MrGullible
Jedi
[quote author=drygol]
C`s rule about getting knowledge , therefore raising awareness , also applies here
[/quote]
I agree totally. This discussion is raising my awareness in certain areas. I am very new to these forums so I may be misinterpreting some part of the focus, but I am supposing that in the material sense of this discussion it is useful and helpful to gain awareness and knowledge about some of the different issues related to basic network security in the interest of DOing something so that it isn't quite so easy for some of the "lower-echelon" negative folks to bring trouble to us.
[quote author=drygol]
Tor wont give you any anonymity if you dont look at java-script.
[/quote]
I agree again. :) It is important not to rely on any one technology or approach, including tor. There are combinations of approaches that are very effective in offering basic protection. By "basic protection" I mean making it harder for others (e.g. individual entities or small negative hacker groups) to cause problems with personal network experience, using someone's machine without their knowledge, and stealing personal information. The protections are much less effective against a larger concerted effort.
[quote author=drygol]
If its about ff3 , IMO , every post that raises users awareness is ok but there is no point in being afraid of hackers/crackers.
[/quote]
I disagree here in certain respects, although it depends on how you characterize "afraid". Many users are "afraid" of being hacked/cracked/whatever term because of the disruption and problems this can cause in their life. The problems could include fraud, impersonation / identity theft, tracking behavior, and perpetrating other attacks. In the bigger picture this is might not be of high significance, but I think it is of some significance.
[quote author=drygol]
Unbreakable systems does NOT exist.
[/quote]
Well please list some and why they are better. This could be helpful to many of us with security concerns! I for one would like to research them. I'm aware of using AppArmor, SELinux, virtual machines, and chroot's for application security purposes. They each have their own strengths and weaknesses and aren't a solution in an of themselves.
C`s rule about getting knowledge , therefore raising awareness , also applies here
[/quote]
I agree totally. This discussion is raising my awareness in certain areas. I am very new to these forums so I may be misinterpreting some part of the focus, but I am supposing that in the material sense of this discussion it is useful and helpful to gain awareness and knowledge about some of the different issues related to basic network security in the interest of DOing something so that it isn't quite so easy for some of the "lower-echelon" negative folks to bring trouble to us.
[quote author=drygol]
Tor wont give you any anonymity if you dont look at java-script.
[/quote]
I agree again. :) It is important not to rely on any one technology or approach, including tor. There are combinations of approaches that are very effective in offering basic protection. By "basic protection" I mean making it harder for others (e.g. individual entities or small negative hacker groups) to cause problems with personal network experience, using someone's machine without their knowledge, and stealing personal information. The protections are much less effective against a larger concerted effort.
[quote author=drygol]
If its about ff3 , IMO , every post that raises users awareness is ok but there is no point in being afraid of hackers/crackers.
[/quote]
I disagree here in certain respects, although it depends on how you characterize "afraid". Many users are "afraid" of being hacked/cracked/whatever term because of the disruption and problems this can cause in their life. The problems could include fraud, impersonation / identity theft, tracking behavior, and perpetrating other attacks. In the bigger picture this is might not be of high significance, but I think it is of some significance.
[quote author=drygol]
There are a lot of tools that are faaar better ..... BUT always keep in mind that there is no real protection.I agree. The SELinux MAC kernel module is the tightest control I know of,
Unbreakable systems does NOT exist.
[/quote]
Well please list some and why they are better. This could be helpful to many of us with security concerns! I for one would like to research them. I'm aware of using AppArmor, SELinux, virtual machines, and chroot's for application security purposes. They each have their own strengths and weaknesses and aren't a solution in an of themselves.