I suppose someone sending a "treatment" to whoever asks is, not unheard of, but I wouldn't be entirely open to it, mostly because there's no free lunch in the universe.
But the "she can rest assured that her osteoporosis will disappear within three months" is a big red flag, how can that assurance be made with that certainty and a time frame? specially if there was no other information shared other than two injuries? without knowing anything, without any life style adjustments, without requiring any living effort? it seems rather far fetched to me.
After reading this exchange with him I can say that I don't have any red flags anymore. I am assured he is a charlatan.Well, here are the messages exchanged this morning with Eric Barthelemy in a private message on Facebook :
Perlou: I thought I'd suggest a book by Laura Knight called "De Paul à Marc: Le paléochristianisme" (From Paul to Mark: Paleochristianity).
Perhaps you already have it... Have a great weekend...
Eric Barthelemy
That's nice, but out of the question. The time has passed for reading things that will be destroyed. We have entered the golden age, no more new-age possible. Paul and Mark, if they're fourth-century people, are rotten. So there's no point in discovering characters like them. Thanks for the tip, and a great weekend too.
Perlou: Sorry to have bothered you for nothing... Take good care of yourself.
Eric: When I see the number of your publications linked to the great swindler Silvano Trotta or others...I'm not on their planet, fortunately. I advise you to be more discerning. Excellent weekend
I think we have the answer to my question to the Cassiopaeans...
Too bad... But each to his own path and learning... Thank you Barnabé for your help, which I appreciated...
Now we know where we stand...
After all these years on this forum, reading, researching, and networking it should be obvious to anyone what his "work" is.