Free will question?

bngenoh said:
What you call the "most mundane of tasks," can also be perceived as challenges, because to me life is "made of a continuous stream of challenging yet very precious moments." One of the challenges is to recognize the challenge, as such, another is to asses what is to be learned, then learn it. The challenges are one of the most precious of gifts, bequeathed to us by God, and it is one of the ways we interact with it:

True. Perhaps we can say that taking life as a continuous stream of challenging moments is a big part of the very process of developing an aim.
I see life a bit like days that are followed by a night were you rest and sleep. Sleep time is fundamental for self replenishment, but within the context of life, if we sleep for too long we'll just enter a state of permanent dormancy. If we take those "mundane" moments, the moments where we are most likely to fall asleep because nothing "too exciting" seems to be happening, and take them as the constant challenge that they are (pretty much the process of staying vigilant, keeping our inner observer active and proceed to changing our behavior when appropriate), we are slowly but surely building our will, our self discipline, our ability for self control, and for real change.

bngenoh said:
Done consistently, one realizes that, :O wait a minute, this is normal and natural, then it just becomes one of the traits that is inherent in one, but expressed consciously, instead of haphazardly. It becomes more about remembering who one is, then a distinct familiarity and logic is shed upon all that is SEEn and experienced.

Yep!
 
Yes, I agree, Gertrudes. Well said. I feel more and more (though I've felt this on and off for many years) that Life itself is a great, precious gift. And Life IS challenges, no matter how you look at it and where you look. Without challenges there's no learning and no growing. :)

One of the biggest challenges is to keep alert and vigilant all the time, pay attention and Remember yourself as much as possible. Mundane situations or not, it's EXTREMELY difficult to do this for any length of time. So that's where "the rubber hits the road."
 
Killer thread. Thank-you for starting it alkhemst. I have been hanging off of every word said here by everyone.

Laura said:
Usually, spotting a programmed response (realizing that System 1 is in charge) doesn't necessarily make it easy to do anything differently - not at first. You have to spot it a number of times, learn its nuances, and build up a certain force that comes with seeing it in order to do otherwise. It's kind of like the idea of practicing shooting baskets in the mind helping the actual physical action. You spot the program/reaction, and each time, you go through in your mind what it is, where it comes from, what it does, how harmful it can be (all of which has to be worked out over time), and what would be a better way to react/perceive. Then, one day, you actually catch the program/perception before it begins... and consciously decide to do/be otherwise.

Like: "every time that topic comes up, I know that I get tense and reactive, I feel angry and defensive, and I start talking too much and say things that make people angry at me." So, if you've gotten that far, the next step would be: "Oh, there is that topic that I always react to but I think I'm going to pass on reacting this time and just observe how it makes me feel to say nothing..."

That sort of thing.

Golden.... just golden.
 
The question I started here came from some self investigation because I wanted to know what it was in me that firstly wanted to deny a direct observation of myself (regarding interactions here), then wanted to divert attention away from the initial observation, then finally after some toing and froing wanted to accept that observation I was initially denying.

For me it had much to do with being ashamed of what others were seeing in me. That was the real emotion and the subsequent emotions that I was stating (like feeling wrongly accused for instance) were more of a construction to deny the feeling of being ashamed and interestingly, I did feel these things too to some extent. So I started even deceiving myself with emotions that I manufactured and by manufactured, I mean I created these emotions with the ulterior purpose of covering the feeling of shame.

So here’s what’s interesting for me, after some time, I reread my initial posting that people were saying was motivated by a personal investment and it suddenly dawned on me that they were right. I sounded like a Mr Know-it-all, all puffed up and arrogant. It wasn’t the first time mind you (on this particular thread and others). For example, when Truth Seeker first said it, for a moment I could see what she/he was saying, then almost immediately I went into denial.

So at the point I saw this in a more concrete way, I started feeling ashamed of myself (again) and I almost went back into denial of that (again) because the shame didn’t feel good but then there was something in me that just said no to going down that path again. So that’s where my question of free will derived from because I could see there was clearly a realisation that started in me early on but the my own programs hooked in before I could exercise my own free will to a fuller extent.

So I wanted to understand that process in terms of what circumvents the programming in me, for which I find much written here valuable - particularly how recognising my immediate feelings that react almost thoughtlessly, or mechanically to situations and/or events (which I was doing in the above situation described). Knowing this process or at least acknowledging this, I see now was utilised by me as a kind of theoretical tool that stopped me going into the same denial process again. So what Laura was saying about it starting with seeing our mechanical natures, even as a concept at first (i.e. without having prior personal experience), makes a lot of sense to me.

Personally, what I did because I still see much value in emotional processing, was to acknowledge the personal truth about myself being invested in the façade of “being smart”, then instead of reacting to the arising feeling of being ashamed of that observation (like I was doing before), I just allowed that feeling of being shame to occur without judging the feeling as good or bad etc. and I found myself getting into a deeper sadness, and truth be told I just started crying. After that I felt a sense of relief coupled with a feeling of being less ashamed. Anyway I felt it useful to describe that personal experience because this thread goes into the role of emotions. Be glad to hear your thoughts on that too. Thanks
 
[quote author=alkhemst]
Personally, what I did because I still see much value in emotional processing, was to acknowledge the personal truth about myself being invested in the façade of “being smart”, then instead of reacting to the arising feeling of being ashamed of that observation (like I was doing before), I just allowed that feeling of being shame to occur without judging the feeling as good or bad etc. and I found myself getting into a deeper sadness, and truth be told I just started crying. After that I felt a sense of relief coupled with a feeling of being less ashamed. Anyway I felt it useful to describe that personal experience because this thread goes into the role of emotions. Be glad to hear your thoughts on that too. Thanks[/quote]

Sounds like you're now therapeutically processing emotions you've been buffering yourself from feeling. Seems like the key for you is your willingness to experience whatever may be stored up. That's the process as I experience it.
 
alkhemst said:
For me it had much to do with being ashamed of what others were seeing in me. That was the real emotion and the subsequent emotions that I was stating (like feeling wrongly accused for instance) were more of a construction to deny the feeling of being ashamed and interestingly, I did feel these things too to some extent. So I started even deceiving myself with emotions that I manufactured and by manufactured, I mean I created these emotions with the ulterior purpose of covering the feeling of shame.
"It" is a wily bastard isn't it. :D "It" even convinces us sometimes that what it "produces," which in fact is just a manipulation of our essence, through it's architecture, because "it" cannot create anything, is really ourself. "It" does this as a tactic of obfuscation, so that it can then say, "nothin to see here folks, keep calm, go back to sleep, and carry on." (taken from webgliders thread,) :lol:
alkhemst said:
So here’s what’s interesting for me, after some time, I reread my initial posting that people were saying was motivated by a personal investment and it suddenly dawned on me that they were right. I sounded like a Mr Know-it-all, all puffed up and arrogant. It wasn’t the first time mind you (on this particular thread and others). For example, when Truth Seeker first said it, for a moment I could see what she/he was saying, then almost immediately I went into denial.
Ha, it's haughtiness is really something isn't it. Whenever it rears it proverbial head, and i am remembering myself, i just have to go into anyone of my memory banks when it was active, pull out the file of the consequences of it's operation, which quite readily and completely refute "it," ie whenever i was wrong. Then i laugh at it, saying to "it;" "what, you're still in there?" Happened to me today btw, it is a great reminder of always paying strict attention to the environment, both within and without, and using the changes therein to rise ever more out of subjectivity.
alkhemst said:
So at the point I saw this in a more concrete way, I started feeling ashamed of myself (again) and I almost went back into denial of that (again) because the shame didn’t feel good but then there was something in me that just said no to going down that path again. So that’s where my question of free will derived from because I could see there was clearly a realisation that started in me early on but the my own programs hooked in before I could exercise my own free will to a fuller extent.
No is the beginning, a crucial first step, the rebellion, but we must keep walking, and therein is the possibility of revolution osit, which is merely going and doing, what & where one has resolved to do & go, ie yes, which implies a decision, a CHOICE. Revolution is being open to learning, not knowing where the lesson may manifest itself, and acting accordingly, ie posting the question that is the topic of this thread, is your movement from no to yes, from rebellion to revolution, osit. Revolution entails non-anticipation, a kind of faith and trust that the Universe, the grand and impossible wonder that it is, gives to all, our challenge is to be ready, and we can't be ready if we are blinded by anticipations.

Amazing isn't it, when we just ask a question, with no presupposition, prejudice, assumption, preconceived notions, etc of what the answer is. The practicing of non-anticipation, whose effects are seemingly miraculous.

If you can remember that state that said, "no to going down that path again," and consciously struggle to always move yourself to that place, and/or strive to listen to it's voice, then your progress may increase osit. As always, it is a matter of paying strict attention of the environment, both within and without, and acting accordingly.
alkhemst said:
So I wanted to understand that process in terms of what circumvents the programming in me, for which I find much written here valuable - particularly how recognising my immediate feelings that react almost thoughtlessly, or mechanically to situations and/or events (which I was doing in the above situation described). Knowing this process or at least acknowledging this, I see now was utilised by me as a kind of theoretical tool that stopped me going into the same denial process again. So what Laura was saying about it starting with seeing our mechanical natures, even as a concept at first (i.e. without having prior personal experience), makes a lot of sense to me.
Yes, if there is anything that is true in us, it will recognize truth, no matter the depth of darkness that it is in. Then, we can choose, to remain in the depths of darkness, or to struggle to reach truth, and thus become free.
alkhemst said:
Personally, what I did because I still see much value in emotional processing, was to acknowledge the personal truth about myself being invested in the façade of “being smart”, then instead of reacting to the arising feeling of being ashamed of that observation (like I was doing before), I just allowed that feeling of being shame to occur without judging the feeling as good or bad etc. and I found myself getting into a deeper sadness, and truth be told I just started crying. After that I felt a sense of relief coupled with a feeling of being less ashamed. Anyway I felt it useful to describe that personal experience because this thread goes into the role of emotions. Be glad to hear your thoughts on that too. Thanks
Yes, truly all the facades that have been created in us through imitation, etc. Really do use up much of our energies to support falsehoods that are not even our own. Their destruction can indeed be saddening, for it is the realization that we have been soundly asleep, for a long "time." However, it is also the signal to ourselves, that there is a chance to awaken, but only if we keep destroying all the falsehoods without mercy, struggling all the while against the forces which support those falsehoods, both within and without, and their various lies, such as, that one can awaken without pain, without effort, without much struggle and suffering, on the part of the one who has chosen to awaken, it only hurts because we have bought the lies, both "it's" and "theirs," thus taking all the BS as true, thereby supporting the falsehoods with our energies, which of course are ourselves, we are our energies, osit. As such we paid for the lies with ourselves, that realization, is indeed painful to the core.

The pain that we feel from withdrawing our energies from the falsehoods, is merely a side effect of integrating ourselves, ie our energies, towards the configuration of being able to recognize truth, which of course means knowing and recognizing falsehood and it's nature, both within and without.

Never cease, in every moment to be aware that it is a battle, an epic war, to become conscious, that is to BE, that is my motto. :cool2:
 
It is definitely interesting or maybe better put revealing the way others reflect back to myself differently when I'm in reaction mode to when I'm willing to learn without assuming what is to be learnt as you say. By others I mean those not in reaction mode the majority of the time as many here aren't which I've come to learn also.

By the off chance anyone heard or read this:

The Neuroscience of Psychotherapy: Building and Rebuilding the Human Brain
Louis J. Cozolino

Apparently goes into the brain's physiological changes seen after emotional trauma release or something like that, got highly recommended on another forum I'm on.

Thanks again for the insights on this thread.
 
Realizing that the way your brain works (due to programming) in concert with your emotions, is NOT in YOUR best interests, is one of the toughest things to face. To further realize that it LIES to you all the time, that there are things that you CANNOT SEE AT ALL even if you KNOW they are there (here I'm speaking about concepts/understandings), is shattering. It was to me.
 
Yeah, not to mention how little we do see. Even when we know all this intellectually, there's more and more experiences I notice that are clear evidence for it all.
 
Laura said:
Realizing that the way your brain works (due to programming) in concert with your emotions, is NOT in YOUR best interests, is one of the toughest things to face. To further realize that it LIES to you all the time, that there are things that you CANNOT SEE AT ALL even if you KNOW they are there (here I'm speaking about concepts/understandings), is shattering. It was to me.

For me it's equally hard to face that others we've entrusted to not lie to us or have our best interests at heart, actually don't or really can't as we are basically incapable as a whole of doing that even for ourselves and the irony is when we start off in life we are then most trusting we will ever be and likewise the most vunerable.
 
alkhemst said:
Laura said:
Realizing that the way your brain works (due to programming) in concert with your emotions, is NOT in YOUR best interests, is one of the toughest things to face. To further realize that it LIES to you all the time, that there are things that you CANNOT SEE AT ALL even if you KNOW they are there (here I'm speaking about concepts/understandings), is shattering. It was to me.

For me it's equally hard to face that others we've entrusted to not lie to us or have our best interests at heart, actually don't or really can't as we are basically incapable as a whole of doing that even for ourselves and the irony is when we start off in life we are then most trusting we will ever be and likewise the most vunerable.

Indeed. I faced that back in the 80s... it was about ten years later that I realized how deep it actually went, that even the most fundamental ideas on which our entire civilization - including how we understand ourselves as humans - was based, were at best wrong, distorted, twisted, and at worst, totally evil.
 
Oxajil said:
Menna said:
RedFox - I was at my friends house and his wife made some desert. Being on the Paleo diet cake doesnt really go. I have a problem if I stray from a diet even alittle bit it most often leads into a binge...So in order to not be rude when she offered me her desert I had a few bites.

I don't think it's rude to say you'd rather not, you can say that you're on a strict diet. That's what I do, and eventually my family members and friends understood, and don't think it's rude of me anymore to pass on what they offer me. They see that I'm pretty serious about it, and they have learned to respect my decision. Fwiw.

I agree. Another way to think about it: would you be insulted if a guest politely refused your food and gave a reason? I doubt it. And personally, if a friend responded with righteous indignation to such a minor thing, I think I'd question why I was friends with them in the first place.
 
Menna said:
Yes I have a be nice program.
In that case, it might possibly be helpful to (re-)read what the old "big 5" narcissism/narcissistic wounding books have to say on the problem of being unable to set boundaries or assert oneself with people. It's addressed in detail in The Narcissistic Family.
 
I dug up this thread again as I've been pondering this question of freewill and its relationship to the soul, especially in regards to the last C's session.

My current understanding is that a fundamental aspect of a soul is its true capacity to use freewill. I'm thinking of the analogy of any electrical device, to simplify, let's say a toaster. The toaster exists, has capacity to make toast, you can even put bread in it but until you switch it on, until it is activated, its of no use, its doesnt function as it's intended to do - it can't make toast.

It could work as a door stop, a storage for cultery or whatever one's creativity could find an alternative use for it, but without activating it with power - its not really a toaster.

So I was thinking this is the same with our soul. Without activating our soul with unabridged and untainted use of our will, our soul is lifeless, and if it is what it is because of its function, without acting on its function - its not even a soul.

So in relation to this, Ive been wondering about a few things:

- When we talk about a soul becoming seated is this the process by which one's freewill is activated and done so enough that it won't be inactive again?

- Is this why a child can turn into an adult and struggle with seating the soul and in many cases never firmly seat the soul at all?

- When our soul is inactive through no use of freewill, does this create an opening, in a sense an invitation for other souls to make use of our body?

- similar question: is an inactive soul that has a body essentially an empty vessel, or in other words an organic portal (or act like an organic portal)?

- If the soul is completely inactive, does this allow other souls not only to use but to seat upon that body?

- In that case does the original soul detach or is it attached but just turned off / asleep and basically ineffective?

- If the soul does actually detach, where does it go?

- If the observer is not the body, is the soul the observer?

- If the soul is the observer, and if an inactive soul can't detach, would it be feasible to say that when there are two (or more) souls attached to the body, the inactive soul still observes while the occupying soul/s use its own will to make all the decisions?

I know my questions above kind of leads to that conclusion, but I'm not sold on it, its my current way of seeing it, but would be interested to know others thoughts on that, if its not on track and what would be more so - thanks
 
Back
Top Bottom