Free energy and HAARP technology

Good luck, I changed the configuration of plates and separators last night and got far less output. I wish I had some good math to go with this. Just gotta keep at it and hope dr Stiffler releases more information.
 
If you want to quickly find out the relationships between different parameters, then you need data. IE take 1mil sheets, and test with 1mil, 2mil, 3mil... Until you get to 20mil or something, plot the results. The data can be tested mathematically for patterns.

Bismuth fishing sinkers can be melted down. I knew someone who melted them down and used them to make magnets float.
 
Inquorate said:
If not, then the num,ber 1.094 (wherever it comes from) is changing. So I would need to keep t5his in mind when making coils, or indeed doing any experiments related to spatial resonance.
Click to expand...
If you change the constant to 1.020408163?
 
This post was made by watching

Even with simple and risibly inadequate layman "knowledge" bits of basic physics I could identify the weakness in

Paul M Brown: Resonant Nuclear Battery (Nucell)​

as soon as he explains it in his patent: can you spot the part about the weakness?
The simplest form of nuclear battery is the Burke Cell (US Patent # 3,939,366, Ref. 4). [This patent for a betavoltaic type of nuclear power device was issued to Yasuro Ato and Soji Miyagawa of the Agency of Industrial Science & Technology of Japan, so I not sure why he referred to it as Burke Cell. If a Burke Cell is a device, I haven't seen anything about it. A Holmes and Burke Cell is apparently a type of zinc-acid battery, but that's probably unrelated.] This method consists of a conventional battery and a conventional load connected by means of a radioactive conductor. If we inspect this arrangement we find that all of the power dissipated in the load is not drawn from the battery. And upon closer examination we find that a current amplification occurs within the radioactive conductor (Ref. 3).

This phenomenon is known as the Beta Voltaic Effect, and it may be explained by referring to Figure 6. For the simple case of this example, we will set the radioactive source (any alpha or beta emitter) external and separate from a silver wire. Now the battery from Figure 5 provides an electromotive force (emf) across the wire and consequently, conduction electrons within the wire are set in uniform motion. By definition, electricity is measured in terms of the number of charged particles (electrons) moving past a point in a unit of time and we call this amperes.

The process by which a beta particle is absorbed, is such that the beta particle collides with the molecular structure of the copper, knocking electrons free. This electron avalanche occurs until the beta particle (electron) effectively comes to rest. A single beta particle emitted from strontium-90 that is absorbed in copper will generate 80,000 ions in a distance of 0.030 inches. Now, as soon as these electrons are knocked loose, they effectively become free electrons in the wire, and as such these additional electrons are acted upon by the emf applied across the wire to give the avalanche electrons a uniform direction of flow, regardless of their incident angle. This increase in the number of moving charged carriers is measured in the real world as increased current. We also measure a reduction in the resistance of the wire (Ref. 6), an increase in its conductivity (Ref. 7), while the current is directly proportional to the voltage (Ref. 8). In other words, the current goes up with an increase in voltage (Ref. 5). This is basically attributed to the increased emf acting on a greater number of avalanche electrons.

Additionally, flux cutting also occurs as the beta particle approaches the current carrying wire which yields an emf to help drive electrons (Ref. 9).

Now we will look at how we apply this phenomenon to our device. Figure 7 depicts a basic LC tank circuit comprised of an inductor and a capacitor. Theoretically, if this LC circuit were superconductive, then an externally applied electric impulse would yield an LC oscillation that would continue to oscillate forever due to no losses in the system.

However, our LC circuit is not superconductive, and the oscillation damps out due to the losses inherent to the LC tank. To minimize these inherent losses, we tune the circuit into resonance at the self-resonant frequency of the inductor. This causes the inductive and capacitive reactances to cancel, leaving only ohmic losses (resistance).

If we apply a radioactive source as part of the LC tank, then through every cycle of the oscillation of which current is flowing, that current gets amplified by an amount proportional to the activity of the source. All we need is an input of an amount of energy equal to the system losses to achieve a sustained oscillation. At this point, we have a self-driven oscillator that we call a Nuclear Powered Oscillator.

Any energy contributed to this oscillating LC tank must be removed and we accomplish this by simply impedance-matching a transformer which yields high-frequency AC current to drive a load. In a nutshell, that is the principle of operation for the Resonant Nuclear Power Supply: an LC tank circuit oscillating at its self-resonant frequency, driven by natural radioactive decay energy. Energy in excess of the operational requirements is removed through a transformer to yield electrical energy in usable form to drive a load.

Figure 10 depicts the starting method which involves the use of a high voltage source to charge the capacitor of the tank circuit, which is then discharged to ground through a Class C amplifier at a rate equal to the resonant frequency of the tank circuit. A spectrum analyzer is used to monitor the activity within the tank and once a clean oscillation is started, the high voltage power supply and Class C amplifier are removed, a process that takes a few seconds. Then the power removed from the tank circuit is determined by measuring the voltage drop across a resistor of known value and double-checked by directly measuring the current delivered to the load.

In 1985, a feasibility study was performed including a search of the published literature. This revealed a significant amount of supportive data. Experiments followed on the effects of alpha and beta radiation absorbed in a current-carrying inductor. The results demonstrated (1) a reduction in the resistance of the coil, (2) an increase of the quality factor (Q) of the circuit, and (3) an increased conductivity of the inductor.

A proof of feasibility prototype was built in early 1987, which yielded 75 watts of power. Although the device generated electricity, it also demonstrated a frequency stability problem and showed signs of material degradation.

In mid-1988 a co-development venture was initiated with Atomic Energy of Canada's Radiochemical Company for the purpose of exploring source configuration possibilities in regard to performance and safety parameters.

Our efforts in 1989 primarily centered around optimization of the oscillator, which must be of a design with a high Q, tight coupling, and low loss.
Click to expand...
Result:
In contrast to the more modest claims made above, Paul M. Brown said he got a maximum of 9.2 kW output (400 V, 23 A) in 1986, but that device may have been rapidly degrading while in operation from radioactive damage and possibly also overheating.
Click to expand...
So while this machine is definitely not free energy, but a new energy source and is working, it has the key weakness as stated in bold above and also can you spot it in the above text, the first long quote?
Reddit user:
- Thanks for this! Grandpa was talking about his work and how he died in a "car crash"
reddit Poster dalkon - who made the long quote above - responds:
- Yeah, Brown was allegedly killed April 2002 for testifying against Pacific Equity Investigations Amr "Anthony" Ibrahim Elgindy.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/a2114...rown-case-another-smart-guy-doing-dumb-thing/
Click to expand...

Here is the key weakness in his battery:
The process by which a beta particle is absorbed, is such that the beta particle collides with the molecular structure of the copper, knocking electrons free. This electron avalanche occurs until the beta particle (electron) effectively comes to rest. A single beta particle emitted from strontium-90 that is absorbed in copper will generate 80,000 ions in a distance of 0.030 inches.
Click to expand...
Obviously the copper used here will degrade like crazy.
His entire white paper could be COINTELPRO, flooding conspiracy theorist civilians with fantastic crap to incapacitate them, yet according to this paper probable Deep State paid Scientist Dr. Dennis Cravens
( in his paper titled Electric Propulsion Study AD-A227 121 downloadable PDF, essentially creating the UFT for the Deep State, at least one probably working version)
analyzed 'free energy class' generators / power sources for what conspiracy theorists think levitating craft and he also looked at above and stated:
Likewise, the Nuclear Resonant method of Paul Brown does not have the potential of 5-D verification but could become useful as a power source.
Click to expand...
Obviously. As other assertive technologists and their financiers in the field noticed that this key problem
A proof of feasibility prototype was built in early 1987, which yielded 75 watts of power. Although the device generated electricity, it also demonstrated a frequency stability problem and showed signs of material degradation.
Click to expand...
can be attacked effectively:
In mid-1988 a co-development venture was initiated with Atomic Energy of Canada's Radiochemical Company for the purpose of exploring source configuration possibilities in regard to performance and safety parameters. Our efforts in 1989 primarily centered around optimization of the oscillator, which must be of a design with a high Q, tight coupling, and low loss.
Click to expand...
Just because we don't see publicized solutions, doesn't mean they couldn't solve this problem. Essentially gaining a functional, long lasting Resonant Nuclear Battery. Essentially the problem is "how to feed lots of copper" to this nuclear battery? Maybe using some kind of "belt-fed machinegun" mechanism? Or just circumvent copper and replace it with another element - a fluid maybe, which can release the necessary avalanche of electrons just as well? But which obviously can be re-filled from a reserve tank? If this material is a lot more dangerous, but Deep State has access to such materials?

Government players do have access to restricted materials that simple civilians can only STEAL. Like Bob Lazar did so he could build his particle accelerator. :D
- Hey Bob, where is that atomically stable Moscovium / Elerium-115 you stole from the EG&G labs? You know the one the FBI and other government agencies WERE LOOKING FOR ON YOUR FARM?? :D

Anyway:
1. Even in the recent Dolan - Jesse interview an American general hushes Dolan, looks around and states that Dolan's ridiculous conspiracy idea of ELECTROGRAVITICS already researched and applied to the heavy B-2 bombers fuselage TO EASE LIFT is TOTAL BULLSHIT!!! Emphasis from him made aggressively in order to make Dolan shut the hell up. :D Then both Dolan and Jesse laughs and says that objection from the American Deep State officer was because electrogravitics solution was already working in select aircraft of the The U.S. Air Force, which operates the too heavy B-2 Spirit stealth bomber
REFERENCE INTERVIEW LINK.

2. Hungarian scientists / physicists - who were excommunicated from Established Academia - were talking about the key component concept of Symmetry Destruction (See Dr. Craven's paper above in the spoiler) in their work toward free energy motors in around 1999. They had YT videos demonstrating electrogravitic lift of their wire anchored device, which jumped into the air and was only held back by wires. And other electricity producing methods. They probably read Dr. Cravens' paper? :D Or did they use a helium balloon packaged in TinFoil? Dubbing it as free energy device proof? :D :D
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom