"fight club" communications

My perspective, the Q post looked like they were playing a "game" where you dont get told the rules and they want you to solve the puzzle, but in order to solve the puzzle, you have to know the rules otherwise you can't win because that is what the solution is based on. I've seen puzzles like this before and I don't play. An simple example of what I mean, if the unspoken rule is: apple is the answer for anything "sky", and the question posted is: what color is the sky? Who's going to guess "apple"? Noone.

I follow a three strike rule and somewhere along my digging, I ran across my third "strike" where the Q drops "predicted" current event in real time. I don't actually remember which three it was as I wasnt keeping track of the specifics. While i still didnt trust anything anyone was saying about it, I did have a "sigh" moment that I had to really figure out what is going on with this because there's something there and it was important enough that the lying media just wouldnt let it go. At the time, its 2021 and fake fads dont last this long. Eventually on the greatawakening.win a commenter posted a link to a wordpress blog:

Just so you know, the general consensus here is that Qanon is a US intel agency psyop designed to manipulate people. Your take on it seems destined to create a topic and discussion that quickly descends into far more noise than signal, and encourages pattern recognition running amok.
 
Just so you know, the general consensus here is that Qanon is a US intel agency psyop designed to manipulate people. Your take on it seems destined to create a topic and discussion that quickly descends into far more noise than signal, and encourages pattern recognition running amok.

I understand, and I'm in agreement with the Qanon take. "Qanon" is a form of controlled opposition psyop specifically to create that noise around the Q post.

Sadly, that's the downside with this system (upside if you're a player), its always going to exist with some sort of noise layer. There is a framework or usage structure behind it, I'm just not sure what it is yet. Otherwise, DecodingSymbol's blog post wouldnt be able to trace it through the generational eras. Knowing the framework is probably the only way to keep the noise level down.



My original thought behind sharing the topic (in general), is since this system was expose during Trump's presidency, then should see an a significant uptick of its usage as TPTB trying to keep him out, ie excessively using whatever means at their disposal. So if there's ever a time to point out this system, it would be "now".

Just as a note, I'm totally OK with letting the thread just fizzle out. :lol: This is already a niche topic, slapped right in the middle of disinformation.
 
Just so you know, the general consensus here is that Qanon is a US intel agency psyop designed to manipulate people. Your take on it seems destined to create a topic and discussion that quickly descends into far more noise than signal, and encourages pattern recognition running amok.


I've read that QAnon is a production by John Brennan.

While riding a bus to class at Fordham, he saw an ad in The New York Times that said that the CIA was recruiting. He decided that a CIA career would be a good match for his "wanderlust" and his desire for public service.[6] He applied to the CIA in 1980. During his application he admitted during a lie-detector test that he had voted for the Communist Party candidate four years earlier. To his surprise, he was still accepted; he later said that he finds it heartening that the CIA valued freedom of speech.[21]

Criticism of President Trump
Brennan helped establish the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump’s campaign, which included the use of foreign intelligence, during the period leading up to the 2016 presidential election.[79] Since leaving office, Brennan has been harshly critical of President Trump. In March 2018, Brennan said Trump had "paranoia", accused him of "constant misrepresentation of the facts", and described him as a "charlatan".[80] Following the firing of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe later that month, Brennan tweeted to Trump, "When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but will not destroy America... America will triumph over you."[81]

Axios quoted Brennan tweeting a response to Trump's harsh comments about James Comey: "Your kakistocracy is collapsing after its lamentable journey... we have the opportunity to emerge from this nightmare stronger & more committed to ensuring a better life for all Americans, including those you have so tragically deceived."[82] On July 16, 2018, Brennan tweeted his reaction to Trump's comments at the 2018 Helsinki summit meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin:

Screenshot 2024-09-15 at 09-49-22 John Brennan (CIA officer) - Wikipedia.png

Trump responded by calling Brennan a "total lowlife".[84] Brennan was also the target of a mailed pipe bomb incorrectly addressed to "John Brenan", as were multiple other Democratic lawmakers, officials, and critics of Trump.[85]

In December 2018, Brennan tweeted that Trump should prepare for the "forthcoming exposure of your malfeasance & corruption." One day after the release of the Barr letter in March 2019, Brennan said on MSNBC: "Well, I don't know if I received bad information, but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was. I am relieved that it's been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election...I still point to things that were done publicly, or efforts to try to have conversations with the Russians that were inappropriate, but I’m not all that surprised that the high bar of criminal conspiracy was not met.”[86] The Barr letter was criticized by many as deceptive after the release of the Mueller report weeks later, with Mueller writing to Barr that the letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work.[87]

Durham investigation
In March 2019, attorney general Bill Barr appointed United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut John Durham to investigate the origins of the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, which involved some Trump associates.[99] In December 2019, The New York Times reported that Durham was specifically scrutinizing Brennan's role.[100][101] Durham interviewed Brennan for eight hours on August 21, 2020, after which a Brennan advisor said Durham told Brennan he was not a subject or target of a criminal investigation, but rather a witness to events.[102]

Hunter Biden Emails
In October 2020, Brennan was one of a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials who released an open letter stating that the Hunter Biden Laptop Controversy "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation".[103] Portions of the laptop's contents have since been verified as authentic, and no such Russian linkage was found.[104]
 
Here’s another hypothesis on who “Q” was, just to add to the pile.
This was posted by James True. During the last 4 to 5 years, I’ve followed his material, read several of his books and if I recall correctly, even quoted him a few times.

I suspect he stared too deeply into the abyss, and got looked back at, HARD by 4th Density creeps.
Due to his inability to get grounded in objective reality, he seems to have definitely declined in his mental and emotional stability over the last year.
Now, most of his material is incoherent and an absolute mess, in my opinion.
Back to his take on the “Q” identity, here’s the meme he posted:
1F99722F-D151-444F-9FB2-E27F38E8E121.jpeg
 
Trump's inauguration day was meant to be my personal check-in point to give myself a goal to learn more about separating comms news from regular news. However, since last August my personal life got so chaotic that I actually got to spend nearly no time on it, and I do rank this topic pretty low on my overall personal priorities.

There were some items I did want to note as occasionally, I still see news articles that get circulated that seem more comms than not, although not as much as I was seeing before, but that could be a bias as I havent even been able to look at the news cycle like I had done before. These were the only ones that really stuck in my mind:

One was Peanut/P-Nut the Squirrel, lots of articles for Peanut but not much love for Fred the Raccon (i.e. a narrative focus on one item over another). Peanuts is also a cartoon, which NewClear314 places in the category of MK Ops. Peanuts can also be associated with older imagery of Elephants and Peanuts from the Circus, where the Elephant is associated with the Republican Party. So Peanuts, in general, have been used as a comms vehicle in the past.

Donald Trump working at McDonald's which acts as an easy campaign ad against Harris. NewClear314 has fast food as as a kind of murder/hit job/"take-out" comms. SleepDude has been doing streams, one of which he links McDonald's to the "foot soldiers" of the C.I.A. I interpreted it as, those of which who may be in a "rock and a hard place", they're not in any position of influence so they can't really change how their "leadership" portrays/leads them, but they also know too much to find work elsewhere (without getting off'd). So for Trump to work at McDonalds, could be a potential comms that he's has their backing (as opposed to just the "heads").

The recent LA "wildfires". As the winter season rolled around, I was wondering how the comms were going to keep spreading the "hot, hot, hot" climate change (political "climate") narrative while normal weather news was expecting major snowstorms which already seemed to be abnormal on its own. On the side, I believe another yet on its way (its is icy where I'm at! which is not typical for my region). Outside of the (I think) obvious localized corruption, wildfires can be comms of other kinds of corruption. Weather ("natural" disasters) comms seem, to me, more tied with information flow (ie flood of information), so for a fire to go wild, implies a anger/outrage narrative that "took a life of its own" ie what ever psyops may have lost control. I don't see a NewClear314 post on "wildfires" per say, but one for Smokey the Bear, associated with foreign "arsonists". Where there's smoke, there's fire.

The New Jersey Drones (if this turns into a actual sport team, I'll faceplam really hard), I'm not sure what to make of it. It does not seems to be aligned with the comms I'm used to seeing so either its a really new "foot soldier" or worker bee/drone or its something else altogether. For this, I'll defer over to Dark Journalist, as I would agree with him, it seems more like the X-tech/Steganography than whatever comms I'm looking.



My main take away thus far is the comms really needs a kind of context/"radio tuning" that I'm definitely missing, such as the Peanut the Squirrel case. Since symbols can have multiple meanings, there has to be some kind of additional context in the way the message is sent to help identify what the comms is actually saying, that i'm just not getting. It could be as simple as AP News will only ever send to one party/faction versus CNN sending for an entirely party/faction. Or, something more in-depth, as the who the message comes from (i.e. Musk/Zuckerberg/Jobs), is a historical package of symbols that should already be known, and that alone is enough to understand the context.
 
Back
Top Bottom