on. There is also an automatic zapper model where it turns on for 7 minutes, off for 21 min. (LED flashes to show waiting period), on 7, off 21, and on for a final 7 min. before shutting itself off. It has elastic wrist bands (that you may need to wet) and can be used while sleeping. It also has a few other features, such as continuous mode until you manually turn it off, etc. The automatic model costs $150 plus $6 shipping.
All the information you need to build your own zapper is in the books (and also how to use it). I’ve built several over the years (two for my family and several more for friends). Even a novice (like me) can read the instructions carefully and make one. I also own both commercially made models. The zapper current (from a 9 volt battery) doesn’t reach deep into bowel content, the eyeball, and testicles (the relatively high frequency travels along the walls/lining of these tissues rather than through them). You complete killing organisms that the zapper current does not reach by doing the herbal parasite program (three common herbs, green walnut hull, wormwood, and fresh ground cloves, all info in books including recipes to make your own or sources of non-polluted supplements for purchase and dosages).
The zapper was discovered by accident when she used to use an AC current frequency generator for each particular organism to selectively zap (much longer and harder to get rid of parasites that can do harm). In 1994 her son, Geoff, having computer and electronics knowledge, built a low cost, hand held portable, battery operated frequency generator. When tested on one bacteria, three others at much different frequencies also died. When tested on other patients, dozens of pathogens were killed at the same time. It was later discovered to be because of DC battery use.
There is some conman making similar claims but with a bunch of bunk thrown in on U.S. TV – an infomercial made to look like an interview. Also the same con artist (supposedly convicted for fraud) was confrontationally interviewed by Paula Zahn on CNN in recent years. Just a warning that there is all sorts of disinformation surrounding this subject to make money and probably vector away from true info / debunk and "throw out the baby with the bathwater."
By the way, Dr. Clark has been harassed, sued, had criminal charges brought against her for supposedly practicing medicine without a license (which she denied) and then dropped in the last 8 to 10 years. All suits, the civil ones, as well as the criminal charge that was dropped, urged her to have an easy settlement by agreeing not to publish any more books, which she, of course, refused to do. Suspicious, yes? Suddenly, everything will be dropped if you agree to not publish any more information. She has moved to Tijuana, Mexico and has a clinic and research center there, although she travels around the world for seminars and conferences. There are many clinics and centers for alternative treatments using her methods (and some her name) around the world.
Some more info where to get supplies (herbal supplements, vitamins, etc): Self Health Resource Center, 1055 Bay Blvd., Suite #A, Chula Vista, CA 91911 619-409-9500, fax 619-409-9501, orders 800-873-1663, web page www.shrc.net, email info@shrc.net. Self Health Resource Center recently merged with Dr. Clark Store, same address and telephone. Web page: www.DrClarkStore.com, orders by phone: 866-DR-CLARK (372-5275).
Finally, as mentioned before (and in the books) high doses of vitamin C (I use powder). There are two types ascorbic acid and non-acid ascorbates (different minerals - could be calcium ascorbate, etc. or combination of several mineral ascorbates). And the pH testing tape can be purchased from any health food store or vitamin/supplement shop and used to test urine or saliva (usually comes with chart and instructions). A 15 foot roll of pH tape goes for around $12 to $15.
I hope this info helps and would be interested in any results if you try it. Best regards to you and your dad.
There is a huge amount of info about alternative cancer treatment and cure from Hulda Regehr Clark, Ph.D., N.D. The following books are available: The Cure for All Cancers; The Cure for All Advanced Cancers; and The Cure for All Diseases (which has one of the longest chapters on curing cancer). These books are available from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, among others, as well as from Dr. Clark Store. Each new printing / edition has new information added.
I know that there was some doubt mentioned in another thread about Dr. Clark’s approach to disease by some (while others said it would benefit to kill parasites in any case), but I can only give my experiences and hope it helps. While I have no data I can relate about cancer being cured (I have bought the book or suggested it for quite a few people having cancer, but no one has taken it seriously and tried to cure themselves, being scared into doing the usual treatments with very bad results – at least it sounds like your father may not fall into this category), I have over 10 years of experience with her treatments with some amazing results. In 1996, my mother began having Multiple Sclerosis type symptoms. Mainly she had very poor control over her right leg. In just a few months, she deteriorated to the point where she was dragging her right foot on the ground when she walked and lifting her leg with her hands to get in and out of a car, etc. She got an MRI, and went to two of the "leading specialists" in the country. Neither one could say whether she had MS or not, although an MRI was supposed to be the definitive method to by which to judge. They said they couldn’t say she had it and they couldn’t say she didn’t. I don’t know if there was a flaw with the MRI. One of them told her that his usual patients were in a wheelchair and that at this point there was not much he could do for her. I told her if there isn’t anything he can do for you now, what will he be able to do when you’re in a wheelchair? Anyway…
Someone told me about The Cure for All Diseases and I got and read it. Having read other similar info over the years, I decided to try it. Within a few weeks the progress of whatever she had stopped and reversed. She only did the parasite program and used a zapper that I built using the parts list and instructions in the book and nothing else that was recommended. I have had very good results with the herbal parasite killing and zapper, as well as doing the kidney cleanse and liver cleanse programs.
Dr. Clark’s basic theory is that toxic pollution built up in tissues can invite parasites to cause havoc on health and lead to "opportunistic diseases." She uses the term parasite in two senses, the usual narrow one, as well as anything that lives on or in you, but more often the latter. She claims that you can stop any of the long list of diseases in the book in its tracks but will not fully heal until a thorough investigation to identify and clean up the toxic substances that started the process is completed. She advocates "self health," for everyone to take responsibility for their own health, become a “health detectiveᾠ and share all your findings with as many people as you can.
You can build a zapper (about $25 in parts) or buy one commercially built from Healthy Signs, PO Box 43 Yelm, WA 98597 USA toll free tel. 866-558-5323 also 360-894-5323 www.healthysigns.com email: healthysigns@yahoo.com. There is a manual zapper with copper tube hand holds that you must time yourself for $80 plus $5 to $6 shipping. You have to do three sessions of zapping - 7 minutes on, 20 to 30 min. off (waiting); 7 min. on, 20 to 30 min. off; 7 min. on. There is also an automatic zapper model where it turns on for 7 minutes, off for 21 min. (LED flashes to show waiting period), on 7, off 21, and on for a final 7 min. before shutting itself off. It has elastic wrist bands (that you may need to wet) and can be used while sleeping. It also has a few other features, such as continuous mode until you manually turn it off, etc. The automatic model costs $150 plus $6 shipping.
All the information you need to build your own zapper is in the books (and also how to use it). I’ve built several over the years (two for my family and several more for friends). Even a novice (like me) can read the instructions carefully and make one. I also own both commercially made models. The zapper current (from a 9 volt battery) doesn’t reach deep into bowel content, the eyeball, and testicles (the relatively high frequency travels along the walls/lining of these tissues rather than through them). You complete killing organisms that the zapper current does not reach by doing the herbal parasite program (three common herbs, green walnut hull, wormwood, and fresh ground cloves, all info in books including recipes to make your own or sources of non-polluted supplements for purchase and dosages).
The zapper was discovered by accident when she used to use an AC current frequency generator for each particular organism to selectively zap (much longer and harder to get rid of parasites that can do harm). In 1994 her son, Geoff, having computer and electronics knowledge, built a low cost, hand held portable, battery operated frequency generator. When tested on one bacteria, three others at much different frequencies also died. When tested on other patients, dozens of pathogens were killed at the same time. It was later discovered to be because of DC battery use.
There is some conman making similar claims but with a bunch of bunk thrown in on U.S. TV – an infomercial made to look like an interview. Also the same con artist (supposedly convicted for fraud) was confrontationally interviewed by Paula Zahn on CNN in recent years. Just a warning that there is all sorts of disinformation surrounding this subject to make money and probably vector away from true info / debunk and "throw out the baby with the bathwater."
By the way, Dr. Clark has been harassed, sued, had criminal charges brought against her for supposedly practicing medicine without a license (which she denied) and then dropped in the last 8 to 10 years. All suits, the civil ones, as well as the criminal charge that was dropped, urged her to have an easy settlement by agreeing not to publish any more books, which she, of course, refused to do. Suspicious, yes? Suddenly, everything will be dropped if you agree to not publish any more information. She has moved to Tijuana, Mexico and has a clinic and research center there, although she travels around the world for seminars and conferences. There are many clinics and centers for alternative treatments using her methods (and some her name) around the world.
Some more info where to get supplies (herbal supplements, vitamins, etc): Self Health Resource Center, 1055 Bay Blvd., Suite #A, Chula Vista, CA 91911 619-409-9500, fax 619-409-9501, orders 800-873-1663, web page www.shrc.net, email info@shrc.net. Self Health Resource Center recently merged with Dr. Clark Store, same address and telephone. Web page: www.DrClarkStore.com, orders by phone: 866-DR-CLARK (372-5275).
Finally, as mentioned before (and in the books) high doses of vitamin C (I use powder). There are two types ascorbic acid and non-acid ascorbates (different minerals - could be calcium ascorbate, etc. or combination of several mineral ascorbates). And the pH testing tape can be purchased from any health food store or vitamin/supplement shop and used to test urine or saliva (usually comes with chart and instructions). A 15 foot roll of pH tape goes for around $12 to $15.
I hope this info helps and would be interested in any results if you try it. Best regards to you and your dad.
highmystica
Jedi Master
Thanks to prayers for rain and stardust for posting the original peice and to henry for the fulcanelli stuff. And you too Bholanath for what you posted regarding Bernard. Wow. How sad for Béchamp - it kinda reminded me of Tesla.
Getting to the current part of this thread. I can't really add much about besides "don't let your dad play in the land of chemo dant" My mom went that way and she has long recovered from the cancer, but has never recovered from the chemo. Now I'm a big believer in holistic medicine but that has already been covered - there is however one thing that hasn't been touched on. You mentioned your mother and it got me thinking. My grandparents moved to this certain house many many years ago and shortly thereafter she was diagnosed with cancer and he did a lovely job taking care of her. After several years following her death he got involved with and eventually married another woman who moved in with him and in about a year she developed the same kind of cancer and eventually died. Then he himself developed the same cancer and died. The odd part is that these too women developed this cancer in a really nasty form, but it was much slower for him, not just in appearance, but also how long it took for it to end his life. I always felt that the land is somehow toxic there - I don't know if it is radon leaking up out of the soil or something else, but perhaps you might want to look into a radon detector and if need be move you dad, while at the same time going the holistic route. Good luck Dant!
Getting to the current part of this thread. I can't really add much about besides "don't let your dad play in the land of chemo dant" My mom went that way and she has long recovered from the cancer, but has never recovered from the chemo. Now I'm a big believer in holistic medicine but that has already been covered - there is however one thing that hasn't been touched on. You mentioned your mother and it got me thinking. My grandparents moved to this certain house many many years ago and shortly thereafter she was diagnosed with cancer and he did a lovely job taking care of her. After several years following her death he got involved with and eventually married another woman who moved in with him and in about a year she developed the same kind of cancer and eventually died. Then he himself developed the same cancer and died. The odd part is that these too women developed this cancer in a really nasty form, but it was much slower for him, not just in appearance, but also how long it took for it to end his life. I always felt that the land is somehow toxic there - I don't know if it is radon leaking up out of the soil or something else, but perhaps you might want to look into a radon detector and if need be move you dad, while at the same time going the holistic route. Good luck Dant!
Hi dant,
Some people say that high-dose vitamin C helps fight cancer. The idea comes from the famous nobel-prize winner Linus Pauling (for peace).
More information can be found on: http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/vitcancer.htm.
I haven't read much about it as yet, but might be worth a search.
All the best for your dad!
Some people say that high-dose vitamin C helps fight cancer. The idea comes from the famous nobel-prize winner Linus Pauling (for peace).
More information can be found on: http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/vitcancer.htm.
I haven't read much about it as yet, but might be worth a search.
All the best for your dad!
dant
The Living Force
Thanks!
My father has been taking VC although not as much as
I recommended (5-10g /day), and I have reminded him
of its value. I am researching a bit about sodium bicarbonate
(baking soda) but wanting to know more about the interactions
between baking soda and VC before proceeding.
The hard part is helping him to formulate an aim or goal
for his continuing existence, in spite of his deteriorating
conditions. He is less and less mobile, his mind more
"tired", due to the effects of his "cancer", that is acting
upon him.
But the interesting thing is, he has lived beyond his
doctors predictions that he would probably not live
past a year. I have reminded him that doctors subjective
opinions are not to taken at face value.
I have constantly reminded him that his life is worth living;
that he can add more to his own life by pursuing objective
knowledge, by reading on specific subjects of interests,
and to observe nature/life for what it really is, putting
aside his own belief systems (sacred cows).
Interestingly, from the conversations I have had with him,
he was surprised of some of the truths I have learned from
SOTTs voluminous sources (and he resonated in certain places
he knew was true, but on other subjects, it had to be reserved
since he was lacking the foundations necessary to understand,
which is fair (karma)) and he was surprised that such sources
of information could be gained from the Internet for which some
of his generation may have a hard time understanding the
technology involved, being able to access and use it.
It has been an interesting and quality time with my father.
Kind regards,
Dan
My father has been taking VC although not as much as
I recommended (5-10g /day), and I have reminded him
of its value. I am researching a bit about sodium bicarbonate
(baking soda) but wanting to know more about the interactions
between baking soda and VC before proceeding.
The hard part is helping him to formulate an aim or goal
for his continuing existence, in spite of his deteriorating
conditions. He is less and less mobile, his mind more
"tired", due to the effects of his "cancer", that is acting
upon him.
But the interesting thing is, he has lived beyond his
doctors predictions that he would probably not live
past a year. I have reminded him that doctors subjective
opinions are not to taken at face value.
I have constantly reminded him that his life is worth living;
that he can add more to his own life by pursuing objective
knowledge, by reading on specific subjects of interests,
and to observe nature/life for what it really is, putting
aside his own belief systems (sacred cows).
Interestingly, from the conversations I have had with him,
he was surprised of some of the truths I have learned from
SOTTs voluminous sources (and he resonated in certain places
he knew was true, but on other subjects, it had to be reserved
since he was lacking the foundations necessary to understand,
which is fair (karma)) and he was surprised that such sources
of information could be gained from the Internet for which some
of his generation may have a hard time understanding the
technology involved, being able to access and use it.
It has been an interesting and quality time with my father.
Kind regards,
Dan
Galaxia2002
Dagobah Resident
The big Pasteur Fraud, postulates that fail to keep, viruses, vaccines and polio
It is too interesting! This article tells the story of fraud developed by Pasteur and how it affects us to this day and much more related to the false perception of viruses that cause disease. I hope you enjoyed.
Article translated by google and a bit fixed from:
http://www.dsalud.com/index.php?pagina=articulo&c=1511
Is it Justified the Germ Theory of Disease?
Given the importance of the matter at this time we will adress what might be called the "war on germs" in two articles that correspond to the two "sides" involved in this war imagined by Louis Pasteur and his followers. In this first course we look at the "side invader"-microbes-and the next we are going to talk about "defending side" making an in-depth review of what the official medicine known as "immune system."
We must therefore begin by clarifying what the theory of microbial infection or disease theory suggests-although it would be more correct to say-it requires that microorganisms are the cause of many diseases and, therefore, the primary therapeutic strategy is to destroy them. And although this theory is the foundation of economic power of large multinational pharmaceutical companies, a brief tour of its origins, its evolution and current dogmatic implementation will reveal not only the absence of scientific basis in their proposals, but the dramatic consequences that an uncritical acceptance has on the health of the population.
Perhaps it is not possible to know exactly who first came to the idea that some sort of invisible and evil creature was the blame for our ills. In various ancient cultures there are references to live agents as possible causes of diseases. Later the doctors of Al Andalus spoke about "creatures" or "tiny bodies" referring to possible causative agents of serious evils after entering into the body. Since then the idea of an external threat permeated deeply into the research.
A mid-sixteenth century Girolamo Francastoro spoke of a "seminary mortis" (seed of disease) as the transmitting agent of disease by direct contact or remotely. And it was because at that time when it appeared the notion of "contagion" in relation to syphilis. One and a half century later Anton van Leeuwenhoek was the first one able to observe the "germs" which earned him the honorary title of father of microbiology, although the term "bug" appears to stem from surgeon Charles Sedillot and became popular during the sessions of the Academy of Sciences Paris. it is considered that first formulated the germ theory of disease was Agostino Bassi in 1835.
A WORLD PASTEURIZED
However, the almost absolute protagonist of this unfortunate story is Louis Pasteur to who the Encyclopedia Britannica-owned by some of the Rockefeller-defined as " a French Chemistry microbiologist whose contributions were among the most varied and valuable in the history of science and industry. he was who proved that microorganisms cause fermentation and disease. He was who pioneered the use of vaccines. " At this point, few would question his contributions to the history of the industry. Another thing is his scientific career for which has been shown that their alleged discoveries are due to plagiarism and fraud.
There are three tests, unknown to the general public but quite rigorous and devastating, leaving it clear to Pasteur's behavior throughout his career: the books of Ethel Douglas Hume and Robert B. Pearson, and Gerald L. Report Geison. These texts leads to two fundamental ideas. The first, Pasteur plagiarized his master Antoine Bechamp, thorough researcher and member of the Academy of Sciences of France. Well, the problem is not merely to copy his ideas but that he misunderstood, confused and misrepresented, launching the history of medicine by a completely opposite way that should go, with tragic consequences for the health of all as discussed below. Moreover, Pasteur "fixed" the results of their experiments to correspond with the ideas he wanted to show, which against all evidence, persist in school textbooks and head of the vast majority of people, including doctors.
Bechamp had analyzed the relationship of microorganisms with specific diseases fallowing the footsteps of researchers such as Günter Ederlein, Jean Tissot, Raimond Rife or Wilhelm Reich. What Pasteur did was to simplify his ideas stating that microorganisms are the cause of disease, a simple idea to grasp, and above all profitable, not only in economic terms but in a much more important area: that of individual responsibility and collective health and disease.
Rockefeller’s Encyclopedia Britannica also awards Pasteur another discovery that he actually stole Bechamp: fermentation of wine and milk. Bechamp Denied spontaneous generation in which Pasteur believed blindly until he decided to appropriate his teacher's theory without understanding it. Moreover, the conclusions reached by Pasteur means that he did not understand even their own experiments on digestion and fermentation processes. And that explains that his family asked not to make public their laboratory notebooks after his death. Only in 1975, a Princeton historian, Professor Geison, had the opportunity to conduct a comprehensive study of nearly ten thousand pages which had remained secret until the death of the grandson of Pasteur and the conclusions of its report, entitled Science Louis Pasteur Private presented in 1993 at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, it would ensure that Pasteur not only published false information but he was guilty of "scientific misconduct" by violating rules of medicine, science and ethics . None of which has prevented him still to be considered "benefactor of humanity" even in the advertisements of yogurts.
THE POSTULATES THAT FAIL TO KEEP
The other famous protagonist of this story is Robert Koch. The importance of their contribution lie in the paradoxical fact that their rigorous approach, far from demonstrating the validity of the germ theory, what really makes is literally refute it. "Incredible? Let's see.
Pasteur was a practical man, while Koch was a theorist, but they had in common-perhaps since enlisted volunteers for the Franco-Prussian war - was their marked militaristic vision of life . So while Pasteur contributed to humanity manipulated experiments, Koch did the same with a theoretical framework that served to legitimize these experiments: the famous postulates developed by his teacher, the German anatomist Friedrich Henle, that Koch modified according to which:
A micro-organism ...
... Has to be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease but not in healthy organisms.
... Has to be isolated from the diseased body and grown in pure cultures.
... Should cause disease when introduced into a healthy body.
... Has to be isolated again in the agency that has been inoculated and identified as identical to the original specific causative agent.
As you can see it is an approach characterized by impeccable logic. The problem is not satisfied in any supposedly contagious disease. As early as 1909 the Lancet published this devastating phrase: "Koch's postulates are met seldom or never." What did they do then these "benefactors of humanity"? Did they wonder why the microbes lived inside the plants, animals and humans without causing disease unless a minority? "Did they raised the question of how to protect us if they live within us? Did they wonder how they managed to survive in humans for two million years without antibiotics or vaccines? Do you reject the theory of infection to look for another hypothesis to explain their observations achieved? Did they questioned about the true role of microbes in nature?
Absolutely not. The theory of infection and their postulates are still there, intact, as well as effigies of Koch and Pasteur. Although "tweaks" of course. To begin Koch was forced to give up the second part of the first postulate "but not in healthy bodies" to find numerous instances of what they called "asymptomatic patients" were not really sick but who had developed the organism but not any disease. And why did that happen? The idea of infection involves an invasion of outsiders ... but is that microbes normally live inside all living beings. So it was very easy to fulfill the first part of assumption and impossible to fulfill the second.
However, the “ workaround” does not end here. Koch and colleagues, Rush, Max von Pettenkofer and Rudolf Virchow also soon realized that they could not cause the same disease by inoculating the organism into another host and sets the third postulate. So they changed the original approach of Henle and the "same disease" became "similar symptoms." Problem solved!
In 1937, when it was found that the illnesses supposedly caused by viruses do not even meet the first postulate, ran a veil over the requirement of "absolute presence" of the pathogen and used expressions like 'regular presence' or 'consistency transmission ".
Not what many investigators were checking with their own eyes, nor rigorous rebuttals made by the prestigious Claude Bernard, nor and the many subsequent revisions have served to stop a devastating current to today.
An example of this is provided by pellagra. In 1913 a researcher injected tissue filtrates from a patient of pellagra in several monkeys causing similar symptoms of the disease. The conclusion was that there was a filterable virus in the tissues and therefore pellagra was a viral illness. A year later a committee of government experts said that pellagra was not related to diet and was given to Joseph Golderberg the search for the virus. Well, now in his preliminary investigation Golgerberg concluded that there was not a viral illness but originated in the diet. And he spent fifteen years fighting against the prevailing dogma of the germ theory until it finally got the recognition that this disease causes a deficiency of vitamin B.
BECHAMP HAD REASON
Meanwhile the original ideas that Pasteur had simplified and perverted (the ideas of Antoine Bechamp), were forgotten. But Bechamp and Pasteur approaches are not only two different ideas, but two distinct theories are mainly two ways of looking at life with profound and far-reaching consequences. The Pasteur connects with Darwin and his followers to apply to life the "fittest" and think that evolution is the result of a competition that have won. Bechamp theory , however, part of the idea of cooperation among the people that make up the network of life.
And although Bechamp was "erased" from the official story his ideas germinated and today there is a stream of research that continues to explore the way that he opened whose latest findings that confirm beyond doubt that his insights and suggestions were on the correct line.
Today we know that bacteria were essential for the emergence of life on Earth through photosynthesis creating adequate weather conditions. And then was the gradual coming together of different types of bacteria leading to the current cell, true cooperatives vital that enabled the formation of multicellular organisms.
In short, bacteria are key elements in the food chain, both at sea and on land and air. As explains the Spanish biologist Máximo Sandín, teacher of Human Evolution and Human Ecology at the Autonomous University of Madrid, citing studies from the last ten years "they purify water, degrade and recycle toxic waste products, replenish the carbon dioxide the atmosphere and make available to plants nitrogen from the atmosphere. Without them, the continents would be deserts that would hatbor little more than lichens. In humans the number is ten times that of the cells and their biomass is greater than the plant biomass of the planet "(between the reader www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/msandin/).
But the role of bacteria does not end there. Then see how far they are necessary for life and the dramatic consequences of the war declared against them.
THE ARMS RACE
First of it should be understood that the imposition of the of Pasteur’s ideas contributed to the development of "weapons" with which "fight" to the alleged perpetrators of the disease. And put on us on the track who is responsible for the triumph maximum of those ideas. Because the history of the development and consolidation of the germ theory of disease is the story of the creation of great pharmaceutical empires with Rockefeller clan ahead.
Antibiotics and vaccines were the two main categories of weapons developed to fight bacteria or prevent their attack. Both issues have been dealt with extensively in this magazine so that here we focus on the global role they have played over one hundred years, poisoning, disrupting the ecological balance, creating enormous health problems disguised as "new diseases "keys of a billionaire business, maintenance of destructive concepts of health and disease ...
The first antibiotics were developed, penicillin like- acting at the outside of the cells by blocking the production of proteins and alter their function and the environment and the consistency of the cell membrane, thus affecting its function as a filter for toxic elements or particles. Subsequently began to develop other operating inside our cells, sulfonamides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, quinolones, macrolides, Septrim and so on. These products work in different ways, all with serious consequences. Here are the most important-obviously not often mentioned on prospects or the information on the Internet- relying on research that Dr. Heinrich Kremer stated in his book The Silent Revolution of Medicine, Cancer and AIDS. According to him antibiotic ...
... Block the formation of DNA (genetic information of cells) by preventing the formation of new cells and causing mutations.
... Alter the balance of microorganisms that live symbiotically in our bodies, in particular disrupt the specialization of gut bacteria in the key roles of cooperation. And,
... Interfering with the energy production within mitochondria.
Do not forget that mitochondria are ancient bacteria in the course of evolution that were incorporated into our cells and are the generators of life energy. They are therefore essential for life and have their own genetic information transmitted directly from mother to child. Any damage that they suffer not only impact on energy production creating serious health problems but can be transmitted from one generation to another. And that is precisely what has been happening because of the mass administration of antibiotics for decades and other toxic products manufactured by the pharmaceutical macroindustria that was created by the same power groups that now control oil and energy obtaining every year hundreds of billion euros in sales of its patents and poisons.
A self-destructive process a real "microecological" disaster - that has led humanity to a dead end because there is no possibility of making more powerful antibiotics to overcome the resistance developed by microbes. Being in this context that we must certainly place the emergence of new "viral" in the context of AIDS. Products that are released to market without proper clinical studies and experience used as guinea pigs people terrified and helpless children.
VACCINES: FRAUD AND POISONING
The other idea that Pasteur gave to humanity is the vaccination. From the viewpoint of the hegemonic medical model, which plays an important role the conception of the Immune System as a defensive army against microbes- vaccines are something like if we would capture a handful of enemies so that our intelligence services will take accurate information to design more specific strategy against him.
And we approach to the critical of vaccines from two perspectives. One by removing the theoretical base that supports it: the germ theory and the concept of Immune System developed by the Medical officer. But it will be discussed in the next article where we are going to see that the vaccines lack the most basic bio-logical sense though they have been imposed under the false argument that served to eradicate the disease and stop epidemics. Now let's take the second perspective which is to analyze its negative effects and expose the lies about its effectiveness beginning at the origin of the shots, of course, going by of the hand of Pasteur.
Robert Koch himself, in a paper published in 1881 on Anthrax, criticized the research of Pasteur and accused him of distorting the results of vaccination experiments. What do he mean? Pasteur conducted an experiment that has gone down in history as the final proof that the body is able to immunize itself against a disease if you receive the weak causing microbe. The days May 5th and 17th 1881 he inoculated 25 of 50 sheep an Anthrax vaccine consisting of attenuated bacilli, days later, on May 31th, 50 rams were injected virulent bacilli predicting that unvaccinated will die unlike of vaccinees ones that were protected. Two days later, in a crowded theatrical scene, farmers, journalists and scientists, found the overall success: among unvaccinated sheep were 23 dead and two dying while the 25 vaccinees had survived.
So far the story as told by the manuals, textbooks and Wikipedia on the internet. Only that there are other lesser known sources of information that provide insight into a truth very different from what happened. This is the case of the book H. J. Hudson The Great Betrayal: Fraud in science or medical health papers of Eneko Landaburu (available on numerous websites). Just one year after of the "miracle" Pasteur began receiving reports of numerous villages in France and Hungary where they had used their vaccine but vaccinated sheep died by the thousands. The same happened in other countries which tried to replicate his experience: Italy, Germany, Russia, Argentina ... What had happened? Two years later would be known as Pasteur declared at the Academy of Sciences that the vaccines had a "trigger." In other words, a poison (based on potassium dichromate) that had destroyed the bacilli inoculated in rams vaccinated and therefore had survived.
Today we know that is not true that vaccines have eradicated any disease. Rigorous studies show that the highs and lows of intensity or disappearance of epidemics such as smallpox, diphtheria, tuberculosis and rubella were related to changes in living conditions and not to the introduction or vaccines (for a discussion more detailed with numerous examples and references into http://saludypoder.blogspot.com/2010/02/puntualizando-sobre-vacunas-y-salud.html).
Moreover, a broad social movement involving many doctors, now warns of the serious health problems caused by vaccines. Including encephalitis, meningitis, pneumonia, quadriplegia, epilepsy, polio, kidney failure, cerebral paralisys, blindness, rheumatoid arthritis, adenopathy, seizures, osteomyelitis, cholera, chromosome abnormalities, genetic diseases and malformations.
It worth to add that vaccines have contributed greatly to strengthening the irresponsibility of people on their health by making them dependent on large multinational pharmaceutical companies as well as establish a aberrant health system not only that does not solve the health problems of the population but for many years they had worsen when they are created.
ANOTHER STEP IN THE WAR ON GERMS
But let us look back again. When pasteurized bacteriologists had difficulties to find new bacteria which confer disease, they began to think that maybe there were smallest microbes that couldn’t be seen even with the light microscope. So they decided to resurrect a term coined in the late fourteenth century to refer to possible entities invisible poisonous "viruses." Some microbes that at first was thought might be of a liquid nature -and so were called "contagium vivum fluidum" – although later they determined that they were “particles."
The fact is that until the invention in 1931 of electron microscopy the virus was pure conjecture. It turns out that in 1884 the microbiologist Charles Chamberland had invented a filter that allowed to retain the bacteria contained in a serum and thought that all "infectious agents" were held in it, but some researchers concluded that there ware "filterable agents, microbes who managed to pass it and kept in serum. Hence there must be deducted that they were "minibacterias" or "ultravirus." It would, however, until the invention by Ernst Ruska and Max Knolldel of the electron microscope when they could see for the first time ... and immediately began to blame them for new diseases. And begin a new phase in the war against microbes emerging a new breed of "hunters" virologists.
Well, let's be pragmatic and take as an example: the case of polio, the first disease to be "demostrated" was caused by a virus, to show how far the Virology is dominated by dogmatism, preconceived ideas and interests of multinationals and power groups. But first let's briefly review, again with the help of Professor Sandin, the role that viruses have on the Web of Life: "There are between 5 and 25 times more viruses than bacteria!" Said Maximo Sandin in the report Are really are bacteria and viruses responsible for most diseases? which appeared in No. 125 of this magazine. We live in very immersed in a sea of bacteria and viruses that, again, are essential for the functioning of life. Few people know that viruses exist in the sea in astronomical numbers and that they control the base of the food pyramid, are a reservoir of genetic information and are involved in biogeochemical processes among which is the contribution to the nucleation of clouds, the genome living consists of a sum of bacterial genes and viral genes. Fewer still know that when human genome was sequenced that what was sequenced was actually only the coding portion of the protein and that is only 1.5% of the genome in which sequences have identified hundreds of thousands of bacterial and mobile elements and endogenous retroviruses whole and fragmentary. The rest, the other 98.5% are mobile elements, endogenous viruses, exons, repetitive sequences ... all of viral origin. All this leads to a singular conclusion: are viruses and bacteria the architects of life ". He adds on his website: "The majority of animal and plant genomes are composed of endogenous virus (internal) and mobile elements and sequences derived from viruses." Sandin speaks of what has hitherto been called "junk DNA" by geneticists who despise everything that is not known. When it turns out that this "junk information" there are essential homeotic genes for embryonic development which arrange on chromosomes reveals that they are of retroviral origin. In fact, in subsequent work, published in the last fifteen years has already been established that certain endogenous viruses in mammals have the task of forming the placenta and suppress immune responses so during pregnancy the fetus was not rejected by the mother’s body . The Professor Sandin has also documented that "the virus in the free state are quite inert and it is the cell that uses and actives components of the virus."
THE POLIO EXAMPLE
In short, the "polio", Greek word that means "gray marrow" - is characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord and affect motor neurons causing paralysis and in severe cases, death. And at the of nineteenth century end resulted in authentic "epidemics" affecting mainly middle-class children. The “pasteurized “ bacteriologists was quickly in search of the culprit bacteria. Just as we did not find it, they revived the old idea of "filterable agents", ie the virus.
In fact former President Theodore Roosevelt decided to launch a war against polio "because he had just seen him affected by it and that would start a career as a reward for whoever would win elevation to the altars of science (not to mention the substantial benefits of a vaccine to be marketed on a global scale). Moreover, polio became included in the Public Health Act as "infectious disease" according to criteria such as B. Sach (published in the Journal of. Obst. & Gyneco., 63: 703 710, April 1911): "In general, any disease occurs in epidemics is sufficient to prove infectious or contagious nature." No comments. Obviously the inclusion of polio as an infectious disease involving the investigation, ruled out bacteria, and only remained in the hands of virologists. And virologists, as its name indicates, are dedicated to hunting viruses. So in 1909 he produced another of those "milestones" in the History of Medicine: nothing less than the first time that "proved" that a disease was caused by a virus. And what was this "show"? Simply, Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper started from the premise that since the virus was very small elements filtering the serum of a patient and removing all the possible bacteria what remained was to be the agent guilty! Anyone would think today that there was the possibility that another small particles like those were there but these "great scientists" not only considered so but they related to the serum as a “virus isolated. "
The presumptive identification of the culprit virus did not occur until almost forty years later. In 1948 Gilbert Dalldorf and Grace Sickles, the Department of Health New York, found in the feces of sick children an "unidentified filterable agent" which was later named "poliovirus." Nobody could explain how a common inhabitant of our intestines could reach the spine and attack the nerve tissues of the brain but decided to ignore this "detail" and started a competition to find the vaccine, something that would say have made Jonas Salk - School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and Albert Sabin, a researcher at the Institute for Medical Research, an agency owned by… Rockefeller.
the discovery of Dalldorf and Sickles clearly was "providential" for seekers of vaccines and that until then had been dedicated to growing the virus on the basis of injecting tens of thousands of monkeys and chimpanzees. In fact, the huge delay in the investigation despite of the millionaires funds invested was because they focused on experimenting with monkeys even though they were watching that the course of the disease was different from that of humans. And thousands of monkeys were sacrificed on the table of vivisection in the name of science. In fact they calculated that, with a found vaccine, to inject it into the U.S. population would require sacrifice 50,000 monkeys.
The first to get a "vaccine" was Salk from the feces of three children who were not sick! But apparently it was not relevant. However, to launch the vaccine, they found something troubling: three variants of the supposed poliovirus in the intestines of patients. And that meant that a vaccine made from one of them did not entirely protect the disease. As far as I have investigated this obstacle was saved simply forgetting about it! Later Sabin vaccine was presented as "trivalent" ie, saying that it protected from the three variants of the virus.
Meanwhile vaccines seekers staged a new disaster: to produce significant amounts of virus they used cheaply cancer cells of a patient named Henrietta Lacks died in 1951. Soon 600,000 of those cultured cells were scattered throughout the country being used for all types of investigations and experiments. Obviously it was feared that the vaccines were contaminated with carcinogen elements , but their production did not stop.
In 1954, Salk's vaccine would prove in 400,000 American children and "only" 112 get ill with polio a few months after receiving three doses. But Salk unaccounted for those ill with less than three doses or within the first two weeks after the third dose. They was all considered "unvaccinated" completely altering test results. Truly a worthy disciple of Pasteur! The official conclusion of his report was that the vaccine provided protection for between 30 and 90% but was publicly announced as a great success and April 12, 1955 the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis declared it completely safe by saying further that offered complete protection against polio. Salk received the Congressional Medal from hands of then-President Eisenhower and six manufacturers launched it to the market the 27 million doses that were prepared to wait to get approval to rely on pressure from the foundation.
Two weeks after the start of vaccination were recorded 260 cases of children with polio, of which 11 die with what the U.S. Surgeon General immediately suspended vaccination throughout the country and convened an urgent meeting with Salk and manufacturers. They assured him that everything was under control and that the next dose would be safe. Sabin, Salk's competitor, proposed the total cessation of vaccinations but he had good contacts in key positions of power and the campaign resumed despite the warnings of John Enders, who had received the Nobel Prize in 1949 for growing the virus in Human tissue-about possible agents not detected in the vaccine.
The epidemic would worsen. Only 2,000 cases in Boston came within four months of resumed vaccinations when in previous years had never exceeded the figure of 300 cases. In New York and Connecticut also doubled the number of cases. And in Vermont tripled. In Massachusetts, 77.5% of paralytic cases had received three or more doses of vaccine. Finally decided to suspend in Canada. In Ottawa cases had increased by 700% - as in several European countries. In 1957 half of those who suffered polio in the United States were vaccinated! In fact in the five states where the campaigns launched over compulsory vaccination, cases was increased 400%. Finally, four manufacturing companies withdrew from the market at the dismal failure and the fear of possible legal action by those affected.
"THE VACCINE WORKS!"
But suddenly, in the growing atmosphere of disrepute, the epidemic began to subside. Soon, the cases fell ... To zero! What had happened? Had finally worked the vaccine? Certainly so was how it was announced in big headlines as can be seen today in any encyclopedia or manual. Yet another critical investigations reveal very different stories, almost spooky. The vaccine not only worked but had become the leading cause of paralysis in children and adults! "Using the Salk and Sabin vaccines increase the chance of your child contracting the disease. It seems that the most effective way to protect your child from polio is to make sure it does not get the vaccine, "Dr. Robert Mendelsohn manifest, president of the National Federation of Health and Professor of Pediatrics, Community Health and Preventive Medicine University of Illinois and also the author of several books on public health and vaccinations, including Confessions of a Medical Heretic and The medical time bomb of immunization against disease. Then, why then fell polio cases?
Firstly, because the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-of which we spoke extensively in an article published in No. 128 of the journal, the diagnostic criteria changed! Before, if the symptoms appeared during 24 hours polio was diagnosed, from that time to be the ill determined the symptoms had to persist for at least 60 days! And besides it was decided that if cases occurred within 30 days after vaccination were considered "preexisting"!
As it were not enough so far one of the most significant clinical manifestations of polio was the inflammation of the lining of the brain and nerves. Since then that would be diagnosed as meningitis ... even in the presence of poliovirus.
The result? That between 1951 and 1960 were 70,083 diagnosed cases of polio and meningitis, but after the entry into force of the new criteria were reported between 1960 and 1980 only 589 cases of polio, and 100,000 of meningitis! The data is so brutal that there can be no doctor in the world that once they find on their own that what is said here is true, don’t have doubts about what had told about the polio vaccine, but on any vaccine .
Add that patients with symptoms of paralysis typical of polio would thereafter diagnosed as Acute Flaccid Paralysis provisionally pending the testing for poliovirus. The funny thing is that from that date, most testing was negative, ie that the virus did not appear guilty.
Common sense, in short, noted that it was necessary to revise the theory of the polio virus and look for other causes, but what was done was to use the strategy as evidence that the vaccine worked because no cases of polio were diagnosed. Moreover, the insolence went to the extreme as statistics were not present data for acute flaccid paralysis which was interpreted as that there was no case.
I guess that by now the reader will not be surprised to know that before the introduction of the vaccine the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis paid doctors $ 25 for each diagnosis of the disease but after the introduction of the vaccine were guidelines opposite direction.
Not be surprised to learn that most physicians did not report adverse reactions to the vaccine. FDA's own end admitting that 90% of cases of adverse reactions to the vaccine were not reported.
Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistician who chaired the Evaluation Commission of the American Public Health Association, in the fifties, would ensure in 1962 in a congressional hearing that the statistical reduction of polio cases was due to the change actually of the criteria used to communicate: "Before 1954 any doctor who diagnosed polio was doing a favor to the patient by subsidizing the costs of hospitalization (...) is simply the change in diagnostic criteria is what predetermined cases decline between 1955 and 1957. Was used or not the vaccine. "
Other countries used similar tactics. In China, for example, cases of polio were "converted" in cases of Guillem Barré syndrome that is indistinguishable from paralysis until then considered a symptom of polio. In Germany the was "managed" in the method of the CDC. And so on ...
At the end if someone gave positive test it was mounted immediately a campaign of vaccination statewide. And if reappeared cases, revaccination.
Make you wonder that in the International Journal of Emidemiology Kohler appeared a study entitled Unnecessary injections associated with paralysis or that in the website of the World Health Organization (WHO) appeared a text under the heading of “Twelve million injections per year The most needless”?
POLIO, EFFECT OF POISONING
While all this was happening physicians and researchers who have been saying for fifty years that polio was caused by poisoning by insecticides, especially DDT, and other toxins were systematically scorned and silenced. And that from the earliest times there have been reports of paralysis caused by different kinds of poisons: arsenic, phosphorus, carbon monoxide, lead, cyanide, aniline, benzene ... In fact it have successfully treated cases of polio using reducing substances known for their efficiency in annul poisons such as methylene blue, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) or the dimercaprol.
The truth is that polio has been associated consistently with fumigation, the daily use of DDT, the use of pesticides on crops, rivers, forests and roads and even aircraft with its launch by sprays or by spraying with children. It also has been associated with injections of antibiotics and removal of the tonsils. And the reductions in cases agree - what a coincidence! - With the withdrawal of these products on the market.
Currently it is stated that polio has been eradicated in most parts of the planet but the truth is known 45 terms derived from the word polio to describe the effects of pesticide poisoning, including those of polioencephalomalacia, polyradiculoneuritis, poliomielomalacia spinal or poliomalacia multifocal.
Having seen, is it not revolting to the reader that the World Health Organization still maintain programs of mass vaccination against polio just in developing countries where there are parallel programs for spray with DDT in large tracts of land?
It is too interesting! This article tells the story of fraud developed by Pasteur and how it affects us to this day and much more related to the false perception of viruses that cause disease. I hope you enjoyed.
Article translated by google and a bit fixed from:
http://www.dsalud.com/index.php?pagina=articulo&c=1511
Is it Justified the Germ Theory of Disease?
Given the importance of the matter at this time we will adress what might be called the "war on germs" in two articles that correspond to the two "sides" involved in this war imagined by Louis Pasteur and his followers. In this first course we look at the "side invader"-microbes-and the next we are going to talk about "defending side" making an in-depth review of what the official medicine known as "immune system."
We must therefore begin by clarifying what the theory of microbial infection or disease theory suggests-although it would be more correct to say-it requires that microorganisms are the cause of many diseases and, therefore, the primary therapeutic strategy is to destroy them. And although this theory is the foundation of economic power of large multinational pharmaceutical companies, a brief tour of its origins, its evolution and current dogmatic implementation will reveal not only the absence of scientific basis in their proposals, but the dramatic consequences that an uncritical acceptance has on the health of the population.
Perhaps it is not possible to know exactly who first came to the idea that some sort of invisible and evil creature was the blame for our ills. In various ancient cultures there are references to live agents as possible causes of diseases. Later the doctors of Al Andalus spoke about "creatures" or "tiny bodies" referring to possible causative agents of serious evils after entering into the body. Since then the idea of an external threat permeated deeply into the research.
A mid-sixteenth century Girolamo Francastoro spoke of a "seminary mortis" (seed of disease) as the transmitting agent of disease by direct contact or remotely. And it was because at that time when it appeared the notion of "contagion" in relation to syphilis. One and a half century later Anton van Leeuwenhoek was the first one able to observe the "germs" which earned him the honorary title of father of microbiology, although the term "bug" appears to stem from surgeon Charles Sedillot and became popular during the sessions of the Academy of Sciences Paris. it is considered that first formulated the germ theory of disease was Agostino Bassi in 1835.
A WORLD PASTEURIZED
However, the almost absolute protagonist of this unfortunate story is Louis Pasteur to who the Encyclopedia Britannica-owned by some of the Rockefeller-defined as " a French Chemistry microbiologist whose contributions were among the most varied and valuable in the history of science and industry. he was who proved that microorganisms cause fermentation and disease. He was who pioneered the use of vaccines. " At this point, few would question his contributions to the history of the industry. Another thing is his scientific career for which has been shown that their alleged discoveries are due to plagiarism and fraud.
There are three tests, unknown to the general public but quite rigorous and devastating, leaving it clear to Pasteur's behavior throughout his career: the books of Ethel Douglas Hume and Robert B. Pearson, and Gerald L. Report Geison. These texts leads to two fundamental ideas. The first, Pasteur plagiarized his master Antoine Bechamp, thorough researcher and member of the Academy of Sciences of France. Well, the problem is not merely to copy his ideas but that he misunderstood, confused and misrepresented, launching the history of medicine by a completely opposite way that should go, with tragic consequences for the health of all as discussed below. Moreover, Pasteur "fixed" the results of their experiments to correspond with the ideas he wanted to show, which against all evidence, persist in school textbooks and head of the vast majority of people, including doctors.
Bechamp had analyzed the relationship of microorganisms with specific diseases fallowing the footsteps of researchers such as Günter Ederlein, Jean Tissot, Raimond Rife or Wilhelm Reich. What Pasteur did was to simplify his ideas stating that microorganisms are the cause of disease, a simple idea to grasp, and above all profitable, not only in economic terms but in a much more important area: that of individual responsibility and collective health and disease.
Rockefeller’s Encyclopedia Britannica also awards Pasteur another discovery that he actually stole Bechamp: fermentation of wine and milk. Bechamp Denied spontaneous generation in which Pasteur believed blindly until he decided to appropriate his teacher's theory without understanding it. Moreover, the conclusions reached by Pasteur means that he did not understand even their own experiments on digestion and fermentation processes. And that explains that his family asked not to make public their laboratory notebooks after his death. Only in 1975, a Princeton historian, Professor Geison, had the opportunity to conduct a comprehensive study of nearly ten thousand pages which had remained secret until the death of the grandson of Pasteur and the conclusions of its report, entitled Science Louis Pasteur Private presented in 1993 at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, it would ensure that Pasteur not only published false information but he was guilty of "scientific misconduct" by violating rules of medicine, science and ethics . None of which has prevented him still to be considered "benefactor of humanity" even in the advertisements of yogurts.
THE POSTULATES THAT FAIL TO KEEP
The other famous protagonist of this story is Robert Koch. The importance of their contribution lie in the paradoxical fact that their rigorous approach, far from demonstrating the validity of the germ theory, what really makes is literally refute it. "Incredible? Let's see.
Pasteur was a practical man, while Koch was a theorist, but they had in common-perhaps since enlisted volunteers for the Franco-Prussian war - was their marked militaristic vision of life . So while Pasteur contributed to humanity manipulated experiments, Koch did the same with a theoretical framework that served to legitimize these experiments: the famous postulates developed by his teacher, the German anatomist Friedrich Henle, that Koch modified according to which:
A micro-organism ...
... Has to be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease but not in healthy organisms.
... Has to be isolated from the diseased body and grown in pure cultures.
... Should cause disease when introduced into a healthy body.
... Has to be isolated again in the agency that has been inoculated and identified as identical to the original specific causative agent.
As you can see it is an approach characterized by impeccable logic. The problem is not satisfied in any supposedly contagious disease. As early as 1909 the Lancet published this devastating phrase: "Koch's postulates are met seldom or never." What did they do then these "benefactors of humanity"? Did they wonder why the microbes lived inside the plants, animals and humans without causing disease unless a minority? "Did they raised the question of how to protect us if they live within us? Did they wonder how they managed to survive in humans for two million years without antibiotics or vaccines? Do you reject the theory of infection to look for another hypothesis to explain their observations achieved? Did they questioned about the true role of microbes in nature?
Absolutely not. The theory of infection and their postulates are still there, intact, as well as effigies of Koch and Pasteur. Although "tweaks" of course. To begin Koch was forced to give up the second part of the first postulate "but not in healthy bodies" to find numerous instances of what they called "asymptomatic patients" were not really sick but who had developed the organism but not any disease. And why did that happen? The idea of infection involves an invasion of outsiders ... but is that microbes normally live inside all living beings. So it was very easy to fulfill the first part of assumption and impossible to fulfill the second.
However, the “ workaround” does not end here. Koch and colleagues, Rush, Max von Pettenkofer and Rudolf Virchow also soon realized that they could not cause the same disease by inoculating the organism into another host and sets the third postulate. So they changed the original approach of Henle and the "same disease" became "similar symptoms." Problem solved!
In 1937, when it was found that the illnesses supposedly caused by viruses do not even meet the first postulate, ran a veil over the requirement of "absolute presence" of the pathogen and used expressions like 'regular presence' or 'consistency transmission ".
Not what many investigators were checking with their own eyes, nor rigorous rebuttals made by the prestigious Claude Bernard, nor and the many subsequent revisions have served to stop a devastating current to today.
An example of this is provided by pellagra. In 1913 a researcher injected tissue filtrates from a patient of pellagra in several monkeys causing similar symptoms of the disease. The conclusion was that there was a filterable virus in the tissues and therefore pellagra was a viral illness. A year later a committee of government experts said that pellagra was not related to diet and was given to Joseph Golderberg the search for the virus. Well, now in his preliminary investigation Golgerberg concluded that there was not a viral illness but originated in the diet. And he spent fifteen years fighting against the prevailing dogma of the germ theory until it finally got the recognition that this disease causes a deficiency of vitamin B.
BECHAMP HAD REASON
Meanwhile the original ideas that Pasteur had simplified and perverted (the ideas of Antoine Bechamp), were forgotten. But Bechamp and Pasteur approaches are not only two different ideas, but two distinct theories are mainly two ways of looking at life with profound and far-reaching consequences. The Pasteur connects with Darwin and his followers to apply to life the "fittest" and think that evolution is the result of a competition that have won. Bechamp theory , however, part of the idea of cooperation among the people that make up the network of life.
And although Bechamp was "erased" from the official story his ideas germinated and today there is a stream of research that continues to explore the way that he opened whose latest findings that confirm beyond doubt that his insights and suggestions were on the correct line.
Today we know that bacteria were essential for the emergence of life on Earth through photosynthesis creating adequate weather conditions. And then was the gradual coming together of different types of bacteria leading to the current cell, true cooperatives vital that enabled the formation of multicellular organisms.
In short, bacteria are key elements in the food chain, both at sea and on land and air. As explains the Spanish biologist Máximo Sandín, teacher of Human Evolution and Human Ecology at the Autonomous University of Madrid, citing studies from the last ten years "they purify water, degrade and recycle toxic waste products, replenish the carbon dioxide the atmosphere and make available to plants nitrogen from the atmosphere. Without them, the continents would be deserts that would hatbor little more than lichens. In humans the number is ten times that of the cells and their biomass is greater than the plant biomass of the planet "(between the reader www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/msandin/).
But the role of bacteria does not end there. Then see how far they are necessary for life and the dramatic consequences of the war declared against them.
THE ARMS RACE
First of it should be understood that the imposition of the of Pasteur’s ideas contributed to the development of "weapons" with which "fight" to the alleged perpetrators of the disease. And put on us on the track who is responsible for the triumph maximum of those ideas. Because the history of the development and consolidation of the germ theory of disease is the story of the creation of great pharmaceutical empires with Rockefeller clan ahead.
Antibiotics and vaccines were the two main categories of weapons developed to fight bacteria or prevent their attack. Both issues have been dealt with extensively in this magazine so that here we focus on the global role they have played over one hundred years, poisoning, disrupting the ecological balance, creating enormous health problems disguised as "new diseases "keys of a billionaire business, maintenance of destructive concepts of health and disease ...
The first antibiotics were developed, penicillin like- acting at the outside of the cells by blocking the production of proteins and alter their function and the environment and the consistency of the cell membrane, thus affecting its function as a filter for toxic elements or particles. Subsequently began to develop other operating inside our cells, sulfonamides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, quinolones, macrolides, Septrim and so on. These products work in different ways, all with serious consequences. Here are the most important-obviously not often mentioned on prospects or the information on the Internet- relying on research that Dr. Heinrich Kremer stated in his book The Silent Revolution of Medicine, Cancer and AIDS. According to him antibiotic ...
... Block the formation of DNA (genetic information of cells) by preventing the formation of new cells and causing mutations.
... Alter the balance of microorganisms that live symbiotically in our bodies, in particular disrupt the specialization of gut bacteria in the key roles of cooperation. And,
... Interfering with the energy production within mitochondria.
Do not forget that mitochondria are ancient bacteria in the course of evolution that were incorporated into our cells and are the generators of life energy. They are therefore essential for life and have their own genetic information transmitted directly from mother to child. Any damage that they suffer not only impact on energy production creating serious health problems but can be transmitted from one generation to another. And that is precisely what has been happening because of the mass administration of antibiotics for decades and other toxic products manufactured by the pharmaceutical macroindustria that was created by the same power groups that now control oil and energy obtaining every year hundreds of billion euros in sales of its patents and poisons.
A self-destructive process a real "microecological" disaster - that has led humanity to a dead end because there is no possibility of making more powerful antibiotics to overcome the resistance developed by microbes. Being in this context that we must certainly place the emergence of new "viral" in the context of AIDS. Products that are released to market without proper clinical studies and experience used as guinea pigs people terrified and helpless children.
VACCINES: FRAUD AND POISONING
The other idea that Pasteur gave to humanity is the vaccination. From the viewpoint of the hegemonic medical model, which plays an important role the conception of the Immune System as a defensive army against microbes- vaccines are something like if we would capture a handful of enemies so that our intelligence services will take accurate information to design more specific strategy against him.
And we approach to the critical of vaccines from two perspectives. One by removing the theoretical base that supports it: the germ theory and the concept of Immune System developed by the Medical officer. But it will be discussed in the next article where we are going to see that the vaccines lack the most basic bio-logical sense though they have been imposed under the false argument that served to eradicate the disease and stop epidemics. Now let's take the second perspective which is to analyze its negative effects and expose the lies about its effectiveness beginning at the origin of the shots, of course, going by of the hand of Pasteur.
Robert Koch himself, in a paper published in 1881 on Anthrax, criticized the research of Pasteur and accused him of distorting the results of vaccination experiments. What do he mean? Pasteur conducted an experiment that has gone down in history as the final proof that the body is able to immunize itself against a disease if you receive the weak causing microbe. The days May 5th and 17th 1881 he inoculated 25 of 50 sheep an Anthrax vaccine consisting of attenuated bacilli, days later, on May 31th, 50 rams were injected virulent bacilli predicting that unvaccinated will die unlike of vaccinees ones that were protected. Two days later, in a crowded theatrical scene, farmers, journalists and scientists, found the overall success: among unvaccinated sheep were 23 dead and two dying while the 25 vaccinees had survived.
So far the story as told by the manuals, textbooks and Wikipedia on the internet. Only that there are other lesser known sources of information that provide insight into a truth very different from what happened. This is the case of the book H. J. Hudson The Great Betrayal: Fraud in science or medical health papers of Eneko Landaburu (available on numerous websites). Just one year after of the "miracle" Pasteur began receiving reports of numerous villages in France and Hungary where they had used their vaccine but vaccinated sheep died by the thousands. The same happened in other countries which tried to replicate his experience: Italy, Germany, Russia, Argentina ... What had happened? Two years later would be known as Pasteur declared at the Academy of Sciences that the vaccines had a "trigger." In other words, a poison (based on potassium dichromate) that had destroyed the bacilli inoculated in rams vaccinated and therefore had survived.
Today we know that is not true that vaccines have eradicated any disease. Rigorous studies show that the highs and lows of intensity or disappearance of epidemics such as smallpox, diphtheria, tuberculosis and rubella were related to changes in living conditions and not to the introduction or vaccines (for a discussion more detailed with numerous examples and references into http://saludypoder.blogspot.com/2010/02/puntualizando-sobre-vacunas-y-salud.html).
Moreover, a broad social movement involving many doctors, now warns of the serious health problems caused by vaccines. Including encephalitis, meningitis, pneumonia, quadriplegia, epilepsy, polio, kidney failure, cerebral paralisys, blindness, rheumatoid arthritis, adenopathy, seizures, osteomyelitis, cholera, chromosome abnormalities, genetic diseases and malformations.
It worth to add that vaccines have contributed greatly to strengthening the irresponsibility of people on their health by making them dependent on large multinational pharmaceutical companies as well as establish a aberrant health system not only that does not solve the health problems of the population but for many years they had worsen when they are created.
ANOTHER STEP IN THE WAR ON GERMS
But let us look back again. When pasteurized bacteriologists had difficulties to find new bacteria which confer disease, they began to think that maybe there were smallest microbes that couldn’t be seen even with the light microscope. So they decided to resurrect a term coined in the late fourteenth century to refer to possible entities invisible poisonous "viruses." Some microbes that at first was thought might be of a liquid nature -and so were called "contagium vivum fluidum" – although later they determined that they were “particles."
The fact is that until the invention in 1931 of electron microscopy the virus was pure conjecture. It turns out that in 1884 the microbiologist Charles Chamberland had invented a filter that allowed to retain the bacteria contained in a serum and thought that all "infectious agents" were held in it, but some researchers concluded that there ware "filterable agents, microbes who managed to pass it and kept in serum. Hence there must be deducted that they were "minibacterias" or "ultravirus." It would, however, until the invention by Ernst Ruska and Max Knolldel of the electron microscope when they could see for the first time ... and immediately began to blame them for new diseases. And begin a new phase in the war against microbes emerging a new breed of "hunters" virologists.
Well, let's be pragmatic and take as an example: the case of polio, the first disease to be "demostrated" was caused by a virus, to show how far the Virology is dominated by dogmatism, preconceived ideas and interests of multinationals and power groups. But first let's briefly review, again with the help of Professor Sandin, the role that viruses have on the Web of Life: "There are between 5 and 25 times more viruses than bacteria!" Said Maximo Sandin in the report Are really are bacteria and viruses responsible for most diseases? which appeared in No. 125 of this magazine. We live in very immersed in a sea of bacteria and viruses that, again, are essential for the functioning of life. Few people know that viruses exist in the sea in astronomical numbers and that they control the base of the food pyramid, are a reservoir of genetic information and are involved in biogeochemical processes among which is the contribution to the nucleation of clouds, the genome living consists of a sum of bacterial genes and viral genes. Fewer still know that when human genome was sequenced that what was sequenced was actually only the coding portion of the protein and that is only 1.5% of the genome in which sequences have identified hundreds of thousands of bacterial and mobile elements and endogenous retroviruses whole and fragmentary. The rest, the other 98.5% are mobile elements, endogenous viruses, exons, repetitive sequences ... all of viral origin. All this leads to a singular conclusion: are viruses and bacteria the architects of life ". He adds on his website: "The majority of animal and plant genomes are composed of endogenous virus (internal) and mobile elements and sequences derived from viruses." Sandin speaks of what has hitherto been called "junk DNA" by geneticists who despise everything that is not known. When it turns out that this "junk information" there are essential homeotic genes for embryonic development which arrange on chromosomes reveals that they are of retroviral origin. In fact, in subsequent work, published in the last fifteen years has already been established that certain endogenous viruses in mammals have the task of forming the placenta and suppress immune responses so during pregnancy the fetus was not rejected by the mother’s body . The Professor Sandin has also documented that "the virus in the free state are quite inert and it is the cell that uses and actives components of the virus."
THE POLIO EXAMPLE
In short, the "polio", Greek word that means "gray marrow" - is characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord and affect motor neurons causing paralysis and in severe cases, death. And at the of nineteenth century end resulted in authentic "epidemics" affecting mainly middle-class children. The “pasteurized “ bacteriologists was quickly in search of the culprit bacteria. Just as we did not find it, they revived the old idea of "filterable agents", ie the virus.
In fact former President Theodore Roosevelt decided to launch a war against polio "because he had just seen him affected by it and that would start a career as a reward for whoever would win elevation to the altars of science (not to mention the substantial benefits of a vaccine to be marketed on a global scale). Moreover, polio became included in the Public Health Act as "infectious disease" according to criteria such as B. Sach (published in the Journal of. Obst. & Gyneco., 63: 703 710, April 1911): "In general, any disease occurs in epidemics is sufficient to prove infectious or contagious nature." No comments. Obviously the inclusion of polio as an infectious disease involving the investigation, ruled out bacteria, and only remained in the hands of virologists. And virologists, as its name indicates, are dedicated to hunting viruses. So in 1909 he produced another of those "milestones" in the History of Medicine: nothing less than the first time that "proved" that a disease was caused by a virus. And what was this "show"? Simply, Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper started from the premise that since the virus was very small elements filtering the serum of a patient and removing all the possible bacteria what remained was to be the agent guilty! Anyone would think today that there was the possibility that another small particles like those were there but these "great scientists" not only considered so but they related to the serum as a “virus isolated. "
The presumptive identification of the culprit virus did not occur until almost forty years later. In 1948 Gilbert Dalldorf and Grace Sickles, the Department of Health New York, found in the feces of sick children an "unidentified filterable agent" which was later named "poliovirus." Nobody could explain how a common inhabitant of our intestines could reach the spine and attack the nerve tissues of the brain but decided to ignore this "detail" and started a competition to find the vaccine, something that would say have made Jonas Salk - School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and Albert Sabin, a researcher at the Institute for Medical Research, an agency owned by… Rockefeller.
the discovery of Dalldorf and Sickles clearly was "providential" for seekers of vaccines and that until then had been dedicated to growing the virus on the basis of injecting tens of thousands of monkeys and chimpanzees. In fact, the huge delay in the investigation despite of the millionaires funds invested was because they focused on experimenting with monkeys even though they were watching that the course of the disease was different from that of humans. And thousands of monkeys were sacrificed on the table of vivisection in the name of science. In fact they calculated that, with a found vaccine, to inject it into the U.S. population would require sacrifice 50,000 monkeys.
The first to get a "vaccine" was Salk from the feces of three children who were not sick! But apparently it was not relevant. However, to launch the vaccine, they found something troubling: three variants of the supposed poliovirus in the intestines of patients. And that meant that a vaccine made from one of them did not entirely protect the disease. As far as I have investigated this obstacle was saved simply forgetting about it! Later Sabin vaccine was presented as "trivalent" ie, saying that it protected from the three variants of the virus.
Meanwhile vaccines seekers staged a new disaster: to produce significant amounts of virus they used cheaply cancer cells of a patient named Henrietta Lacks died in 1951. Soon 600,000 of those cultured cells were scattered throughout the country being used for all types of investigations and experiments. Obviously it was feared that the vaccines were contaminated with carcinogen elements , but their production did not stop.
In 1954, Salk's vaccine would prove in 400,000 American children and "only" 112 get ill with polio a few months after receiving three doses. But Salk unaccounted for those ill with less than three doses or within the first two weeks after the third dose. They was all considered "unvaccinated" completely altering test results. Truly a worthy disciple of Pasteur! The official conclusion of his report was that the vaccine provided protection for between 30 and 90% but was publicly announced as a great success and April 12, 1955 the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis declared it completely safe by saying further that offered complete protection against polio. Salk received the Congressional Medal from hands of then-President Eisenhower and six manufacturers launched it to the market the 27 million doses that were prepared to wait to get approval to rely on pressure from the foundation.
Two weeks after the start of vaccination were recorded 260 cases of children with polio, of which 11 die with what the U.S. Surgeon General immediately suspended vaccination throughout the country and convened an urgent meeting with Salk and manufacturers. They assured him that everything was under control and that the next dose would be safe. Sabin, Salk's competitor, proposed the total cessation of vaccinations but he had good contacts in key positions of power and the campaign resumed despite the warnings of John Enders, who had received the Nobel Prize in 1949 for growing the virus in Human tissue-about possible agents not detected in the vaccine.
The epidemic would worsen. Only 2,000 cases in Boston came within four months of resumed vaccinations when in previous years had never exceeded the figure of 300 cases. In New York and Connecticut also doubled the number of cases. And in Vermont tripled. In Massachusetts, 77.5% of paralytic cases had received three or more doses of vaccine. Finally decided to suspend in Canada. In Ottawa cases had increased by 700% - as in several European countries. In 1957 half of those who suffered polio in the United States were vaccinated! In fact in the five states where the campaigns launched over compulsory vaccination, cases was increased 400%. Finally, four manufacturing companies withdrew from the market at the dismal failure and the fear of possible legal action by those affected.
"THE VACCINE WORKS!"
But suddenly, in the growing atmosphere of disrepute, the epidemic began to subside. Soon, the cases fell ... To zero! What had happened? Had finally worked the vaccine? Certainly so was how it was announced in big headlines as can be seen today in any encyclopedia or manual. Yet another critical investigations reveal very different stories, almost spooky. The vaccine not only worked but had become the leading cause of paralysis in children and adults! "Using the Salk and Sabin vaccines increase the chance of your child contracting the disease. It seems that the most effective way to protect your child from polio is to make sure it does not get the vaccine, "Dr. Robert Mendelsohn manifest, president of the National Federation of Health and Professor of Pediatrics, Community Health and Preventive Medicine University of Illinois and also the author of several books on public health and vaccinations, including Confessions of a Medical Heretic and The medical time bomb of immunization against disease. Then, why then fell polio cases?
Firstly, because the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-of which we spoke extensively in an article published in No. 128 of the journal, the diagnostic criteria changed! Before, if the symptoms appeared during 24 hours polio was diagnosed, from that time to be the ill determined the symptoms had to persist for at least 60 days! And besides it was decided that if cases occurred within 30 days after vaccination were considered "preexisting"!
As it were not enough so far one of the most significant clinical manifestations of polio was the inflammation of the lining of the brain and nerves. Since then that would be diagnosed as meningitis ... even in the presence of poliovirus.
The result? That between 1951 and 1960 were 70,083 diagnosed cases of polio and meningitis, but after the entry into force of the new criteria were reported between 1960 and 1980 only 589 cases of polio, and 100,000 of meningitis! The data is so brutal that there can be no doctor in the world that once they find on their own that what is said here is true, don’t have doubts about what had told about the polio vaccine, but on any vaccine .
Add that patients with symptoms of paralysis typical of polio would thereafter diagnosed as Acute Flaccid Paralysis provisionally pending the testing for poliovirus. The funny thing is that from that date, most testing was negative, ie that the virus did not appear guilty.
Common sense, in short, noted that it was necessary to revise the theory of the polio virus and look for other causes, but what was done was to use the strategy as evidence that the vaccine worked because no cases of polio were diagnosed. Moreover, the insolence went to the extreme as statistics were not present data for acute flaccid paralysis which was interpreted as that there was no case.
I guess that by now the reader will not be surprised to know that before the introduction of the vaccine the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis paid doctors $ 25 for each diagnosis of the disease but after the introduction of the vaccine were guidelines opposite direction.
Not be surprised to learn that most physicians did not report adverse reactions to the vaccine. FDA's own end admitting that 90% of cases of adverse reactions to the vaccine were not reported.
Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistician who chaired the Evaluation Commission of the American Public Health Association, in the fifties, would ensure in 1962 in a congressional hearing that the statistical reduction of polio cases was due to the change actually of the criteria used to communicate: "Before 1954 any doctor who diagnosed polio was doing a favor to the patient by subsidizing the costs of hospitalization (...) is simply the change in diagnostic criteria is what predetermined cases decline between 1955 and 1957. Was used or not the vaccine. "
Other countries used similar tactics. In China, for example, cases of polio were "converted" in cases of Guillem Barré syndrome that is indistinguishable from paralysis until then considered a symptom of polio. In Germany the was "managed" in the method of the CDC. And so on ...
At the end if someone gave positive test it was mounted immediately a campaign of vaccination statewide. And if reappeared cases, revaccination.
Make you wonder that in the International Journal of Emidemiology Kohler appeared a study entitled Unnecessary injections associated with paralysis or that in the website of the World Health Organization (WHO) appeared a text under the heading of “Twelve million injections per year The most needless”?
POLIO, EFFECT OF POISONING
While all this was happening physicians and researchers who have been saying for fifty years that polio was caused by poisoning by insecticides, especially DDT, and other toxins were systematically scorned and silenced. And that from the earliest times there have been reports of paralysis caused by different kinds of poisons: arsenic, phosphorus, carbon monoxide, lead, cyanide, aniline, benzene ... In fact it have successfully treated cases of polio using reducing substances known for their efficiency in annul poisons such as methylene blue, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) or the dimercaprol.
The truth is that polio has been associated consistently with fumigation, the daily use of DDT, the use of pesticides on crops, rivers, forests and roads and even aircraft with its launch by sprays or by spraying with children. It also has been associated with injections of antibiotics and removal of the tonsils. And the reductions in cases agree - what a coincidence! - With the withdrawal of these products on the market.
Currently it is stated that polio has been eradicated in most parts of the planet but the truth is known 45 terms derived from the word polio to describe the effects of pesticide poisoning, including those of polioencephalomalacia, polyradiculoneuritis, poliomielomalacia spinal or poliomalacia multifocal.
Having seen, is it not revolting to the reader that the World Health Organization still maintain programs of mass vaccination against polio just in developing countries where there are parallel programs for spray with DDT in large tracts of land?
I was answering about this thread: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,25606.msg304087.html#msg304087
and I thought it would be great to show it here too:
I found something enough interesting regarding the education system in French... by reading "En finir avec Pasteur, un siècle de mystification scientifique" - Dr Eric Ancelet (Finish it with Pasteur, one century of scientific mystification) - Editions Médecine et Société, collection Resurgence.
http://www.amazon.fr/Pour-finir-avec-Pasteur-mystification/dp/2872110259
This book was edited at first ten years ago, this one is the fourth increased edition, 2010.
I gonna try to translate this part which gives an interesting way to understand the mass people conditioning by school... But at first, I gonna translate the back cover for explaining the point of the book:
Pages 77 & 78
I forgot to specify that Dr Eric Ancelet is a veterinary doctor who was excluded of the Order of the Veterinarians further to the publication of its book. He is a psychotherapist and a speaker today.
I would also like to quote some passages of this book which seem to me very relevant:
Maybe that Pasteur wanted to help Napoleon III to be cured of its epilepsy, but certainly to remove an immense glory from it and not by pure kindness:
Sorry, this is a mistake between Napoleon Ist (Bonaparte), who was epileptic, I did not find something which would corroborate an epilepsy disease for Napoleon III who was the Emperor at the Pasteur time.
and I thought it would be great to show it here too:
I found something enough interesting regarding the education system in French... by reading "En finir avec Pasteur, un siècle de mystification scientifique" - Dr Eric Ancelet (Finish it with Pasteur, one century of scientific mystification) - Editions Médecine et Société, collection Resurgence.
http://www.amazon.fr/Pour-finir-avec-Pasteur-mystification/dp/2872110259
This book was edited at first ten years ago, this one is the fourth increased edition, 2010.
I gonna try to translate this part which gives an interesting way to understand the mass people conditioning by school... But at first, I gonna translate the back cover for explaining the point of the book:
Pages 77 & 78
I forgot to specify that Dr Eric Ancelet is a veterinary doctor who was excluded of the Order of the Veterinarians further to the publication of its book. He is a psychotherapist and a speaker today.
Galaxia2002 said:
I would also like to quote some passages of this book which seem to me very relevant:
Maybe that Pasteur wanted to help Napoleon III to be cured of its epilepsy, but certainly to remove an immense glory from it and not by pure kindness:
Sorry, this is a mistake between Napoleon Ist (Bonaparte), who was epileptic, I did not find something which would corroborate an epilepsy disease for Napoleon III who was the Emperor at the Pasteur time.
shijing
The Living Force
I’ve been reading about pleomorphism recently, and wanted to report what I’ve found so far. The concept on the face of it seems fantastic – but so do a lot of things until you start digging deeper, so I’m wondering if there might be something to it and if it could be useful in a practical way (besides what it already underscores re: taking care of your body through proper diet, good sleep habits, etc).
To start with, this is a short overview of the best-known pleomorphism researchers (Bechamp, Rife, Enderlein, and Naessens), and a recent overview with bibliography is located here. This is a short video overview of some basic concepts; a monologue by Rife can be found here and an interview with Naessens here.
Odyssey mentioned this link about pleomorphism here -- I’ve edited out quite a bit and it’s worth an entire read, but here are some of the key concepts:
Since the above mentions ‘parasites’, I wonder if it has any relevance to this:
Christopher Bird (see below) says this about parasitism:
Christopher Bird discusses Naessens’ work here. I’m leaving a lot out again, but the biographical parts are definitely worth reading to get a solid example of ponerization in medicine and science:
Take a look at this video by James DeMeo (author of Saharasia), where he shows the spontaneous emergence of what Wilhelm Reich called ‘Bions’ from inorganic matter under the influence of extreme heat (such as might be generated through electrical discharge or the descent of a bolide through the atmosphere?)
Here are a couple more short videos on the somatid cycle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py-hutc5ZNM&list=PL2F2A67EF182C423A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttl5NBo3_Z4
With the above paragraphs in mind, the following are interesting:
Continuing:
Ross Horne provides the following summary:
It's not clear to me yet whether or not George Merkl's chondriana are the same thing as the microzyma/somatids described above. But it seems that if this theory is generally correct, it could have some profound implications for Bryant Shiller’s work, as well as that of Joseph and Wickramasinghe. It also adds a new perspective to some of the topics covered in the recent article On viral 'junk' DNA, a DNA-enhancing Ketogenic diet, and cometary kicks.
To start with, this is a short overview of the best-known pleomorphism researchers (Bechamp, Rife, Enderlein, and Naessens), and a recent overview with bibliography is located here. This is a short video overview of some basic concepts; a monologue by Rife can be found here and an interview with Naessens here.
Odyssey mentioned this link about pleomorphism here -- I’ve edited out quite a bit and it’s worth an entire read, but here are some of the key concepts:
Since the above mentions ‘parasites’, I wonder if it has any relevance to this:
8/9/97 said:
Christopher Bird (see below) says this about parasitism:
Christopher Bird discusses Naessens’ work here. I’m leaving a lot out again, but the biographical parts are definitely worth reading to get a solid example of ponerization in medicine and science:
Take a look at this video by James DeMeo (author of Saharasia), where he shows the spontaneous emergence of what Wilhelm Reich called ‘Bions’ from inorganic matter under the influence of extreme heat (such as might be generated through electrical discharge or the descent of a bolide through the atmosphere?)
Here are a couple more short videos on the somatid cycle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py-hutc5ZNM&list=PL2F2A67EF182C423A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttl5NBo3_Z4
With the above paragraphs in mind, the following are interesting:
3/30/02 said:
3/4/12 said:
Continuing:
Ross Horne provides the following summary:
It's not clear to me yet whether or not George Merkl's chondriana are the same thing as the microzyma/somatids described above. But it seems that if this theory is generally correct, it could have some profound implications for Bryant Shiller’s work, as well as that of Joseph and Wickramasinghe. It also adds a new perspective to some of the topics covered in the recent article On viral 'junk' DNA, a DNA-enhancing Ketogenic diet, and cometary kicks.
Fascinating Shijing, far more than i can absorb on one reading. Was interested in how the introduction of probiotics whereby they were healing gut wounds (discussed elsewhere too), the cycle of Somatid; from beneficial to toxic, with toxic being the larger part of the cycle as it interacts with food nutrients and then sees general change/decay in the cycle.
There was also the ph relationship and this: "Emotional upheaval and unloving thoughts, anger, etc., have a strongly acidifying effect in the tissues."
When it talks about Mold, related to yeast and fungus, being "the end-stage of all pleomorphic cycles in the body."
Thank you for posting.
There was also the ph relationship and this: "Emotional upheaval and unloving thoughts, anger, etc., have a strongly acidifying effect in the tissues."
When it talks about Mold, related to yeast and fungus, being "the end-stage of all pleomorphic cycles in the body."
Thank you for posting.
