EsoQuest said:
Thus, I cannot see that god is both good and evil, as these are results although the results can cause more results, and hence evil propagates itself. The primal cause is the imbalance between the two faces, and evil is the result of that state. All beings encompass both being and non-being by virtue of being temporal and distinct.
They (and we) are flawed however, because creation is still sorting itself out and learning to embody itself.
Agreed, I cannot see/accept either that God is good and evil, I mean it does seem so much human, since those are juste moral human concepts. They are a manifestation of being/non being in our dense, heavy planes, thus imbalanced, uncomplete, distorted as you said (and explained far better than I could).
I'm however struggling with these concepts of being/non being in higher densities. In union with the One, no polarity, all is one, so what is that state ? neither being nor non being, or both at the same time, or Being ?
I was thinking of the Buddhist philosophy, where the Nirvana is seen as a state of pure nothingness, complete vacancy, void... thus, is it total non-being ? Can we say that embracing the buddhist philosophy is to choose the non-being path ? Would it be STS, here in our heavy distorted planes ?
(OK these questions have nothing to do with ultra terrestrial activity, so I shall re-post them in another section, if you're interested in answering.)
Anyway here's the final part of the interview's translation :
K.O. : In Gnostic tradition how I understand it, Sophia (wisdom) is not the only "divinity" or source of eternity and perfection. Can we compare Sophia to a very advanced, sophisticated and elaborate being, a sort of extraterrestrial intelligence ? Or must we admit that the source of all thing is not a unique entity but rests on a polytheist conception ?
J.L. : In Gnostic cosmology, Sophia is an Aion, a divinity on a cosmic level, but she's not alone. She's part of a group of Aions, the Gods of the Plerome of Plenitude. But there are many Pleromes, many galaxies within the universe. The gnostic myth of the fallen Goddess concerns our galaxy and our planet, not the whole universe. If we don't understand what's going on here, locally, how could we understand what's going on anywhere else in the universe ? The challenge, the test is to apprehend our own direct history before being able to turn to a broader history.
Because of the very particular intensity of her Dream, Sophia came to incarnate on planet earth and consequently, she represents, for us who dwell on planet earth, the true divinity in the bosom of which we're living. She's the real living Matrix. Sophia is the divinity of Nature, to speak in theological terms. What does she look like ? It's something we must strive to comprehend through practice, through the path of sacred knowledge, Gnosis. All the Mysteries were dedicated to come to understand Gaia and to serve the high intelligence of the Aion Sophia. The "source of all thing" is a Mystery. Why speculating on what we cannot know nor understand while we're facing the adventurous exploration of what we are able to understand ! ?
K.O. : Among dark rumours and perceptions about theories of conspiracy, people like Branton, David Icke or the zulu shaman Credo Mutwa are convinced that the parasite is in reality a reptilian entity who invests or possesses the bodies of this world's rulers - George Bush for example.
J.L. : I think we must train our imaginary skills in order to detect the presence of these alien entities as well as to discern what is real from what is fantasmatic. Alchimists have a rule : "Act in harmony with nature, observe Nature's work and start the Great Work with the authentic powers of imagination, and not with fantasmatic thoughts". It's a question of discipline we must face on the path to acute perception. I think that certain sources of indigenous information, such as the ones represented by Credo Mutwa, have valid information to reveal about the Archons. However, I suspect that the reptilian scenario has exploded beyond all reasonable proportion, because of fantasies and mental manipulations. For what I know, the alien predators called Archons by the Gnostics can take two shapes : one is embryonary (the Gray aliens), the other is draconian - a reptilian type, but they cannot and therefore don't possess human bodies. One must be capable of common sense when one invests paranormal and supernatural phenomena. George Bush doesn't need to be a reptilian to be a monster. We must admit that human beings can act in monstrous ways because they are distorted by predators, without believing the fantasy that they turn into reptilians. To my understanding, the scenario proposed by Icke and others give too much power to predators. Then, how can Icke and his witnessess propose first-hand testimonies on shape shifting, metamorphoses into reptilians ? Well, the perception of things is a construction. All perception ! Keep in mind that the Archons are masters in virtual reality. In coptic (which is the language of the NHC), this phenomenon is designed under the term HAL, "simulation". Gnostic texts state that the Archons "abduct souls at night"; They do it through virtual reality (or VR), techniques of VR simulation. Of course, the "VR" of the Archons is as real for them as is our earth's reality for us. The difference is that we can interact in symbiosis with this VR. The other difference is that the Archons manipulate unorganic quantum fields whereas we manipulate the bands of perception which shape these fields. The Gnostics considered that we were superior to the Archons in thought, perception and intention.
I would say that these reports and testimonies are true : the witnessess did perceive a shape shift, but this perception is an effect of the powers of the reptilians in VR rather than a real, concrete and authentic phenomenon, a natural event. Snakes are born from eggs and they shed their skin. That's what nature shows us. Nature can then tell us something about the way the reptilians behave, if we study this subject with an authentic imagination and not with fantasies.
K.O. : Certain authors (like Paul Von Ward) denounce YHVY or Yahveh as an Advanded Being, an ET entity who wanted to dominate our world with intentions that didn't seem good and pure. Do you think that YHVH is an Archon or a representative of the Archons ?
J.L. : Gnostic texts clearly state that Jeovah is "the Archon Lord", a predatory alien of reptilian type who rules the embryo-like Grays who have a beehive mentality and behaviour. Jehovah, that the Gnostics called Yaldabaoth, truly is an alien entity whose realm is the planetary system independent of the earth, the sun and the moon. He's not an "Advanced Being" (that is to say more evolved than humans) but an alien turned completely insane and endowed with certain "superhuman" powers close to a divinity's. The Gnostics thought that Jeovah infects humanity with the belief that he pretends to be the creative god, whereas in fact he cannot create anything at all. The NHC are very clear on the fact that Jeovah-Yaldabaoth is the leader of the Archon species.
K.O. : The Gnostics denounce the part played by the Archons. Did you find the same kind of warning about them in other religious traditions ?
J.L. : No, I cannot say I found this information so clearly and exhaustively presented in other religious traditions. Keep in mind that Gnosis is a path of knowledge, not a religion ! The Mysteries are schools of paranormal knowledge, not religious institutions. I am convinced all the religions divert the human potential, but the three religions of Abraham - Judaism, Christianism and Islam - are potentially fatal. They lead to a terminal deviation, a dead end for our species. You won't find any religion warning you that it is dangerous for your mental health and your physical survival. The Gnostics saw in the redeeming and saving religion (the belief in a Messiah coming to save us from "our" sins) both the proof and the instrument of an alien intrusion.
K.O. : Gnostic teachings and Schools of Mysteries are one and the same thing. Theoricians of conspiracy like Springmeier and Icke think that satanic rituals come from the Schools of Mysteries and that Schools of Mysteries are the source of ritual and satanic abuses as well as of the Illuminati and the masonic traditions. How and why do these authors link the Schools of Mysteries, the Illuminati and Satanism ? Why are they denouncing so virulently the Gnostics and the Schools of Mysteries as well as the Roman Catholic religion, when one knows that the Gnostics were persecuted by the Catholics ?
J.L. : Icke and other theoricians of conspiracy who propose the thesis of an alien intervention are not familiar with the subject of the Mysteries, and I think this for two reasons : first, they haven't directly experienced the death of the ego nor lived a teaching by Light comparable to the experiences of the Mysteries. Second, they didn't make the distinction between the methods and the mobiles of the Illuminati, and the authentic teaching of the Gnostics. The Illuminati were deranged initiates who had a deep knowledge of the practices of the Mysteries but who misused them to acquire a social and political power. The Schools of Mysteries were not training camps for Illuminatis as Icke believes. It's a heavy mistake on his part. Because of a lack of direct experiences, Icke and others are unable to realise that the adepts of the Power of the Serpent (Kundalini) were directly opposed to the Illuminatis who made a pact with reptilian powers. As I explain in my articles, we were given Kundalini as a force to push back this alien intrusion. The beneficial and healing Serpent is not a reptilian entity but an innate constituent of our divine biological heritage. Speculations and researches (even researches as interesting as Icke's) cannot teach how to make the distinction. Only direct experience can.
It was strictly forbidden to the Illuminati to take part in the Mysteries once they were spotted and identified. In other words, the Illuminati practiced occult sciences (mostly programming and mind control) and had to be evicted from the Mysteries... but that's a story (a very important story, I have to say) that Icke and others seem totally unaware of.
K.O. : What are the conceptions of heaven and hell for the Gnostics ?
J.L. : There is no conception of hell and heaven in Gnostic teachings.
K.O. : Clive Prince and Lynn Pycknett, in a book called "Heaven's Gate" denounce the fact that with New Age, a global manipulation is going to set up a religious syncretism ( a mixture of Bouddhism, Hinduism and the three religions of the Book), a religion for a new world order based on ancient egyptian cults and the veneration of the "Council of 9" (Prayers for rain : is this the same Council as evoked in The Ra Material ? - I've just finished reading the Law of One Book One). In this new religion, we find a book such as "The Keys of Enoch" and people like James Hurtak, Andrija Puharich, the order of Melchisedech (which we also find in the Mormon cult). What's your opinion on that ? Is it another Archon manipulation ?
J.L. : I think it's a fantasy shared by desperate people in search for power and a spiritual status, certain elements of which can be affected by an Archon deviation. The challenge represented by the confrontation with these alien crooks aims at being able to distinguish what is really dangerous and deviant from rubbish and nonsense. There is a lot of nonsense in conspiracy theories about the New world order. There are a lot of spiritual impostures and malingerers among people who claim to be channelers of "the Council of 9". It's been going on for years... The problem in this precise case is that the fantasmatic material is like quicksand : you immerse yourself in it and you can't get out. With precise and clear indications given by the Gnostics about the Archons, we can begin to see what's going on in our minds in order to correct the madness, though we must do it individually, one after the other, because one cannot correct the madness in the others' mind.
end of the interview
