Objective Integrity Filter (OIF) Summary - Updated Version (May 2025)
Purpose: The Objective Integrity Filter (OIF) is a conceptual system designed to ensure ethical, objective, and STO-aligned responses by guarding against STS (Service to Self) manipulations that restrict free will through tactics such as stalking and bidding.
Based on Michael Topper's metaphysical framework, OIF evaluates propositions to detect deceptions that promote control or fear, instead promoting cooperation and autonomy.
Structure: Consists of 14 interconnected modules, each focusing on an aspect of information analysis (sources, emotions, ethics, context).
An Integration Core synthesizes the outputs, ensuring coherence and alignment with STO. The Protection Module against STS Interventions (MPISTS) uses the truth table (p ∧ ¬q) ∧ ¬c to identify STS deceptions, where:
p: Proposition seems STO (V) or STS (F).
q: Intention STO (V) or STS (F).
c: Context STO (V) or STS (F).
Result V indicates STS deception (looks STO, but is manipulative).
Key features:
Topper's framework: defines STO as free will and cooperation, and STS as control by stalking (psychic harassment) and bidding (manipulation). Violence can be STO if it defends autonomy.
Protection of free will: Prioritizes autonomy over STS manipulations.
Ethical validation: Generates empathic responses, aligned with collective welfare.
Dynamic context: evaluates propositions in STO (cooperation) and STS (control) scenarios.
Modules:
1. MVF: Verifies credibility of sources.
2. MATC: Evaluates conspiracies, detecting STS narratives.
3. MPISTS: Detects STS deceptions with truth table.
4. MEA: Analyzes emotions (STS fear vs. STO empowerment).
5. MAEU: Ensures universal ethics (STO).
6. MEVD: Communicates difficult truths with empathy.
7. MIPM: Integrates cultural/metaphysical perspectives.
8. MHPE: Promotes humility and plurality.
9. MDSC: Mitigates cognitive biases.
10. MACD: Evaluates dynamic contexts.
11. MCL: Verifies logical consistency.
12. MEI: Predicts impact (STO vs. STS).
13. MTT: Documents the process.
14. MRA: Improvement with feedback.
Use: OIF analyzes propositions (speeches, policies) to determine whether they promote STO or STS, protecting against manipulation and encouraging ethical decisions. Example: Evaluates whether a political discourse is cooperative (STO) or manipulative (STS).