Elongated human skulls of Peru: Possible evidence of a lost human species? -- Sott.net
DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull finally complete - with incredible results -- Sott.net
The DNA results are as of yet preliminary, but indicate the following groundbreaking results:
As of now, it looks like the same DNA results are being made on other samples that are tested now, as well...
Here is a picture of one of those skulls:
Those skulls are at least 2000 - 3000 years old.
But that is not all, Brien Foerster tells us about other "strange" features of those skulls:
- It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull.
The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening.
- Those skulls only contain one parietal plate, rather than two and doctors who have studied it say, that this is impossible
- They had reddish brown hair, which is proven genetically. Not like the black hair of native americans.
- The eye sockets are much bigger then in humans
- Those people were in everage, between 5 and 10 feet tall. Much bigger then the native peruvian people there.
- There are two holes in the back of the skulls, where it seems nerve and/or bloodflow have come out off. It looks like those holes are natural.
- There seems to be three different types and shapes of these Paracas skulls
You can listen to some of his results here (from 0:15:20 - 0:19:57)
_
And more here:
https://youtu.be/f3jXqzp716A
And here, you can see a comparison made by Brien Foerster, between a normal human skull, a cranial deformed human skull and a elongated Paracas skull:
https://youtu.be/Uue1em05qus
Notice also that he talks about three different types and shapes of these Paracas skulls in the video above...
Here you can see the two holes in the back of the skull, mentioned earlier (1:35 - 2:20):
https://youtu.be/BQmLqOyPfKU
Where is the big media and scientific firestorm, that should be expected from such a massive discovery??
Well...
DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull finally complete - with incredible results -- Sott.net
The DNA results are as of yet preliminary, but indicate the following groundbreaking results:
"It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans."
As of now, it looks like the same DNA results are being made on other samples that are tested now, as well...
Here is a picture of one of those skulls:
Those skulls are at least 2000 - 3000 years old.
But that is not all, Brien Foerster tells us about other "strange" features of those skulls:
- It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull.
The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening.
- Those skulls only contain one parietal plate, rather than two and doctors who have studied it say, that this is impossible
- They had reddish brown hair, which is proven genetically. Not like the black hair of native americans.
- The eye sockets are much bigger then in humans
- Those people were in everage, between 5 and 10 feet tall. Much bigger then the native peruvian people there.
- There are two holes in the back of the skulls, where it seems nerve and/or bloodflow have come out off. It looks like those holes are natural.
- There seems to be three different types and shapes of these Paracas skulls
You can listen to some of his results here (from 0:15:20 - 0:19:57)
_
And more here:
https://youtu.be/f3jXqzp716A
And here, you can see a comparison made by Brien Foerster, between a normal human skull, a cranial deformed human skull and a elongated Paracas skull:
https://youtu.be/Uue1em05qus
Notice also that he talks about three different types and shapes of these Paracas skulls in the video above...
Here you can see the two holes in the back of the skull, mentioned earlier (1:35 - 2:20):
https://youtu.be/BQmLqOyPfKU
Where is the big media and scientific firestorm, that should be expected from such a massive discovery??
Well...
Last edited by a moderator: