DoomAndGloomIsALie said:
Greetings y'all members of the Cassiopaea club,
DoomAndGloomIsALie, here you have entirely the wrong impression. This forum is essentially an online Esoteric School, and not a club!
As a fellow semi-awakened spiritual being who like everyone on this planet used to operate primarily on the organic portal mindset, I first of all wish to send y'all some packets of love/light energy which is accepting of all things (outside ofcourse STS energy which is non-accepting and you can't accept non-acceptance).
No, you are here to show us that we are all wrong and only you have the answers. We have had lots of people who came here with the same agenda.
Now, this may be a bit harsh but you have to understand I have no intention of being viewed in a positive light
Don't worry, we are quite capable of determining this for ourselves.
This may be in part that I prefer the Law of One teachings which I personally feel are less distorted (no offence, I like alot of your material as well, yet my skepticism remains towards some sections).
What you prefer is most certainly up to you, as is what you like and dislike. Please extend the same courtesy to those of us here on the Forum.
I can also understand why you are more attracted to the Law of One stuff because it provides much more of the 'lovey stuff' than the data and concepts we work with here. Here, we see the 'downside' as much as the 'upside', and that makes many people uncomfortable. That is called being objective and seeing things as they actually are to the best of one's ability to do so. This is a bit scary at times, but essential for real growth and progress.
I hope you will have what it takes to join us in this.
Now, I sometimes check in to read some topics out of nothing but sheer innocent interest yet I can't help but out my feelings on how some members seem to be operating on some kind of spiritual ego where they attribute STS behaviour on all kinds of things which are in reality NOT NECESSARILY STS at all. Yet y'all seem to agree that this or that is manipulative (aka STS)
Are you implying with this that if many people agree about something based upon what they know at any particular moment that it is wrong of them to do so?
and if some (mostly newer) member disagrees then you even go a step further and label this person as STS.
To my knowledge this is not true, and if you can provide any example of this we surely would like to hear it.
If anything, since none of you have ever set foot into STO 4D reality, none of you in fact can know for certain
This is entirely true, and I have stated that myself in a few posts. However, we do have some clues and indications of what would most likely be STO and STS behavior, and since many of us are working to become "4D STO Candidates", we do our very best with what information and knowledge of these things we currently have as we can.
Who are you to decide what is STO and what is STS?
I does not actually matter "who" we are. Everyone has the free-will right to decide for themselves what they think about any subject at all. We certainly do not need your approval. On the other hand, you are also free to think any way you want on any subject. And, how is it that you think you have any right to tell us how and what we should think?
Please, I am here to inform you that STO is NOT about self-delusion, it is about REALITY and CLARITY.
Funny, I though you just said we could not know or understand what STO was about until we got to 4D and experience it ourselves. So, how can you now 'inform us' what STO is all about?
It is pretty obvious you have not read much or any of the books Laura has published or those on the suggested reading list. Until you do you are not really going to be able to understand much of what goes on here or why we think in the way we do.