webglider
Dagobah Resident
Re: Free will vs "lessons"
Hi Nickelbleu, this is the first time I've come upon this thread, and maybe I'm responding to something you said that you already figured out. This is what you said on April 4, 2008:
To my understanding, the difficulty you're having revolves around the word "accept". I agree with your revulsion in relation to the "...hatred, injustice, illogic and violence..." but one has to accept that these things exist because they do.
One does not have to accept them as being okay though. One can try to extirpate them in one's own behavior, in the part of the world in which one has influence. But just trying to eradicate them in oneself is really pretty hard.
Shutting out what we don't like because it doesn't confirm our sense of reality is like choosing not to explore all the paths in the park. The paths are there whether we choose to walk on them or not, but if something wicked is walking down one of them, we won't feel the need to be vigilent because we have no knowledge that a path is even there.
Hi Nickelbleu, this is the first time I've come upon this thread, and maybe I'm responding to something you said that you already figured out. This is what you said on April 4, 2008:
Nicklebleu said:And it has been my scope in the last 10 or more years to be more accepting of the world around me. But that is an almost impossible task, if you don't have the proper "philosophical background". Because there is so much hatred, injustice illogic and violence around, that one wonders on what grounds you might accept that. Not being affiliated to any religion I wasn't able to "turn my other cheek", so how on earth are you going to accept all this.
To my understanding, the difficulty you're having revolves around the word "accept". I agree with your revulsion in relation to the "...hatred, injustice, illogic and violence..." but one has to accept that these things exist because they do.
One does not have to accept them as being okay though. One can try to extirpate them in one's own behavior, in the part of the world in which one has influence. But just trying to eradicate them in oneself is really pretty hard.
Buddy said:Could it be possible that we struggle with the issues of Freewill and Determinism because we are attempting to see them in their absolute sense? Trying to understand something as a thing in itself, when it only exists when something else is in place?
Hopefully, the following illustration will clarify what I mean:
If you went to an unfamiliar city, took a stroll thru the park and deliberately noticed all that there was to see, then at some point you would have a complete mental map of that park, exactly the way it is, and you could then determine all the possible paths you could take thru or around the park. You are aware of all the possible choices for paths because your map is accurate, unified and non-contradictory. This is opposed to someone who walks thru the park everyday and never notices much and doesn't have a complete picture. If such a person were to panic and need to flee, he would not know what his options were and would probably take a path that could lead to even greater danger. The key is, he wouldn't know exactly what to do because his awareness/knowledge of the park is so limited.His freewill mostly exists as unrealized potential and is currently limited to the paths he knows about or can see in the midst of emotional difficulties. His freewill is not a piece of the puzzle of the park, it's in the paths that are outlined by the way the pieces fit together.
Shutting out what we don't like because it doesn't confirm our sense of reality is like choosing not to explore all the paths in the park. The paths are there whether we choose to walk on them or not, but if something wicked is walking down one of them, we won't feel the need to be vigilent because we have no knowledge that a path is even there.